Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

thalestrader

Reading Charts in Real Time

Recommended Posts

Hi Marko,

 

Good stuff! Thank you for keeping things going here in the thread. My son's birthday is tomorrow, and the party is Sunday, and I am responsible, per my wife's "request," for coming up with a suitably carnivorous menu for a dinosaur themed party. It has been far more difficult than I had anticipated, and of course, being a guy, I let it go until today.

 

I'm likely not going to be able to trade at all today, other than two demo orders I have in on CL. As I am typing this, a short has just been filled at 79.71 ... I have a buy order down below where I'll stop and reverse.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=19441&stc=1&d=1266597898

 

 

I now have to go on a search for Brontosaurus legs right now (though my son tells me they are no longer called "Brontosaurus," but have been renamed "Appatosaurus." I am not responsible for the spelling of either.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70fd5c7e75_2010-02-19CLDemo1.thumb.jpg.4db640c5426e801d1d2dcef2880a6dca.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a 1440 minute (daily) crude chart showing the prior day's high (green hash) and low (red hash) on each bar. I use 9AM EST as the daily open (pit session open). Ceratinly one can see that it can pay, and pay handsomely, to pay attention to price when it arrives that the prior day's high/low.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=19454&stc=1&d=1266633729

 

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70fd67381c_AStudyinPriorHighsPriorLows1.thumb.jpg.285ef0ff4f110537c345806406792d15.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...

My son's birthday is tomorrow, and the party is Sunday, ...

 

I now have to go on a search for Brontosaurus legs right now (though my son tells me they are no longer called "Brontosaurus," but have been renamed "Appatosaurus." I am not responsible for the spelling of either.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

Thanks,

please give my birthday greetings to your son, wishing all of you a nice party and lots of fun.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
EUR/USD ACD Long closed at 17:15

Profit +30 , .84R

...

 

From a daily chart I learn that price made it above 1.36 during the evening.

So the R-multiple "could" be much higher, had I stayed online longer; anyway ten hours are definitely enough per day.

 

I'll update that chart on Mo morning for the exact multiple, my chart programs are in the office since I don't take the markets home.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here is a 1440 minute (daily) crude chart showing the prior day's high (green hash) and low (red hash) on each bar. I use 9AM EST as the daily open (pit session open). Ceratinly one can see that it can pay, and pay handsomely, to pay attention to price when it arrives that the prior day's high/low.

....

 

Yes it does pay. For my standard FDAX and FGBL trades I always observe the 2 day and 3 day rhythm of high and low.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thales (and others following his HH HL breakout style) might enjoy a look at two threads over at forexfactory.

 

The first is "The System II (Yes with Irony)" which is a slightly different breakout;

 

and the second is a derivative "FCR Thread" which include thales trade as an FCR 1. The derivative also has a spin off website which includes a description of the method.

 

 

An interesting thing about it from my perspective (as a set the stop and just give it room type of guy) was that both are, like thales, very aggressive in tightening. This page describes the tightening strategy rather well ... its a little different to thales (maybe??? you could comment) but I think its quite a solid approach.

 

exit descriptions (author is not a native english speaker)

 

You need to read the summary document on the FCR spin off website to understand exactly when the different exits are applied.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
... fxchateau

 

fxchateau.com : trading in the noise for >= $100 per month ?

 

I always wonder, why these people can't make money with their perfect systems in the markets.

Edited by Marko23

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there,

 

Apologies for not posting of late but I thought I should as I was an early follower of the 'System 2' thread which was started by a former pit trader. I never really posted much there as it focused on Euro whereas I traded cable but followed it avidly. The reason for my post was Kiwi's reference to trade management as this was always my bug bear and took a while to find a way to make things work properly for me. When the system 2 thread first started the OP mentioned the 20/20 and 20/40 rules whereby one used a 20 pip hard stop and a TP at either 20 or 40 pips giving either a 1R or 2R return. This had me bemused for a while as I found that my win rate with the suggested entries was way lower than 50% which meant that one was a net loser over time. Then it dawned on me (and I think this is what you have been explaining of late Thales?) that it is fine to have a 1R or 2R return for winners if the losers are always less than -1R. In other words one's stop needs to be aggressively trailed to reduce risk. I always liked this as I have a firm belief that the only thing I have any control over in my trading is the amount of risk I have in any one trade.

 

From memory the OP's own method of trade management was to trail his stop 1 pip at a time up to b/e. I tried this but it didn't feel logical enough for me. Anyway after a lot of experimentation I ended up using the method that hopefully these 2 charts that I posted elsewhere last year explain.

 

5aa70fd6b4005_gbpusd-09113m1h.thumb.gif.6378af159b85e22aa8473a33b12a9256.gif

 

5aa70fd6bcb65_gbpusd-091118m1a.thumb.gif.eb80e4c9898fd0cc623eedf7174b0cea.gif

 

In essence I used M5 levels (set-ups) but, when the trade triggered, I would drop to M1 and trail above / below M1 swings up to a level where I could put my stop at b/e. The reasoning behind this being that, when price breaks through a level, I 'expect' it to break hard and fast. Any pullbacks or hesitation suggest to me that the trade might not work out as I am 'expecting' it to. My mindset is firmly of the belief that my job is to manage / reduce risk - the winners simply win, but it's how I manage the losers that defines whether I make money or not. I'm pretty sure Thales mentioned a similar method a few weeks ago when describing an ES trade?

 

Anyway, hope this isn't too off topic. As an aside I am now using a very similar system trading M15 'a la Thales'. It makes for an awful lot of losers (approx. 70%) but these losers are on average around -0.25R whereas the winners are a large multiple of this.

 

Kind regards

BT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a look at the derivative material from fxachillies as well BT.

 

I noticed that many people seemed to struggle to really get a handle on Thale's trade management and suspect that thinking about this material might help quite a bit. I think that fxachilies struggled with the system ii stops for the same reason you did and thus created a more logical structure to remove doubt.

 

His definition of a multiple stop strategies that evolve depending on 1. the entry pattern used and 2. what happens afterwards addresses the sort of uncertainty you describe above. To my surprise I realized that I too can trigger more aggressive exits to my benefit and will be experimenting with that tomorrow - and also that the exit is not a stop but a reduced limit order.

 

It also makes me wonder about the use of the absolute first exposed R in both R multiples and in expectancy calculations. If one is able to consistently manage a much lower loss then perhaps the average loss should sometimes be used rather than the maximum - or at least two measures should be considered when evaluating system quality.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It also makes me wonder about the use of the absolute first exposed R in both R multiples and in expectancy calculations. If one is able to consistently manage a much lower loss then perhaps the average loss should sometimes be used rather than the maximum - or at least two measures should be considered when evaluating system quality.

 

I think that's an extremely interesting point and possibly hinges on one's personal attitude to risk. By that I mean that, given the way I manage my trades now, I could use a single digit hard stop for each entry but the danger for me in doing this is that I would see up to 70% of my trades get taken out at 1R which I personally couldn't handle, no matter how good the overall R/R on winning trades is, but that's just me!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When I look back at my trades I actually compare the original stop level v the actual stop level and record a brief reason for why it was less (or more) eg; nervous, did not feel right, poor trade, no acceleration. This usually results in a large majority of stops being smaller than the original loss based on me being nervous - or not feeling right about the trade (I have never quantified why - maybe I should). I think this is a more accurate measure as its real trading on a discretionary basis v fully systematic.

Interestingly enough on about half of these should I have kept the original stop loss level as they then turned into profits. It has never made much difference to the PL overall (as lots of little losses do add up, compared to lots of even smaller losses) but I prefer the feeling of discretionary control suits me better at the moment, plus I use more context.

 

The most important thing I have been concluding lately that suits me, is that longs and shorts based on the context of the market behave differently. (I dont care about robustness and purity of a system that treats everything the same - I want one that will allow me to consistently make money in a way that suits me, plus different markets definatley react and trade differently).

eg; if in a downtrend and a nervous market the reactions are likely to be quicker and more shallow, while in an uptrend reactions seem to take longer, and pullback further. Currencies trade differently to crude to equities. So in each case the things to watch for are slightly different.

So for some markets I give more leeway to stops others less. The downside to this is that it can get confusing. too many choices are not necessarily always a good thing.:)

 

The one consistent thing that I find continually rises its head from profitable traders ---- is you have to give yourself the opportunity to participate in the runners. Just aiming to make money day in day out with little scalps (while it does work for some and I am not knocking it) is tough work.(good for the brokers). I have always found that myself and others I know make the majority of the money on a small percentage of the trades. (I only I knew which ones in hindsight)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Choppy trade most of the day on Friday showing a reversal in the USA session. The break down from the recent multi-day range has been fierce. Any re-test of the lower edge of that range is obvious for working into a short position.

 

Only longs to be had will be scalps unless there is a very very clear capitulation. Should it capitulate I will aim to be out of 1/2 by the time we trade the recent multi-day range low and attempt to trail the rest and scaling out the remaining 1/2 into 2 separate exits.

 

The obvious short to look for is in the recent multi-day range low area, ideally in the 1.5660 - 1.5620 area. Shorts there will be aiming for a new low but will be out of 1/2 before making that new low. I'll attempt to trail the other 1/2 with successive LHs from the 60 min chart.

MK_2010-02-22_105622.thumb.png.078e5196ab535e1fecbf1f6a0f988576.png

MK_2010-02-22_105801.thumb.png.fb2a4c9e6df5e32de02ca46e3a7be05e.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
... Based on the daily charts, I anticipate high prices for equities and gold, lower dollar...

 

I've been long the ES and Gold, and see no reason to change my view. While a pulback at some point is to be expected, I am never one to argue with one way prices so long as I am driving the right way on that one way street.

 

I am looking to take a position in the dollar index, but in spite of the push to new highs on Friday, I am still looking at the dollar as a coin spinning on its edge, and I do not yet know which way it shall fall. C now exceeds A, but still falls within a proportion that allows for a terminal movement to the upside, while still, of course, allowing for a continued rally.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70fd6e9e51_2010-02-19DJ-301.thumb.jpg.409695e5b303cc0fb026bb79eafc7d63.jpg

5aa70fd6ee854_2010-02-19GLD1.thumb.jpg.389cde3be632e2bd1191655d2645b338.jpg

5aa70fd6f302f_2010-02-19DXYO1.thumb.jpg.26a2e7ed2eaef94d379ac8f03853638c.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Anyway, hope this isn't too off topic. As an aside I am now using a very similar system trading M15 'a la Thales'. It makes for an awful lot of losers (approx. 70%) but these losers are on average around -0.25R whereas the winners are a large multiple of this.

 

It also makes me wonder about the use of the absolute first exposed R in both R multiples and in expectancy calculations. If one is able to consistently manage a much lower loss then perhaps the average loss should sometimes be used rather than the maximum - or at least two measures should be considered when evaluating system quality.

 

I had a rough first week of February, during which I had a nearly -4R draw down, and for a while, my average loss was stuck above -.70R. After last week, I am now up +23.76R MTD, and my average loss is down to -.52R. During a more typical month, my results are fairly close to BT's, if I were to count BE trades as losses. That has always been my point - I keep taking my swings, cutting my losers, and letting my profits run to target(s). So, while my average win is currently +1.56R, it is actually +3R as measured by by average actual loss for the month. Again, during a typical month (it is unusual for me to have a -4R draw down, but it happens a couple of times each year) my average profit is around 1.5R as measured against my initial risk point. But measured against my average actual loss point, my average profit is about +6R.

 

For what its worth, I believe I could win a very high rate % of my trades, probably close to 90% or better, as almost every one of my trades foes into a small profit at some point soon after entry. However, I'd likely be exchanging profits for the sake of not losing as often. I really cannot imagine doing this day in and day out for +2 or +3 ticks/trade, especially when the inevitable full stop loss takes out the profits of 5 or more "winning" efforts.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am looking to take a position in the dollar index, but in spite of the push to new highs on Friday, I am still looking at the dollar as a coin spinning on its edge, and I do not yet know which way it shall fall. C now exceeds A, but still falls within a proportion that allows for a terminal movement to the upside, while still, of course, allowing for a continued rally.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

I'm a bit jealous, I spent ages writing on my USD chart and yours is so much clearer than mine.

Sorry I haven't been contributing more ...

5aa70fd7042e5_dollarindexdaily.jpg.7c9c6d04a30b21c86662ff25af1c53b4.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
For what its worth, I believe I could win a very high rate % of my trades, probably close to 90% or better, as almost every one of my trades foes into a small profit at some point soon after entry. However, I'd likely be exchanging profits for the sake of not losing as often. I really cannot imagine doing this day in and day out for +2 or +3 ticks/trade

 

I guess this is an example of 'gnothi seauton'? I think this is / was always an issue for me as I didn't believe that I liked losing. It's taken me a long time to realise that I don't mind having lots of losing trades but I do mind losing big!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.