Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

thalestrader

Reading Charts in Real Time

Recommended Posts

  thalestrader said:
But, when followed by something like this, it usually means I am too early, and I should close the position as close to BE as I can wait for further indication.

 

 

Do you think that is a bit of a corrective channel upwards, maybe waiting for open?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Crude didn't give me a chance to snap this pic before pulling back quickly. I wanted to point out that Crude traded to session highs shortly before the pit session opened. It pulled back to about 73.20 immediately following the pit session open, and then rallied back to the pre-pit high. I wanted to say that that would be a decent low risk spot to sell crude with a tight stop. That doesn't mean that the drop is going to continue, and that you can hold a short for 100 ticks or more. It was just to show crude responds to globex highs during pit hours.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=18671&stc=1&d=1265034093

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70fbf673a0_2010-02-01Crude1.thumb.jpg.258e1ba21bee036dc234fd4f191dc4ac.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
Crude didn't give me a chance to snap this pic before pulling back quickly...

 

I am still demo trading crude, and I entered with a market order - like I said, Crude hit that high and didn't give me a chance to get in at the high or snap a pic. For those who like to see Ninjatrader markers, I show the entry plotted here:

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=18672&stc=1&d=1265034449

 

I would have liked to have been short from about a nickle higher, but between the time I saw what I wanted to see to get short and the time my finger hit the market order button, it was what it was.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70fbf6ec16_2010-02-01Crude2.thumb.jpg.8811b3361e3a2069bec293fda5415112.jpg

Edited by thalestrader
typos, etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

attachment.php?attachmentid=18673&stc=1&d=1265034683

 

Side trade I sometimes see, after a big down bar (8800 to 8750) I find you sometimes get a good retracement if this is broken again. Particularly if there has been sustained downtrend.

I generally wait until you get a "failed down bar" this is the one that looks like the downtrend trend is to resume, then enter on a break above this..... I never chase these, and ideally want to see acceleration up...so if it goes nowhere, just get out.

 

EDIT: it did not accelerate, so out at 6 ticks below entry.

EDIT 2: friken c..k sucking MF I am ..... after I was out it then accelerated at least its 30+ ticks higher.

EDIT3: especially as I realised I was looking at the wrong chart - trading of the hourly, exiting on the 15min..... my neighbour now thinks I have tourettes.

AUD1.png.201c92b904a17e30087afb55db32feec.png

Edited by DugDug

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
... I wanted to point out that Crude traded to session highs shortly before the pit session opened. It pulled back to about 73.20 immediately following the pit session open, and then rallied back to the pre-pit high. I wanted to say that that would be a decent low risk spot to sell crude with a tight stop. That doesn't mean that the drop is going to continue, and that you can hold a short for 100 ticks or more. It was just to show crude responds to globex highs during pit hours.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=18671&stc=1&d=1265034093

 

I hope that was close enough to real time for folks to see that price can be read for fun and profit.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=18676&stc=1&d=1265035423

 

As I do not feel that there is anything left to prove, and I really do not like having those Ninjatrader markers on the chart, I probably am going to revert back to my blue line, red line, green line method of annotation for these little CL demo trades as well.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70fbf85fd9_2010-02-01Crude3.thumb.jpg.d708ef1f3b56e7aae1a74af933be398f.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  forrestang said:
Do you think that is a bit of a corrective channel upwards, maybe waiting for open?

 

I was thinking so ... but the ES has powered above that resistance level that I had noted with the red rectangle, and actual chart points always trump trendlines, channels, and EW and so forth, so for now, as I am not long, I will wait to see if price reaches 84.50 and then 93.25 and watch how it acts if it does.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

EDIT: In other words, I am in no hurry to do anymore with ES today unless it initiates a move from an S/R level

Edited by thalestrader
added "EDIT:..."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
... In other words, I am in no hurry to do anymore with ES today unless it initiates a move from an S/R level

 

I'm not in a real big hurry to get involved here either, though if I were to decide to do so, this is how I'd do it ...

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=18677&stc=1&d=1265036438

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70fbf8ca17_2010-02-016E2.thumb.jpg.f759e3ecbee1526902c4e6f54427c172.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
...I do not have anything close to 10,000,000...

 

Suuure. ;)

 

  thalestrader said:
Once you know what you are doing and what to expect from your trading, you can, as my currency trading friend says, "afford to have a little fun."

 

I totally understand that with the recent OIRC ordeal. My main question was with your daughter...because from what I understand, that wasn't to "have a little fun..." that was to teach her how to trade.

 

And with your daughter, you didn't "know" because she was new...although I guess since you taught her and maybe even babysat her account a little, you know to expect something similar to your own results.

 

I'll leave this alone after this last question (which is basically my whole point of this little discussion I started)....

 

Would you recommend ME (or someone like me) trade a $25 account with leverage like you started your daughter with (and steadily decrease my % risk as my account grows)?...rather than trading a $250 or $500 account with more 'reasonable' leverage?

 

On that note...what type of % risk was your daughter using by the time her account hit $250 or $500?

 

I won't ask any more questions on this topic after this. :embarassed:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Cory2679 said:
My main question was with your daughter...because from what I understand, that wasn't to "have a little fun..." that was to teach her how to trade.

 

She's nine ... if it wasn't fun for her, we'd have stopped immediately.

 

I think that someone looking to learn to do this as a career needs to start with good habits from the beginning. So if I were you, I'd keep right on doing what you are doing.

 

By the time she was up to $250, I had her trade between 20-1 and 50-1 leverage depending upon pips at risk on a particular trade. Though when she caught runners and she was awake to do so, she would add on every break low using a 1 minute chart (and kiwi thought he was the only one who had figured that out), so her actual leverage in those cases was quite high relative to the account size, but still very moderate relative to her actual risk based upon her trade management.

 

All of this is why I stopped posting our results here - folks focused too much on comparing their results to her results and too little on their results and how to improve them. Focus on profit and loss measured in ticks, not dollars. And these concerns with leverage really indicate a concern with nominal dollars, not profit and loss measured in tick increments, which is where the focus needs to be.

 

If you can trade for a dime/tick, and finish each week with 20-30 dollars more in your account, do you think you can then figure out how to increase your size so that each week you finish with 200-300 dollars more in your account? And from there 2000-3000 dollars more in your account? Learn to trade for ticks, and the dollars will easily follow. Focus on the dollars, and you will never find them where you want them to be - in your account.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
Sell Stop crude demo 73.75 and here is the B/O as of 10:33 ...

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=18678&stc=1&d=1265038509

 

Trade above 74.00 cancels the order.

 

It is 11:04 as I post this ... exit demo short at 74.46 for +30 pennies, exit a few seconds after 11:00 EST

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=18679&stc=1&d=1265040269

 

Any doubters who wandered in from other forums and chat rooms can look at the entry fill time stamp and the time stamp on the initial post here at TL and decide for themselves whether the post was timely or not.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70fbf91c1a_2010-02-01CLat1033EST2.jpg.770d2f51525c4503d1e8b0032f80f739.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
Learn to trade for ticks, and the dollars will easily follow. Focus on the dollars, and you will never find them where you want them to be - in your account.

 

This is for everyone following this thread who is still trying to learn his or her way to profitability. If you have a trading platform that lets you turn the dollar pnl off and replace it with ticks or points pnl, do it. Certainly, you should have a daily loss limit measured in ticks, and you should know what it is and you should honor it, whether you are demo trading or trading live. But do not be distracted by dollar amounts. It is only money and it means nothing. The only thing that matters is did you win more ticks than you lost at the end of the day? The week? The month? Once you answer yes consistently to all three, and you are demo trading, it is time to go live. If once you go live you consistently answer yes to all three, then it is time to increase your size, but slowly, and always honor your daily loss limit.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=18680&stc=1&d=1265041985

 

 

Trade small until you learn how to trade. And always, even after you learn, trade for points not dollars. It makes all the difference.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70fbf95851_2010-02-01PointsandDollars1.jpg.47aaa94848a72a0bfa37fa7caa1090ca.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The ES has made it to within a whisper of where Id again start looking to sell, though I'd have preferred it to have touched or trade through that level (which it still might do). I did not take the 6E short, and so far I haven't missed anything (which of course, might change). I had thought to take a long on the 6B earleir this morning (which I did not post) but then I thought better of it. That would have been at PT 1 with a BE stop right now - couldawouldashoulda.

 

Here is the current ES:

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=18681&stc=1&d=1265042545

 

 

I did manage to make some demo dollars, though my broker refuses to honor them as real.

 

I am at this point giving serious consideration to removing the ES completely from my traded markets and replacing it, at least temporarily, with crude. So instead of 6B, 6E, 6J, ES, it will be the three currency futures with CL. For the last six trading days crude has proven itself to be a very easy market to trade. I'm going to continue to demo it for a week or two to make sure that I'm seeing what I seem to have been seeing. But right now, it looks like Brownie must be on to something.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70fbf9af52_2010-02-01ES4.thumb.jpg.1611c67eeef01e0a2c5904883d9a1ede.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply.

 

I brought this up because of what happened to me last night. I was thinking, if your daughter turned $25 into about $1,000 in 3 months, maybe I could turn $250 into $10,000! (BUT, keep in mind, I can't afford to blow $250 right now!)

 

But that would require big-time leverage. I decided I would start trading with that type of leverage beginning last night....

 

I started off with some losing trades. None of them were full losers, but they were worse than they normally would have been for me because I was trading on my laptop on the couch at my girlfriend's house, something I've never done before and I'm totally not used to, and it messed me up (also why I didn't post any of the trades in real-time).

 

ANYWAYS, after my first 4 trades resulted in a net loss, I quit. If only I would have stuck in there, there were some blatantly obvious opportunties coming up (later last night and then this morning) that would have made me very profitable after it was all over.

 

BUT, on the plus side, I think after this experience and everything leading up to it, I'm truly finally beginning to realize this:

 

  thalestrader said:
...folks focused too much on comparing their results to her results and too little on their results and how to improve them. Focus on profit and loss measured in ticks, not dollars. And these concerns with leverage really indicate a concern with nominal dollars, not profit and loss measured in tick increments, which is where the focus needs to be.

 

I think this has been my biggest issue and why I'm not flourishing right now.

 

It's funny, I was talking to my girlfriend about this last night...over the month of January, my results were scattered...I traded some live, with different amounts of leverage which i kept modifying, I did some demo trading, and I did some live trading "off the record' from this thread..when I was taking my time off.

 

Over the month of January, if you put the pieces together (and ignore my stupid platform issue the first week), I was net profitable every week!...and not 1-2 ticks, decent profit!

 

HOWEVER, the results were indeed scattered.

 

I think I have the trading and money management down solidly enough to trade net profitably. I just keep coming up with other stupid things that get in my way from just doing it and continuing to do it without stopping!!!!!

 

BUT, perhaps now that I am realizing all this, I can finally address it and move on! I feel like I'm just spinning my tires in mud right now.

 

Anyways, sorry about this big post. I think I use this thread a little bit like a journal sometimes. I'll try to stick to just posting charts for a little while. ;)

 

Cory

Losses.thumb.jpg.853bb3fcb90e562aaee211b58c89718a.jpg

Missed.thumb.jpg.ed3e92c81f0a4844ce2ebfa1f06bcbe3.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Cory2679 said:
...I'll try to stick to just posting charts for a little while...

 

Here's a chart right now, for good measure. ;)

 

Current look at EUR/JPY. Possible short?

EJ15M.jpg.4a687158148e827b8944799849b3738c.jpg

EJ15M2.jpg.f6dbcef395777235cb46ee4e4642a96f.jpg

Edited by Cory2679

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Cory2679 said:
Here's a chart right now, for good measure. ;)

 

Current look at EUR/JPY. Possible short?

 

I have to leave right now to help some people with something and I'll be back later...

 

Here's how the EUR/JPY is looking to me now...of course it may climb higher before declining and breaking the low (it's obvious how the SL & targets would be adjusted accordingly).

 

We'll see how it looks when I get back. It is getting later and later, though (the later it gets, the less confident I am in an impending significant move)...

EJ15M3.jpg.d44994b38d1a293e9505cfa2a82fa70d.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:

I am at this point giving serious consideration to removing the ES completely from my traded markets and replacing it, at least temporarily, with crude. So instead of 6B, 6E, 6J, ES, it will be the three currency futures with CL. For the last six trading days crude has proven itself to be a very easy market to trade. I'm going to continue to demo it for a week or two to make sure that I'm seeing what I seem to have been seeing. But right now, it looks like Brownie must be on to something.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

Took you long enough to see the light.

 

Just send 20% of profits to my paypal and we will call it even.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:

 

I am at this point giving serious consideration to removing the ES completely from my traded markets and replacing it, at least temporarily, with crude. So instead of 6B, 6E, 6J, ES, it will be the three currency futures with CL. For the last six trading days crude has proven itself to be a very easy market to trade. I'm going to continue to demo it for a week or two to make sure that I'm seeing what I seem to have been seeing. But right now, it looks like Brownie must be on to something.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

:(:(

 

Actually I have started watching crude lately too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  forrestang said:
Are you more interested in the mini or the big oil?

 

Hmm never really thought bout it. I'm watching CL now. Unless one is vastly better than the other, I guess it would be CL.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Cory2679 said:
Thanks for the reply.

 

I brought this up because of what happened to me last night. I was thinking, if your daughter turned $25 into about $1,000 in 3 months, maybe I could turn $250 into $10,000! (BUT, keep in mind, I can't afford to blow $250 right now!)

 

But that would require big-time leverage. I decided I would start trading with that type of leverage beginning last night....

 

I started off with some losing trades. None of them were full losers, but they were worse than they normally would have been for me because I was trading on my laptop on the couch at my girlfriend's house, something I've never done before and I'm totally not used to, and it messed me up (also why I didn't post any of the trades in real-time).

 

ANYWAYS, after my first 4 trades resulted in a net loss, I quit. If only I would have stuck in there, there were some blatantly obvious opportunties coming up (later last night and then this morning) that would have made me very profitable after it was all over.

 

BUT, on the plus side, I think after this experience and everything leading up to it, I'm truly finally beginning to realize this:

 

 

 

I think this has been my biggest issue and why I'm not flourishing right now.

 

It's funny, I was talking to my girlfriend about this last night...over the month of January, my results were scattered...I traded some live, with different amounts of leverage which i kept modifying, I did some demo trading, and I did some live trading "off the record' from this thread..when I was taking my time off.

 

Over the month of January, if you put the pieces together (and ignore my stupid platform issue the first week), I was net profitable every week!...and not 1-2 ticks, decent profit!

 

HOWEVER, the results were indeed scattered.

 

I think I have the trading and money management down solidly enough to trade net profitably. I just keep coming up with other stupid things that get in my way from just doing it and continuing to do it without stopping!!!!!

 

BUT, perhaps now that I am realizing all this, I can finally address it and move on! I feel like I'm just spinning my tires in mud right now.

 

Anyways, sorry about this big post. I think I use this thread a little bit like a journal sometimes. I'll try to stick to just posting charts for a little while. ;)

 

Cory

 

The biggest reason for not profiting from trading is in essence because, from the physicality of the market/trade to the mind of the person making the trade, almost everything is a contradiction.

 

The greatest of which is money.

 

Hence, we trade to make money but it's the last thing we should be trading for or thinking about.

 

Regards...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.