Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

thalestrader

Reading Charts in Real Time

Recommended Posts

  thalestrader said:
Here is how the ES looks over the last hour or so ...

 

You can make it difficult, or you can make it easy. I prefer easy.

 

A very easy and forgiving way to trade, right?

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=18385&stc=1&d=1264541241

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=18386&stc=1&d=1264541241

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70fb6b44ca_2010-01-26ES1.thumb.jpg.3a4228f753c1c7173bf2f4be19f5ea7c.jpg

5aa70fb6b9d4b_2010-01-26ES5.thumb.jpg.b0c0ed40ca2acd3602a5b4671002b0dd.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
Did I leave out the part of re-entering on new lows?

;)

I have heard you mention that before Thales, a ways ago in the thread, but I had yet to grasp the concept of how to 'pull the cord' quickly' when a trade just nics your entry.

 

I thought about it, I suppose that is part of being nimble. How do you decide wether or not it is a re-entry you want to take, or how often is your entry just barely "nic'd" more than once? By that I mean, if you are stopped in, and price immediately moves against you, and you exit. But then take another re-entry at a slightly worse price....... Do you get these types of entries often, where you have to enter twice?

Edited by forrestang

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  forrestang said:
How do you decide whether or not it is a re-entry you want to take, or how often is your entry just barely "nic'd" more than once? By that I mean, if you are stopped in, and price immediately moves against you, and you exit. But then take another re-entry at a slightly worse price....... Do you get these types of entries often, where you have to enter twice?

 

I get "nic'd" as you put it, often enough for me to have figured out how to stop the bleeding quickly when it happens. So long as the initial H/LH is intact, I'll renter on a new lower low unless price starts really getting wide ranging and over lapping within the range of the sequence. In other words, if price starts zipping up and down between the H and the L (I think I posted an example of this last week on the 6B) I stand down. I rarely get "nic'd" twice on the same opportunity unless I am shorting at the lows of a larger range expecting a bigger break down. Learning to recognize ending diagonal/wedges will prevent most of those.

 

All of the above can be flipped around for long opportunites, of course.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Edited by thalestrader
typo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  TradeRunner said:
1 Trade: BE

 

Even though I'm trading on replay and could trade the full 24hrs I have stopped taking any trades before 6:00GMT because I would never be awake at that time if I was trading real time.

 

If you do not feel right about a trade you are in, getting flat is a good course of action. You can always get back in after you re-evaluate, but it is tough to be honest with yourself when you still have money on the line.

 

I also like that you were not looking to chased the downtrend. I would have been happy to enter short even after a 200 tick drop, but like you, I'd rather get short on a short sequence after a rally in the downtrend, rather than intiaqting a new short at the lows.

 

Keep them coming!

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Current look at the dollar index shows the dollar printing a somewhat suspicious lower high on its most recent attempt to clear resistance. Lots of stuff tomorrow - hearings, the Fed, and the State of the Union According to Obama. The Buck may be stuck until everything is out.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70fb6e1e11_2010-01-26DXYO1.thumb.jpg.46afeb2a495fa6c2707071da3a7b3018.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Marko23 said:
This is a very useful observation ... "If it channels, it is most probably corrective."

 

Your hint, to short from the top, is great; thanks, that never came to me.

 

My daughter asked me what I thought about a short on a break of 126.03, and loking at the chart, I was reminded of Marko's post above. I drew the lower channel line, copied, pasted, and placed it along the highs. Not a perfect fit, but it sure looks as though the decline from the afternoon highs is corrective, and that a rally rather than new lows is more likely. For whatever reason, PA often gets "funky," (for lack of a better term) heading into fed announcements, so it could go either way. At any rate, price did break 126.03, dropped to the channel line, and has found at least momentary support there. It could be just the bounce before the storm of course.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70fb6e7207_2010-01-26EURJPYChannel1.thumb.jpg.2ffda4995d55f9b22520f4a393a01d38.jpg

Edited by thalestrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  patrader said:
I sometimes find looking at candlestick body only bars helpful for clarification of current direction and S/R.1264522597_1_UploadImage.png

 

Does it matter to you that your tcls be exactly parallel to the originating tl?

 

Are all of your trades initiated at either a TCL violation of some wort for reversals?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  forrestang said:
Does it matter to you that your tcls be exactly parallel to the originating tl?

 

Are all of your trades initiated at either a TCL violation of some wort for reversals?

I prefer that the tcl not be parallel and instead converge with the tl.These wedges are also called rising and falling wedges.Trend channels with parallel tcl's tend to continue trending until a large tcl overshoot forms a wedge.The wedge is usually a sign of weakening momentum and possible reversal of trend.It's important that a major S/R level be at or near the completion of the wedge in order to increase confirmation of trend reversal.Basically its a dueling lines concept where the third push of price,tcl and horizontal S/R meet.If price reverses off the tcl and S/R level then a 123 will possibly form and it's success will confirm the trend reversal.Many of my trades are initiated at tcl's but since they are "early" its very important to have a major S/R level included in the setup.What price does at the dueling lines point is also very important.Price should reverse and show ct strength.Until signs of ct strength than no trade.Sometimes a slight overshoot will occur before ct strength which i like because it traps late trend traders who add fuel to the ct when their stops are hit.The best reversals are strong with little sideways price action allowing me to scale out of contracts,go to b/e and hold the rest for larger targets after completion of the 123.Reversals that go sideways usually mean that the current trend is not done and the wedge will fail so i scalp out and wait for another wedge to form.HTH

Edited by patrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Marko23 said:
Long one degree smaller... At 1st target.

 

You offer a very disciplined and accurate application of the approach - it is easy to keep your losses small and your profits large relative to the size of your losses when you take your cues from price as you do.

 

That is a great series of charts you posted this morning (for I would say last night!).

 

Thank you.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.