Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

thalestrader

Reading Charts in Real Time

Recommended Posts

Here is more of my clutter for the thread! :cool:

 

TARGET HIT!!! ONCE AGAIN IN A STATE OF SHOCK.:confused:

 

Once again I am not happy with the P1 selection. Everything at BE, although I think the better stop would be above the last swing high,but nice to book profits before sleeping it seems. We'll see how this goes in the morning.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=13470&stc=1&d=1253080610

15September2099_GU3.jpg.47e660d26ea240ac1a4a60ce1d5c9201.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

HI TT,

 

I seem to recall that you mentioned early in this thread (or maybe another) that while your approach for stocks and the ES (and FX for that matter) is essentially the same across the board, there where some subtle differences. Looking at your recent ES trades I am struggling to see much difference at all :D The most obvious is I see you using some 15 min charts on ES. I wonder if you might perhaps highlight the more important differences.

 

Do you find the ES to suffer from more false break outs? It seems Index futures are particularly prone to those tests pokes and prods that go a tick or two beyond a range and then shoot off he other way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here is more of my clutter for the thread! :cool:

 

TARGET HIT!!! ONCE AGAIN IN A STATE OF SHOCK.:confused:

 

Once again I am not happy with the P1 selection. Everything at BE, although I think the better stop would be above the last swing high,but nice to book profits before sleeping it seems. We'll see how this goes in the morning.

 

 

2nd half stopped B.E.

15September2099_GU4.jpg.ee54b88e2a8a832792402b02798199d7.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is my Yen (6J) trade from this morning. At the time it triggered I could not connect to TL, so I decided to wait until its conclusion - otherwise it would have been posted in real time.

 

Entry point was 11072, initial stop loss 11091, with profit targets at 11042 and 11012 for +30 ad +50 ticks respectively. It is not a pretty as it looks, however, as my initial position was knocked out for -19 on the whole position on what I presume must have been a news driven spike (no other reason for price to move from +21 to -19 and then immediatley resume the decline other than some external event). My stop loss was11091, high tick of the spike was, you guessed it, 11091). I rentered short at 11072. So net result is +11 on 50% (+30 ticks - 19 ticks) and +31 on 50% (+50 ticks - 19 ticks).

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f25e5167_09-16-20096J11072short1.thumb.jpg.5724a56a016c06b791fb587b7255ec09.jpg

5aa70f25eaf36_09-16-20096J11072short2.thumb.jpg.75fc6a12eb64e6fe80f6a4f354b250eb.jpg

5aa70f260e09d_09-16-20096J11072short3.thumb.jpg.d2c5a90ac52c0654ad7c0894e4c1b145.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
HI TT,

 

I seem to recall that you mentioned early in this thread (or maybe another) that while your approach for stocks and the ES (and FX for that matter) is essentially the same across the board, there where some subtle differences. Looking at your recent ES trades I am struggling to see much difference at all :D The most obvious is I see you using some 15 min charts on ES. I wonder if you might perhaps highlight the more important differences.

 

Hi BlowFish,

 

When I day trade stocks I almost always am trading stocks that gapped at open (and I trade only in the direction of the gap) and typically enter on new session highs/lows. I watch a 5 minute chart.

 

When I day trade the ES, I will typically watch a 5 minute chart of the day session only. I also will use a 15 minute continuous session (24 hour) chart. Currency futures I really do not look at anything other than a 15 minute chart, though I do look at certain range charts.

 

In the end, I would suggest that all of my trading does come down to the same things: support, resistance, new highs/lows in trends and breakouts of ranges, paying attention to highs and lows, higher highs and higher lows, lower highs and lower lows.

 

In addition to scanning through the biggest % movers in the S&P 500, I watch 6B, 6E, 6J, and the ES. I have attached an example of each chart. If you think you are seeing something that I am not addressing let me know.

 

Do you find the ES to suffer from more false break outs? It seems Index futures are particularly prone to those tests pokes and prods that go a tick or two beyond a range and then shoot off he other way.

 

I haven't really thought much about that, but I do know that for ES trades, I tend to trade on a breakout only after a precise price point has been tested at least twice before it fails to hold, whereas when I trade currency futures or stocks, I am likely to trade a new high/low on the first go around.

 

I do not know if I would say that that is because the index futures are more prone to false breakout (a term the accuracy of which I doubt) as much as index futures trade in such a way that S/R sometimes isn't established as quickly as with certain other markets. Also, what are often called false breaks are not breaks of S/R at all.

 

For example, I remember reading somewhere here at TL where someone bemoaned the fact that he or she shorted a "false break of yesterday's low" and questioned how anyone could trade breakouts as they are so "unreliable."

 

Prior highs and lows are indeed important, and they do represent areas of potential S/R. But it does not seem, to me at least, that a particular price ought to be considered to be SUPPORT or RESISTANCE in fact simply by virtue of the coincidence that during time period X that particular price happened to be the highest or lowest price traded.

 

In other words, those price levels have potential significance, but that significance is not realized or established until price tests and reacts in and around those levels. So, what is often identified as a "false break" is really nothing more than part of the testing process. But, though I am what most folks call a "breakout" trader, I have bought more "breaks" of prior lows than I have shorted over the years, and I have likewise sold more breaks of prior highs than I have bought.

 

I do not know if I am communicating my meaning very clearly. If I can come up with a more clear explanation, I'll share it.

 

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f262206f_09-16-2009APC63.51long3.thumb.jpg.946c8fed128fe70d582f9f85a6534a55.jpg

5aa70f2628279_09-16-2009ES1.thumb.jpg.91a17c0ee04a36e97a41f043035c5054.jpg

5aa70f262d12f_09-16-2009ES2.thumb.jpg.4b7b920f4aca598128e56e9a67a49709.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Do you find the ES to suffer from more false break outs? It seems Index futures are particularly prone to those tests pokes and prods that go a tick or two beyond a range and then shoot off he other way.

 

I haven't really thought much about that, but I do know that for ES trades, I tend to trade on a breakout only after a precise price point has been tested at least twice before it fails to holds

 

It dawned on me after I made that excruciatingly long post that my trade on the ES shows precisely what I was trying to comunicate, and in fact, the ES has obliged by giving us two perfect examples in one morning. The attached chart is a keeper. Print this out and keep it near your trading station, because if you are trying to trade the ES, this chart is worth more than any book, seminar, magazine, trading course, etc and so on that costs tens, hundreds, thoudands of dollars.

 

This pattern occurs over and over. Everyday? No. But that is where patience is required. In my opinion, I would bet that 90%+ of all trades that were breakeven or losses that are blamed on "false breakouts" are nothing more than a trader trading a test to establish a level's importance, rather than the breakout from a level the significance of which has already been established.

 

 

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f2632bfa_09-16-2009ESTestTestBreakout1.thumb.jpg.b3df0dcc8fdbe5682b5eff8065a49665.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
But it did happen twice yesterday as well.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

I usually use HiLo bars, rather than OHLC bars as I show in the above screenshots. Some of you may find that the HL bars might help you see the establishment of S/R as it develops in real time.

 

Anyway, I had to make an early exit as I have appointments this afternoon and may not be back before the close.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f26437b3_09-16-2009ESTestTestBreakout3.thumb.jpg.4d8769f6f696943575dea2a3892534c2.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
this is definitely a good technique thales. I have such a hard time with being patient for this kind of thing though. looking at my chart of gbp/usd i see 4 tests in a row though i expect it to break out soon

I say this knowing obviously anything could happen, but if you look to the left of these 4 tests occuring about the time of your post, what did you see that would make you a little aprehensive about any BO that might be occuring, in that direction?

 

At least that was my interpretation.

Edited by forrestang

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice charts Thales - clean, crisp, easy to understand - which is not easy to find in an indicator, software driven business we operate in.

 

Thales continues to post great stuff and he should get some HOF (Hall of Fame) status or something.

 

:applaud:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thales,

Couple questions on trade execution. I apologize if this was answered previously.

 

1) When entering a trade, do you have a buy stop or sell stop sitting just above the level after a 2nd retest occurred or do you wait for price to break above and then enter?

 

2) Would you consider shorting at the areas I highlighted in yellow? Or only shorting new lows and buying new highs?

 

3) How do you define a retest - price must touch previous level exactly, price must come w/in X ticks of previous level or price can break previous level by X ticks? In other words, how stringent are you in looking at the 2nd retest high or low compared to the previous level?

tl1.jpg.1eb55729727a4dbbd5ec1542f4f309d9.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi BlowFish,

 

I do not know if I am communicating my meaning very clearly. If I can come up with a more clear explanation, I'll share it.

 

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

Thanks for your detailed reply....seemed pretty clear to me :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Folks,

 

I was able to snap a series of shot of this morning's ES action, but the first 30 minutes are often my most hectic period of the day, so simultaneous posting is not always possible.

 

Same pattern occurred again this morning, giving a buy point at 1064.25, and an initial stop loss of 1062.25. A wise profit target to scale out with some profits was 1070, the Globex overnight high. Looks like 1090 area is next higher target for cash, but there is no reason SP has to see that today, and it certainly has earned a rest. Also, the futures have been and continue to see at a discount to cash, so while 1090 is a cash target, futures may not print that high.

 

TTT has this as a Short Sell day, and as the market closed at its highs yesterday, a continuation to higher highs was to be expected.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f2704ef1_09-17-2009ESTestTestBreakout1.thumb.jpg.7d6ec75894c8b1a9bbaba4aa752073d1.jpg

5aa70f270a52d_09-17-2009ESTestTestBreakout2.thumb.jpg.5c7a746ebe8d6422ce23993b729f21d0.jpg

5aa70f270fe94_09-17-2009ESTestTestBreakout3.thumb.jpg.ee01203b1024b8a92124d8bc1433e139.jpg

5aa70f2715a9b_09-17-2009ESTestTestBreakout4.thumb.jpg.7c0a65fa3b0a86da38800636957fe21c.jpg

5aa70f271b009_09-17-2009ESTestTestBreakout5.thumb.jpg.96fd94eed117141c9322eff8471daea8.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1) When entering a trade, do you have a buy stop or sell stop sitting just above the level after a 2nd retest occurred or do you wait for price to break above and then enter?

 

I enter on a 1 tick stop, e.g. this morning the test of yesterday's high at 1064 gave me a 1064.25 buy stop.

 

2) Would you consider shorting at the areas I highlighted in yellow? Or only shorting new lows and buying new highs?

 

No, though they might have been stop loss areas. I would have needed a lower high to print first before I would start to look for short opportunities.

 

3) How do you define a retest - price must touch previous level exactly, price must come w/in X ticks of previous level or price can break previous level by X ticks? In other words, how stringent are you in looking at the 2nd retest high or low compared to the previous level?[/indent]

 

I trade it just as you see here. If instead price had printed 1064, and then a few bars later it printed 1064.25, and then a few bars later it printed 1064 again, I would be sitting on my hands waiting for a print at 1064.25 that then pulled back. Then I would have placed a buys stop at 1064.50.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a possible short ES 1062, stop 1065.25, though as I highlight on the 15 minute, this short happens right where price will have an opportunity to dig into potential support. If the decline carries below that support, then ES should target 55, 52, and perhaps even a test of yesterday's low.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f27261a0_09-17-2009ESTestTestBreakout7.thumb.jpg.6b67bacef971a0c826cd7e3bca12b216.jpg

5aa70f272bfb9_09-17-2009ESTestTestBreakout9.thumb.jpg.48af0e4342f0f26787739c5ad829f837.jpg

5aa70f27316aa_09-17-2009ESTestTestBreakout10.thumb.jpg.9072397af771a656d98bd1fd1fad4fbc.jpg

5aa70f2790495_09-17-2009ESTestTestBreakout11.thumb.jpg.c0c499e5080025a446390cd88d5a6f0a.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1) Trade 1 stop loss was 1062. I mistyped it here as 1062.25. The low prior to the entry was 1062.25, so stop loss was placed 1 tick below. After trigger, price pulled back to 1062.25 and then hit 1070 target. If some had set a stop loss based upon what I typed rather than the chart, then they would have been stopped out. My stop was 1062.

 

2) Trade 2 was entered on an stop at 1062. I believe I did type the correct stop loss in that post, which was 1065.25 for that trade.

 

3) I did not think of that as a short break there in real time, Brownie. And looking at it now, I do not see it as anything special either. Now, if you are going to ask me why I don't se anything there, I can only answer that I do not see that as a favorable place either to go short or to add to a short position.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Folks,

 

ES ... over and over and over and over ...

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

This one ended in a loss of -.50/contract.

 

Total for the day, in hindsight, wouldashouldacoulda been +8.50 points, as the second half of the first trade should have been a +1.50 stop. I kept a break even stop, so the +1.5 on the chart is theoretical, not actual. The second trade stopped its decline before my 55.25 target, and was stopped out for +1.75 on the whole position. The third trade handed me my only loss today, -.50 on the whole position. Total was a mere +7 points after a whole lot of trading (for me). I will probably not even look at the ES tomorrow.

 

I am still 50% short the 6B, and my stop on the remaining position is at +1, because that is what the market has dictated (entry at 1.6468, and the reaction high 1.6466, and current stop right in the middle at 1.6467. First half of the position was taken at 1.6435 (right above the upper horizontal line).

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f27dcfaf_09-17-2009ES8.5.thumb.jpg.c70be2f65710cb4df36456a8c8906013.jpg

5aa70f27e28e7_09-17-20096B33and1stop.thumb.jpg.62392ca6d35500b55f6dca5820f63952.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why not to simply connect you account to myfxbook which will collect all this data automatically for you? The process you described looks tedious and a bit obsolete but may work for you though.
    • The big breakthrough with AI right now is “natural language computing.”   Meaning, you can speak in natural language to a computer and it can go through huge data sets, make sense out of them, and speak back to you in natural language.   That alone is a huge breakthrough.   The next leg? AI agents. Where they don’t just speak back to you.   They take action. Here’s the definition I like best: an AI agent is an autonomous system that uses tools, memory, and context to accomplish goals that require multiple steps.   Everything from simple tasks (analyzing web traffic) to more complex goals (building executive briefings or optimizing websites).   They can:   > Reason across multiple steps.   >Use tools like a real assistant (Excel spreadsheets, budgeting apps, search engines, etc.)   > Remember things.   And AI agents are not islands. They talk to other agents.   They can collaborate. Specialized agents that excel at narrow tasks can communicate and amplify one another’s strengths—whether it’s reasoning, data processing, or real-time monitoring.   What it Looks Like You wake up one morning, drink your coffee, and tell your AI agent, “I need to save $500 a month.”   It gets to work.   First, it finds all your recurring subscriptions. Turns out you’re paying $8.99 for a streaming service you forgot you had.   It cancels it. Then it calls your internet provider, negotiates a lower bill, and saves you another $40. Finally, it finds you car insurance that’s $200 cheaper per year.   What used to take you hours—digging through statements, talking to customer service reps on hold for an hour, comparing plans—is done while you’re scrolling Twitter.   Another example: one agent tracks your home maintenance needs and gets information from a local weather-monitoring agent. Result: "Rain forecast next week - should we schedule gutter cleaning now?"   Another: an AI agent will plan your vacations (“Book me a week in Italy for under $2,000”), find the cheapest flights, and sort out hotels with a view.   It’ll remind you to pay bills, schedule doctor’s appointments, and track expenses so you’re not wondering where your paycheck went every month.   The old world gave you tools—Excel spreadsheets, search engines, budgeting apps. The new world gives you agents who do the work for you.   Don’t Get Too Scared (or Excited) Yet William Gibson famously said: "The future is already here – it's just not evenly distributed."   AI agents will distribute it. For decades, the tools that billionaires and corporations used to get ahead—personal assistants, financial advisors, lawyers—were out of reach for regular people.   AI agents could change that.   BUT, remember…   We’re in inning one.   AI agents have a ways to go.   They’re imperfect. They mess up. They need more defenses to get ready for prime time.   To be sure, AI is powerful, but it’s not a miracle worker. It’s great at helping humans solve problems, but it’s not going to replace all jobs overnight.   Instead of fearing AI, think of it as a tool to A.] save you time on boring stuff and B.] amplify what you’re already good at. Right now is the BEST time to start experimenting. It’s also the best time to find investments that will “make AI work for you”. Author: Chris Campbell (AltucherConfidential)   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/     
    • What a wild year.   AI seems to be appearing everywhere you look, Paris hosted a weird Olympics, unrest continues in the Middle East, the US endured a crazy-heated election, and the largest rocket ever to fly successfully landed in a giant pair of robot arms.   Okay, but what about the $money stuff?   Well, this year we've seen a load of uncertainty - inflation is still biting and many businesses have gone down.   Property has been very fractured, with developments becoming prohibitively expensive, while other markets have boomed.   It hasn't been an easy ride, that's for sure.   However, the stock market has had some outstanding results, and for those who know how to trade, some have done VERY well for themselves.   Some have replaced their incomes. Some have set themselves up for the rest of their days on this planet.   How about you? How did you go? Author: Louise Bedford    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/  
    • U Unity Software stock watch, attempting to move higher off the 22.4 triple+ support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?U  
    • TSSI TSS stock, watch for an ascending triangle breakout above 11.49, target 15 area at https://stockconsultant.com/?TSSI
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.