Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

thalestrader

Reading Charts in Real Time

Recommended Posts

Well, I was dedicated enough to trade Thanksgiving evening (it's not a holiday in Tokyo), but was only rewarded with this loss on the EJ...

 

I probably should have passed on this one the way price was acting fairly choppy/back-and-forth/go nowhere/etc. I think I wanted a trade too badly...

5aa7104863cd1_EURJPY11_25_2010(15Min).jpg.2c24d52f5bc4efeb18b4a1c7b2e7d8dd.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I'm all done for the week. Had 2 trades this morning...one very small loss and one break-even.

 

I actually posted every single trade I took this week to this thread.

 

Looking back, I think I did a relatively good job of choosing my trades carefully (although of course I didn't get everything)...that has been my recent focus...choosing my trades carefully, not trading every little swing/overtrading/ignoring context/etc. Looking back, I got a very decent move out of almost all my trades (although often after I was flat!)...and yet, I'm only up 1.44R for the week. I attribute this to poor trade management...I chose my trades well (in my opinion), but I managed them poorly. I have put very little time or thought into trade management lately as I've been very focused on how I choose my entries, but I think I need to spend some time on it (without neglecting entry choice!...this is key).

 

Also, I'm constantly battling emotional issues. If you look at my daily results, there's an obvious pattern...I start at X, then do a little worse, then do a little worse, then do a little worse, etc. My emotions snowball during the week...over the weekend I can usually refresh and recharge, but I get bogged down during the week. I think part of the problem is my target of 4 weeks in a row with 2.5+ net R......once I hit 2.5R for the week (which I did after the close of Tuesday), it's really hard to put that at risk to make more (and if I do, and I drop back below 2.5R, it's really demoralizing), and it creates problems (like squeezing stops way too tight, cutting profits way short, getting to BE too soon, etc.). I have a possible solution to this that I'm going to post to my log before the end of the day. ;)

 

Have a good weekend everyone!

5aa7104871a47_Trade1-VerySmallLoss.jpg.43f69d76fffd3eca91aa88f08251064f.jpg

5aa7104876258_Trade2-BreakEven.jpg.378fa367e07a61d9c6760605f32ee34f.jpg

Trades.thumb.JPG.4619f69890e2150f68b45e45b011b130.JPG

5aa7104880758_DailyResults.JPG.65b93b0da40a5d7d5421e0ae96ff4ce6.JPG

Edited by Cory2679

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Cory2679 said:
...I have a possible solution to this that I'm going to post to my log before the end of the day. ;)

 

Click here to view the post! (It's relatively short.)

 

NOTE: This will be the last time I post a link to one of my log posts to this thread...for those of you who have a monogomous relationship with this thread and privately thanked me for the link I posted last time, simply subscribe to my log thread to get an e-mail alert when there's a post...I really hardly ever post to it anymore so it certainly won't flood your inbox.

 

-Cory

Edited by Cory2679

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Current view of the EURUSD - this is a little account my daughter and I trade, and we have been short since last Sunday open 1.3713 (break of opening low into the gap), stop loss is currently 1.3490, and we are looking to add to the short at 1.3280 sell limit ...

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=23107&stc=1&d=1290983309

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa710489e277_2010-11-28EURUSDshortandselllimit1.thumb.jpg.45de3ee672419e2de318dccb0a8bcf6f.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Thales,

 

That is the type of trading I have been doing over the past 4 or so months - great work for team Thales! While that type of trading is not as action packed as day trading, I find it hugely more profitable, but at the cost of trading being somewhat less engaging. Please don't get me wrong, it is still highly enjoyable. When you catch a run like this and you add fairly aggressively to the winners at no extra risk, your R/R goes through the roof. They don't happen every week and that is part of what makes this type of trading unattractive to so many people I think. At least, that is a large part of why I dismissed this type of approach in my early years. I was too hung up on being right and developing a trading style around high win %. I ironically though, the opposite is more profitable for me - go figure!

 

With kind regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  MidKnight said:
Hi Thales,

 

That is the type of trading I have been doing over the past 4 or so months - great work for team Thales! While that type of trading is not as action packed as day trading, I find it hugely more profitable ... it is still highly enjoyable.

 

Hi MidK,

 

Good to hear you're doing well!

 

I have not been day trading much at all since May, but we've done very well working these swings in the 6E and the ES. Built a nice long position starting 9/14 on the 6E, with four total buy points, which was closed on 11/08 for +1100 ticks on the first position, +950 ticks on the second, +500 ticks on the third, and -79 ticks on the fourth. I enjoyed every single tick!

 

If my business slows down enough this winter to allow me to day trade, I will likely limit myself to day trading stocks, and continue swing trading futures.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cracker effort on that long. It was one helluva climb off the yearly lows.

 

Hey quick query on your limit short - were you risking the entire R zone of about 80-100 pips? This has always been an area I've not been comfortable with....

 

All my best,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  MidKnight said:
Cracker effort on that long. It was one helluva climb off the yearly lows.

 

Here is the post with chart from when the long was initiated ...

 

  thalestrader said:
current view of the EURUSD ... low - high - higher low - higher high ...

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=22319&stc=1&d=1284513779

 

And here is what our daily chart looks like currently with prior notes and markings intact ...

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=23111&stc=1&d=1290990936

 

  MidKnight said:
...Hey quick query on your limit short - were you risking the entire R zone of about 80-100 pips?

 

And then some - we're risking almost half of the open trade equity, though we'd probably have reason to abandon ship long before it goes that far against us. But, you never know, and that is what a stop loss is for. Now, if we were not already sitting on 400+ ticks of profit, and this was simply a new position, then standard "rip cord" rules would apply, i.e. cut the loss at 20-40 pips and try again later if price action calls for it.

 

We did get filled on the 1.3280 sell limit, and here is what our position currently looks like ...

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=23110&stc=1&d=1290990747

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa71048adede_2010-11-28EURUSDshortandselllimit2.thumb.jpg.c844e58f2a3dc8600965db15df82b022.jpg

5aa71048b2619_2010-11-28EURUSDDailyChart1.thumb.jpg.2fa49c23f68932662a3727dfd21de6b1.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Thales. I have been applying the same rip cord rules on my adds as well, so they are really treated is independent trades. Because you are not choosing to make that distinction your trade management approach for the adds makes sense to me. Thank you for the reply.

 

With Christmas cheers for your ears,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

6J Short. This looks like it is going nowhere. I probably should have brought my stop to BE when it made a lower low at 19:45 I am going to pull the cord if he opportunity presents itself

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
Current view of the EURUSD ... we have been short since last Sunday open 1.3713 (break of opening low into the gap), stop loss is currently 1.3490, and we are looking to add to the short at 1.3280 sell limit ..

 

Short from 1.3713, 1.3280, 1.3204, and 1.3186 ... looking for the move to continue down to 1.3000-1.29000. Of course, it can do anything it wants to do, and stops are trailing behind.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=23114&stc=1&d=1291037537

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa71048c971c_2010-11-28EURUSDTradelevels1.thumb.jpg.3aa5bb4f2f1c4d5212556b3b572a45a8.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Current view of 6E reminds me of a post by Marko some time ago - if it channels, it is probably corrective. I drew the lower trend line, coppied it, and slid the copy to the upper position - right now 6E is in a perfect choppy channel, and I'd expect the break to be down.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=23117&stc=1&d=1291086212

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa7104966933_2010-11-296E1.thumb.jpg.1412ef05b952a320a9bbb2521ad86382.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
Current view of 6E reminds me of a post by Marko some time ago - if it channels, it is probably corrective. I drew the lower trend line, coppied it, and slid the copy to the upper position - right now 6E is in a perfect choppy channel, and I'd expect the break to be down.

 

That was a quick trip to the lower trend line, followed by a bounce ...

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=23118&stc=1&d=1291086482

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa710496c8b0_2010-11-296E2.thumb.jpg.09ad40483b4b96384482ae20597f8fd2.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

6 E long order not hit cancelled and reset to 1.3125

1st PT 1.3145

2nd 1.3250

Entry price 1.3125

SL at 1.3105

 

UPdate 2nd PT changed to 1.3213 fib 61% also congestion in that area

Update profit +10 moving SL to -10

SL hit arrgh! -10 x 2k = -20 ticks

 

 

Update: The good news is that I saved myself 10 ticks by moving SL since SL would have been hit anyway.

Edited by lblanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

6 E short order 1.3071

1st PT 1.3052

2nd 1.2947

Entry price 1.3072

SL at 1.3092

 

UPDATE 1st PT hit +20

SL at BE on 2nd half

 

UPDATE 2nd PT + 60 no good pivot point to move stop so I am leaving it at BE. Bedtime

Edited by lblanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.