Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

thalestrader

Reading Charts in Real Time

Recommended Posts

I downloaded and read the George (must be a Dyslexic writer) Taylor book over the weekend.

The way I do these things is to read it makes some notes. Put it down and leave it for a week let the subconscious work on it, then try again (and possibly again) as Thales said you need the "aha" moment.

So far my take is he provides an interesting take on the structure of how a market moves, that if you can get into sync with it can certainly help with visualising the flow of the market, and objective points. This can really hep a trader pre plan the next days likely action.

My first thought is not to think too much in terms of days as he talks about - but in terms of swings and flow of the market (especially not with near 24 hr trading)

I may be wrong here but I think Thales hints at this with the hint of looking at highs, lows, and the moves between them.

If I find it fits in with my mindset, I get the aha moment and find it adds value the associated website certainly looks a great tool to save me the work of trying to crunch numbers myself.

lets see what the future holds.

 

You will certainly find value in Taylor, his work is genius, he understood market manipulation like no other, was obviously a trader first and a writer last, don't think he scored much at writing essays in school:)

 

Where most people goof up is due to designation of days as BUY,SELL, SELL SHORT days, he could have just called them Day1, Day2, Day3, it is the cycle that is of paramount importance, do not make the crucial mistake of fitting the days action into the cycle.

If once you get the hang of the rules that govern each day, then the focus is on the primary play for the day, this is what the big boys do.

The exact calculations of the projected levels etc are important but you don't have to get into that if you don't want to, for a very small subcription you can obtain all that plus much more from Richbois.

I am in no way promoting his service for I have learnt to keep the book, albeit not to the same standard and sophistication as Richbois who obviously is adept at programming in Excel:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If once you get the hang of the rules that govern each day

 

I need to go back through that TTT thread to see if anyone ever listed out the rules you mention above. I spent an hour last night trying to get something from one of Taylor's chapters and it was painful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wrote a small document tittled The Guide to Trading TTT E-Books. My English is a little better than Taylor's (at least I have an excuse as English is my second language) :)

 

I believe that it is a usefull brief resume of Taylor's book.

 

If any of you is interested, please email me at rich@taylortradingtechnique.net and I will be happy to send you a copy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oil

 

We haven't seen a big volume push today. I'm expecting some sort of break either above or below this consolidation area.

 

Lots of resistance. A big player is going to have to make the move to get a good break.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=19762&stc=1&d=1267547896

5aa70fdf5b26a_3-2-201002.thumb.png.599dd69511c4c1833e9ff875b2f7924a.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I spent an hour last night trying to get something from one of Taylor's chapters and it was painful.

 

Then you are on the right track ...

 

I really do suggest that you try to get your understanding by reading Taylor directly, rather than what anyone else has to say about what Taylor may or may not have meant. It is painful, I agree. My currency trading friend (also a TTT user) calls Taylor "tortuous" to read. But tortuous as it may be, no service or internet forum can substitute the understanding that can only come from directly wrestling with the original book itself. Do not be in a hurry to make it a part of your trading. You are doing fine without it. I think it can only help, if you approach it properly. But it will only cause harm if you try quickly to incoprate it based upon an incomplete or flawed understanding.

 

Best WIshes,

 

Thales

Edited by thalestrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Oil

 

We haven't seen a big volume push today. I'm expecting some sort of break either above or below this consolidation area.

 

Lots of resistance. A big player is going to have to make the move to get a good break.

 

...and BINGO was his namo! :rofl:

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=19765&stc=1&d=1267548966

5aa70fdf73436_3-2-201003.png.9396e5c98491976fff7d7239982cdd03.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here is my CL play of the day at the moment - short at 79.40 (yesterday's break down point), with a stop loss one tick above this morning's 79.48 high - risk is 9 ticks.

 

Profit target is 2 Bills at 77.40 - 200 ticks ...

 

I would have rather this took place after the pit opens at 9AM EST, but, you got to take them when they are offered.

 

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=19739&stc=1&d=1267535648

 

 

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

 

 

Was looking for the same trade, a short at 79.40. Would have been a nice flip of the breakdown area from yesterday. I didn't get the confirmation I wanted and stayed out. I'm looking for a short up here near 80.48 now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't been able to post in a while but i've been keeping an eye on things thanks to all the contributors. makes for excellent reading.

 

here's a longer term trade on gold...inspired by reading trader vic at the moment.

5aa70fdf7a529_gold2310.thumb.gif.7071159f7f32140b4050ddd9f6e20bad.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Was looking for the same trade, a short at 79.40. Would have been a nice flip of the breakdown area from yesterday. I didn't get the confirmation I wanted and stayed out. I'm looking for a short up here near 80.48 now.

 

I hear you on the short - test of yesterday's high was nearly a given once price tried twice and failed to break and hold back below yesterday's break down level. I have a buy stop at 80.51 as well, though it is getting late in the day for me as I have to be at my daughter's elementary school for an assembly program at 1:30 ...

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I haven't been able to post in a while but i've been keeping an eye on things thanks to all the contributors. makes for excellent reading.

 

here's a longer term trade on gold...inspired by reading trader vic at the moment.

 

Hi motion100,

 

I like your gold chart. I added to my longs yesterday and today, adding to an initial position established by an earlier 123 type entry from about a month ago - 123's are the gift that keeps giving ...

 

Gold also looks as though it may be setting itself up for a rally ...

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=19134&stc=1&d=1265855003

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=19135&stc=1&d=1265855003

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I hear you on the short - test of yesterday's high was nearly a given once price tried twice and failed to break and hold back below yesterday's break down level. I have a buy stop at 80.51 as well, though it is getting late in the day for me as I have to be at my daughter's elementary school for an assembly program at 1:30 ...

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

That would likely be a nice BO to the upside if price can break through the 80.48 area. I'm currently trying to play a short off of that level, thinking we may retest 79.40. It's not going well at the moment though!

 

20100302-bi1m3u5hr2q98ximtkgh3hcxyf.preview.jpg

Click for full size - Uploaded with plasq's Skitch

 

20100302-qcka1qe71gsjft1asmrx67phty.preview.jpg

Click for full size - Uploaded with plasq's Skitch

 

Just got filled and am down a few ticks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just got filled and am down a few ticks.

 

Hmmm ... not what I expectfrom jonbig, that's for sure. A sell limit a few ticks on the short side of 80.48 with a stop loss a few ticks on the long side of it should have been the play, don't you think?

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hmmm ... not what I expectfrom jonbig, that's for sure. A sell limit a few ticks on the short side of 80.48 with a stop loss a few ticks on the long side of it should have been the play, don't you think?

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

Yeah I got burnt on that one haha. As you said, should have played it closer to 80.48.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There that BO haha. My stops at BE. Figure if it wants to pullback and flip 80.48, I can get long there.

 

20100302-rt9quwhyaywa2tmxew4dt2hwdc.preview.jpg

Click for full size - Uploaded with plasq's Skitch

 

That was a strange ride. I managed to get in on the break out, though with worse fill than Thales entry. Price quickly fell back and I went out BE. It has sice fallen back through the R I was hoping for it to flip. Hmm. Sitting on hands now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
question for the OIL traders

 

do you use the full 24 hours of data or only the pit session which I believe is from 9AM to 2:30PM EST

 

Thanks

 

I normally only consider pit hour price action in my trading analysis so I do have opening gap up/down considerations.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
question for the OIL traders

 

do you use the full 24 hours of data or only the pit session which I believe is from 9AM to 2:30PM EST

 

Thanks

 

I use 24 hour high/low 9am to 9 am ...

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
question for the OIL traders

 

do you use the full 24 hours of data or only the pit session which I believe is from 9AM to 2:30PM EST

 

Thanks

 

I use the whole session. There seems to be some good action at night.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great intraday volatility. Unable to take out the previous days developing R 1.4980 - 1.5000 area does not bode so well for my 'capitulation theory'. Despite having yesterdays buy zone a little inaccurate, I will stick with this theory until PDL is exceeded and holds.

 

Keen to buy in the 1.4850 - 1.4900 area, but maybe this is in the process of making HLs, if that is the case, it is possible to buy in the 1.4910/30 area. Any longs taken down here will be out of 1/2 before breaking the R stopping at 1.5016 with a ultimate target way up into 1.51. If the market instead breaks out of the immediate R, then I'll be looking to buy a flip as it tests it for S. Ultimate target for this again would be the 1.5100/40 area.

 

I'm having difficulty seeing short scenarios. That may be a huge warning sign! Stay alert for the possibility that my long bias blinds me to the short side. A classic warning would be too many losing longs, stay open minded today for the possibility that my theory is wrong! Any short taken will just be scalps unless we clearly break the 1.4850 area and then come back to test it.

20100303_plan_240m.thumb.png.656909470350a100b20d744f3b3ca463.png

20100303_plan_60m.thumb.png.98a19e0bf1405806450392ba08e8aa25.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.