Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

thalestrader

Reading Charts in Real Time

Recommended Posts

Here is what my EURUSD/6E short looks like - short at 1.3646, stop loss is 1.3652, and I have a profit target at 1.3428. If I am not stopped out, this will be closed by end of day whether the target is reached or not. I had an initial stop at 17 ticks on the 6E short, and lowered it to the prsent -6 ticks, which makes the open risk on the trade -.35R ...

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=19657&stc=1&d=1267199673

 

I like doing these types of trades (no idea why I like them so much), but my problem is that there is usually very little clear market structures to lean on. I suspect you are leaning on the TTT to call this as HOD and maybe that is why your stop is 1 tick past it. How did you decide on an initial stop when you entered though?

 

Cheers,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I like doing these types of trades (no idea why I like them so much), but my problem is that there is usually very little clear market structures to lean on. I suspect you are leaning on the TTT to call this as HOD and maybe that is why your stop is 1 tick past it. How did you decide on an initial stop when you entered though?

 

Hi MidK,

 

Here is a chart with some notes, and some explanations below:

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=19673&stc=1&d=1267225498

 

First and foremost is always "where is resistance?" and "where is support?" We want to sell resistance and buy breaks of resistance, we want to buy support and sell breaks of support. In this case, I used two recent pivots to define a potenital zone of resistance. Similar to your daily prep on the GBPUSD, I look for zones where I might expect sellers to get more active and zones where I might expect buyers to get more active.

 

In addition to this reisitance zone, we had price at the mid-figure (00's are the figure and 50's the mid-figure). For whatever reason, Probably the same reason me and some of my trading friends like to use 50 and 100 ticks for profit targets) these areas tend to be S/R, when first approached during the day, e.g. see yesterday's low on the EURUSD/6E.

 

In addition to that, I did, as you noted, have a statistical possible high based upon TTT at 1.3652.

 

I also noted that the rally was quite choppy, with price moving in overlapping waves. Overlapping waves often, though not always, indicate that a rally (or decline) is geting a bit "long in the tooth," and is perhaps due for a pause, if not a reversal.

 

So, I was looking for price to hit that zone, and then watched to see what happened. Once it broke 1.3651 and stuttered, fell back a few ticks, tried to push higher again and failed, I went in at the market.

 

As for my initial stop, I use 10-20 ticks. It might be 13, sometimes 17, sometimes 15 - it depends upon where price is and how it is acting. It is usually a level set for the day and I set it in my trading platform so that if enter - whether it is a market, limit, or stop entry, I have that stop loss go in. Obviously, on the 123 entries, the initial stop is set by the higher low or lower high of the sequence. When I am selling resistance or buying support, I use a preset based upon current volatility as measured by my eye. This way I can set my number of contracts in my trading DOM and be ready to just buy/sell market if the opportunity presents itself.

 

Once price fell from where I entered, I wait for its first minor reaction against me, and then move the stop to one tick above the high. This occurs very quickly - I'm watching the DOM. When I say the first reaction against me, it may be as little as this: I sell at market and I'm filled at 46. price drops to 43, scurries up to 47, and then falls back to 43. At that point lower my stop - often my full R risk is cut to tenths of an R within seconds of entry for these trades. It is that fast - my good friend, professional pilot, and serial lurker jands saw me do a CL trade yesterday where I sold on a limit order at 77.98 - my fill was at what was then the top tick of the swing, and within seconds I moved my stop to one tick above entry. I was up about 12 ticks on that trade when price quickly reversed and I was stopped (my PT was 30 ticks if I recall correctly). Had I not lowered my stop, my loss would have been -1R as price blasted higher, but instead, my loss was only -.12R including commision.

 

I always am looking to cut risk to a point where if I'm stopped, I'm probably glad of it. I try to make -1R losses rare. You see, I can always sell it again if price probes resistance further and gets pushed back down. I did this yesterday with the 6E in the afternoon. I think I may have posted those trades here as well.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70fdd06243_2010-02-266ERallyStall-Pause1.thumb.jpg.51ff203568a4a3e3db6f283b44227f35.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First and foremost is always "where is resistance?" and "where is support?"

Check that.

 

In addition to this reisitance zone, we had price at the mid-figure (00's are the figure and 50's the mid-figure).

Check.

 

In addition to that, I did, as you noted, have a statistical possible high based upon TTT at 1.3652.

Check.

 

I also noted that the rally was quite choppy, with price moving in overlapping waves. Overlapping waves often, though not always, indicate that a rally (or decline) is geting a bit "long in the tooth," and is perhaps due for a pause, if not a reversal.

Check that too.

 

As for my initial stop, I use 10-20 ticks. It might be 13, sometimes 17, sometimes 15 - it depends upon where price is and how it is acting. It is usually a level set for the day and I set it in my trading platform so that if enter - whether it is a market, limit, or stop entry, I have that stop loss go in. Obviously, on the 123 entries, the initial stop is set by the higher low or lower high of the sequence. When I am selling resistance or buying support, I use a preset based upon current volatility as measured by my eye. This way I can set my number of contracts in my trading DOM and be ready to just buy/sell market if the opportunity presents itself.

This is quite a skill, one I must certainly spend some time developing the sensitivity towards! This part here is the essence of what I was getting at.

 

Once price fell from where I entered, I wait for its first minor reaction against me, and then move the stop to one tick above the high. This occurs very quickly - I'm watching the DOM. When I say the first reaction against me, it may be as little as this: I sell at market and I'm filled at 46. price drops to 43, scurries up to 47, and then falls back to 43. At that point lower my stop - often my full R risk is cut to tenths of an R within seconds of entry for these trades.

A new question, you brought up your buddy doing the CL method with you and how you two ended up taking the same trades on the day but managed them differently. I was curious if he is so quick to cut his risk like this?

 

I always am looking to cut risk to a point where if I'm stopped, I'm probably glad of it. I try to make -1R losses rare. You see, I can always sell it again if price probes resistance further and gets pushed back down. I did this yesterday with the 6E in the afternoon. I think I may have posted those trades here as well.

Indeed, that is true. In the heat of the moment though if I find that I am taking a tiny tiny loss but the market isn't really moving against the initial position much and then I keep re-entering. In my end of day review, I may end up viewing that action as overtrading and if the original idea works out without the need for my micro-managing, then in all honesty, I'm pretty sure I would be chastising myself....

 

Awesome post - thank you. Label that post one for the book you may end up writing one day :)

 

With kind regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A new question, you brought up your buddy doing the CL method with you and how you two ended up taking the same trades on the day but managed them differently. I was curious if he is so quick to cut his risk like this?

 

We cut our initial risk identically. The difference in results was in managing stops to capture profit. He was not as aggressive as I, and it paid off in his favor.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
We cut our initial risk identically. The difference in results was in managing stops to capture profit. He was not as aggressive as I, and it paid off in his favor.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Gotcha - thanks for the reply :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...

Once price fell from where I entered, I wait for its first minor reaction against me, and then move the stop to one tick above the high. This occurs very quickly - I'm watching the DOM. When I say the first reaction against me, it may be as little as this: I sell at market and I'm filled at 46. price drops to 43, scurries up to 47, and then falls back to 43. At that point lower my stop -

....

 

Thanks for this excellent post; the better a post the more questions follow.

 

Does your DOM monitor local highs and lows or you monitor them while you watch the DOM? My DOM is rather dumb and shows daily high and low only.

 

If you monitor them, what is your internal timeframe for that?

I know that I asked this question some time ago, perhaps we can try an answer now.

Personally I find it hard work to remember local h/l while watching a dancing price. Training can help when I know that it is possible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks for this excellent post; the better a post the more questions follow.

 

Does your DOM monitor local highs and lows or you monitor them while you watch the DOM? My DOM is rather dumb and shows daily high and low only.

 

If you monitor them, what is your internal timeframe for that?

I know that I asked this question some time ago, perhaps we can try an answer now.

Personally I find it hard work to remember local h/l while watching a dancing price. Training can help when I know that it is possible.

 

My DOM does not moark off the "local" or "recent" highs/low. I just watch the dancing price. You could do this watching a chart as well (I can do it whether I'm watching a daily bar chart at the time of entry or a single tick chart).The reason I like to watch the DOM at these moments is I can get a sense from the "dance" of whether I am on the right side or not. That "sense" comes from a lot of watching. It is difficult for me to find words to explain what I'm looking for other than to say that just as charts show patterns that repeat over time across markets and timeframes, so does the manner of price movement on a dancing DOM.

 

My "internal timeframe" for this is best described as "the moment at hand." If I am selling against resistance, I am looking for the first, most minute 123 - yesterday, for example, on the 6E, price traded to 1.3651 (anticipated resistance) dropped back to 1.3647 or so, scurried up to 1.3650, failed to even print at 1.3651, and then dropped below 1.3647 - a 123 of very small degree, but a 123 nonetheless.

 

Sometimes I will actually have a limit order resting in the market, and in those cases, once filled, I'll be waiting for the first pause at a high (if I am short), and then I watch to see whether price is going to put in a 123 in my favor, or if price is going to pull back a few ticks and then move higher, in which case I will usually go flat and sell higher.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Once price fell from where I entered, I wait for its first minor reaction against me, and then move the stop to one tick above the high. This occurs very quickly :yes sir: - I'm watching the DOM. When I say the first reaction against me, it may be as little as this: I sell at market and I'm filled at 46. price drops to 43, scurries up to 47, and then falls back to 43. At that point lower my stop - often my full R risk is cut to tenths of an R within seconds of entry for these trades. It is that fast - my good friend, professional pilot, and serial lurker jands :evil tongue: saw me do a CL trade yesterday where I sold on a limit order at 77.98 - my fill was at what was then the top tick of the swing, and within seconds I moved my stop to one tick above entry. I was up about 12 ticks on that trade when price quickly reversed and I was stopped (my PT was 30 ticks if I recall correctly). Had I not lowered my stop, my loss would have been -1R as price blasted higher, but instead, my loss was only -.12R including commision.

 

 

Yes, I was shocked, this all happened in what seemed like a few seconds. A lot shorter time period than I thought he meant. It's nice to take a swing and not hurt! :)

 

Good trading,

 

Jim

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My DOM does not moark off the "local" or "recent" highs/low. I just watch the dancing price. You could do this watching a chart as well (I can do it whether I'm watching a daily bar chart at the time of entry or a single tick chart).The reason I like to watch the DOM at these moments is I can get a sense from the "dance" of whether I am on the right side or not. That "sense" comes from a lot of watching. It is difficult for me to find words to explain what I'm looking for other than to say that just as charts show patterns that repeat over time across markets and timeframes, so does the manner of price movement on a dancing DOM.

...

 

Thanks Thales, from your words I see "it can be learned" though it may take a lot of training.

Makes make perfect and there is a similar saying here: "Übung macht den Meister."

Perhaps a good trader trades from price action like a well trained musician plays at sight.

This helps and I like such a training much more than programming backtests...

 

...

My "internal timeframe" for this is best described as "the moment at hand." If I am selling against resistance, I am looking for the first, most minute 123 - yesterday, for example, on the 6E, price traded to 1.3651 (anticipated resistance) dropped back to 1.3647 or so, scurried up to 1.3650, failed to even print at 1.3651, and then dropped below 1.3647 - a 123 of very small degree, but a 123 nonetheless...

 

This is confirmed by scale invariance and self-simlarity of price action.

If 1-2-3 is real than it must be observable on any time scale.

I did such a test after my first reads in this thread und I repeated it today on my Bund charts, which I know inside out.

You can find 1-2-3 patterns intertwined from a daily pattern down to 1m patterns.

What you do is much more clear for me now.

 

...

Sometimes I will actually have a limit order resting in the market, and in those cases, once filled, I'll be waiting for the first pause at a high (if I am short), and then I watch to see whether price is going to put in a 123 in my favor, or if price is going to pull back a few ticks and then move higher, in which case I will usually go flat and sell higher.

 

Good example and many thanks again for taking time to answer my question.

 

 

Kind regards, Marko

Edited by Marko23

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Makes make perfect and there is a similar saying here: "Übung macht den Meister."

 

Should read

 

Practice makes perfect and there is a similar saying here: "Übung macht den Meister."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This image from Wikipedia shows an example for self-similarity

 

Kochsim.gif

 

A Koch curve has an infinitely repeating self-similarity when it is magnified.

 

The Mandelbrot set is another example

 

Feigenbaumzoom.gif

Edited by Marko23

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Last week put in a decent down week. This trend is clearly evident on the high time frame charts and I don't see any reason for it to stop yet. 1.50 is likely to be a big number and from eyeballing the weekly chart it is possible to see some sort of S there. On a short-term basis I have 4 theories:

 

  1. The market makes another new marginal low for a 3 thrusts pattern bringing in at the least a couple days of rally/chop.
  2. The market squirts higher right now for at least a couple of days of rally chop.
  3. The market continues to make lower boxes as per the 60m chart.
  4. Capitulation is always an option and I must remain open minded for that possibility.

 

All longs must be clearly obvious as they are against the man momentum that many various time frames can clearly see as down. Aside from obvious scalps, the only longs will be on a clear marginal new low or from a capitulation. I will aim to be out of 1/2 by the time we close today's gap open and attempt to trail the rest and scaling out the remaining 1/2 into 2 separate exits.

 

Waiting for shorts in the 1.5260-1.5300 area with exits planned to be out of 1/2 before hitting new lows and trailing the other 1/2 on the 15m chart after breaking to new lows. Above there we have the obvious shorts in the large zone of 1.5360 - 1.5460 area (I prefer 1.5400/60) where I will work shorts for a while. I don't think we'll see that today, but it is still part of what I am watching and starting to plan for.

20100301_plan_240m.thumb.png.4c3542bd61b5854534f3b36f6a3c8b3a.png

20100301_plan_60m.thumb.png.70d9c7db00b051da5e2417e671808799.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a sell limit on the 6E at 1.3645, high tick was 1.3646, but I did not get filled either in the demo account or in real life. I thought I was in there early enough, but I couldn't even get a partial. Frustrating, but it does happen occasionally, especially early hours of the new week ...

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=19683&stc=1&d=1267401883

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=19684&stc=1&d=1267402054

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70fdd4ab90_2010-02-286E1.thumb.jpg.cead3969bc503b00a5eeb98583609264.jpg

5aa70fdd4fae1_2010-02-286E2.thumb.jpg.55393b5d549f94e082f7f4aeb011d133.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Thales,

 

That is unfortunate about missing a fill on that superb location. From the chart posted, I can't really see why you would have put a limit order at that price - care to elaborate? Something I notice with IB Idealpro exchange as that the spreads on EU are very often down to 1/2 pip with several million in either side at the inside bid/ask. You can trade between any spreads with idealpro just like you would expect from an exchange. Having said that, have you considered using the spot market in an exchange like this, especially since it is possible to get an even better spread than is possible on the futures.

 

All my best,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Current look at CL in the Ninjademo with a long at the break above Friday's high ... we'll see what Crude is capable of on a sleepy Sunday evening.

 

In real life I bought CL at 80.01, and my real life stop loss is currently 79.99. For the purpose of this demo and for my own inquiring mind, I am going to trail this with what I consider natural stops, should any develop between now and the time I shut down for the night. Profit target is 81.24 in real life and for the sake of this demo trade.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=19685&stc=1&d=1267403441

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70fdd5474b_2010-02-28CL2.thumb.jpg.9f504c0ee06565a1702dd824281a627e.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a 5 minute CL just to show that price pulled back to the 2/24 high, and bounced, and I have moved my stop to 80.44, which will be +38 demo, +43 in real life ...

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=19686&stc=1&d=1267405013

 

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70fdd5a02c_2010-02-28CL3.thumb.jpg.81a2d5d28c166aef5905b25ca3edafc7.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here is a 5 minute CL just to show that price pulled back to the 2/24 high, and bounced, and I have moved my stop to 80.44, which will be +38 demo, +43 in real life ...

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=19686&stc=1&d=1267405013

 

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

Interesting to see how you played that Thales. I'm in a sim short on CL right now.

 

20100301-fat4fsmpcfpmn99b9jphyb8snk.preview.jpg

Click for full size - Uploaded with plasq's Skitch

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Thales,

 

That is unfortunate about missing a fill on that superb location. From the chart posted, I can't really see why you would have put a limit order at that price - care to elaborate? Something I notice with IB Idealpro exchange as that the spreads on EU are very often down to 1/2 pip with several million in either side at the inside bid/ask. You can trade between any spreads with idealpro just like you would expect from an exchange. Having said that, have you considered using the spot market in an exchange like this, especially since it is possible to get an even better spread than is possible on the futures.

 

All my best,

MK

 

Hi MidK,

 

I'll be leaving the spot to my daughter. I do still watch the cash charts, same as I watch the SPX when trading the ES. But I have a feel for the futures, and my philosophy has always been of the old "if it ain't broke, don't fix it."

 

As to why I wanted to sell there, I see an impulsive move down off of Friday's high, and a choppy rally attempt that looks to me like a good old fashioned bear flag. There is no magic to the number, it was one tick below the resistance zone I outlined for you on this chart here, which is, of course, within the resistance zone that we played with on Friday. I expect at least a measured move off the high, and that may offer a good place to buy. As to why I then sold at 1.3649 - well, if they didn't want to let me sell it at to them at 45, they can now pay me premium!

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=19688&stc=1&d=1267405910

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70fdd64525_2010-02-286E5.thumb.jpg.d05babea7a01adf9217a5e8d2dc4e7cc.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Interesting to see how you played that Thales. I'm in a sim short on CL right now.

 

Price nearly always tells you what the path of lest resistance is ... our job is not to fight it as it makes its way along that path.

 

Here is what my 6E short ... stop loss is at 1.3641, which will be +1/2R (just a reminder that I do not trade using Ninja - so while I do have this position in my trading account, the position represented by Ninja's chart trader is a sim position - I am using Ninjasim for the edification of those who think the trades shown in this thread are hindsight - at the very least they cannot say I'm calling anything after the fact that letme get a fill in Ninja).

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=19689&stc=1&d=1267406773

 

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70fdd69676_2010-02-286E6.thumb.jpg.acc4aa4125b69a0bfe88ad6fb0ceaaaa.jpg

Edited by thalestrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi MidK,

 

I'll be leaving the spot to my daughter. I do still watch the cash charts, same as I watch the SPX when trading the ES. But I have a feel for the futures, and my philosophy has always been of the old "if it ain't broke, don't fix it."

 

As to why I wanted to sell there, I see an impulsive move down off of Friday's high, and a choppy rally attempt that looks to me like a good old fashioned bear flag. There is no magic to the number, it was one tick below the resistance zone I outlined for you on this chart here, which is, of course, within the resistance zone that we played with on Friday. I expect at least a measured move off the high, and that may offer a good place to buy. As to why I then sold at 1.3649 - well, if they didn't want to let me sell it at to them at 45, they can now pay me premium!

 

Gotcha mate, I guess it was just that you used a limit order rather than what has been the normal 123 type thing. As I have said prior, I am drawn to this, but struggle to get precision when I have done this in the past. I had to laugh at your comment about them paying you a premium lol - nice work :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Price nearly always tells you what the path of lest resistance is ... our job is not to fight it as it makes its way along that path.

 

I'm going to try to keep that in mind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.