Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

thalestrader

Reading Charts in Real Time

Recommended Posts

...

Good to hear from you again ... you've been too quiet!

Thank you :) . If I were to post I would most likely only add noise. The charts that are posted and discussions that follow is already more than anyone could wish for.

...I kind of thought R-multiples was the basis of Richard Dennis's and William Eckhardt's money management regimen from the 70's...

..."A rose by any other name ..."

True. What Branscomb did was conceive how to use it for system evaluation (normalization of expectancy, R distribution graphs etc) and then to give it a name - important in itself since that is what makes it possible for me and you to talk about it in a conceptual manner now.

 

My comment was not directed to you Thales but to the writings of Van. I just think professional writers should give reference when appropriate, that's all. When they don't, they somehow imply that what they write is common knowledge and does not have an originator, or that they came up with the idea themselves. I don't know Branscomb, and he probably doesn't care - but I do.

 

Best wishes, TB

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My comment was not directed to you Thales but to the writings of Van. I just think professional writers should give reference when appropriate, that's all....

 

No problem, TrueBalance. I agree with you - credit where credit is due.

 

I know you were not directing your comments toward me. I've said all along that I am a most unoriginal trader. And I stand by that self-assessment.

 

I have, however, spent my way through all manner of BS, and all I've wanted to do in this thread is direct folks to the people, books, articles, and concepts that I feel have been of value, so as to help others avoid the fools errands I've been on. So, our friend Kiwi notwithstanding, I found Van Tharp incredibly helpful (though I'd probably not recommend his two books so much as the three or four articles I've posted here in the thread.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Folks,

 

Found some Linda Raschke videos on Youtube when doing a google search for her seminar. I haven't watched each of these, so I cannot vouch for their content, but she has never disappointed me.

 

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wsH6fWVP3Z8]YouTube - Linda Raschke: Stick to the Plan and Become a Better Trader[/ame]

 

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5x--xYjuajE&feature=related]YouTube - Linda Raschke and Why She Rarely Uses Trailing Stops[/ame]

 

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9rHLGJq79ZU&feature=related]YouTube - How to Use Stops, Why Trade with Stops, How to Determine Stops[/ame]

 

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AnQZnNmKJng&feature=related]YouTube - OCO As Trade Entry Techniques with Linda Raschke[/ame]

 

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1hs6-mr6PU&feature=related]YouTube - Plan Your Trades, Learn the Essentials[/ame]

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I, like TrueBalance, was irritated by VT's lack of attribution of the R Multiple idea to Chuck. Particularly because I'd found Chuck to be one of those guys, like you my dear Thales, who provides great value to others without requesting payment.

 

And lets not talk about some suspect stuff in VT's love of the once popular NLP.

 

 

But, I said that expectancy and R multiples didn't take risk of ruin into account and thus were a little flawed. I'm going to prepare a long post on this with a little spreadsheet attachment so that people can test the ideas themselves but this will take a while so I don't know when it will happen.

 

One question though. To demonstrate it easily I'll use the Kelly RoR percentage as the equivalent to RoR for a particular system. I don't say it is an absolutely correct calculation (because the assumptions actually aren't right) just that if I have two similar system outcomes (one at 35% wr, one at 50% wr and one at 80% wr) it can be used to compare one RoR with another and thus determine relative bet sizes. So, the question: does anyone object to my use of Kelly and if so what would you suggest instead?

 

The clue to my thesis on why Expectancy/R Multiple is imperfect is that you can bet much harder on a high win rate system than a low win rate system. To see this intuitively think about what causes ruin ---- a string of losing trades or more correctly a string of mainly losing trades that takes your account balance under (say) 50%.

 

If you think about an 80% wr system ... how many times are you going to take trades before you see a string of 20 losers? On the other hand, if you have a 35% wr system, how many times do you throw the trading dice before you see a string of 20 losers? So, if on a 50% wr system you were willing to bet 2% of your equity on every trade would you also bet exactly 2% on an 80% system and a 35% system ... or would you bet a different percentage.

 

If different then how does that affect the expectancy?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure who originated some of these ideas I seem to remember Tewles writing about it in The Futures Game: Who Wins, Who Loses, & Why (1974) Amazon.com: The Futures Game: Who Wins, Who Loses, & Why (9780070647572): Richard Teweles, Frank, Jones: Books though may be mistaken. Don't have the book to hand to see if he credited anyone else. I also seem to rember he talks about RoR and Monte Carlo simulations.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not sure who originated some of these ideas ...

 

There really has been nothing new of any real importance conceived, discovered, etc. and so on with respect to trading since Dickson Watts published Speculation as a Fine Art sometime in the late 1800's (what is "selling down to the sleeping point" if not a commonsense, real world expression of the risk of ruin?). If you have that book alone, that is enough, provided you have the emotional discipline required to heed its advice.

 

We now live in a world where fame is viewed as the pinnacle of achievement. It is telling that Charles Dow never called his technical approach "Dow Theory," that William O'Neil codified the work of others (Livermore, Baruch, Darvas et.al.) and named the approach with a simple acronym of the approach's component concepts, i.e. CANSLIM. Wells Wilder created an indicator that he called, simply Relative Strength Index. Others subsequently added the prenom "Wilder's" to RSI only to distinguish the indicator from the concept of relative strength.

 

But where have we come in the last 35 years? We have a Joe Ross who wants to name a basic building block of price action after himself, we have a Joe DiNapoli who wants to rename Fibonacci levels after himself, and Tom Demark wants to name every single thing that emanates from his body a "Demark this" and a "Demark that." Each is exceedingly unoriginal, in his own way. But why should I care? As Thomas Jefferson would say, "It neither breaks my bones nor picks my pocket."

 

I am all for credit where credit is due. But let's not become overly concerned with the "from where things came" and lose sight of the main point - "will this be to my advantage or disadvantage to use".

 

You can call it whatever you wish. In the end, this about speculating about the immediate future direction of prices in order to profit while limiting losses. And we should use whatever we may find at our disposal to aid us in those endeavors.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...And lets not talk about some suspect stuff in VT's love of the once popular NLP...

 

NLP is one thing for which I never fell ... I guess after he published his book he had to sell something.

 

As for the spreadsheet, etc., Kiwi, I think the Kelly RoR %'s should be fine for our purposes.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Edited by thalestrader
typo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing really changed still. GU continues in the range giving another decent short opportunity on Friday. All of last week was spent down in this range. It has refused to break my immediate resistance in the 1.5740 area so far implying to me that there are many eager sellers still at only slightly higher prices than these lows. But I also feel it needs to go up through that R before it can go down through the S, it feels like a case of the market is too short at the moment and needs to wash some shorts out before it can go lower. Maybe I'm over analyzing it, but that is how I feel. Despite how I feel, I'll trade what I see and the plan will be similar to Friday. Looking to short above 1.5720 and be out of 3/4ths before 1.5580. Light longs in the narrow band of 1.5540/80 aiming to be out of 3/4ths before 1.5700. When we do finally break, I want to at least have something already on, even if it is just a 1/4 position because the move out of here could be decent.

MK_2010-02-15_112743.thumb.png.1d96f5badccd3d245ed4a90cd3bb5fe5.png

MK_2010-02-15_112927.thumb.png.bcdcc2c68c55fe1d42b06f082dd61269.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Folks,

 

I just want to reiterate a point made earlier in this thread that any questions about the approach to trading discussed here ought to be addressed to me here in the thread rather than through PM.

 

Thank You,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Anyone else thinking long on the EURJPY?

 

Hi Beeker,

 

The custom we follow in this thread when posting a potential trade opportunity is to include a chart, and on that chart, we use a dark blue line to denote the proposed entry, a red line for the initial stop loss, and green lines for profit target(s), if targets are used.

 

Without a chart, this may as well be twitter.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

my bad, been watching this thread for awhile and it's one of the better ones on the forum.

 

here's a chart of the 15m EURJPY, i only trade futures but since today is President's Day and US markets are crap, nice to check out the forex... price action is the same whether you trade forex, futures, stocks, whatever... it's all run by human emotion and psychology which doesn't change (except for the computers, but those are programmed by humans).

 

this is a 15m, only trade on fast time frames usually a 1m and 5m, but this is still valid for a longer term trade, just larger risk/reward compared to the faster time frame.

 

red circle is where i'd go long, yellow trendlines just shows the break and the bottoming pattern is sort of obvious, the red line is the lowest i'd like to see this go for the long thesis to still be intact.

 

to make a call, long will be at 22.373, gotta worry about 22.375-22.380 but past that should be good to push up. stop at 22.340, first target at 22.430.

 

this is on my demo account, i don't have a funded forex account yet, only trading the futures live.

chart_15m.gif.a316339aebafdca36d22d15d8f2d356c.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Where is everyone? Is it a US holiday or have you all gone to see Don Miller in NY?

 

Anyway good day for me although with 6 trades I might have veered into over trading: +76

 

Some of my entries were aggressive but I also managed my stops aggressively.

5aa70fd111abd_6E20100215.thumb.png.7ab26224e7f3cbc9ddb506cdb1ec1081.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The market is in coma.

EJ is in the middle of a chop zone.

If anything I think it is pointing down but I would not do anything.

 

Gabe

 

I must have had a senior's moment as i was looking at UJ.

The picture is the same but I have a long bias towards the EJ and the GJ.

 

Gabe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yawn, I may start cut and pasting the daily plan soon ;)

(note to self, when I feel its going to last forever, this is when it will break - stay alert today!)

 

GU still within range of last weeks tight play. Good rejection out of 1.5720. I still feel it needs to go up through that R before it can go down through the S. The daily chart shows these tight clumps fairly often on GU with the majority end up breaking the counter trend swing (in this case, up) before resuming the major trend (down). Light longs in the narrow band of 1.5540/80 aiming to be out of 3/4ths before 1.5700. Looking to short above 1.5720 and be out of 3/4ths before 1.5580. Should be break out and I'm not on board I'll be entering on the first mini pullback into the edge of this range we are currently in.

MK_2010-02-16_114054.thumb.png.a83465b4998729c9bead5917b439c406.png

MK_2010-02-16_114222.thumb.png.39639c4e050b70b1ccc21fe1a642039e.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's my pick for MidKnights chart.

 

This is not so much a prediction as a preference for a particular scenario which could be joined with a 15m thales break when the top penetration failed (if) or some sort of breakout on penetrating the lows after the failure.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=19275&stc=1&d=1266277747

5aa70fd127054_2-16-20109-25-32AM.thumb.png.8d10e106c23d45f529db7da9d86dcf63.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.