Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

thalestrader

Reading Charts in Real Time

Recommended Posts

  MidKnight said:
It seems you are using the 123 definition to encompass anything that gives a first HL or LH - I am not as it was my understanding that a 123 was in the following sequence of a HH-HL-LH or LL-LH-HL.

 

I am not sure how we differ other than that you seem to have some criteria as to what makes a trend change sequence that I do not hold.

 

The term "123" has become a sort of easy short hand as this thread has progressed. But early on I used 123 to refer specifically and only to a reversal of the Trader Vic variety. Later in the thread, when I first posted the chart where I spelled out the highs and lows, I referred to those price indications that I trade as "sequences." I would perhaps prefer that we use the phrase "short sequence" and long sequence" rather than 123, but that is not the root of the problem here.

 

What I am saying is that H-L-LH (short sequence) or a L-H-HL (long sequence) can manifest itself at varying degrees of trend. By degree of trend, I am referring to extent or magnitude of price movement when price is followed as a continuous flow of activity (time is also a factor, though on the degrees of trend that manifest themselves intraday, time is much less a factor than when considering larger trends). I think you are concentrating on price as blocks of activity that exists in discrete units known as bars. You see inside bars. I see chop zones (chop zones, like the trade sequences themselves, exist at all and varying degrees of trend).

 

I do not advocate trading all such sequences, especially those of small degree. But if price is at an anticipated level of S/R, I often take a shot. As I have said, folks should take a week or two to do nothing but paper trade these sequences, identifying H's and L's. Perhaps I was a ssuming that from such an exercise wone would come to distinuish how price acts when a move has exhausted itself and this when to act on thse sequences or not. I think it has worked for some. But it has not worked for others. I do not know what to sugest next. I suspect that if this approach is not working for you, then there ,may be something in your experience that is preventing you from making it work,.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is the current look at the EURJPY. What is clear to me is that price has made a low, price has rallied off that low in an impulsive manner, and price is now pulling back from the rally high. This, what is clear to me is that price has done everything it needs to do to present a possible long sequence.

 

It is not guaranteed to trigger before price prints a lower low.

 

It may test the session low and then trigger.

 

It may make a lower low and reset the game clock, so to speak as there would no longer be a long sequence, but a further downtrend confirmation.

 

If it triggers, it is not guaranteed to go to the first target.

 

If it triggers, it may immediately reverse and fall to new session lows.

 

But, it is nonetheless clear that at this moment in time, everything is in place to get me long if price makes a new session high. Price has tested last week's low and found immediate support at that low, and price has a L-H-HL sequence potential at this point in time. Nothing else is guaranteed.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70fa86a19d_2010-01-17EURJPY1.thumb.jpg.5f651bb7e6b6dc4a1c2b6297294f3242.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
What I am saying is that H-L-LH (short sequence) or a L-H-HL (long sequence) can manifest itself at varying degrees of trend. By degree of trend, I am referring to extent or magnitude of price movement when price is followed as a continuous flow of activity (time is also a factor, though on the degrees of trend that manifest themselves intraday, time is much less a factor than when considering larger trends).

 

  thalestrader said:
I do not advocate trading all such sequences, especially those of small degree.

 

Hi Thales,

 

I think I am going to bow out of this discussion as I feel we haven't really made any progress on original discussion that all trend changes are preceded by a 123 and that 123s are an edge. To me, you seem to be mixing varying levels of degree to assert your statement, were as, I am saying that all trends do not reverse with a 123 of the same degree as the trend. I am also baffled how you can say 123s are an edge but you would not advocate trading all of them across their varying degrees. For if it was a true edge, one would want to be trading all of them unless one had extra filtering to enhance the edge.

 

  thalestrader said:
I think you are concentrating on price as blocks of activity that exists in discrete units known as bars. You see inside bars. I see chop zones (chop zones, like the trade sequences themselves, exist at all and varying degrees of trend).

 

No I am not, but when a 15m chart is posted it sure makes it a lot easier to communicate the chart due to its static nature.

 

With kind regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I find the success of a 123 to be confirmation of previous price behavior that signaled a possible trend change.The previous price behavior i look for is three pushes(or legs or drives).These pushes occur in a trend channel contained by a tl and a tcl(or ltl and rtl or whatever you want to call them).Thales calls this pattern a diagonal.I know them as wedges.Doesn't matter what you call them it's seeing them in real time that matters especially if at an important horizontal S/R price area.Once the third push touches or slightly overshoots the tcl and price reverses then i consider this a possible start of a trend change.For further confirmation of the trend change i need to see a strong counter trend response that pushes price out of the channel and clearly past the tl.Now i look for further confirmation of this possible trend change by how price reacts on the retest of the third push's extreme.I need a test that fails to exceed the extreme to again confirm a possible trend change.Next i need price to reverse and push back to the previous ct swing point.Finally all i need is for price to push past this swing point (trade entry one tick beyond swing point) and continue pushing in this direction for total confirmation that the trend has changed.Sometimes on the retest price pushes thru the extreme and the trend continues causing me to again look for three new pushes,a strong ct tl break out of the new channel,a failed retest of the new extreme and reversal push past the new swing point(triggering entry).Other times price slightly exceeds the extreme and reverses again setting up the need for more confirmation via another 123 for total confirmation of trend change.Hope that helps1263768727_59_UploadImage.png

Edited by patrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
I was thinking more of a business objective statement rather than a book. Assuming your goal is indeed to profit from your operations - what sort of profit do you expect and how would you like to acquire it? At the very least you might consider pondering those for a while, even if you think initially you already know the answers. There is something beyond mere technical considerations that is causing your difficulty, MK. I truly do believe the answer to your quandary is within you, and not ina anything I can do or say technically about the maner in which I trade.

 

You have to be willing to work on yourself.

 

There are other points in you post to which I will have to respond later.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

Before I quit my job as a programmer to trade full-time I purchased Van Tharps Peak Performance home study course and over the last 5 years I have worked through the entire course 3 times. Shortly after trading full-time there was some areas in Tharps course that didn't make sense to me (the parts integration stuff) so I contacted a local NLP consultant to guide me through the process. We did a few sessions together before I started doing it on my own. The huge majority of 'trading' books are psychology / motivational books. I own very little technical literature.

 

Is there more work I can do on myself? Absolutely! But that is true for anyone. I also feel that blaming ones psychology for lack of trading success is often an unfair scapegoat. If you read any of Steenbarger's stuff on traderfeed, he has written several times that all the proper psychology in the world won't matter if one is trading without an edge. It really is that simple. No edge, and it won't matter at all. If have an edge, then the psychology comes into play.

 

Yeah, I can do more work on myself, and maybe surprisingly to some, that is a part of why I trade - continuous self-improvement.

 

With kind regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
Here is the current look at the EURJPY...

 

As the pullback deepens, the sequence still lives, but I adjust my stop and targets based on the swing size and pullback depth.

 

By the way, I am long Jets.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70fa86fba5_2010-01-17EURJPY2.thumb.jpg.4a9d066e14991562f0575f9fd662132b.jpg

5aa70fa875549_2010-01-17EURJPY3.thumb.jpg.5b050f1ca7623759bb7f8f948bcf8da5.jpg

5aa70fa87aa2e_2010-01-17EURJPY4.thumb.jpg.de2fdc121e2b982bb24fb42f09ee66e8.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
It's almost as though your mind wants to fill in the rest of a decline that's yet to come, isn't it?

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

Sure looks like it. I don't follow that pair, so I don't know is thats a major R level from before or not. But the double top, followed by a LL and a LH and another LL, to me indicates trend reversal.

 

Or of course the whole thing could end up being a PB of the larger trend haha :confused:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  daedalus said:
So you boys trading CME futures tomorrow or scraping the day due to the holiday?

 

I wasn't planning on any trading until Tuesday. The girls have no school, so we were going to going to go to a science museum. I could tell by the look on my oldest daughter's face that she was not entirely thrilled with the idea. I asked her what she would like to do. Immediately she had a big smile and said, "I want to trade!"

 

So who knows. I won't be trading futures, but I may be sitting here watching her trade.

 

Anyway ... the GBPUSD sure looks like fun!

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70fa885471_2010-01-17GBPUSD3.thumb.jpg.28f0f28372c6832019005585c4757346.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  patrader said:
Moment of truth for retest on 6B.Will it be double top and reverse? or slightly higher high and reverse? or push thru and continue up?1263784563_63_UploadImage.png?

 

If I were the kind of guy who bet on such things, I'd be inclined to bet up.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Edited by thalestrader
typo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey guys,

 

I was reading through the whole MK/Thales discussion just now, and had a thought.

 

When I first became interested in trading, before I had actually ever traded or studied a chart, I went around seeking out people to talk with about it.

 

I had the privilege of meeting in person with a guy in his office who started and runs what is now a $5+ billion CTA. Yes, billion with a "b."

 

Our conversation was really brief...I mostly met with the guy in charge of "marketing"...the fund manager had been hit in the face with a tennis racket and was doped out on pain medication. :o

 

I probably made a fool of myself in that office...during that time, I was in the middle of reading my very first book about trading..."Trading for Dummies"---yes, that's right.

 

He later sent me an e-mail that I'll quote:

 

(talking about me wanting to be a trader...)

 

"The single thing that I recommend is to get a freaking clue about statistical learning, ie, quantitative prediction with data, data mining."

 

I asked for some recommended readings...

 

"I'd recommend these two books, with the first one being a much easier read:"

 

Amazon.com: Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, Second Edition (Morgan Kaufmann Series in Data Management Systems) (9780120884070): Ian H. Witten, Eibe Frank: Books

 

Amazon.com: The Elements of Statistical Learning (9780387952840): T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, J. H. Friedman: Books

 

I went through those books back then, and it seems it's basically a mix of the fields of computer science and statistics. I'm not sure of MK's background completely, but the computer programming reminded me of this.

 

All this to say...there's more than one route to huge success in this game. I think this approach isn't really fitting with MK, and that he seems to have some issues/disagreements with the concept and the logic behind it...which is totally fine..."different strokes for different folks."

 

Maybe this would be something he (or anyone else) would be interested in.

 

I dunno, just thought I'd throw that out there. :)

 

-Cory

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Cory2679 said:
I went through those books back then, and it seems it's basically a mix of the fields of computer science and statistics. I'm not sure of MK's background completely, but the computer programming reminded me of this.

 

All this to say...there's more than one route to huge success in this game. I think this approach isn't really fitting with MK, and that he seems to have some issues/disagreements with the concept and the logic behind it...which is totally fine..."different strokes for different folks."

 

Maybe this would be something he (or anyone else) would be interested in.

 

I dunno, just thought I'd throw that out there. :)

 

-Cory

 

Hi Cory,

 

Another book on the subject that I would wholeheartedly recommend is Evidence Based Technical Analysis by Dave Aronson. The stats approach is the only way to truly say there is an edge, otherwise any claims of edge are virtually assured to be distorted by discretion in real-time and under hindsight by various biases.

 

I've said in here many a time that I am all for discretion and I in fact embrace it my own trading. Your post here makes it seem as if my 'discussions' with Thales might be viewed as confrontational, but from my point of view, they are not. The questions are meant to try and dig a bit deeper into his thinking because I am sure his trading is as automatic as waking up in the morning and quite possibly what he thinks is so obvious it isn't worth explaining, well...it might be. Yeah, I do not agree with some of Thales assertions about 123s, but I don't think I have any issues with the concept or logic behind them - do I?

 

With regards to the approach fitting me or not, I'll let you know when I am through exploring.

 

All my best,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  MidKnight said:
Yeah, I do not agree with some of Thales assertions about 123s, but I don't think I have any issues with the concept or logic behind them - do I?

 

I didn't mean specifically "123s"...I just meant with Thales's trading approach as a whole.

 

  MidKnight said:
With regards to the approach fitting me or not, I'll let you know when I am through exploring.

 

All right! :)

 

-Cory

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.