Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

thalestrader

Reading Charts in Real Time

Recommended Posts

Hi Corey2679,

 

I just want to add that you seem to be on a good path. The only thing I want to mention is that on charts 2 and 4 you didn't draw any diagonal trend lines where the trend is obvious, and so is the trend break on the EU. (Is'nt that the main focus of Stikky Stock Charts?) Anyway.... I wish you extended luck with your trading.

 

Ektrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
Hi Cory,

 

Your charts look excellent. Also, I always felt that O'Neil does not give credit enough to Darvas. Isn't O'Neil's CANSLIM nothing more than a formalized version of Darvas's Technofundamentalist approach?

 

Good work, Cory. I think it is an excellent course of action, and it can only help your trading, even if you eventually change course. And it didn't cost you anything other than the price of the books and your own time and effort.

 

I hope it pays you great dividends over the coming weeks, months, and years.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

I wonder who Darvas didn't give credit to though Thales.

 

When I read the book I:

- enjoyed it immensely,

- noted the simplicity of style,

- note the pure luck that overcame his lack of discipline,

 

and now, wonder where his source was because he really didn't seem to be the sort of guy who created strategy - more flowed with it. I think O'Neil might be closer to Wyckoff than Darvas but I'd have to go back and read all 3 again to test that thought.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Kiwi said:
I wonder who Darvas didn't give credit to though Thales...and now, wonder where his source was because he really didn't seem to be the sort of guy who created strategy - more flowed with it.

 

"Darvas trained for the market just as methodically as he had studied his dancing, read some 200 books on the market and the great speculators, spent eight hours a day until saturated. Two of the books he rereads almost every week: Humphrey Neill's Tape Reading and Market Tactics and G. M. Loeb's The Battle for Investment Survival."

 

One could certainly do worse ... Loeb is among my favorites as well.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
Hi Folks,

 

Here is a series of charts from another Nat Gas trade, also from 2007. Again, whether you call it a 123 or an ABC, the concept is the same - a low, a high, a higher low, a buy.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

Hi Thales,

 

took the example in your 3rd chart to show a useful observation about 123 ( or ABC ).

This may already be known to members of this thread.

 

One can get a projection on a minimum target for the third move:

- draw a line from point 1 to point 3

- draw a parallel to this line of the same length

- move the parallel so that it starts at point 2

 

The endpoint of the parallel is a target which

- has the same distance from point 3 as point 2 has from point 1

- takes the same time to develop as the move from point 1 to point 2.

 

When the target is taken out earlier, a further upmove may follow as seen in your example.

5aa70f80a23e0_ThalesExample1.thumb.png.1ea9bd5ad909e2ebb50b012a887f84db.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Marko23 said:
Hi Thales,

 

took the example in your 3rd chart to show a useful observation about 123 ( or ABC ).

This may already be known to members of this thread.

 

One can get a projection on a minimum target for the third move:

- draw a line from point 1 to point 3

- draw a parallel to this line of the same length

- move the parallel so that it starts at point 2

 

The endpoint of the parallel is a target which

- has the same distance from point 3 as point 2 has from point 1

- takes the same time to develop as the move from point 1 to point 2.

 

When the target is taken out earlier, a further upmove may follow as seen in your example.

 

Memories. I learned this from a guy named JR Stevenson who used to pop in and out of various trading rooms way back in the early days of the internet. Last time I heard from him was back in 2006 when he sent me an email telling me that he was preparing to move from South Carolina to Memphis. I haven't heard from him since. All this to say that he is a real person who really trades. His book is available from Trader's Press. I own it myself, and it has a few tricks in it that are worth knowing, including something he calls a "cyclic trend line."

 

Good stuff, Marko. I do not utilize this simple channel technique nearly as often as I probably ought to do.

 

I have always wondered whether the method associated with JH didn't at some point have some interaction with JR (who was an old-timer from way back) given the similarity between JR's method and JH's "tapes, lateral, traverses" as well as certain uses of trendlines one finds in the various JH threads.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
... JR Stevenson... His book is available from Trader's Press. I own it myself, and it has a few tricks in it that are worth knowing, including something he calls a "cyclic trend line." ...

 

Thanks for this hint. I'll take a look at Trader's Press web site.

 

The projection is just another piece of the daily puzzle. I came accross it when I tried to find rules of thumb from the Elliott stuff. One important rule over there is: wave 3 of an impulse cannot be the smallest of waves 1, 3, and 5.

Therefore when I see C > 100%A it may be "3" > 100%"1" and a "5" may be following.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
Also, I always felt that O'Neil does not give credit enough to Darvas. Isn't O'Neil's CANSLIM nothing more than a formalized version of Darvas's Technofundamentalist approach?

 

I just ran across this post of yours from another thread that made me think of what you had said on this thread. Interesting.

 

  thalestrader said:
O'Neil has admitted to various inteviewers that it was Darvas's book that inspired his trading and the formulation of his famous CANSLIM approach.

 

-Cory

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The last four weeks or so the weekly Tokyo open as been an opportunity to seel the USD and the Yen and buy just about anything else - gold, oil, stocks, etc and so on.

 

If that practice continues, then the EJ and the EU have some clear buy points. If not, and instead we see USD and YEN buying and traders start selling everything else, then a break and hold of last weeks lows should be clear "starter's gun for some downside targets. The EU, should it break last week's 1.458x low and hold below it, should have a go at 1.4440 and down to 1.4325 (with some possible fib support at 1.4387) before any real buying might materialize. By the way, if either of these trigger, I would not let the trade run clear to the other side of the current trading ranges befoe pulling the plug.

 

At any rate, this may be an interesting few days (perhaps the last interesting days) before 2010. Don't forget there is a two day FOMC meeting. Often times this means if you want to trade any kind of short term moves, you had better do it in Tokyo, Frankfurt, or London, because the NY traders seem to freeze and pucker shut at the very thought of the FED crew sitting and sipping cappuccinos.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f81036ce_12-13-2009EJTokyo.thumb.jpg.55bff520101f9c03cee2e38ff71942f4.jpg

5aa70f810934e_12-13-2009EUTokyo.thumb.jpg.44527faa033c9bb13bb84c5301c06cc9.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
a break and hold of last weeks lows should be clear "starter's gun for some downside targets.

 

Sorry for the late post, but I'm watching the Eagles trying as hard as they can to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory against the Giants.

 

EJ has been a nice successive short. Just keep selling more and more until PT is hit.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f811eb1c_12-13-2009EJKeepGoingShort1.thumb.jpg.70c4ee20cfd4b1241fa54ddc495cecca.jpg

Edited by thalestrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thales so you would have entered around here on the eu. Did I hear you right about the last trade. Keep selling more and more(on the ej) So you wouldnt be just scaling out but you would be scaling in too! Please correct me if I am wrong.

 

eu38.thumb.jpg.bea5d86df85c69925bc52d54b046219f.jpg

 

 

Thanks

Don

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Don4 said:
Thales so you would have entered around here on the eu. Did I hear you right about the last trade. Keep selling more and more(on the ej) So you wouldnt be just scaling out but you would be scaling in too! Please correct me if I am wrong.

 

Thanks

Don

 

Hi Don,

 

Sorry, I didn't see your post as I am 90% focused on the Eagles game right now.

 

Sure, that looks good to buy the EU. I see Gabe also posted about a leak. I don't know what leaked, but at any rate, that would have been a good buy point for me but I wouldn't let it retrace too much below my buy point before I'd give up on it, but that's me.

 

As far as the EJ, it isn't really scaling in, as that implies a partial position at various levels to accumulate a full position. The way I look at it is like this: If I am short and I have a profit target at price level X, and I see nothing to make me think a bounce is anything more than a brief respite before the decline continues, then why not add to the position if I have a break even stop on the exiting position, and if a reasonable stop level on the new position is within our predefined risk levels, then why not add? If you have confidence in your entry and your targets, then show it, right?

 

At any rate, I had three shorts, and all three were stopped out at the break even level of the last entry.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
Memories. I learned this from a guy named JR Stevenson who used to pop in and out of various trading rooms way back in the early days of the internet. Last time I heard from him was back in 2006 when he sent me an email telling me that he was preparing to move from South Carolina to Memphis. I haven't heard from him since. All this to say that he is a real person who really trades. His book is available from Trader's Press. I own it myself, and it has a few tricks in it that are worth knowing, including something he calls a "cyclic trend line."

 

 

'Baldy' (JR) hung out for a while fairly recently (18 months ago?) in a trading room called Sanuk. I seem to remember him having some health issues a while back. I hope he is OK.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Gabe2004 said:
This is off topic but does anyone know of a timer for Ninjatrader that will sound an alarm 10 seconds before the end of the current bar?

 

Thanks

 

Gabe

 

 

you know it is OT... why don't you start a new thread ?

 

have you tried the search button !?!?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Thales,

 

Good afternoon!

 

I really like the simplicity of your method but sometimes I struggle to find the relevant swings. If you take a look at the attached chart, could you please let me know if you would consider the dotted lines to be valid breaks or if you wait for the "larger" swing area to break to place an order...

 

Many thanks for your help!!!

Leandro

StreamingServer.gif.5c5f9307f72a627e8a0820267a000746.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm watching the EJ this week...here's an annotated chart.

 

EDIT: The more I look at the PA for that first "setup" the more I think it may have been a break-even effort or just locking in some small profit. I doubt after that second attempt to touch profit I would have held on all the way back past BE. Also, on the short of the current PA, I may be inclined to take it with a tight stop...price would have to present a natural stop level that made the R:R more desirable.

 

We'll see what happens! I'm not trading this week...just watching...

 

EDIT2: I added a second chart with another possibility for a short...

 

-Cory

EJ.JPG.63904120bc21c1fb055ed4f569ca20d4.JPG

EJ2.JPG.734789ede9f5bea9f69173495915ea2b.JPG

Edited by Cory2679

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.