Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

thalestrader

Reading Charts in Real Time

Recommended Posts

 

To bring stuff back on track this is one of the good things about this thread. "Trading Charts in Real Time". You don't need blotters or what not you can see potential entries posted before hand (often way before they trigger). Usually a chart with the action that triggers them, and one of the real crux's of the matter (as I know you would agree Brown) which is management of the trade to exit. About the best you could hope to manage in a forum environment. Who cares whether it is real money sim or all fantasy....the trades speak for themselves.

 

Just about this thread, I appreciate that it is the ONLY thread that deals with the 'hard right edge.' Which is what trading is about. Not saying dead charts are useless or anything, as explaining things on them are sometimes necessary, but showing someone what the right edge looks like prior to a trade is an awesome perspective.

 

And that most trades posted are kind of swing/position trades lends itself well to be able to show someone your 'right edge read.'

 

So I am appreciative of all those that have put themselves out there showing what they see on their 'right edge read,' irrespective of whether that trade was a winner or loser.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

William O'Neil's How to Make Money in Stocks and the technical chapters of Frost and Prechter's Elliot Wave Theory. Nothing I can say or post will be able to replace the benefit you will get from reading and studying the material and then following along here to see how and where I may be applying it.

 

 

I think O'Neil was one of the first books I got long long time ago, certainly wont be the most recent edition. I did download a copy to the kindle last time I went for a break the charts where not so clear (not sure how to zoom only usually read stuff on it).

 

I did re-read the extract you posted from pretcher though was loath to. The concepts there (apart from the wave count stuff) like 'wedging' shortening of thrust, moves and corrections and all that good stuff have been written about by old timers like Livermore, Dunnigan, Gann, and more recently by people like Murphy and Edwards & Magee.

 

Anyway unless someone can tell me how to zoom on a kindle (increasing the font dosen't seem to zoom pictures) I'll pick up a new edition of O'Neil, you have been very clear how important you found it while I thought I understood his concepts perhaps I don't!!!

 

Anyway thank's for taking the time to answer in detail and post those charts, I'll try to ask better questions in future :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 6E is volatile! It's had like a 60ES equivalent range today. Anyway this chart isn't educational or helpful, but I took my first 6E trade today and it was wild so I thought I would share.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=16290&stc=1&d=1259953765

124.thumb.png.820fa3a7d4b0111eb10a18089778cc4b.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The 6E is volatile! It's had like a 60ES equivalent range today. Anyway this chart isn't educational or helpful, but I took my first 6E trade today and it was wild so I thought I would share.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=16290&stc=1&d=1259953765

 

You let a 50 pip profit turn into nothing.

That is a NONO :)

I think you should have kept something.

Gabe

 

PS. didn't see your comment in the chart. Didn't mean to beat you down. It was more for myself because I used to do things like that. (sometimes I still do)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You let a 50 pip profit turn into nothing.

That is a NONO :)

I think you should have kept something.

Gabe

 

PS. didn't see your comment in the chart. Didn't mean to beat you down. It was more for myself because I used to do things like that. (sometimes I still do)

 

I don't want to jack this thread at all, Thales is showing us all such great stuff and this is a hot topic so I will keep this brief. In my book, trailing stops are a no-no. I used to scale out at strategic points, then one day a mentor challenged me to compare my results to all in- all out and I did. All in/out was by far the most profitable, though it did also show the biggest drawdowns.

 

The real reason I was scaling out was because it was emotionally difficult for me to watch a large gain turn into a loss. For me, it was impossible for me to let my winners run on a consistent basis while scaling or trailing. It just never worked. The only purpose they served was to make me feel better on the inside lol.

 

Since then I've been all in/out, though I'm sure I will start scaling again one day just for pure peace of mind. But for now, what feels good emotionally isn't a priority.

 

I challenge you to go back to all your trades and look- see what would have happened if you had been all in/out. My guess is that you will be surprised. I've met a few people who's scaling strategy works out better than all in/out, but in my experience the vast majority (including me) all in/out is the most profitable, but perhaps the most mentally difficult.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed. Its a choice and the choice depends on what your goals are and they include how you feel.

 

I learned this testing systems years ago. One of the few really good eod systems I bought waited with a $1500 stop until a substantial profit existed before it even started to tighten. It usually exited on a reversal signal. I added different capture processes but it never helped to tighten early. However, optimum profit is rarely the key goal for a discretionary trader.

 

Whichever approach one takes ... the 100%, must do, important thing is "Do the same thing EVERY time."

 

The thing that kills you is either trying to optimize the trade or reacting to the last trade(s). Following your !@####@! rules :2c:

 

 

I don't want to jack this thread at all, Thales is showing us all such great stuff and this is a hot topic so I will keep this brief. In my book, trailing stops are a no-no. I used to scale out at strategic points, then one day a mentor challenged me to compare my results to all in- all out and I did. All in/out was by far the most profitable, though it did also show the biggest drawdowns.

 

The real reason I was scaling out was because it was emotionally difficult for me to watch a large gain turn into a loss. For me, it was impossible for me to let my winners run on a consistent basis while scaling or trailing. It just never worked. The only purpose they served was to make me feel better on the inside lol.

 

Since then I've been all in/out, though I'm sure I will start scaling again one day just for pure peace of mind. But for now, what feels good emotionally isn't a priority.

 

I challenge you to go back to all your trades and look- see what would have happened if you had been all in/out. My guess is that you will be surprised. I've met a few people who's scaling strategy works out better than all in/out, but in my experience the vast majority (including me) all in/out is the most profitable, but perhaps the most mentally difficult.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Agreed. Its a choice and the choice depends on what your goals are and they include how you feel.

 

I learned this testing systems years ago. One of the few really good eod systems I bought waited with a $1500 stop until a substantial profit existed before it even started to tighten. It usually exited on a reversal signal. I added different capture processes but it never helped to tighten early. However, optimum profit is rarely the key goal for a discretionary trader.

 

Whichever approach one takes ... the 100%, must do, important thing is "Do the same thing EVERY time."

 

The thing that kills you is either trying to optimize the trade or reacting to the last trade(s). Following your !@####@! rules :2c:

 

 

Agreed 100%.

 

One thing I've been doing from the very beginning is religiously following my rules. Of course in the beginning my rules were horrible and I wasn't profitable as a result, but as my rules have gotten better, I have gotten better. Hopefully as my rules improve now I will get more and more profitable. One day I will yield to the mental ease of scaling out, but giving in to my mind wasn't something I wanted to get into the habit of doing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I challenge you to go back to all your trades and look- see what would have happened if you had been all in/out. My guess is that you will be surprised..

 

I couldn't agree with you more! If it weren't for the psychological barrier of trading the way I have observed in your journal, everyone would be doing it. I do think the 'lofty' targets and all in/out is an excellent approach, it's just hard for a lot to deal with watching a big winning trade evaporate into a BE or a loss.

 

Like you mentioned when I look back at all my trades, if I would have held tight, I'd probably be unhappier short term, but overall thrilled at the results at the end of each month.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The 6E is volatile! It's had like a 60ES equivalent range today

 

Hi John,

 

It's going to be as this is pretty much one of the most volatile regular reports released in currency land aside from maybe interest rates. The number was a big surprise too, so that helps exaggerate things ;)

 

With kind regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The markets are imperfect. I am imperfect. Can I assume I am so good that a single entry and exit are perfect enough? Maybe. Can I accept the volatility of my equity curve and the risk of ruin with a single entry/exit approach? If I accept I am imperfect, maybe I can smooth out the volatility in my equity curve, reduce the risk of ruin and manage risk more effectively (risk from an overall style point of view) by allowing myself both multiple entries and exits. I accept my imperfection and do not need to squeeze out every point on a trade. My goal is to make money trading, not perfectly enter at the low and perfectly exit at the high. I accept the market is imperfect, after all, it is made up of many imperfect people. The market is grey, not black and white.

 

That is my point of view, I'm not trying to change anyone who is into all in/out type of trading.

 

With kind regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
One day I will yield to the mental ease of scaling out, but giving in to my mind wasn't something I wanted to get into the habit of doing.

 

 

I also would not wish to change your mind, Jon, or anyone's for that matter. I would simply offer that someone viewing your trade management of this particular trade might wonder at the fact that you risked and lost 50 ticks open profit in the hope of gaining only an additional 15 ticks. Knowing that you do not enter a trade unless you feel that your analysis allows for a reasoable expection of a 1:1 risk/reward, then some might wonder if it might be prudent, rather than "giving into your mind," if one were to adjust one's stop from time to time to a point commensurate with the hoped for additional gain.

 

Again, I am not criticizing your trade management. I'm just offering another perspective. While I do believe there are certain aspects of trading, and life itself, for that matter, that do yield to right and wrong distinctions, this is not one of them. Thank you for sharing this trade with us.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I also would not wish to change your mind, Jon, or anyone's for that matter. I would simply offer that someone viewing your trade management of this particular trade might wonder at the fact that you risked and lost 50 ticks open profit in the hope of gaining only an additional 15 ticks. Knowing that you do not enter a trade unless you feel that your analysis allows for a reasoable expection of a 1:1 risk/reward, then some might wonder if it might be prudent, rather than "giving into your mind," if one were to adjust one's stop from time to time to a point commensurate with the hoped for additional gain.

 

Again, I am not criticizing your trade management. I'm just offering another perspective. While I do believe there are certain aspects of trading, and life itself, for that matter, that do yield to right and wrong distinctions, this is not one of them. Thank you for sharing this trade with us.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

 

Good point Thales. I've often thought about that when my target is 1 tick away, "how much am I risking for this 1 tick?". But you are right, in that I did risk 50 ticks for an additional 15.

 

Unfortunately for my PnL, but fortunately for the discussion, this trade also provided us with an example of trailing. I did in effect trail my stop when I moved it to BE. I can't recall if my stop was 8 or 10 ticks, but in order to protect that I moved my stop to BE. Price then rallied to 1 tick above BE, stopping me out and costing me the 65 ticks. This is an example of why, for a long time, I didn't even move the stop to BE. That one little trail to BE cost me 65 ticks.

 

But we could go nuts talking about this, as was mentioned, there is no right way. I just know that for me all in/out is more profitable, so that's what I stick to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Weekend Reading

 

 

Whichever approach one takes ... the 100%, must do, important thing is "Do the same thing EVERY time."

 

The thing that kills you is either trying to optimize the trade or reacting to the last trade(s). Following your !@####@! rules :2c:

 

 

Hi Folks,

 

This weekend I offer an old Ed Seykota interview from an old issue of S&C magazine, and a link to an old Time Magazine interview with Nicolas Darvas.

 

Business: Nicolas Darvas Pas de Dough - TIME

 

A favorite of mine form Ed Seykota is when he tells us that "I have many rules and some higher laws. Some of the rules are: Trade with the long-term trend. Cut your losses. Let your profits ride. Bet as much as you can handle and no more."

 

And from Darvas, "I have no ego in the stock market," he says. "If I make a mistake I admit it immediately and get out fast."

 

 

Listen to Kiwi: Follow your rules!

 

Have a wonderful weekend!

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

ed-seykota-of-technical-tools.pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
To bring stuff back on track this is one of the good things about this thread. "Trading Charts in Real Time". You don't need blotters or what not you can see potential entries posted before hand (often way before they trigger). Usually a chart with the action that triggers them, and one of the real crux's of the matter (as I know you would agree Brown) which is management of the trade to exit. About the best you could hope to manage in a forum environment. Who cares whether it is real money sim or all fantasy....the trades speak for themselves.

 

If you were to ask me, I'd have to say this is a pretty special thread, as far as internet forums go. I know that just the act of posting a potential trade causes some folks to experience the same "fear of loss" due to having made their judgment public as they experience form actually being in the trade itself.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The 6E is volatile! It's had like a 60ES equivalent range today. Anyway this chart isn't educational or helpful, but I took my first 6E trade today and it was wild so I thought I would share.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=16290&stc=1&d=1259953765

 

If that was the plan then good job anyway! EDIT: I see from subsequent posts it was so good job.

 

This comment is easy to make with hindsight......After the entry bar there was a 3 bar correction, I would have been inclined to move the stop above that. Also there was a 1 2 3 against your position just after that. Each are perfectly valid.

Edited by BlowFish

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Thales! Wouldnt it be far simplier (cant spell) to trade your system off of the hourly charts? Just wondering!

 

eu30.thumb.jpg.06f5c2d3ae8a5e167e846005a922bbfc.jpg

 

eu31.thumb.jpg.4a55343dd05609a2070e18efda0d511e.jpg

 

Thanks

Don

Edited by Don4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The principles discussed in this thread apply also to German Bund Future; a 10y treasury future; 1 tick or 0.01 point is 10€.

 

An inner Darvas box is formed by points 1, 1a, 2, 2a .

An outer Darvas box is formed by levels 4 and 5 .

 

When one goes short at 3, the intension is to cross level 4. Therefore the stop has to be at level 5 not at 3a, which belongs to the inner box.

 

After crossing 4, the stop moves to level 3a.

 

One had to start on Tuesday for "U.S. numbers" on Friday.

FGBL-03.thumb.png.2f19c213b23a62609ac20db0c49dd982.png

Edited by Marko23
Hint for Friday down

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The principles discussed in this thread apply also to German Bund Future; a 10y treasury future; 1 tick or 0.01 point is 10€.

 

An inner Darvas box is formed by points 1, 1a, 2, 2a .

An outer Darvas box is formed by levels 4 and 5 .

 

When one goes short at 3, the intension is to cross level 4. Therefore the stop has to be at level 5 not at 3a, which belongs to the inner box.

 

After crossing 4, the stop moves to level 3a.

 

Could you post a 4hour chart or a Day chart.

 

Thanks

Don

Edited by Don4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The next smaller time scale offers similar opportunities.

 

If one trusts the top at 1a, 2a, one can enter a cascaded Short with the downtrend in the next higher time scale as the trader's friend.

 

In this situation, the stop for Short at 2b and Short at 3 is the level 1a, 2a.

 

The Short at 2b is one degree lower than the Short at 3.

FGBL-05.thumb.png.2f283b9e50687c02fa6a88c3dda70314.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.