Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

thalestrader

Reading Charts in Real Time

Recommended Posts

  Cory2679 said:
Talking about similiar/identical situations makes me think of the Paul Tudor Jones movie, "Trader," and the correlation between the 1980's charts and the 1920's charts...over 90% correlation. Crazy.

 

I've been lucky enough to meet PTJ via video conference, by the way! :D

 

:cool:

Send me an autograph. :)

I am looking for that video now

 

Gabe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  MidKnight said:
Or the people on the minus side are not posting....

 

 

You are probably right.

Why don't you come back and give it a try for another 2-3 weeks.

Thales said in two of his posts to me that I am really close only to lose 1/3 of my account.

I am sure I am close and these are just minor setbacks.

We have a great family here (and just like in any family we have disagreements and friction) but I'd rather be in my family which I know and most of the time I feel good there, than somewhere else alone.

 

Gabe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
Here is how we managed our missed entry. As I said, we bought at market and the fill was 1.65429. We then added twice as price moved in our favor. We now have three positions with an average buy of 1.65494, with a stop on each at 1.6560. We have PT1 limits on the two "first-in" positions at 1.6590, with a limit on the third position at 1.6645.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

I'd be curious to know how you were adjusting your stop loss after each add. Actually, now that I re-read your post about entering at 1.65429, it doesn't mention where your stop loss was. Could you expand on how you initially placed your stop when the market is running away from you and how you altered that stop on each successive add? Thanks.

 

With kind regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Cory2679 said:
For example, if one of those trades that Thales posted as "trying to get a loser" was a loser, you might say "Oh, that was a loser BECAUSE OF such and such on that chart, and I won't take a trade like that.", when really it may have been just fine to get into.

 

Just to be clear, I am not going to post a flawed opportunity in order to post a losing trade.

 

Losing trades are inevitable.

 

I have posted losing efforts here in this thread, and I will continue to do so.

 

Today I posted two opportunities. I thought the GU was a good long opportunity (if triggered), and I thought the EJ short that I posted was a good short opportunity (if triggered). The GU long triggered, and the EJ short did not. And the trade that triggered turned out to be a winning effort. I posted each opportunity prior to the entry being triggered.

 

I am not "cherry picking" after the fact trades to post here. Except for when I post an historical trade to make a point, I do not post opportunities unless I can do so prior to entry triggering, or soon thereafter in terms of both time and price. This thread is about reading price in real time. I cannot predict which opportunities will not trigger and which will trigger, and of those that do trigger, I cannot predict before hand which will result in a loss, which in a win, and which will be break even efforts.

 

So, when I say I'm trying to get a losing trade for Don, I mean to convey the notion that all a losing trade is to me is an opportunity that did not move in my favor, and it will happen eventually, and soon no doubt, so long as I keep taking my swings.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
Stopped at 1.6449 so +26.1 and +25 = +25.5 more or less. Not a bad afternoon.

My only disappointment is that I was hoping for a losing trade per Don's request as I am very curious to find out why he requested, specifically, a losing trade.

 

Best Wishes,

Thales

 

:applaud: I hope all your trades are winners.

 

 

Don

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  MidKnight said:
I'd be curious to know how you were adjusting your stop loss after each add. Actually, now that I re-read your post about entering at 1.65429, it doesn't mention where your stop loss was. Could you expand on how you initially placed your stop when the market is running away from you and how you altered that stop on each successive add? Thanks.

 

With kind regards,

MK

 

We have a 10 tick stop defaulted on the double click entry orders. So, on the initial entry, and each subsequent entry (all market orders), there was an initial ten tick stop. After that, I think you can follow the posts to see where the stop was trailed.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Gabe2004 said:
You are probably right.

Why don't you come back and give it a try for another 2-3 weeks.

 

Hi Gabe,

 

I'm still around, but I just don't have a need in posting my short comings day after day. I'm sorry to disappoint the posters at TL that only like to comment when a person is in pain.

 

Congratulations on a solid days trade.

 

With kind regards,

MK

Edited by MidKnight

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  MidKnight said:
Hi Gabe,

 

I'm still around, but I just don't have a need in posting my short comings day after day. I'm sorry to disappoint the posters at TL that only like to comment when a person is in pain.

 

Congratulations on a solid days trade.

 

With kind regards,

MK

 

I am not sure what you meant by "comment when a person is in pain" but if it was a sarcastic remark I doubt that you are right.

I believe that most of us here would sniff out such people and soon enough they would be gone from this thread.

Just to clarify.

My trades today were not real. Not even paper.

They were an excersize in following the rules.

Within the next few days, I will enter some trades in my real account.

BTW all the trades that I have posted that have triangles and squares in them were with real $. Not alot but real nevertheless.

 

Bottom line - it's good that you are still here.

Gabe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Gabe2004 said:
Stopped out.

Would have made 2x16 pips had this been a real trade.

 

Gabe

 

Moved my stop too fast but at the time it looked like a good idea.

Should have kept it where it is now.

Again - I would have been out of this trade. Look at the post refferenced above.

 

Gabe

 

PS the stop should have been moved after the firts target was hit (in hind sight)

EJ_Nov_30_2009_15min-20.thumb.png.c2bc990b05d866a36529775d5bb2db60.png

EJ_Nov_30_2009_15min-21.thumb.png.a734c7df21e7aef3c6eb4ad25c4676f6.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  MidKnight said:
Or the people on the minus side are not posting....

 

  thalestrader said:
If you are struggling to learn it, do not struggle alone. Speak up! Help is right here, and it won't cost you anything but to raise your hand and ask for it.

 

If we can't hear you, we can't help you.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  MidKnight said:
I'm sorry to disappoint the posters at TL that only like to comment when a person is in pain.

 

I didn't get the sense that anyone was relishing in your pain or the pain of anyone else, for that matter. This has struck me as rather positive and supportive bunck of folks, as a matter of fact. What happened here that made you feel as you do?

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok Thales, Maybe I should give your system a honest try. I truly dont believe that I was knocking it but I have never had much luck with stops. I want everybody to know that I will be using a demo on a 5min timeframe. And that I will only be trading eu. So with that said here is my first trade.

 

eu8.thumb.jpg.b6b18d04817679b5c73fc430143a275c.jpg

 

eu9.thumb.jpg.cd2f70b6b228893844a80ab12416e2eb.jpg

 

Don

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Don4 said:
Ok Thales, Maybe I should give your system a honest try. I truly dont believe that I was knocking it but I have never had much luck with stops. I want everybody to know that I will be using a demo on a 5min timeframe. And that I will only be trading eu. So with that said here is my first trade.

 

 

I didn't say you were knocking it. I just thought that your request that I post a losing trade somewhat off the mark. After all, if I am posting the trades either before the entry triggers or soon thereafter, how can I determine before the trade is over whether or not I am posting a losing trade or a winning trade?

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
I didn't say you were knocking it. I just thought that your request that I post a losing trade somewhat off the mark. After all, if I am posting the trades either before the entry triggers or soon thereafter, how can I determine before the trade is over whether or not I am posting a losing trade or a winning trade?

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

You cant, but I will soon see. So how much of a move would you wait till the next trade. 50-100pips. Is that about right?

 

Thanks

Don

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Gabe2004 said:
:cool:

Send me an autograph. :)

I am looking for that video now

 

Gabe

 

I'm sure you may have already found it, but here's a link to a site that's showing it I found on TL...

 

Trader -Paul Tudor Jones_ÔÚÏßÊÓƵ¹Û¿´_ÍÁ¶¹ÍøÊÓƵ 45

 

Anyone who hasn't seen it should watch it. Really cool. *EDIT: Mostly for entertainment/motivational purposes...it doesn't really teach you how to trade or anything...

 

*EDIT: For anyone who might not be familiar with PTJ, he's well known for his prediction of the 1987 market crash, and he talks about it in the video (this video was before the crash)...it's part of what's cool about the video...

 

-Cory

Edited by Cory2679

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
Just to be clear, I am not going to post a flawed opportunity in order to post a losing trade.

 

Oh yes, I know. That was never unclear. :)

 

I sort of took it as a little bit of a joke when you kept saying you were trying for a losing trade.

 

-Cory

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.