Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

thalestrader

Reading Charts in Real Time

Recommended Posts

The analogy I use when I'm teaching people goes like this ...

 

Perhaps one of the most valuable posts I've read if one accepts the truth contained within, not least of which is this:

 

People cannot be fully spoon-fed skills.

 

It takes practice, practice, practice.

 

A wonderful post, Richard. Thank you.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You will short circuit your progress and short change yourself by continually looking for short cuts.

 

A summary of Plato written anonymously on a publically edited and editable web site is hardly a substitute for reading Plato for yourself.

 

 

My girlfriends grandmother learnt Russian to read war and peace "as it should be read" (to quote her).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
For the record, my daughter was never under any threat of punishment, and she was free to give up at any time if she had found the activity boring, uninteresting, or burdensome in any way.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

I wonder whether having implicit trust is something to do with it? I think one of the reasons people have difficulty with trading (in general) is that whilst they acknowledge certain 'truths' they don't completely and unconditionally accept them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I wonder whether having implicit trust is something to do with it? I think one of the reasons people have difficulty with trading (in general) is that whilst they acknowledge certain 'truths' they don't completely and unconditionally accept them.

 

I think that is true, and as you and I have both said early on, and others have more recently offered, she did not have a brainful of baggage to contend with as most of us do by the time we get to a place such as this.

 

And of course, another factor in her favor is that she was all about the ticks won vs. lost, and not concerned with making money or losing money. Not too long ago, MidK posted about his struggles and wondered about our weekly PnL. I thought after that that it does more harm and no good to post PnL figures in dollar terms, so any PnL I may mention going forward will be strictly in terms of ticks(pips) won/lost, and not dollar terms. After all, the focus should be on capturing more pips of price movement than one loses. The money will follow.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My girlfriends grandmother learnt Russian to read war and peace "as it should be read" (to quote her).

 

There is much to be said for reading an author in his or her own language, though I do believe a careful and sensitive translator can convey the author's intent (I'm one of those old fashioned folks who think that a writer's intended meaning can be accessible to the reader, even across time and culture). At the same time, a careless translator, or worse, a translator with a certain ideological agenda, can destroy a text beyond recognition in the process of translating. If one were to read Jowett's Republic, and then the Allen Bloom translation, one might find come away feeling that one or the other got something wrong given the differences. By the way, I'd argue that Bloom got it right.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Richard,

 

What were/are you teaching?

 

I ask because you seem to be talking about one style of teaching/learning and its not necessarily completely applicable to trading.

 

Years back I learned to ski. And over time I improved my skiing and like many applied the 1-2 lesson per year approach. Like traders, skiers arrived at instructors with their own baggage (the pain of large crashes, broken bones, the impact of previous styles of skiing and teaching).

 

When we started the Austrians held sway and teaching was as you described. Over time we went through french, american, and even zen influences. Over time, less intellectual and more effective techniques were developed and an important element was less talk and more modeling and shaping. Watch, do, "try pressing down a little with your big toe", wow. Very personal and very effective.

 

 

Discretionary trading is not unlike skiing. Good days truly flow down a slope of unending opportunity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I............... I thought after that that it does more harm and no good to post PnL figures in dollar terms, so any PnL I may mention going forward will be strictly in terms of ticks(pips) won/lost, and not dollar terms................

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

I wonder if that is because your daughters account is larger than yours now :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A good start for the week.

44 pips on EJ with 1 unit only.

Reason was - potential closing of the gap which happens many times on Sunday.

For the rest of the week I will trade/annotate the EJ only as per the system of this thread.

 

Gabe

EJ_Nov_29_2009_15min.thumb.png.1e91cbdd4d3b2289b7137c3371c7f219.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And of course, another factor in her favor is that she was all about the ticks won vs. lost, and not concerned with making money or losing money. Not too long ago, MidK posted about his struggles and wondered about our weekly PnL. I thought after that that it does more harm and no good to post PnL figures in dollar terms, so any PnL I may mention going forward will be strictly in terms of ticks(pips) won/lost, and not dollar terms. After all, the focus should be on capturing more pips of price movement than one loses. The money will follow.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

Hi,

 

I don't recall this exactly, but whatever....I think I've always posted any results from this exploration in average pips per trade (accounting for partial exits over the entire position). I may have commented on the Thales Family Trading Co % gains, but not dollars.

 

Anyways, it is with regret that I posted my struggles here and should have known better than to do so in public on the Internet. The exploration has been somewhat beneficial though, so maybe a case of no pain, no gain.

 

With kind regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Was the Russian version the first one she read?

 

Gabe

 

She (my GF) believes that she (her Grandmother) first read it in German or possibly Rumanian but had a smattering of Russian already.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
it is with regret that I posted my struggles here and should have known better than to do so in public on the Internet

 

I don't understand the REGRET part.

No one knows who you are.

You were honest with yourself and that is what counts.

I don't know if you were around when I wiped out 1/3 of my account and I was hesitant to post that fact.

But I did.

I told myself that that is the honest thing to do.

For myself and for the rest of the people that saw me gain day after day only to give it back and then some.

 

I am sure that deep inside you feel better. Especcially after Thales commented on your trades (hopefully that was of some benefit)

 

Don't leave us because I will be left alone to call a spade a spade :)

 

Gabe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

......Anyways, it is with regret that I posted my struggles here...

 

I'm sorry to hear that, I am not quite sure why you would feel that. I got something from your posts if that is any consolation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Anyways, it is with regret that I posted my struggles here

 

I am sorry to hear that, MidK. It certainly has not been my intent to cause anyone regret, and if you feel I have been picking on you, I apologize. You were kind enough to offer us a most honest and comprehensive view of what you were experiencing, and thus I perhaps over used your example.

 

I hope we don't lose you, but I understand your feelings and I appreciate your contributions here.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
She (my GF) believes that she (her Grandmother) first read it in German or possibly Rumanian but had a smattering of Russian already.

 

I thought so.

My father was 1st violin in a phylharmonic orchestra back in the country that I was born in.

When I was a child I really disliked classical music. Especially violin.

I thought it sounded harsh.

I prefered Elvis, The Shadows, Deep Purple and the likes - music which my father called BANGA BANGA because of the rhythm.

So one day I called him to listen to a guitar section of Highway Star.

I thought that my father will ridicule me again but he said that he is really impressed because the motive is classical.

Then Beethoven's 40th came out as Joy To the World and became a big hit and some others.

I LOVE classical music today. and eventhough it represnts only about 15% of my CD collection if I would have to take 10 cd to a deserted island, probably more than half would be classical and sound tracks (which in my case fall into the same category)

 

The point I am trying to make is that sometimes the way to the original is through the backdoor and thinking that the fake, the immitation, the proccessed version has not relevance is a mistake.

 

Be it music, litrature, furniture or other art forms.

 

If I cannot afford Dali in my house should I not hang a poster of a Dali or Rembrandt, or Escher just because they are not originals?

Should I look down on someone because they like a second class form of expression?

 

Gabe

 

So here is that famous piece :)

Highway Star.mp3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Could you post some losing trades? Thanks, Don

 

We'll give it a try ...

 

GU with a sell stop at 1.6469, go to break even at 1.6436, with PT's at 1.6420 and 1.6369;

 

or

 

GU with a buy stop at 1.6507, go to break even at 1.6526, with PT's at 1.6557 and 1.6607

 

This thing is really rattling around.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f705c813_11-29-2009GUAsiaShort1.thumb.jpg.fe3e63d31620cbb78317b00e9052e99c.jpg

5aa70f7061be7_11-29-2009GUAsiaLong1.thumb.jpg.9fd4b0426a91ababf588a042adfe93f2.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GU with a buy stop at 1.6507, go to break even at 1.6526, with PT's at 1.6557 and 1.6607

 

The Gain data through Ninjatrader shows a 1.6525 high on that little pop, but our broker shows a high of 1.65262, so we are going to break even on this trade.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f706775b_11-29-2009GUAsiaLongBreakeven1.thumb.jpg.7b00e3613b0b2952e483d394b77bc7c7.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
... awaiting the next opportunity.

 

Hi folks,

 

My daughter and I were saying good night to her little brother and we missed the entry on this opportunity.

 

Buy stop 1.6528, go to break even at 1.6557, PT1 1.6590, PT2 1.6645.

 

We're in, but not at 1.6528. We bought at market 1.65429. It happens.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f706f176_11-29-2009GUAsiaLongLateentry1.thumb.jpg.7a56fbad9fd9dd053352dae039ce1402.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A break even effort, and awaiting the next opportunity.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

I took this trade!

 

I handled it kinda funny, though...

 

I'm trading the 6B...My initial buy stop was @ 1.6513, with a S/L of 1.6470, with a PT of 1.6554...

 

Pulled out for BE (actually an average of 0.5 ticks of profit)..

 

BTW, got slipped 2 ticks on my entry...geez... EDIT: It was actually 1.5 ticks.

 

THEN, I actually placed a buy stop at 1.6534 (the "high", ie where Thales got BE, was 1.6530 on my chart), so a print of 1.6534 would mean a significant breakout of the high...

 

Then I got filled, put my S/L at 1.6513 (what would have been BE on my original trade), and my PT at the original 1.6554 (about a 1:1 R/R situation).

 

Got profit...ended up with 20.5 ticks of profit between both of the trades.

 

I guess I could have put my second trade buy stop @ 1.6531, but I picked 34 just because it was right in the middle between my original entry of 13 and my original PT of 54.

 

I normally wouldn't handle a trade this way but it seemed reasonable in the moment, and turned out well.

 

-Cory

 

EDIT: It would have probably been more prudent to take the trade Thales just mentioned, rather than doing what I did. Oh well...I think I was a little distracted because I was thinking about the trade I was just in, rather than looking for the next opportunity. Even though it worked just fine this time, and I think my handling of it was all right, I need to forget old trades and move on to new opportunities...

Edited by Cory2679

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I handled it kinda funny, though... It would have probably been more prudent to take the trade Thales just mentioned, rather than doing what I did. Oh well...I think I was a little distracted because I was thinking about the trade I was just in, rather than looking for the next opportunity. Even though it worked just fine this time, and I think my handling of it was all right, I need to forget old trades and move on to new opportunities...

 

Here is how we managed our missed entry. As I said, we bought at market and the fill was 1.65429. We then added twice as price moved in our favor. We now have three positions with an average buy of 1.65494, with a stop on each at 1.6560. We have PT1 limits on the two "first-in" positions at 1.6590, with a limit on the third position at 1.6645.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f7071b45_11-29-2009GUAsiaLongLateentry2.jpg.e204126de4f71bf7dcc641a86b6435f7.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone on here that trades currency futures generally trade the Tokyo session with them?

 

This is my first time tonight, and it seems like overall, the volume, spreads, and slippage (all related, of course) are much less favorable.

 

That's not just based on my experience tonight...I've scrolled back through charts with volume plotted and Tokyo is substantially lower...London tooks all right and defintiely the first half of the NY session...

 

Not to mention, tonight seems like a relatively high volume night compared to some other Tokyo sessions...I could be mistaken though, I didn't do THAT much research.

 

Thanks,

Cory

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Date: 8th April 2025.   Markets Rebound Cautiously as US-China Tariff Tensions Deepen     Global markets staged a tentative recovery on Tuesday following a wave of volatility sparked by escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. The Asia-Pacific region showed signs of stability after a chaotic start to the week—though some pockets remained under pressure. Taiwan’s Taiex dropped 4.4%, dragged lower by losses in tech heavyweight TSMC. The world’s largest chipmaker fell another 4% on Tuesday and has now slumped 13.5% since April 2, when US President Donald Trump first unveiled what he called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.   However, broader sentiment across the region turned more positive, with several markets rebounding sharply after Monday’s dramatic sell-offs. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged over 6% in early trading, rebounding from an 18-month low. South Korea’s Kospi rose marginally, and Australia’s ASX 200 gained 1.9%, driven by strength in mining stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.6%, though still far from recovering from Monday’s 13.2% crash—its worst day since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. China’s Shanghai Composite added 0.9%.   In Europe, DAX and FTSE 100 are up more than 1% in opening trade. EU Commission President von der Leyen repeated yesterday that the EU had offered reciprocal zero tariffs on manufactured goods previously and continues to stand by that offer. Others are also trying again to talk to Trump to get some sort of agreement that limits the impact.   Much of the rally appeared to be driven by dip-buying, as well as hopes that the intensifying trade war could still be defused through negotiations.   China Strikes Back: ‘We Will Fight to the End’   Tensions reached a boiling point after Trump threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on all Chinese imports unless Beijing rolled back its retaliatory measures by April 8. ‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow... the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50%,’ Trump declared on social media.   If implemented, the new tariffs would bring total US duties on Chinese goods to a staggering 124%, factoring in the existing 20%, the 34% recently announced, and the proposed 50%.   In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a stern warning, stating: ‘The US threat to escalate tariffs is a mistake on top of a mistake... If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.’ The ministry also called for equal and respectful dialogue, though signs of compromise on either side remain scarce.   Beijing acted quickly to contain a market fallout. State funds intervened to support equities, and the People’s Bank of China set the yuan fixing at its weakest level since September 2023 to boost export competitiveness. Additionally, five-year interest rate swaps in China fell to their lowest levels since 2020, indicating potential for further monetary easing.   Trump Talks Tough on EU Too   Trump’s hardline approach extended beyond China. Speaking at a press conference, he rejected the European Union’s offer to eliminate tariffs on cars and industrial goods, accusing the bloc of ‘being very bad to us.’ He insisted that Europe would need to source its energy from the US, claiming the US could ‘knock off $350 billion in one week.’   The EU, meanwhile, backed away from a proposed 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey, opting instead for 25% duties on selected US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs.     Volatile Wall Street Adds to the Drama   Wall Street experienced wild swings on Monday as investors processed the rapidly evolving trade conflict. The S&P 500 briefly fell 4.7% before rebounding 3.4%, nearly erasing its losses in what could have been its biggest one-day jump in years—if it had held. The Dow Jones Industrial Average sank by as much as 1,700 points early in the day but later climbed nearly 900 points before closing 349 points lower, down 0.9%. The Nasdaq ended up 0.1%.   The brief rally was fueled by a false rumour that Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs—rumours that the White House quickly labelled ‘fake news.’ The market's sharp reaction underscored how desperate investors are for any sign that tensions might ease.   Oil Markets in Focus: Goldman Sachs Revises Forecasts   Crude prices also reflected the uncertainty, with US crude briefly dipping below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021. As of early Tuesday, Brent crude was trading at $64.72, while WTI hovered around $61.26.   Goldman Sachs, in a note dated April 7, lowered its average price forecasts for Brent and WTI through 2025 and 2026, citing mounting recession risks and the potential for higher-than-expected supply from OPEC+.       Under a base-case scenario where the US avoids a recession and tariffs are reduced significantly before the April 9 implementation date, Goldman sees Brent at $62 per barrel and WTI at $58 by December 2025. These figures fall further to $55 and $51, respectively, by the end of 2026. This outlook also assumes moderate output increases from eight OPEC+ countries, with incremental boosts of 130,000–140,000 barrels per day in June and July.   However, should the US slip into a typical recession and OPEC production aligns with the bank’s baseline assumptions, Brent could retreat to $58 by the end of this year and to $50 by December 2026.   In a more bearish scenario involving a global GDP slowdown and no change to OPEC+ output levels, Brent prices might fall to $54 by year-end and $45 by late 2026. The most extreme projection—based on a simultaneous economic downturn and a full reversal of OPEC+ production cuts—would see Brent plunge to below $40 per barrel by the end of 2026.   Goldman noted that oil prices could outperform forecasts significantly if there was a dramatic shift in tariff policy and a surprise in global demand recovery.   Cautious Optimism, But Warnings Persist   With both Washington and Beijing showing no signs of backing down, markets are likely to remain volatile in the days ahead. Investors now turn their attention to upcoming trade meetings and policy decisions, hoping for clarity in what has become one of the most unpredictable trading environments in recent years.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.