Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

thalestrader

Reading Charts in Real Time

Recommended Posts

I'm currently watching the JPY/USD (6J), possibly looking for a break of 1.1286 for the short...

 

I took this trade live!

 

Unfortunately, right after I got in, the price shot quickly against me. I pulled out for a 10 tick loss. It looks like it could be coming back though.

 

I'm not sure if the decision to pull out was good or not...it may have been...

 

I think I just need to step back and collect myself. I did AWESOME sim trading this approach. I just need to somehow translate that into real results. I mean, even just based on the trades I've posted here this week, I'd probably be up a decent chunk already this week, and it's only Tuesday. However, I haven't taken any of them! lol...except this one that I just pulled out of. I'll be interested to see what would've happen had I stayed in.

 

-Cory

5aa70f6944abe_YenShort.JPG.188f9ecff91e58512d3ba51bacdfd1a9.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm watching a setup on the EU (which I didn't take) that would have been a 9 tick loser, which will no doubt keep me out of the next potential winning trade out of fear.

 

I may have squeezed my "theoretical stop" too tight. Price came down within 1 tick of my PT (it actually hit it, but I assume a trade THROUGH would be required for a fill).

 

If nothing else, I could have at LEAST gotten BE, which I definitley would have gotten to after that lower low that almost filled for profit.

 

EDIT: If somehow it would have filled for profit, that would've been +27 ticks...

5aa70f69494f8_Image2.JPG.7fe5370bc7bca0b57d52136568bc9201.JPG

EuroResult.JPG.73cfac240cc4496cce24745774a23025.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I took this trade live!

 

Woops, I didn't take this trade live!! My account was on sim and I didn't realize it. :o:embarassed:

 

Well, it still counts as far as my psychology is concerned, because I thought I was live, but my money is safe and sound.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Assuming you are not trading massive size yes.....not sure about the new mini futures ....no experience of those (yet).

 

The volume on the currency minis is a joke. I'm talking 2% or less of the volume of the standard contracts (check them out on the CME's website).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Woops, I didn't take this trade live!! My account was on sim and I didn't realize it. :o:embarassed:

 

Well, it still counts as far as my psychology is concerned, because I thought I was live, but my money is safe and sound.

 

Happened to me 2-3 times and now I have a stikky note on one of the monitors.

What a relief it was to know that I was in sim when the trade went against me and how upset I was when the sim trade turned in my favour :doh:

 

Gabe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The volume on the currency minis is a joke. I'm talking 2% or less of the volume of the standard contracts (check them out on the CME's website).

Currency volume by 1:40PM Nov_24_2009. Standard size.

 

Gabe

5aa70f695bb9d_CurrencyfuturesvolforNov_24_2009_2PM.png.417beaa4b65b8a1448812a0a9030c49c.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Took an non Thales' tradetoday

Reason was the small candle after the large one. ( i have a theory behind this)

Lost 3x21 = 63 pips.

Potential short by the rules.

 

Gabe

 

Gabe,

Your charts are looking much better lately. That was a choppy area to be getting into a trade. I should know since I did that a bunch today and lost. Would you qualify your entry point as one of your most profitable setups. If not, why not wait for a better one. BTW, I am mostly writing to mysefl here as therapy for taking bad trades today.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gabe,

Your charts are looking much better lately. That was a choppy area to be getting into a trade. I should know since I did that a bunch today and lost. Would you qualify your entry point as one of your most profitable setups. If not, why not wait for a better one. BTW, I am mostly writing to mysefl here as therapy for taking bad trades today.

 

The jury is still out on this one.

I see many times that there is a decent move after a small bar but in this case, this was not the best example of that setup.

 

Gabe

 

PS I like the NEW LOOK of my charts too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Currency volume by 1:40PM Nov_24_2009. Standard size.

 

Gabe

 

Here's a picture of currency futures volume for the EUR/USD, GBP/USD, and the JPY/USD.

 

This list is in the following order...

 

- EUR/USD Standard

- EUR/USD Mini

- EUR/USD Micro

 

- GBP/USD Standard

- Blank (There is no GBP/USD Mini)

- GBP/USD Micro

 

- JPY/USD Standard

- JPY/USD Mini

- USD/JPY Micro

 

Anything other than the standard contract is not reasonable to trade. I WISH I could trade the mini's.

CurrencyVolume.JPG.bc5014be6ba1c3b3d81fef95b93fd649.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I took this trade live!

 

Unfortunately, right after I got in, the price shot quickly against me. I pulled out for a 10 tick loss. It looks like it could be coming back though.

 

I'm not sure if the decision to pull out was good or not...it may have been...

 

Looks like I made the right decision...taking the 10 tick loss. Even if price comes back and makes the trade successful, worst case I could just re-enter at a break of the low or something like that. Like it's been said on here before, easier to make up that 10 tick loss than a potential 25 tick loss.

JPYResult.JPG.ed9d172cd7f067271d8f5f4d6e82194f.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Forex is a beast, and I find it highly unlikley that anybody can tame it using tight stops. Although, I guess there can be exceptions (Thales). But it doesnt work for me! What I want to show you is not necessarily the setup but money management. It is true that I lost $21,000 trading it was $6000 in futures and $15000 in forex. But I knew what I was doing(yea right). The truth is that I didnt know what I was doing. So with that you can read this post with discretion.

 

eurusd1.thumb.jpg.e0c318238d26007b3fab03af78e396c2.jpg

 

eurusd2.thumb.jpg.fa6508dc78fbdb04b49568c6c19a0842.jpg

 

eurusd3.thumb.jpg.3d59a2f44b607acdab11ade4fadf0271.jpg

 

eurusd4.thumb.jpg.8385a07e462be8cd288a84131c7278c4.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So far, a most uninspired break.

 

So far the ES hasn't even mustered the energy to trade 1107.

 

I really see nothing that I like right now. We may take a peak at Tokyo, but otherwise it loks as though Thanksgiving vacation has started.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wish someone would make this version for NT.

 

I haven't seen anything but the screenshots, but I threw this one for NT together today. It's similar in look to what I saw posted here. Anyway, I attached a snapshot of 15-minute virtual bars on top of 1-minute bars. Maybe it will be of use to you.

 

Provided as-is, no warranties, and all that stuff. :)

 

What I want to do is somehow dock a dial on the left side of the chart, so that you can control the opacity in real-time. That way, you don't have to be staring at the virtual bars unless you want to. Not sure how hard ninja is going to fight me on that front. (I'd then like to attach this dial to all of my price indicators, actually)

Z20091123VirtualBars.zip

5aa70f69c3d5f_ES12-0911_24_2009(1Min).thumb.jpg.a2c56436ea1012f5112b4d575128039e.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I understand and agree with you about the spread.

I don't understand though, why does a 5 tick bother your daughter if her average win is 50-60 pips as you have mentioned in the past.

Also I don't agree with the 6 pip handicap.

If Oanda has a 3 pip spread than that is my handicap.

One cannot include the spread twice.

If bid/ask is 100.00/100.03 than to enter long I would pay 100.03 and if I want to exit immediately I would get 100.00 so the handicap is only the spread once and not twice.

 

Please correct me if i am wrong.

 

Gabe

 

 

This is a good question Gabe and illustrates a problem that became clear to me when I started systematizing what I do. You must compare the spread not with your average win but with your average trade.

 

So if your average winner is 60 and your average loser is 20 and you get 50% winners the average trade is (60*.5)-(20*.5) = 20 pips. Compare that with 5 pips spread?

 

 

And the figures above are for a pretty nice trading strategy (profit factor is 30/10 = 3 whereas most systems operate at 1.5 to 2 profit factors. So, you need to get your average trade well up above your costs. The above gave 20/5 so your costs were 25% of your trade. I think you want them to be under 10%.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Since I noticed that some currency pairs move alot during the London open, is there enough liquidity in the futures market during those hours to trade the futures an no the spot?

 

Gabe

 

 

For the majors there is more than enough liquidity in the big contracts but not so much (unless its changed very recently) on the small contracts. (Major = Currency vs USD = pretty much the ones that Thales mentioned). Note: Just saw Cory's post which shows that the minis and micros have no volume - so most small traders are sticking with cash forex.

 

Look, stick with the ones that Thales mentioned on Forex and don't worry about futures yet. Forex scalability helps. If you want to compare spread to trade just use average trade which is likely to be less than half your target winning trades.

 

You might consider another broker. Interactive brokers spreads on GU are rather small. But we do pay commission on every trade (so that's added spread in effect).

Edited by Kiwi

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I haven't seen anything but the screenshots, but I threw this one for NT together today. It's similar in look to what I saw posted here. Anyway, I attached a snapshot of 15-minute virtual bars on top of 1-minute bars. Maybe it will be of use to you.

 

Provided as-is, no warranties, and all that stuff. :)

 

What I want to do is somehow dock a dial on the left side of the chart, so that you can control the opacity in real-time. That way, you don't have to be staring at the virtual bars unless you want to. Not sure how hard ninja is going to fight me on that front. (I'd then like to attach this dial to all of my price indicators, actually)

 

Thank you

 

Great job.

If I may suggest, can you modify the overlaid chart to the following format?

 

Gabe

TimeFrame_overlay.thumb.png.44df9a6ec944b0fa236ffdfad90d53b0.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
For the majors there is more than enough liquidity in the big contracts but not so much (unless its changed very recently) on the small contracts. (Major = Currency vs USD = pretty much the ones that Thales mentioned). Note: Just saw Cory's post which shows that the minis and micros have no volume - so most small traders are sticking with cash forex.

 

Look, stick with the ones that Thales mentioned on Forex and don't worry about futures yet. Forex scalability helps. If you want to compare spread to trade just use average trade which is likely to be less than half your target winning trades.

 

You might consider another broker. Interactive brokers spreads on GU are rather small. But we do pay commission on every trade (so that's added spread in effect).

 

The problem is that IB has high minimums (for me at this time) as far as units traded are concerned.

 

Gabe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Don,

 

I do not follow you at all. Would you try to explain what you are trying do again?

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

Hmmm, yeah - I didn't understand what you were getting at there either...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry guys, I do that alot it might be because of the stroke I had a while back:doh: But I will start a new thread so that I will not clutter this one up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all,

 

I'm going to put more words into my trade posts because I feel that simply marking the blue, red, green lines is insufficient to explain why to take the trade. The actual entry on this technique is trivial, but the reasons why to take that entry are not.

 

I'm taking this short because I see that we have tested the R zone twice more last night and can see how price could go down to at least the 1.4920 area.

5aa70f69f3648_MK01_25_Nov_2009.png.92e09e9de6406e38e97c042661746035.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I may suggest, can you modify the overlaid chart to the following format?

 

Here you are. To get the style you wanted (i think? chart attached), select BoxStyle = true, and make sure the penAlpha is like 100 or so. The alpha is important because otherwise you won't be able to see through to the bars beneath. Note that it also now counts in minutes by default (it used to count in bars by default, but some charts have gaps in the data that would throw off the timing).

5aa70f6a06d16_CL12-0911_20_2009(15Min).thumb.jpg.d7d829f53b8f0afa1a76f076a057641a.jpg

virtBars2.zip

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Date: 8th April 2025.   Markets Rebound Cautiously as US-China Tariff Tensions Deepen     Global markets staged a tentative recovery on Tuesday following a wave of volatility sparked by escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. The Asia-Pacific region showed signs of stability after a chaotic start to the week—though some pockets remained under pressure. Taiwan’s Taiex dropped 4.4%, dragged lower by losses in tech heavyweight TSMC. The world’s largest chipmaker fell another 4% on Tuesday and has now slumped 13.5% since April 2, when US President Donald Trump first unveiled what he called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.   However, broader sentiment across the region turned more positive, with several markets rebounding sharply after Monday’s dramatic sell-offs. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged over 6% in early trading, rebounding from an 18-month low. South Korea’s Kospi rose marginally, and Australia’s ASX 200 gained 1.9%, driven by strength in mining stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.6%, though still far from recovering from Monday’s 13.2% crash—its worst day since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. China’s Shanghai Composite added 0.9%.   In Europe, DAX and FTSE 100 are up more than 1% in opening trade. EU Commission President von der Leyen repeated yesterday that the EU had offered reciprocal zero tariffs on manufactured goods previously and continues to stand by that offer. Others are also trying again to talk to Trump to get some sort of agreement that limits the impact.   Much of the rally appeared to be driven by dip-buying, as well as hopes that the intensifying trade war could still be defused through negotiations.   China Strikes Back: ‘We Will Fight to the End’   Tensions reached a boiling point after Trump threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on all Chinese imports unless Beijing rolled back its retaliatory measures by April 8. ‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow... the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50%,’ Trump declared on social media.   If implemented, the new tariffs would bring total US duties on Chinese goods to a staggering 124%, factoring in the existing 20%, the 34% recently announced, and the proposed 50%.   In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a stern warning, stating: ‘The US threat to escalate tariffs is a mistake on top of a mistake... If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.’ The ministry also called for equal and respectful dialogue, though signs of compromise on either side remain scarce.   Beijing acted quickly to contain a market fallout. State funds intervened to support equities, and the People’s Bank of China set the yuan fixing at its weakest level since September 2023 to boost export competitiveness. Additionally, five-year interest rate swaps in China fell to their lowest levels since 2020, indicating potential for further monetary easing.   Trump Talks Tough on EU Too   Trump’s hardline approach extended beyond China. Speaking at a press conference, he rejected the European Union’s offer to eliminate tariffs on cars and industrial goods, accusing the bloc of ‘being very bad to us.’ He insisted that Europe would need to source its energy from the US, claiming the US could ‘knock off $350 billion in one week.’   The EU, meanwhile, backed away from a proposed 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey, opting instead for 25% duties on selected US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs.     Volatile Wall Street Adds to the Drama   Wall Street experienced wild swings on Monday as investors processed the rapidly evolving trade conflict. The S&P 500 briefly fell 4.7% before rebounding 3.4%, nearly erasing its losses in what could have been its biggest one-day jump in years—if it had held. The Dow Jones Industrial Average sank by as much as 1,700 points early in the day but later climbed nearly 900 points before closing 349 points lower, down 0.9%. The Nasdaq ended up 0.1%.   The brief rally was fueled by a false rumour that Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs—rumours that the White House quickly labelled ‘fake news.’ The market's sharp reaction underscored how desperate investors are for any sign that tensions might ease.   Oil Markets in Focus: Goldman Sachs Revises Forecasts   Crude prices also reflected the uncertainty, with US crude briefly dipping below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021. As of early Tuesday, Brent crude was trading at $64.72, while WTI hovered around $61.26.   Goldman Sachs, in a note dated April 7, lowered its average price forecasts for Brent and WTI through 2025 and 2026, citing mounting recession risks and the potential for higher-than-expected supply from OPEC+.       Under a base-case scenario where the US avoids a recession and tariffs are reduced significantly before the April 9 implementation date, Goldman sees Brent at $62 per barrel and WTI at $58 by December 2025. These figures fall further to $55 and $51, respectively, by the end of 2026. This outlook also assumes moderate output increases from eight OPEC+ countries, with incremental boosts of 130,000–140,000 barrels per day in June and July.   However, should the US slip into a typical recession and OPEC production aligns with the bank’s baseline assumptions, Brent could retreat to $58 by the end of this year and to $50 by December 2026.   In a more bearish scenario involving a global GDP slowdown and no change to OPEC+ output levels, Brent prices might fall to $54 by year-end and $45 by late 2026. The most extreme projection—based on a simultaneous economic downturn and a full reversal of OPEC+ production cuts—would see Brent plunge to below $40 per barrel by the end of 2026.   Goldman noted that oil prices could outperform forecasts significantly if there was a dramatic shift in tariff policy and a surprise in global demand recovery.   Cautious Optimism, But Warnings Persist   With both Washington and Beijing showing no signs of backing down, markets are likely to remain volatile in the days ahead. Investors now turn their attention to upcoming trade meetings and policy decisions, hoping for clarity in what has become one of the most unpredictable trading environments in recent years.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.