Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

thalestrader

Reading Charts in Real Time

Recommended Posts

  Cory2679 said:
I took the same EURUSD trade you did (albeit 6E), but I saw it a little differently. I'm watching the 15 min and 13 range charts, and I took the trade off the range chart... The way I saw it was that price had obviously bounced off the support, then took another attempt and failed, so then I was looking to go long.

 

I was just curious if you consider my execution as a suitable way to handle the move, or if you disagree and why.

 

I've been studying the approach for a couple weeks and began sim trading it this week, and so far I've pretty much approached setups the same way you have, except this one, hence the question.

 

Thanks.

 

Hi Cory,

 

Welcome aboard!

 

You bought support, which is what you want to do. Buy support and breaks of resistance, sell resistance and breaks of support. It looks as though price hit and filled you PT, so that would indicate that you likely did something right and that you didn't just get lucky.

 

Lastly, if you do something and it works, and if you keep doing it and over time you have a net profitable result, then do not let anything I or anyone else says to you cause you to rethink o stop what you are doing. As the saying goes, if it ain't broker, don't fix it. To which I would add, if you're going broke, stop!

 

It looks like you did a fine job. I hope you keep sharing with us.

 

By the way, I like watching the 13R on the futures as well.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
Hi Blowfish,

 

I have placed notes on my chart that I hope answer your questions.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

Thanks for taking the trouble to do that. As with all things the devil is in the detail and knowing what to pass on is probably every bit (or more) important than simply identifying potential BO's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  johnjohn1hew said:
I don't want to ruffle feathers here nor upset anyone, but to me, bars are irrelevant. Dbphoenix and others are always saying this... Price is moving, you trade the movements...This approach could be done using a line chart, but the range of price is important. I just want to keep things simple. I just have a feeling that a lot of focus has been on individual bars lately. Sure, i'm just a beginner (and what do i know, right?), but the theory is sound.

 

I wouldn't say they are irrelevant, its a 'data sampling' issue. Yes price is continuous but how we sample it to make sense of it is important. For example a high or low of a daily bar represents the extremes in that continuous data for the day in a question. The same is true of an hourly bar or a 15 minute bar.

 

Anyway that was not what I was driving at.....what I wanted to know was what action would be taken (if any) if one was to sit down at the moment in time bar 1 was painting or bar 2 etc. I am certainly not hung up on the bars they are simply a way of sampling the data to allow you to see the movement (including extremes) that you are interested in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
Wait for it ... wait for it ...

 

Here we go ...

 

Funny thing too ... after having praised FXCM micro for the small spreads and the lack of slippage, I am getting creamed on my stops (both entries and exits) today. I could see if we were putting on $1,000,000 positions, but we are trading two mini lot equivalents. If this keeps up, we'll be posting trades basis futures only. Looks like FXCM may have taken a page out of Oanda's book. A small spread looks good, but it doesn't mean anything if you are going to get clipped for 3-5 ticks extra in and out.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f635fc73_11-19-2009EURUSDWaiting2.thumb.jpg.2a49bb2a9be26f3f7cca678a56900dc7.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
Funny thing too ... after having praised FXCM micro for the small spreads and the lack of slippage, I am getting creamed on my stops (both entries and exits) today. I could see if we were putting on $1,000,000 positions, but we are trading two mini lot equivalents. If this keeps up, we'll be posting trades basis futures only. Looks like FXCM may have taken a page out of Oanda's book. A small spread looks good, but it doesn't mean anything if you are going to get clipped for 3-5 ticks extra in and out.

 

With that stop loss goes to theoretical break even at 1.4894. If I am stopped there, it will actually be a -2.6 pip loss because my fill was 1.4896. Given the way FXCM is filling stops today, if this goes back to 1.4894, my fill will probably be 1.4891 for -5.6 pip loss.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f6364f33_11-19-2009EURUSDWaiting3.thumb.jpg.6d164ae84deb013bb653ab5c7988be75.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
With that stop loss goes to theoretical break even at 1.4894. If I am stopped there, it will actually be a -2.6 pip loss because my fill was 1.4896.

 

Price has now trade at/through my predetermined BE level, so I placing the stop at the actual rather than the intended entry.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f63731e8_11-19-2009EURUSDWaiting4.thumb.jpg.f20b4722583dedd00dde9edae85afa33.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
Price has now trade at/through my predetermined BE level, so I placing the stop at the actual rather than the intended entry.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

Well, stopped at entry. It looks as though the theoretical break even stop loss (1.4894) would have been safe for now. This is starting to feel like a wouldashouldacoulda.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f637b726_11-19-2009EURUSDWaiting7.thumb.jpg.141a5244a3b460fd013ddcf33a6e7b30.jpg

Edited by thalestrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's my spin on that chart - I think this is similar to what Don is doing as well. Again, I'm not trading this method but for me, I would prefer to enter on the HL and anticipate the break vs. entering above it. That's just me and my reversal style of thinking.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=15567&stc=1&d=1258657863

tl1.png.f87bc9d7e4aa5a7844092c668f75673b.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
Here we go ...

 

Funny thing too ... after having praised FXCM micro for the small spreads and the lack of slippage, I am getting creamed on my stops (both entries and exits) today. I could see if we were putting on $1,000,000 positions, but we are trading two mini lot equivalents. If this keeps up, we'll be posting trades basis futures only. Looks like FXCM may have taken a page out of Oanda's book. A small spread looks good, but it doesn't mean anything if you are going to get clipped for 3-5 ticks extra in and out.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

Hello Sirs :yes sir:

 

I'm not one to push brokers at all, but IB have a good ECN model with tight spreads and because it is a true ECN, you can even go in between the spread if you like. Good deal I think, just the platform is not that intuitive for FX IMHO.....

 

To Thales & JohnJohn: Yes, I know I had been fighting the 'trend' all night. It was the worst type possible for me because the pullbacks were more like clumps instead of nice clean simple pullbacks. I was OK with my trades because it was an exercise at keeping my losses tiny and also I didn't end up revenge trading.

 

I'd just like to comment on the use of 'bars'. I totally agree with the comments about bar irrelevance. I too don't want to ruffle any feathers and have a big debate because I know how dear one can hold ones trading beliefs. Use whatever works for those beliefs.... but anyone using geometry (trendlines, gann fans, ellipses....whatever) should at least be aware the effect of changing bar intervals have on their lines.

 

With kind regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Folks,

 

I cannot think of a time of day less interesting to trade than this period between the NY close and the Tokyo open. At any rate, here is the current look of the EURUSD. Price is showing that the rally out of this morning's low is losing momentum, and is again presenting that now familiar ending diagonal pattern. Remember, this does not assure a a break down out of this patternl. It simply indicates a loss of momentum at the moment. A break up out of this pattern can be fierce, fast, and trending.

 

Now, I got a message from someone taking issue with my referring to some of these as "true" ending diagonals. Apparently a couple of my examples did not have the "required" internal wave count." As I have said, this is not about EW. It is about a pattern that price often traces out as momentum wanes in the latter stages of an impulse move. I really could not care any less than I already do as far as "internal wave counts" are concerned. As I said before, I am not an EW ideologue.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f639a14b_11-19-2009EURUSDED4.thumb.jpg.79679590a0661ca925b919319ece4b4a.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
Hi Blowfish,

 

I have placed notes on my chart that I hope answer your questions.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

This picture is an excellent example of clear thinking --- especially the last one.

 

Thales once again applies a 123break philosophy ... to a pin bar ... in a way that would differentiate one that was likely to take off fast from one more likely to backtrack or fail. This logic is something I used to use in sub-timeframe tests to decide where my entry should be and is excellent.

 

I must say, having read it so clearly, I am going to do a little work to show which pinbars meet the criteria and which dont. Food for thought Thales.

 

15545d1258635600-reading-charts-real-time-answers-blowfish1.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I liked what Thales did with the pinbar so much I used my pinbar indicator to find a few and broke the (very good) 15m pinbar down on a 1m chart. See below :)

 

On price bars vs continuous price: Bars, like moving averages are an indicator. A 15 ema of the 1m prices I show would have given me 1 point a little below the close of the 15m bar. A 15m bar gives you 4 points, OHLC so "can" provide move information like showing that a test "might" have occurred during the 15m bar.

 

Thales pointing out the difference between a good and bad pinbar shows that the longer timeframe bar is just a summary. One version gives a 123 break. The other version (making the high first) would have perhaps given a 123 break down on the 1m chart ... which pinbar would you prefer to be trading.

 

Despite this Price Bars (like mas :boxing:) are a useful way of summarizing the potentially overwhelming information flow that is coming out of the market.

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=15575&stc=1&d=1258672919

 

 

 

A final edit: having looked at a bunch of pinbars ... you really want to find the ones that go down then come back and give you a 123&possiblebreak because 1. the 123break pattern is strong and 2. if they test back before continuation they almost always stop before or round point 3 giving you a stop within the pinbar rather than its bottom! And the nicer looking the internal 123 the less likely that pinbar is to fail.

5aa70f63aa0e4_PerfectPinbar.png.3aada73d23152a8eda42b783ec25dbf0.png

Edited by Kiwi

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
At any rate, here is the current look of the EURUSD. Price is showing that the rally out of this morning's low is losing momentum, and is again presenting that now familiar ending diagonal pattern.

 

Heading into Asia and seeing the EURUSD, I should have taken a look at the EURJPY. Similar pattern to the EURUSD, but in this case it declined to the first PT quickly, whereas if I had traded the EURUSD, I'd still be waiting see price decline to my BE point.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f63afee0_11-19-2009EURJPYED1.thumb.jpg.b27f809316dca4310c885e1a5ba2ca0d.jpg

5aa70f63b5d25_11-19-2009EURUSDED5.thumb.jpg.aa3347a04f3a3500eef2624bfe11c519.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3 cheers for no slippage :cheers:

 

I like this one, even I can see it clear and obvious!

 

Just waking up from my power nap :missy: ......

 

So far looking like yesterday. A bad case of the old 'you snooze, you lose' syndrome.

Edited by MidKnight

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, it doesnt look in real time posting this new way but I guess it is something I have to do. Not posting individual trades as they happen but afterwords. Who couldnt do this. But anyway here it is.......

eurusd1.thumb.jpg.b6a4293e9d2d66485f5c809c73849818.jpg

 

eurusd2.thumb.jpg.43a8181fdfbc41fbef9c94054f1c4aa9.jpg

 

eurusd3.thumb.jpg.d1221a511000573ea04cf50d03edee97.jpg

 

eurusd4.thumb.jpg.a3fd28ec995638651c9889866befb341.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Short GU. See pic.

 

Currently price is a little over my entry point.

 

Edit: 15ms later and it has dropped and broken recent 123 low to give 123break. So moved stop down to 1.6677 over highs.

Edit: 35ms and tp1 has been taken after an hourly break.

gushort.png.d5805700f6d64518aaf460349a599d26.png

Edited by Kiwi

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.