Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

thalestrader

Reading Charts in Real Time

Recommended Posts

...............................

 

EDIT: 0125 EST, filled on the short USD/CAD, canceled the EJ long.

 

EDIT: 0138 EST, exited the USD/CAD for -4 pips (even though the chart annotation says -3, the fill report turns out to say -4)

5aa70f62e55bf_MK05_19_Nov_2009.thumb.png.ea9cfbabb0ebfd8dc0a75f308096382f.png

5aa70f62e92cf_MK06_19_Nov_2009.png.9ee477006a61bfcaf02f5448ebdb485c.png

Edited by MidKnight

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am not trading this, and I will soon be turning in for the night, but here is a case were price would have nicked me into the trade and immediately rewarded me with a resounding stall. This is a case where I'd bring my stop up to -2,-3,-4 ticks or so. If stopped out, I would re-enter a tick above the new high.

 

I have mentioned Mike Reed in other threads here at TL. One thing I learned from Mike is that every trade starts as a scalp. You can always re-enter if price confirms the trades direction. But honestly, every time I enter, I expect price to move quickly and decisively in my favor. Failure to do so often spells trouble. Entry was a buy stop at 1.4930, with a 1.4915 stop loss. Why sit there and hold for a possible -15 tick loss? Cut it at -4, and and set a buy stop for at 1.4932 to get back in. Be ruthless in the protection of yourself.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

 

An excellent post Thales.

 

This is very much an example matching the right entries and exits in a system. I am almost the opposite. First I never ever use breakeven stops and second I wait a long time before moving them.

 

I think this is caused because 1. my entries can be very good but benefit by being allowed to be wrong a bit because I'm picking the trend right but sometimes getting into a retracement too early and, 2. my style of entry doesn't have a really logical "I got stopped out but here's where I get back in" point.

 

I think your approach may be easier to trade ... and it illustrates the need to match ones exits to ones entries when building a strategy. Get either side wrong and an unpleasant experience awaits the :newbie:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Folks,

 

I saw this opportunity on the EURJPY unfolding, but I didn't trade it, and I didn't take a screen shot 'til now.

 

Might I ask if you had been around earlier (with the usual caveats about hindsight) would you have considered a short on a break down of bars 1 2 or 3? Would you have considered a long on a break up of bar 3 ? Thanks as always.

thales.thumb.png.4cd30def527d77a85c2af07c650024d9.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'd like to just dart back to the trade mgmt immediately after the entry is triggered for a moment. A few days ago, Gabe's stops seemed to come up for discussion in that they appeared to be at non-logical levels. Gabe could confirm it for us, but it probably wasn't his stops we were seeing but instead just his exit. In retrospect, Gabe was probably doing what Thales has been talking about here. Taking a small loss and re-entering. Sound about right Gabe?

 

 

I am not sure which trades of mine you are refering to but I still suffer from PMC (Pre Mature Closing) of my trades when the trade goes in my favour)

I was experimenting with closing trades at 1/2 the distance to the nearest swing point instead of waiting to be stopped out at that swing point.

The logic behind this is that at a bar boundry, price in the lower time-frame will cross the boundry of the higher boundry more than once (except in strong moves). So if I take only half the loss, I can go at it twice and be at the same monetary position as if I took the bigger loss.

 

Gabe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Might I ask if you had been around earlier (with the usual caveats about hindsight) would you have considered a short on a break down of bars 1 2 or 3? Would you have considered a long on a break up of bar 3 ? Thanks as always.

 

As Thales is still sleeping I'll take a stab at it :)

I think that the answer is NO because the low of bar 2 did not go below the low of bar 1

 

Gabe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As Thales is still sleeping I'll take a stab at it :)

I think that the answer is NO because the low of bar 2 did not go below the low of bar 1

 

Gabe

 

Yes indeed Gabe. I probably didn't express myself well. What I meant is would TT have considered placing stop entry orders under those bars (which would not have triggered).

 

1 would not have triggered - but was it a potential trade?

2 would trigger on bar 3

3 would trigger on bar 4.

 

Where either of those (2&3) up for consideration? I would have probably considered 3 long too but that did not trigger either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Are you referring to this sequence of discussion?

 

 

 

 

 

 

15402d1258469838-reading-charts-real-time-wtf.jpg

 

The picture I marked up is above.

 

Looking back on it, I wonder? Initially him getting taken out when he did seemed like it didn't make sense to me.

 

But based on this, does it look like after entry price moved enough INITIALLY to want to stay in the trade?

 

Thales brings up a good point. Some trades just fill you and immediately fall on it's face, w/o moving in the direction at all. I haven't trained my eye to recognize this obviously.

 

 

I explained the 1st exit in post #1455.

The second exit was because I was very tired and went to sleep but did not want to hold the position while sleeping.

 

Gabe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes indeed Gabe. I probably didn't express myself well. What I meant is would TT have considered placing stop entry orders under those bars (which would not have triggered).

 

1 would not have triggered - but was it a potential trade?

2 would trigger on bar 3

3 would trigger on bar 4.

 

Where either of those (2&3) up for consideration? I would have probably considered 3 long too but that did not trigger either.

 

 

Bar 2 did not make an L and bar 3 did not make an LH so the conditions were not right for a short.

 

Gabe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

.......................

 

 

EDIT: 0552 EST, I probably have the jitters now with the freedom to take a tiny loss. Exited the trade already as it broke 1 tick above to fill me and then retraced back 1/2 way to the stop. Exited for -8. Can't seem to get anything working tonight, probably because I'm fighting this entire move....

5aa70f630c2c9_MK07_19_Nov_2009.png.399257ee2604c59f158fa2dce6af79af.png

5aa70f6311dbe_MK08_19_Nov_2009.png.a471315d6327b8826b6592f6773aa288.png

Edited by MidKnight

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Might I ask if you had been around earlier (with the usual caveats about hindsight) would you have considered a short on a break down of bars 1 2 or 3? Would you have considered a long on a break up of bar 3 ? Thanks as always.

 

Hi Blowfish,

 

I have placed notes on my chart that I hope answer your questions.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f6317b7c_AnswersforBlowfish1.thumb.jpg.c033cc6b7a7b37dc68970f0933ea9752.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Can't seem to get anything working tonight, probably because I'm fighting this entire move....

 

How soon we forget ...

 

Get a demo account, and from now on, every time you fade a trend on a trend day, take a trade with the trend in your demo account. I'll bet that 9/10 times, at the end of the day, you'd gladly trade your real PnL for the demo PnL.

 

The easiest money you will ever make will be resisting the urge to fade the strong move and instead just keep buying new highs and selling new lows.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
.......................

 

 

EDIT: 0552 EST, I probably have the jitters now with the freedom to take a tiny loss. Exited the trade already as it broke 1 tick above to fill me and then retraced back 1/2 way to the stop. Exited for -8. Can't seem to get anything working tonight, probably because I'm fighting this entire move....

 

Maybe you shouldn't try to pick bottoms or tops. Initiate trades with the trend and assume a continuation...just my opinion. I'm saying this because i can't tell when a top or bottom has been reached, so i look for opportunities in the direction of the trend. This is another thing i like about this approach - you don't predict, you let the market do what its going to do - if it moves in your favor, then so be it. Also, i want to see price action that i can understand and is directionally inclined.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Folks,

 

Current look at the EURJPY - could be an ending diagonal. Ending diagonals do not indicate anything other than that the trend of which it is a part is momentarily losing momentum, and may be coming to an end. In my experience, when an ending diagonal results in a continuation of the trend rather than an end, the move is usually large and subject to continues trending.

 

I do not typically trade the pattern's trendline breaks. I wait for the breaks and then look for my entry.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f631d46e_11-19-2009EURJPYEndingDiagonal1.thumb.jpg.4e43776faa26f3b779a774e2eab51c85.jpg

Edited by thalestrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes indeed Gabe. I probably didn't express myself well. What I meant is would TT have considered placing stop entry orders under those bars (which would not have triggered).

 

1 would not have triggered - but was it a potential trade?

2 would trigger on bar 3

3 would trigger on bar 4.

 

Where either of those (2&3) up for consideration? I would have probably considered 3 long too but that did not trigger either.

 

I don't want to ruffle feathers here nor upset anyone, but to me, bars are irrelevant. Dbphoenix and others are always saying this... Price is moving, you trade the movements...This approach could be done using a line chart, but the range of price is important. I just want to keep things simple. I just have a feeling that a lot of focus has been on individual bars lately. Sure, i'm just a beginner (and what do i know, right?), but the theory is sound.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Current EURUSD

 

If it goes long I'd be looking for +25 and +65 ... if it goes and goes nowhere, I pull the rip cord quickly.

 

If it goes short, I'd be looking at +30 and +70 ... rip cord clause applies.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f632e38a_11-19-2009EURUSD9.thumb.jpg.c05c20cff28815095eea6bf0a840e617.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't want to ruffle feathers here nor upset anyone, but to me, bars are irrelevant. Dbphoenix and others are always saying this... Price is moving, you trade the movements...This approach could be done using a line chart, but the range of price is important. I just want to keep things simple. I just have a feeling that a lot of focus has been on individual bars lately. Sure, i'm just a beginner (and what do i know, right?), but the theory is sound.

 

I've been wanting to say this for a while and for whatever reason I haven't gotten around to it. John is absolutely 100% correct. Bars are irrelevant. A bar is just an arbitrarily selected way to "bundle" price movement.

 

Some here have noted that I sometimes come in "tight," i.e. use few bars to identify an opportunity. Gabe said the other day that he thought you needed at least a certain number of bars before an opportunity presents itself.

 

Watch price move. Trade. Repeat.

 

Look at the chart of the EURJPY in my reply to Blowfish in post #1462. Look at what I say about the bar I label with a "4". What matters is not how many bars price took to get somewhere, what matters is how has price moved. Period.

 

Some have said I seem to have a secret and unknowable way of managing my trades and cutting my losses. I assure you I do not. It is the same thing over and over. I have a good trading friend who always says "Dance with the one that brung ya, and leave with her too.'" What he means is that if you are going to get into a trade because price does xyz, then if it does the same thing but in the opposite direction, get out!

 

If a H-L-LH gets you short, then if price declines and prints a L-H-HL, well, it is time to pull the rip cord, and possibly time to reverse entirely.

 

One of the reasons I do not like mentioning Ross Hook's and Trader Vic 123's is that both understandings tend to place the trader's focus on bars, rather than price levels.

 

John says you can trade this with a line chart. I'll go one farther - when I am trading currency futures, and I am not distracted by other tasks (such as posting on TL) I am watching the DOM only. The chart is always there if I need to check to see if I missed anything, but other wise I just watch where price goes, stops, reverses, etc. In other words, not only do you not need bars to trade this way, you do not need a chart. You just need to see where price is and where it has been in some form or the other.

 

Excellent post John. If the post of the month were still in effect, I'd nominate your post. Anyone struggling with what we are doing here would be well served to print your post and put it in his or her journal.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Edited by thalestrader
spelling, typos

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If it goes long I'd be looking for +25 and +65 ... if it goes and goes nowhere, I pull the rip cord quickly.

 

If it goes short, I'd be looking at +30 and +70 ... rip cord clause applies.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

Long at 81, rip cord level will be a 72 print (possibly higher if this thing double tops). At any rate, a -9 or so should be about the worst case.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f63335c4_11-19-2009EURUSD10.thumb.jpg.9b0790482ef3fc20c074a4f611d9e3fd.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

EUR is a bit indecisive as to what kind of day it is going to have. It is waffling against the USD but, checking back in to our potenital ending diagonal, it is trying to gain strength against the JPY. It is likely not going to make up its mind until US equity markets open and give the marching orders for the day.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f634792e_11-19-2009EURJPYendingdiagonal2.thumb.jpg.8ebdab1f09da58465a3439a8c25e915e.jpg

Edited by thalestrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
94 is the level at which I'd go to BE on my stop. It printed 93, so my finger is on the close position button with a hard stop still at 72.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

It gave me every opportunity to take it off at BE or even a +2 or so, but against what proved to be better judgment, I let it clip me for -9. However, initial disaster stop choices were -27 or -38. -9 is much easier to make up than a loss 3 to 4 times as large, wouldn't you say?

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thales,

 

I'm fairly new to this forum. I've been lurking for a little while but haven't made any posts, but I'm gonna start with a question...

 

I took the same EURUSD trade you did (albeit 6E), but I saw it a little differently. I'm watching the 15 min and 13 range charts, and I took the trade off the range chart...

 

1zeqep.jpg

 

I only trade 1 contract so I only have 1 PT.

 

The way I saw it was that price had obviously bounced off the support, then took another attempt and failed, so then I was looking to go long.

 

I was just curious if you consider my execution as a suitable way to handle the move, or if you disagree and why.

 

I've been studing the approach for a couple weeks and began sim trading it this week, and so far I've pretty much approached setups the same way you have, except this one, hence the question.

 

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Date: 8th April 2025.   Markets Rebound Cautiously as US-China Tariff Tensions Deepen     Global markets staged a tentative recovery on Tuesday following a wave of volatility sparked by escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. The Asia-Pacific region showed signs of stability after a chaotic start to the week—though some pockets remained under pressure. Taiwan’s Taiex dropped 4.4%, dragged lower by losses in tech heavyweight TSMC. The world’s largest chipmaker fell another 4% on Tuesday and has now slumped 13.5% since April 2, when US President Donald Trump first unveiled what he called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.   However, broader sentiment across the region turned more positive, with several markets rebounding sharply after Monday’s dramatic sell-offs. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged over 6% in early trading, rebounding from an 18-month low. South Korea’s Kospi rose marginally, and Australia’s ASX 200 gained 1.9%, driven by strength in mining stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.6%, though still far from recovering from Monday’s 13.2% crash—its worst day since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. China’s Shanghai Composite added 0.9%.   In Europe, DAX and FTSE 100 are up more than 1% in opening trade. EU Commission President von der Leyen repeated yesterday that the EU had offered reciprocal zero tariffs on manufactured goods previously and continues to stand by that offer. Others are also trying again to talk to Trump to get some sort of agreement that limits the impact.   Much of the rally appeared to be driven by dip-buying, as well as hopes that the intensifying trade war could still be defused through negotiations.   China Strikes Back: ‘We Will Fight to the End’   Tensions reached a boiling point after Trump threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on all Chinese imports unless Beijing rolled back its retaliatory measures by April 8. ‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow... the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50%,’ Trump declared on social media.   If implemented, the new tariffs would bring total US duties on Chinese goods to a staggering 124%, factoring in the existing 20%, the 34% recently announced, and the proposed 50%.   In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a stern warning, stating: ‘The US threat to escalate tariffs is a mistake on top of a mistake... If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.’ The ministry also called for equal and respectful dialogue, though signs of compromise on either side remain scarce.   Beijing acted quickly to contain a market fallout. State funds intervened to support equities, and the People’s Bank of China set the yuan fixing at its weakest level since September 2023 to boost export competitiveness. Additionally, five-year interest rate swaps in China fell to their lowest levels since 2020, indicating potential for further monetary easing.   Trump Talks Tough on EU Too   Trump’s hardline approach extended beyond China. Speaking at a press conference, he rejected the European Union’s offer to eliminate tariffs on cars and industrial goods, accusing the bloc of ‘being very bad to us.’ He insisted that Europe would need to source its energy from the US, claiming the US could ‘knock off $350 billion in one week.’   The EU, meanwhile, backed away from a proposed 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey, opting instead for 25% duties on selected US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs.     Volatile Wall Street Adds to the Drama   Wall Street experienced wild swings on Monday as investors processed the rapidly evolving trade conflict. The S&P 500 briefly fell 4.7% before rebounding 3.4%, nearly erasing its losses in what could have been its biggest one-day jump in years—if it had held. The Dow Jones Industrial Average sank by as much as 1,700 points early in the day but later climbed nearly 900 points before closing 349 points lower, down 0.9%. The Nasdaq ended up 0.1%.   The brief rally was fueled by a false rumour that Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs—rumours that the White House quickly labelled ‘fake news.’ The market's sharp reaction underscored how desperate investors are for any sign that tensions might ease.   Oil Markets in Focus: Goldman Sachs Revises Forecasts   Crude prices also reflected the uncertainty, with US crude briefly dipping below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021. As of early Tuesday, Brent crude was trading at $64.72, while WTI hovered around $61.26.   Goldman Sachs, in a note dated April 7, lowered its average price forecasts for Brent and WTI through 2025 and 2026, citing mounting recession risks and the potential for higher-than-expected supply from OPEC+.       Under a base-case scenario where the US avoids a recession and tariffs are reduced significantly before the April 9 implementation date, Goldman sees Brent at $62 per barrel and WTI at $58 by December 2025. These figures fall further to $55 and $51, respectively, by the end of 2026. This outlook also assumes moderate output increases from eight OPEC+ countries, with incremental boosts of 130,000–140,000 barrels per day in June and July.   However, should the US slip into a typical recession and OPEC production aligns with the bank’s baseline assumptions, Brent could retreat to $58 by the end of this year and to $50 by December 2026.   In a more bearish scenario involving a global GDP slowdown and no change to OPEC+ output levels, Brent prices might fall to $54 by year-end and $45 by late 2026. The most extreme projection—based on a simultaneous economic downturn and a full reversal of OPEC+ production cuts—would see Brent plunge to below $40 per barrel by the end of 2026.   Goldman noted that oil prices could outperform forecasts significantly if there was a dramatic shift in tariff policy and a surprise in global demand recovery.   Cautious Optimism, But Warnings Persist   With both Washington and Beijing showing no signs of backing down, markets are likely to remain volatile in the days ahead. Investors now turn their attention to upcoming trade meetings and policy decisions, hoping for clarity in what has become one of the most unpredictable trading environments in recent years.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.