Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

thalestrader

Reading Charts in Real Time

Recommended Posts

  thalestrader said:
Hi Forrest,

 

How are you trading based on this?

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

I'm not sure I know the answer to this? Is this a trick question?

 

But to put it simply, of the 4 pairs I watch regularly, G/J is one of the pairs I won't be taking any trades on for a while. To me the entire area looks like chop. Particularly since Friday, the range got even tighter.

 

I'm sure there is a way to trade it, but I think we'd all be better of just waiting for it to make a decision one way or the other. :2c:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  johnjohn1hew said:
EURJPY opportunity. This is countertrend as the movement is still in the main downtrend supply line. It is on the demand line of a new uptrend that could go up to the main supply line, but who knows....

 

EDIT: you can't see the main supply line of the main trend (down) - sorry.

 

Hi JohnJohn,

 

You could play this one either way - how com you are choosing to play it for longs if you have the trend as down?

 

With kind regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Don4 said:
Now watch for the 15m.

 

Two things, Don4 ...

 

1) Here is my look at the current EURUSD. I have this showing a possible short, but this could easily switch to a long. In the end, nothing seems to be swinging tonight, and I'm happy just to go to bed early and see what tomorrow brings. And,

 

2) My daughter finds your avatar creepy, and I have to say, so do I. Nothing personal, but for now I will be putting you on ignore. You are free to post here, of course, and you are free to keep your avatar. If you change the avatar, I'll take you off ignore. But my daughter is here with me a good bit, so I have to do what I have to do.

 

Thank you for sharing with us.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f60094c5_11-17-2009EURUSD1.thumb.jpg.534827df73bcceab20dcb59c5959d8c1.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  MidKnight said:
Hi JohnJohn,

 

You could play this one either way - how com you are choosing to play it for longs if you have the trend as down?

 

With kind regards,

MK

 

Like i said, i saw a countertrend opportunity. Price was in a defined uptrend within the main downtrend. It was right on the demand line...thought i saw a good opportunity for a long. My analysis was just based on the trend lines. Makes me even more convinced to stick to trades that are in-sync with the main trend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
Two things, Don4 ...

 

1) Here is my look at the current EURUSD. I have this showing a possible short, but this could easily switch to a long. In the end, nothing seems to be swinging tonight, and I'm happy just to go to bed early and see what tomorrow brings. And,

 

2) My daughter finds your avatar creepy, and I have to say, so do I. Nothing personal, but for now I will be putting you on ignore. You are free to post here, of course, and you are free to keep your avatar. If you change the avatar, I'll take you off ignore. But my daughter is here with me a good bit, so I have to do what I have to do.

 

Thank you for sharing with us.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

For you and your daughter I will change it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
Well, what do you know ... USDCAD looks like the real deal.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

It's interesting that this move is basically taking place right off the demand line from the trend that started yesterday.

5.thumb.jpg.311628c124a18d85fa8569f75e44ef2b.jpg

Edited by johnjohn1hew

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Thales :yes sir:

 

I was thinking more about the S/R stuff and thought that maybe you put more emphasis on the recent past few days trade than you would on say S/R from a couple weeks or a month ago - would you say that is true? I know every situation is unique, but just meaning in general. I have been doing the opposite, putting more faith in the obvious S/R, but it is usually weeks or months ago - maybe that is part of my problem. Not assessing the recent past few days action properly while approaching the bigger picture S/R.

 

Thanks in advance for the info.

 

Signed,

Private MK

Edited by MidKnight

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  forrestang said:
Here is the E/U, but I don't really like the size of the stop that is required, so decided to miss this one. Two charts, a 5 and 15m showing the trade.

 

Has anyone ever seen a trade they like, and decide to wait for another swing in which you intend to wait in order to reduce the size of your initial stop?

 

Often. A couple of days ago I wrote about 'backing and filling'. Any time the swings from the end of the previous move are large but without much directional progress being made, you will likely have potential targets closer than stops.Of course when no directional progress is being made you have chop, however you often get 'lazy' movement (especially at the end of a move where momentum is waning). Price is moving just with large retracements after each push. Thales suggested a couple of possibilities for managing an example I posted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Aloha,

 

Here is a possibility with the euro right now, If this fail here we could get some good down, but I think I'll use a different pair like AUD/USD for that if it ends up happening, since it is hitting the R from yesterday as I type this.

 

EDIT: 0346 EST, long and moved stop to 1.4898

 

EDIT: 0401 EST, moving stop to BE

5aa70f6032752_MK02_18_Nov_2009.thumb.png.f84252f1f880f43427079ed4d2181227.png

Edited by MidKnight

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
Hi Folks,

 

Just got in, and I see that the USDCAD declined to reach its second target, and added some on for good measure.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

This was an interesting chart. http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/attachments/208/15423d1258496942-reading-charts-real-time-11-17-2009-usdcad5.jpg (linked for convenience)

 

I can certainly see the 123 but it dosen't look that 'well formed' to me. (I would be unsurprised to find some bucket shop feeds showing a pip HH at 3). To be honest the action looks like a 'box' or ledge to me (if you'll pardon the pattern reference). Still as I review the thread paying a bit more attention I notice other examples like this.

 

Coupled with the fact that immediate resistance had broken and the 'box' was sitting on top of it I would have been just as inclined (actually more inclined) to conciser a long (which fortunately would not have triggered). Of course I would have been mistaken which gives a great opportunity to better my understanding.

 

So formation and context :) I guess on the former (formation) this and any number of other examples are there own answer.

 

I also notice that the 3 bar was also the entry bar and immediately followed the 2/trigger bar. No issues with that just an observation :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  MidKnight said:
Hey Thales :yes sir:

 

I was thinking more about the S/R stuff and thought that maybe you put more emphasis on the recent past few days trade than you would on say S/R from a couple weeks or a month ago - would you say that is true? I know every situation is unique, but just meaning in general. I have been doing the opposite, putting more faith in the obvious S/R, but it is usually weeks or months ago - maybe that is part of my problem. Not assessing the recent past few days action properly while approaching the bigger picture S/R.

 

Thanks in advance for the info.

 

Signed,

Private MK

 

I know in the past when I have focused on a a particular index you actually get to remember levels (I know a couple of people who trade without charts, they just remember key levels, my memory isn't that good anymore). The fresher the level the fresher the memory though significant levels of course persist both as S/R and in your mind for longer. Not what you asked really.

 

I must say all the currencies, what with there wierd fractional components don't seem to stick for me.

 

Conventional wisdom would have that 'obvious' SR is 'best' (perhaps 'strongest' is a more appropriate word) as everyone will be aware of it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  MidKnight said:
Aloha,

 

Here is a possibility with the euro right now, If this fail here we could get some good down, but I think I'll use a different pair like AUD/USD for that if it ends up happening, since it is hitting the R from yesterday as I type this.

 

EDIT: 0346 EST, long and moved stop to 1.4898

 

EDIT: 0401 EST, moving stop to BE

 

 

Filled on T1 for 27pips and stop at 1.4915

 

EDIT: 0459, Filled T2 at 1.4957 for 47pips. 3/4ths of the position is gone now.

5aa70f603989d_MK03_18_Nov_2009.thumb.png.32ea1ecc684b679fd4aed86710dd8541.png

5aa70f6040bcb_MK04_18_Nov_2009.thumb.png.41cd6cbceb49e318e019da789edbb3cd.png

Edited by MidKnight

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  MidKnight said:
Filled on T1 for 27pips and stop at 1.4915

 

EDIT: 0459, Filled T2 at 1.4957 for 47pips. 3/4ths of the position is gone now.

 

Moved stop up 1.4937. Maybe premature as it hasn't taken out the high yet...

 

EDIT: 0619, possible LH in the making.

 

EDIT: 0639, closed trade at 1.4969 for 59 pips. It's stalling here and I'm not going to be a dick for a tick tonight. Target was set for 1.4975. The gain on the trade averaged across exits was 40 pips. A decent result I thought, especially since the risk was so quickly reduced because it moved. Probably my first real feel for getting things moving as soon as it broke out.

5aa70f60482e1_MK05_19_Nov_2009.thumb.png.3e776d0ba138b9454aaad7c617dffa7e.png

5aa70f604c088_MK06_19_Nov_2009.png.de4392a4f335da08e4831e2622bd9a49.png

5aa70f60551aa_MK07_19_Nov_2009.thumb.png.124224d614531e4e54de617b515f7803.png

Edited by MidKnight

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.