Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

thalestrader

Reading Charts in Real Time

Recommended Posts

Hi Thales,

 

I appreciate the comments. I see your point on that nzd/usd trade. I was probably over fixated on the larger daily trend and thought that taking out a minor high on the 3 hour chart would be resumption of trend and off to the races.

 

Throughout my trading development, I have had instances where I do see the market really clear and obvious things jump out at me. I'm being patient, and just wait till I see it. Then for some reason usually after some success, I lose that clarity and things that are more obscure seem obvious. It's overconfidence. I usually need to be humbled again to regain that clarity. Hopefully as my experience continues, I can work on eradicating this cycle.

 

Good comments regarding the trade management. I will continue to experiment in this area and apply various scenarios over the weekend.

 

 

Hiya Kiwi,

 

I actually have all my trades as being with the larger time frame trend (to me that is daily chart). That's the beauty of 'trend' though, you can always find one time frame in agreement with trade direction :)

 

Thanks a lot for the comments and questions. It all helps me learn something.

 

With kind regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
do you tend to take trades against the next timeframe up? And if you do, do you require more range to your targets (or any other multiplier?)

 

As these are day trades that typically last a just few minutes to a few hours, I am not so much concerned with a higher degree trend. I am concerned with were price is in relation to support and reistance levels. So while I am usually on a 15 minute timeframe or lower, for entries and exits, I will check 4 hour, daily, and weekly to see if there is any nearby S/R of which I should be aware, e.g. MidK's GBPCHF short yesterday dropped to a support level that was clearly visible if one looked back a few days, but which was not shown on MK's trading chart and thus he mistook a probe to test that support as a false breakout on his trading chart.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahhh ... ok.

 

That's where we disagree MK. To me, the reason for larger timeframes is either:

- for support and resistance and any timeframe works here (daily, weekly, 4hr etc)

- for trend and here I think you want the one in which the next level of trend exists.

 

That second part means that to me, daily would be a good higher timeframe for the overarching trend on 4 hourly and maybe hourly trades (6x and 24x respectively). But on a 15m trade I think that hourly or 4 hourly would be more appropriate (4x and 16x respectively. So I'd look at (say) the hourly and ... hmmm ... I need to do pictures or this isn't adding to anyones education, mine included. I shall come back to this in an hour with a couple of pictures for the NZD and GBP trades properly annotated.

 

Hopefully that will make my point (lol, or prove me wrong as my system trading tests have done repeatedly).

 

Note: thanks for your comment too Thales as it appears you use the 1st reason as your main driver for a higher timeframe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK.

 

It is interesting looking at what MK and Thales are doing at the same time as I am trying to fully automate. Increasingly it seems to me that Automations strength is in taking advantage of either trends or patterns. And the human's advantage is in taking advantage of Support and Resistance.

 

Now, a smart guy by the name of Sam Seiden, who trades pullbacks into S&R uses the concept of odds enhancers to decide which ones are worth trading. One of them is strength of the initiating move (impulse), another is the shape of the S&R the move came from, another is how far to the next Very High timeframe S&R (daily here perhaps or 4 hr min). The other major is Big picture trend.

 

I'd say that in this case the VHT S&R supported the trades but gave warning areas in the GBP case. But in both cases the trade was against the long timeframe trend. And if you look at Thales' trades with both a 15m and 4hr chart open you'll see that when there is a clear trend (move) on the 4hr then its much easier to make money out of the 15m breakouts.

 

So here are MKs ones from yesterday (with the benefit of my perfect 20/20 hindsight).

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=14922&stc=1&d=1257463724

attachment.php?attachmentid=14923&stc=1&d=1257463724

 

 

Warning Warning ... Kiwi is inclined to trade with the trend so he might just be pandering to his own biases. :)

5aa70f5013c97_11-6-20099-06-08AMnzd.thumb.png.58102484f96691cf2ab49ff542617084.png

5aa70f501cfab_11-6-20099-15-16AMgbp.thumb.png.00bc313f3e4534622f4b5be897617c28.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We rarely see setups that failed.

I would like to post during the next several days, setups that would have failed had one taken the trades.

Please comment as to why a setup failed and whether it was a valid setup in the first place.

 

Thanks

 

Gabe

 

PS Red is a potential short and green a potential long.

EJ_Nov_5_2009_failed.png.da0d76621181cbd65ad4435c42c0796a.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
We rarely see setups that failed.

I would like to post during the next several days, setups that would have failed had one taken the trades.

Please comment as to why a setup failed and whether it was a valid setup in the first place.

 

Thanks

 

Gabe

 

PS Red is a potential short and green a potential long.

 

Just had an idea about the above.

If one looks at a pair that behaves largely like the EJ - GJ in this case - one can see a divergence between the two.

Maybe that would alert the trader that things are not as they seem to be.

 

Gabe

EJ_Nov_5_2009_failed_GJ.thumb.png.2f98b730b02d275172183ee3438b7e3a.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good post Kiwi, the pictures help. I'm starting to become more inclined to just trade off the 15m chart but look at the 240m as a target and scale-out (even adding?) size adjustment factor. My hunch is this side of it can end up more mechanical, but I really need to knuckle down and get some study behind me on this part.

 

The nzd/usd trade I took was based off the 3 hour chart, so that is why the entry was so high up from it's recent range and the stop was much wider than the others I have been doing.

 

With kind regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just got short gbp/jpy. Entry was 150.27 with a stop at 150.60, 33pip risk. First target for 1/2 is at 149.87, with the next target for 1/4 at 149.27.

 

LOL. You really don't want to go with the trend do you :)

 

I'm going to critique it (helpfully I hope) applying Seiden's critera.

 

 

kw8.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What can I say? :) I'm not trying to disprove the simplicity of what Thales is showing. But if just selling lows and buying highs is all that's required and I end up with more losses then winners, hopefully it will serve to vet some the filtering he is using. If it really is that simple, than I should come out on top like his daughter has :D

 

Recently Thales has been mentioning about a certain look of which I also mentioned in prior posts. I wonder how he conveyed that look to his daughter as this sounds like something experience based??

 

All my best,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just got short gbp/jpy. Entry was 150.27 with a stop at 150.60, 33pip risk. First target for 1/2 is at 149.87, with the next target for 1/4 at 149.27.

 

I only just remembered that today it is an NFP number tomorrow morning in the USA. Often the FX waits. Not the best backdrop when looking for a decent move :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just got short gbp/jpy. Entry was 150.27 with a stop at 150.60, 33pip risk. First target for 1/2 is at 149.87, with the next target for 1/4 at 149.27.

 

Hi MidK,

 

I just wanted to refer back to the chart that Gabe fixed for me (see his attachment in post 891). The same story told on that chart can be cut and past to this chart.

 

Your short may be profitable, but price is squarely in the middle of nowhere.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f502dd74_LowerHighsHigherLowsChop1.thumb.jpg.b5229ca36d217ff2bb7f36a78415f738.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
We rarely see setups that failed. I would like to post during the next several days, setups that would have failed had one taken the trades. Please comment as to why a setup failed and whether it was a valid setup in the first place ... Red is a potential short...

 

Hi Gabe,

 

I tried that short myself today and cut it loose for a 10 tick loss. As you can see, it is not surprising that price found buyers at that level. I try to post trades either before or soon after they trigger, and if I am unable to post them while price is still reasonably close to entry, I typically do not post the chart. This was a short worth trying, but you have to keep in mind that there are times that price is breaking out, while other times, price is simply digging into support or resistance. In this case, I exited at -10 ticks. I'd have been willing to re-short new lows, but I wasn't going to hold a short and let it hit new highs.

 

As Kenny Rogers sang, "You have to know when to hold them, know when to fold them ..." Losses can and will happen. You take them and move on to the next opportunity.

 

So, that was a good opportunity to try a short. It was also a good opportuntiy to practice cutting your losses quickly.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f503303b_11-05-2009EURJPYSRZones1.thumb.jpg.513ce0649fd095bf6f527169d28cf387.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi MidK,

 

I just wanted to refer back to the chart that Gabe fixed for me (see his attachment in post 891). The same story told on that chart can be cut and past to this chart.

 

Your short may be profitable, but price is squarely in the middle of nowhere.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

OK, I can see what you mean, but it doesn't look so dissimilar to your post here does it?

 

All my best,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
but it doesn't look so dissimilar to your post here does it?

 

I'd be curious to hear what others think about the comparison before I answer. Would any one else have any comments comparing the current GBPJPY to the EURUSD in my post?

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LOL. You really don't want to go with the trend do you :)

 

I'm going to critique it (helpfully I hope) applying Seiden's critera.

 

 

 

Who is Seiden and what is his criteria?

 

Thanks

 

Gabe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Gabe,

 

I tried that short myself today and cut it loose for a 10 tick loss. As you can see, it is not surprising that price found buyers at that level. I try to post trades either before or soon after they trigger, and if I am unable to post them while price is still reasonably close to entry, I typically do not post the chart. This was a short worth trying, but you have to keep in mind that there are times that price is breaking out, while other times, price is simply digging into support or resistance. In this case, I exited at -10 ticks. I'd have been willing to re-short new lows, but I wasn't going to hold a short and let it hit new highs.

 

As Kenny Rogers sang, "You have to know when to hold them, know when to fold them ..." Losses can and will happen. You take them and move on to the next opportunity.

 

So, that was a good opportunity to try a short. It was also a good opportuntiy to practice cutting your losses quickly.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

Thanks for the answer.

As I said in my post, It would help if people would post failed as well as siccessful trades for the learning experience.

 

Gabe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'd be curious to hear what others think about the comparison before I answer. Would any one else have any comments comparing the current GBPJPY to the EURUSD in my post?

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

The difference is that there is more "separation" between the highs and the lows in Thales's chart.

I think that this "separation" issue is subjective and cannot be numerically quantified. Only by experience which comes from screen time.

 

Gabe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'd be curious to hear what others think about the comparison before I answer. Would any one else have any comments comparing the current GBPJPY to the EURUSD in my post?

 

 

 

There is no lower high in your EUR post, also there is a clean shot at the target with no basing in the way.

 

Steve

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just got short gbp/jpy. Entry was 150.27 with a stop at 150.60, 33pip risk. First target for 1/2 is at 149.87, with the next target for 1/4 at 149.27.

 

Once the market failed to take out the previous low, I 1/2'd my stop. Got taken out at 150.43 for a 16 pip loss.

5aa70f503867f_MK02_06_Nov_2009.png.d500881ed3a0119b24103a63deb65369.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK. Here's another cut at what the two differences are and thus how we might qualify when to stop trading and then start again.

 

kw8.png

 

if the image doesn't show

http : // charts.dacharts. net /2009-11-05/kw8.png

Edited by Kiwi

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, everyone. I've been following this thread since i discovered TL a couple of months ago and wanting to join in. Thanks for starting this great thread to teach, Thales, and everyone here who is contributing to my learning.

 

I'm planning to mark up charts as Thales suggested and post when i can :) I'm just months old at this, so please bear with me if i'm slow on the uptake.

 

If i may begin with a question to Thales or anyone else who cares to answer, why was 1.4664 a buy setup when there was no BO? :confused: Forgive me if the answer should be terribly obvious ..

 

Thanks very much!

5aa70f50486a2_whyabuysetup.thumb.png.0f09b83e0563e0bce26953d685ec68af.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There was a breakout at the point I marked 14 .

 

It went Low at 1, high at 7, higher low 10 bars from the low and then the high at 7 was finally broken (briefly) at 14.

 

 

 

Whoops, sorry the next one.

 

Low above 11:45, then a high is made after one white bar and a black bar. then a higher low is made by the 1 bar pullback with the last red line touching it. Thats L ... H ... HL ... and the breakout is above 1.4664

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
it doesn't look so dissimilar to your post here does it?

 

If i may begin with a question to Thales or anyone else who cares to answer, why was 1.4664 a buy setup when there was no BO?

 

 

Low above 11:45, then a high is made after one white bar and a black bar. then a higher low is made by the 1 bar pullback with the last red line touching it. Thats L ... H ... HL ... and the breakout is above 1.4664

 

I would add to Kiwi's comment that that low was clearly digging into what proved to be an important support zone.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f505a52f_EURUSDSupportExample1.thumb.jpg.9b42ef71dd0b7488e91682c9253ce6c6.jpg

5aa70f506040e_GBPJPYExample1.thumb.jpg.51850aab7644eb27a98866c7ecf11191.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice short signal on GC.

Got in twice but did not trust it because the futures were moving up.

THis where what Thales wrote should be adhered to. ie Trade what you see, not what you think. :(

 

Gabe

GC_Nov_6_2009_15min.thumb.PNG.d153f356a010159bcce13235185c8255.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Date: 8th April 2025.   Markets Rebound Cautiously as US-China Tariff Tensions Deepen     Global markets staged a tentative recovery on Tuesday following a wave of volatility sparked by escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. The Asia-Pacific region showed signs of stability after a chaotic start to the week—though some pockets remained under pressure. Taiwan’s Taiex dropped 4.4%, dragged lower by losses in tech heavyweight TSMC. The world’s largest chipmaker fell another 4% on Tuesday and has now slumped 13.5% since April 2, when US President Donald Trump first unveiled what he called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.   However, broader sentiment across the region turned more positive, with several markets rebounding sharply after Monday’s dramatic sell-offs. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged over 6% in early trading, rebounding from an 18-month low. South Korea’s Kospi rose marginally, and Australia’s ASX 200 gained 1.9%, driven by strength in mining stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.6%, though still far from recovering from Monday’s 13.2% crash—its worst day since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. China’s Shanghai Composite added 0.9%.   In Europe, DAX and FTSE 100 are up more than 1% in opening trade. EU Commission President von der Leyen repeated yesterday that the EU had offered reciprocal zero tariffs on manufactured goods previously and continues to stand by that offer. Others are also trying again to talk to Trump to get some sort of agreement that limits the impact.   Much of the rally appeared to be driven by dip-buying, as well as hopes that the intensifying trade war could still be defused through negotiations.   China Strikes Back: ‘We Will Fight to the End’   Tensions reached a boiling point after Trump threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on all Chinese imports unless Beijing rolled back its retaliatory measures by April 8. ‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow... the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50%,’ Trump declared on social media.   If implemented, the new tariffs would bring total US duties on Chinese goods to a staggering 124%, factoring in the existing 20%, the 34% recently announced, and the proposed 50%.   In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a stern warning, stating: ‘The US threat to escalate tariffs is a mistake on top of a mistake... If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.’ The ministry also called for equal and respectful dialogue, though signs of compromise on either side remain scarce.   Beijing acted quickly to contain a market fallout. State funds intervened to support equities, and the People’s Bank of China set the yuan fixing at its weakest level since September 2023 to boost export competitiveness. Additionally, five-year interest rate swaps in China fell to their lowest levels since 2020, indicating potential for further monetary easing.   Trump Talks Tough on EU Too   Trump’s hardline approach extended beyond China. Speaking at a press conference, he rejected the European Union’s offer to eliminate tariffs on cars and industrial goods, accusing the bloc of ‘being very bad to us.’ He insisted that Europe would need to source its energy from the US, claiming the US could ‘knock off $350 billion in one week.’   The EU, meanwhile, backed away from a proposed 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey, opting instead for 25% duties on selected US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs.     Volatile Wall Street Adds to the Drama   Wall Street experienced wild swings on Monday as investors processed the rapidly evolving trade conflict. The S&P 500 briefly fell 4.7% before rebounding 3.4%, nearly erasing its losses in what could have been its biggest one-day jump in years—if it had held. The Dow Jones Industrial Average sank by as much as 1,700 points early in the day but later climbed nearly 900 points before closing 349 points lower, down 0.9%. The Nasdaq ended up 0.1%.   The brief rally was fueled by a false rumour that Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs—rumours that the White House quickly labelled ‘fake news.’ The market's sharp reaction underscored how desperate investors are for any sign that tensions might ease.   Oil Markets in Focus: Goldman Sachs Revises Forecasts   Crude prices also reflected the uncertainty, with US crude briefly dipping below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021. As of early Tuesday, Brent crude was trading at $64.72, while WTI hovered around $61.26.   Goldman Sachs, in a note dated April 7, lowered its average price forecasts for Brent and WTI through 2025 and 2026, citing mounting recession risks and the potential for higher-than-expected supply from OPEC+.       Under a base-case scenario where the US avoids a recession and tariffs are reduced significantly before the April 9 implementation date, Goldman sees Brent at $62 per barrel and WTI at $58 by December 2025. These figures fall further to $55 and $51, respectively, by the end of 2026. This outlook also assumes moderate output increases from eight OPEC+ countries, with incremental boosts of 130,000–140,000 barrels per day in June and July.   However, should the US slip into a typical recession and OPEC production aligns with the bank’s baseline assumptions, Brent could retreat to $58 by the end of this year and to $50 by December 2026.   In a more bearish scenario involving a global GDP slowdown and no change to OPEC+ output levels, Brent prices might fall to $54 by year-end and $45 by late 2026. The most extreme projection—based on a simultaneous economic downturn and a full reversal of OPEC+ production cuts—would see Brent plunge to below $40 per barrel by the end of 2026.   Goldman noted that oil prices could outperform forecasts significantly if there was a dramatic shift in tariff policy and a surprise in global demand recovery.   Cautious Optimism, But Warnings Persist   With both Washington and Beijing showing no signs of backing down, markets are likely to remain volatile in the days ahead. Investors now turn their attention to upcoming trade meetings and policy decisions, hoping for clarity in what has become one of the most unpredictable trading environments in recent years.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.