Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

thalestrader

Reading Charts in Real Time

Recommended Posts

  ehorn said:
I have attached some commentary and an update to the sequences...

 

Hi ehorn,

 

Are you using volume to identify and distinguish dom from non-dom trend? From your posts of FAZ, I presume you are interpreting the dominant trend for FAZ to be toward higher prices. If so, is this a recent change from down to up according to your approach, or do you view the entire down trend from the all time high to be non-dominant?

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Folks,

 

6J 15 minute chartss is working on what William O'Neil would consider a very nice "cup with handle" base if this were a daily or weekly stock chart.

 

Of course, O'Neil himself is a breakout trader, and the proper buy point would be above the 164 high of the right side of the base.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f3adeffa_10-12-20096J4.thumb.jpg.eab9dadefad97499fb83690992125655.jpg

5aa70f3ae3d8a_10-12-20096J5.thumb.jpg.29d284b378285a6a722ee1975cb3f9c6.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
Hi ehorn,

 

Are you using volume to identify and distinguish dom from non-dom trend? From your posts of FAZ, I presume you are interpreting the dominant trend for FAZ to be toward higher prices. If so, is this a recent change from down to up according to your approach, or do you view the entire down trend from the all time high to be non-dominant?

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

Yes, volume (and price) is used to identify DOM or NON-DOM. More specifically, the sequences of volume within the containers (Trendlines) of price. This is the cornerstone of the principles and their application.

 

As mentioned previously, I believe these principles are applicable to any market - and equities is a starting point (some reasons mentioned above). Typically equities use a "culling" process which draws out stocks meeting certain criteria desirable for spotting new trends (a time saver for those who apply the techniques to equities). I am using FAZ here as a quasi-proxy for the broader market in an effort to demonstrate the principles and their application.

 

Today seemed significant to me in that it appeared that the broader market completed the sequences for this most recent up move, signalling a change in the trend. According to the price and volume sequences, as I have tracked them, this trend in FAZ (current down channel) appears to be also completing and so I am anticipating a new trend (up channel for FAZ) to begin. I am considering this new up trend to be dominant for FAZ just as I consider the beginning of the broader market trend (down) to be dominant.

 

I also view this trend as a resumption of the movement whos price container began last fall and I consider now to be Point 3 of this larger container (part of the higher [or slower if you will] fractal).

 

HTH

FAZ-Entry.thumb.jpg.a85183a31c1a62e8dc8fe037091e9b58.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Folks,

 

Interesting to see how the 6B is vacillating at the earlier noted level (see post #555 above).

 

The GBPUSD has me somewhat befuddled. Daily and weekly price action leads me to have a bearish view of this pair, and the fact that as price digs into support it is chipping away deeper and deeper likewise lead me to a bearish opinion. But, each chip deeper is met with renewed buying interest, which, at the very least, humbles me and keeps me from putting "both arms in the bear suit," as they used to say.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f3bcc8ac_10-13-20096BSR2.thumb.jpg.b1c93a2fd7b528b014ad865d9baa7eca.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
Hi Folks,

 

Sorry for the later post, I should be back to normal within a few days. Long HOG & AN and waiting to get long LM.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

Hi Folks,

 

2/3 today:

 

HOG: -$0.44 (Bought at 26.45, stopped 26.01)

AN: +$0.20 (Bought at 19.20, sold 19.40)

LM: +$1.10 (Bought 31.65, sold 32.75)

 

I took some screen captures but I am having trouble with the files. I'll try to upload them if I can resolve the problem without losing the data.

 

I took two 6J trades today as well, but I was unable to load the screen shots.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  brownsfan019 said:
Were these stock plays gap up plays and buying above the high of the first 5 min bar?

 

Yes, Brownie, that is exactly how I traded them. In fact, I think it safe to say that 99% of my stock day trades are the exact same situation. HOG turned tail quickly and stopped me out after having spent very little time in positive territory basis my long entry. I basically stopped myself out of LM and AN for no other reason than I had an appointment out of the office and so I was done for the day. LM has managed to tack on another 75 pennies or more since I exited, and even AN has managed to chop a bit higher than my exit.

 

I am still having difficulty with my screenhunter files.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What must come next (for my anticipated place within the sequences for FAZ) did not today (I was looking for Increasing Black Volume) - and the stop took me out in mid-morning for a 0.61/share loss.

 

The sequences revealed that - my entry was early with point 3 arriving too deep for my initial stop-loss setting (PT3 will be arriving early A.M tomorrow). I may look for another entry then and if so I will come back and share my analysis.

 

Thanks for letting me share the routine I perform with you on your thread. I enjoyed it and hope to do it again some time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Last couple of days have been kind of boring

- tuesday was -46 points

- wednesday was +12 points

 

Today was more interesting at +199 points. One last picture. I don't really think that posting system trades quite meets the thread objective :)

 

.

kw1.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Gabe2004 said:
We are in the 50% retracement area since the bottom in January to the recent high in August.

It's a long shot but 151.40 looks like a reasonable target.

Going out on a limb here, it should take about a month to get there.

 

Gabe

 

 

We are half way there (GJ)

 

Gabe

GJ_Oct15_2009_Daily.JPG.37aedd5b684fc3b980c550e4cf87ea8c.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Kiwi said:
Last couple of days have been kind of boring

- tuesday was -46 points

- wednesday was +12 points

 

Today was more interesting at +199 points. One last picture. I don't really think that posting system trades quite meets the thread objective :)

 

Hi Kiwi,

 

If you didn't feel it would be giving away too much, you could always post your charts as your system signals an entry (and thus present it in real time rather than after the trade). But, I do understand how much work goes into putting together a working auto-traded system, and therefore I fully respect that you may not want to post your trades as your system manifests its entry points.

 

I do like the fact that I can see your entries, stops, etc even after the fact. It is interesting to me to compare how your algo trades a market to how I myself might have traded it. So, it is up to you. As far as I am concerned, your posts here are welcome, and I feel that it up to the beholder to determine for him or herself whether or not he or she can make someone else's contribution relevant to one's own trading or not.

 

Thank you for sharing with us.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Gabe2004 said:
We are half way there (GJ)

 

Gabe

 

Nice read, Gabe!

 

Remarkable rally for the Pound. Here is an updated GBPJPY chart I had posted a few weeks ago. I was anticipating a breakdown out the consolidation, but the Pound decided to breakup instead.

 

Years ago in her seminar, Linda Raschke, said that "sometimes a consolidation is not a continuation pattern - sometimes its a reversal." I should say so!

 

I do not know if the recent GBP strength is going to continue, or if the downtrend will reassert itself. But either way, today's rally was what my grandpop used to call a "a real humdinger."

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f3cc67a0_10-15-2009GBPJPY2.thumb.jpg.910b7ab303ed471fa32b415f35c74b22.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  ehorn said:
Thanks for letting me share the routine I perform with you on your thread. I enjoyed it and hope to do it again some time.

 

I appreciate any real time analysis demonstrating the application of your principles that you are willing to share. Thank you for this example, and I look forward to your future contributions.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Dinerotrader said:
I am short at this resistance point hoping ..

 

Hoping, Dinero? Sounds a bit too emotional to me.

 

I shorted the 6J at 11045 (I would have sold at 057 but I was out this morning and by the time I was able to open my platform open I missed the first 12 ticks). I bought 3 of them back at 11020, and I am hoping to buy the other two back at 10984.

 

Hoping.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f3cdb112_10-15-20096J2.thumb.jpg.247f3ce4046298ff616c9294199904f5.jpg

5aa70f3cde21b_10-15-20096J3.jpg.23a255b0979901a3a81333d2d3080171.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Got stopped out exactly at my stop out price which also happed earlier today so the emotions are a little higher right now. I'll work on that. I should have cut it loose at the pullback for a small profit since price didn't act as seems best for a reversal. The previous reversals all just touched the resistance and headed back on down. This one retested several times and then pulled back slightly to regain some steam. Some more paid for education.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=14293&stc=1&d=1255630407

5aa70f3ce514f_beeshort2.thumb.png.f578e4d8d4d9832554f59cc2ddd8f39c.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Dinerotrader said:
The previous reversals all just touched the resistance and headed back on down. This one retested several times and then pulled back slightly to regain some steam. Some more paid for education.

 

Just as important as how price acted at resistance is the manner in which it got there. That was some pretty bullish price action if you ask me (I know you didn't). You should print that chart out and pin it on your wall. Of course, all rallies come to an end sooner or later, and no one evr knows for sure where or when sooner or later will come. I know that many here at TL (Db comes to mind as an excellent example) sell resistance and buy support as you did here. But they do so based upon what price does once it gets to S/R, and they do not simply take price reaching S/R as a signal in and of itself. You might find Db's "Trading in Foresight" thread particularly helpful inthis regard. I think it is one of the best threads on any forum anywhere.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
That was some pretty bullish price action if you ask me (I know you didn't)

 

I always appreciate yours as well as anyone's comments. I'm am here to learn, period.

 

I rarely catch reversals since price normally hits resistance and falls back down very quickly. This was a rare occasion that I actually was watching and was able to act. IMO, you can't normally watch price action before entering these reversals since price normally reverses back and the trade is gone in a matter of seconds.

However, I should have moved my stop within a couple cents of my short once price started retesting resistance and trailed it closely which would have brought me a profit on this one. If you look at the past reversals of this stock you'll see that the tests of resistance were quick and the reversal was immediate.

 

I am still looking forward to trading breakouts once daylight savings time changes. Right now I am commuting during that prime time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.