Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

Here are two charts of Gold...

 

1. Inv. H&S Chart (LT?) with Bullish ABC & Targets (from Jun. 5th)

2. Current ABC Bearish Pattern with Price/Time Cycle

 

Regards,

Suri

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=11351&stc=1&d=1244984946

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=11352&stc=1&d=1244984946

gold_invhs_Jun0509.gif.422c9fa6db09203fdfce6ca193bdad3b.gif

Gold_ABCBear_Jun1409.thumb.gif.6edb742fb498d7c38c3c93e6016debb5.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Suri sir,

 

I read your interview regarding dragon pattern I have one doubt regarding the two legs

you mentioned it has to be in 5 to 10% range

It has to be in this range (5% is the minimum criteria)?

& also does it applicable to all timeframe like in 240-min & above?

 

I am uploading Gold 240 min chart does the Dragon pattern is correct?

 

goldchart.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Taq,

 

Yes, it is a Inverse Dragon setup. Thanks for posting 240m chart.

No need to have 5% minimum for the Dragon legs. Dragon setup

is one of the variation of Double Tops/Bottoms. Very rarely

DT and DB's have perfect bottoms/tops.

 

Here is another take on the same @ZG 240m chart. It is

Trader Vic's 2B Top (Irregular Top/Bottom) with

Entry/Stop/Targets.

 

Regards,

Suri

attachment.php?attachmentid=11355&stc=1&d=1245015451

Gold_240_Jun1409.gif.027cd593789c1904c658d8ff7f2009bf.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the chart

 

how you calculate target 2 & 3 in 2B patterns?

 

Also can you suggest some readings for time analysis & projections.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Taq,

 

Thank you for your post.

 

2B Targets are prior Swing Lows/Highs before the pattern

emerged and its distance ratios.

 

To my knowledge books from Scott Carney, Carolyn Borden,

Robert Miner, Larry Pesavento and Bryce Gilmore offered

timing analysis/projections theories. There may be others and

if I remember I will post again.

 

Regards,

Suri

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Vishal,

 

Thank you for your post.

 

In H&S pattern, the target is obtained by subtracting the height of the head from the neckline.

The height of the head is the vertical distance between the neckline to the top of the head.

 

 

Eventhough, small H&S (small width/height) are viable patterns,

very rarely they materialize full and may be difficult to detect.

I would look for H&S patterns with atleast 8 number of bars in each

of the shoulder with a minimum of 2 pivot strength.

 

 

Regards,

Suri

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

In H&S pattern, the target is obtained by subtracting the height of the head from the neckline.

The height of the head is the vertical distance between the neckline to the top of the head.

 

Regards,

Suri

 

do yoy consider only straight neckline or upto some angle (<=30 degree)?

& how you calculate tgts for those H&S?

 

I don't know maybe this week will be all about H&S only every major currency pair is making or already made one in 240-min chart.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
hi

Gold reversal??Gold has bounced back from 61.8 fib levels.

 

Regards

Vishal

 

 

 

Hi Vishal,

 

Here is Gold's Chart with Price/Time Cycles.

 

Regards,

Suri

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=12329&stc=1&d=1248113897

Gold_ABC_July2009.gif.b35ac750706abe22eb45640a737b4c55.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Suri Sir

 

Thanks for your post regarding Gold price time projection.Here is another chart of Copper 240 min showing Bearish Gartley Pattern.Sir whats your view on Bearish Gartley patterns.

 

Regards

Vishal

Copper240min.thumb.png.750354d728a3b612543e8bb04aafec25.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Suri Sir

 

Pls ignore the previous post.Thanks for your post regarding Gold price time projection.Here is another chart of Copper 240 min showing Bearish Gartley Pattern(AB=0.618 XA).Sir whats your view on Bearish Gartley patterns.

 

Regards

Vishal

5aa70f03d5252_copper240.thumb.png.ebf97f437e61ceccbcaeb58d416fc0a9.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Suri Sir

 

Pls ignore the previous post.Thanks for your post regarding Gold price time projection.Here is another chart of Copper 240 min showing Bearish Gartley Pattern(AB=0.618 XA).Sir whats your view on Bearish Gartley patterns.

 

Regards

Vishal

 

Hi Vishal,

 

Thanks for your post....

 

Bearish Gartley patterns are very powerful patterns in the rising markets. They do signal end of the rising trend. But all X5 patterns (Gartley, Butterfly, Bat and Crab) have just about 50-60% success. I think market context is the key on how to trade them.

 

X5 patterns form in Two types --- Retracement and Expansion patterns. The 'D' point in the pattern determines which type of pattern it may be forming. If 'D' is inside the 'XA' swing, then it is Retracement pattern (Gartley and Butterfly). If 'D' is outside the 'XA' swing, then it is Expansion pattern (Bat and Butterfly). Within Expansion patterns, if the central point 'B' is less than 0.618 of XA then it is 'Crab' pattern and if 'B' is greater than 0.618 of XA then it is 'Butterfly' pattern. Although these precise ratios are never achieved in the patterns, perfect Butterfly requires 0.786 of XA Swing. Pl. refer to Scott Carney's books for all the other rules.

 

In the Copper 240m chart, you posted, 'D' is outside the 'XA' swing and hence it is an expansion pattern. Also, 'B' is about 0.7 of XA, hence it is a 'Bearish Butterfly' Pattern.

 

Here are the Copper's 240m and Copper's Daily Chart. They both are Bearish Butterfly patterns. I marked the potential Butterfly targets with Time-Cycles.

 

 

Regards,

Suri

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=12347&stc=1&d=1248176154

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=12348&stc=1&d=1248176154

Copper_240m_Jul2109.gif.25d8ba4635e6676dad18384e9a960566.gif

Copper_Daily_Jul2109.gif.55b55cb07a574209a00e9b0d0fd74d39.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Vishal,

 

Thanks for your post.

I do see Symmetric Triangle.

 

Also, see ABC pattern with Time Cycle projections (based on 3/4th cycle)

and Inv. H&S Pattern (from June).

 

Regards,

Suri

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=12664&stc=1&d=1249313501

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=12665&stc=1&d=1249313501

Gold_ABC_Aug0209.gif.0c852549fbdac78b7a066f31c064858c.gif

gold_invhs_Jun0509.gif.fc2cd348316d24ff97b22b2dcd7632e5.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Suri Sir

Thanks for your post.

Gold 4 hours charts seems to be forming a Rising Wegde pattern.Sir what is the reliability of Rising Wedge patterns(Bullish and Bearish market conditions) and how to trade them and calculate the targets.

 

Regards

Vishal

Gold4hrs.png.99e6c1756b1ad110af3082bd56101bf1.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Suri Sir hello vishal

 

Gold Daily is looks like can go uptp 1030-35 zone but Silver Daily is made bearish butterfly pattern I am looking for tgts 14.70 & 13.80

 

let us see how it will unfold ?

 

Regards,

TAQ

5aa70f28f0769_20-09-0913-1.thumb.PNG.387840c9d7639d3c9f38b2b48b9dce1e.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.