Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

brownsfan019

Diversification Is Not Enough

Recommended Posts

Diversification Is Not Enough

June 2009

By Daniel J. Haugh

 

Ever have a “friend” whose house was broken into and then realized he or she did not have replacement insurance? Or had a tree fall on his or her car resulting in damage that ever so slightly exceeded the ever-so-large deductible? The thought of being uninsured or underinsured for the one event that in retrospect was likely to occur is not a good feeling. Americans, for the most part, do insure their cars, homes and even their lives, but the biggest asset most Americans leave uninsured is their investment portfolios.

 

 

TYPES OF RISK

 

A stock investor’s portfolio has three types of risk:

 

1. A specific company having a problem.

 

2. A sector having a problem.

 

3. The overall market having a problem.

 

For years, investors, brokers and financial planners have looked to diversification to lessen these risks. Owners of bigger accounts have sought to possess a large number of stock positions. Some even say no single position should account for more than X percent of an account—usually around 3 percent to 5 percent.

 

Other investors have sought diversification through the purchase of a single vehicle (the unit investment trust of years ago), then the closed-end funds, the open-end funds (the mutual funds we still seem to relish) and, most recently, exchange-traded funds.

 

These solutions are neither inherently good nor evil, but the problem is how they are portrayed to the public.

 

If you were to ask people on the street who manages the risk of a fund in their 401(k), just about every person would respond with “the fund manager.” However, the fund manager’s response would be “I am paid to buy stocks.” He or she assumes that the risk management is administered by you—the person who decides how much money to place in that fund. Each party believes that the other is doing the risk management, and that means no one is taking care of it.

 

Portfolio managers are graded on a curve and are compensated on the basis of how they did relative to their specific fund’s benchmark index. If you were lucky enough to be in a large-cap fund last year that only lost 35 percent, not only were you “fortunate” (since the S&P 500 lost 38 percent), but the fund expenses probably reflected a good bonus for performance. In fact, Morningstar’s Manager of the Year lost 20 percent, and if you were lucky enough to be in that fund, you should feel really good that the benchmark index was thoroughly throttled.

 

 

MORE THAN DIVERSIFICATION

 

Diversification is a desirable goal; it does an excellent job of reducing account risk due to specific company problems or specific sector problems. In essence, diversification significantly reduces two of the three types of account risk.

 

However, the more diversified your account is, the more market risk your account has, and the more your return is correlated with one or more of the benchmarks in Figure 1.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=11104&stc=1&d=1244061757

 

Uninsured market risk in an investor’s account is not something typically discussed by brokers or financial planners because they avoid using the tools that could significantly lower market risk, hence it is a taboo subject.

 

But most of the investment problems people have had in the past were due specifically to market risk. For instance, the 38 percent decline in the S&P 500 last year, the NASDAQ’s fall of 78 percent from top to bottom in 2001 to 2002 or the first Resolution Trust Corporation in the early ’90s—all market risk. And let us not forget the crash of 1987 or the implosion of the Nifty Fifty for the old-timers.

 

These events all have one thing in common: Before each event, all the talking heads declared it was “a stock picker’s market” and excused that statement after the fact by saying, “There was no place to hide.”

 

A true measure of market risk might be a comparison of what return you would have received, if in Q1 2008, you or your portfolio manager saw a downturn coming and moved into defensive positions at the end of that quarter and held them throughout 2008. Typical defensive positions include such sectors as defense, consumer staples, health care and utilities.

 

So how did some of those areas fare? Well, in 2008 PowerShares Aerospace & Defense Portfolio declined 39 percent, along with many other defense stocks. What about household goods such as Consumer Staples Select SPDR? It was also down by 23 percent. And Kimberly-Clark, parents buy diapers no matter what, right? Apparently not as much; the company was down 24 percent. What about Healthcare Select SPDR? Of course, health care is not cyclical. Actually, it also took a beating with a decline of 22 percent.

 

Since defensive stocks were all significantly down (true, there was no place to hide), that indicates a high level of market risk.

 

The only way to avoid this risk would have been to have no market exposure at all—or have price insurance. If you ask investors, especially individuals in mutual funds, why they are still in the market, the general response would be “After all I lost, I am afraid to miss the up move.” In that response, there is no indication of any research or specific market opinion that communicates anything other than investors are frozen in place.

 

Thankfully, exchange-traded funds on major indexes and some minor indexes, as well as S&P 500 sector indexes, all have very liquid options traded on them, which allows individual investors to select a risk profile other than “all in” or “all out.”

 

 

LEAP FORWARD

 

Another way for individual investors to manage their risk was introduced by the CBOE in the early ’90s with products called LEAPS (Long-term Equity AnticiPation Securities). These are options that extend the expiration date up to three years in the future. More than anything else, LEAPS changed the option user and allowed the investor to use the option product.

 

Prior to LEAPS, most of the options traders tended to be attracted to the product primarily by the leverage aspect and were mostly young with high-risk profiles. LEAPS changed that, and typical clients now use the option product as a risk-reduction tool. For example, PTI Securities’ current

investors’ average age is double that of clients from 15 years ago, and their average account size is significantly higher, while their risk profiles are much lower. In essence, the age of using the option product as an investment risk-management tool is upon us.

 

Because LEAPS options have a long time until expiration, there is less time decay (or cost to hold the position if you were to own the option). Because the cost of insuring a stock position per day is significantly decreased using LEAPS puts, it has now become cost effective for investors to have price insurance in place.

 

The main problem with these management tools is that the majority of professional money managers still do not use them or offer a risk profile that contains them. It is hard to imagine why there has not been a regulatory or market-driven push to provide this risk profile to low-risk investment accounts as exchange-traded options have been around for 36 years and are certainly not new or untested tools.

 

The fund managers are right about one thing, though: It is the responsibility of account holders to select how much money they decide to place in the market and how much they would like to have in different risk profiles. So individuals who want protection need to search for money managers who provide this type of risk profile.

 

 

INSURANCE PLAN

 

To manage your risk and price protection, look for a plan such as the Protected Index Program®, which PTI Securities has designed and implemented since the late ’90s. This entails purchasing a diversified ETF, buying put protection on that ETF with LEAPS and selling a covered call. By selling covered calls, additional cash can be generated, helping to offset the cost of put protection. Individual investors can select the benchmark index in which they desire to invest, the level of price protection (puts) they require for their situation and how much upside they are willing to forgo (what level of covered calls they are willing to sell).

 

Once again, because the time decay or cost of owning an option has been more dramatic in the past several months, buying long-dated put protection and selling short-dated call options (where time decay is greater) is advantageous. This strategy has resulted in a more than 10-year track record that shows a much higher return than the market, along with considerably less market volatility (see Figure 2)—a protected account not participating in some of the dramatic peaks of the market but also not participating in the dramatic valleys.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=11105&stc=1&d=1244061757

 

The net result is significant outperformance primarily due to dramatically lower drawdowns in market pullbacks.

 

This is a risk profile that is much more in line with the expectations of longer-term—especially retirement-focused—investors. It has been my experience that most of these type of investors have little if any desire for more than a 10 percent to 12 percent drawdown in their accounts, as their timeframe just cannot support much greater. So, for these investors and many others, failing to use the available risk-management tools would be a total disservice.

 

Investors need to ask the important question, “How much of my nest egg needs to be insured?” Gone are the days when clients’ only alternative was unlimited and uninsured downside risk if they wanted to

invest in the market. For all who desire less volatility in their investments, the understood constant should be price insurance in place for every share of stock owned in the safe investment allocation.

 

Are these choices more difficult than mutual fund investing? Yes, but isn’t the security of price protection and an absolute dollar amount of identifiable risk worth the extra time and effort?

 

Daniel J. Haugh is president of PTI Securities & Futures L.P. and has five years of experience as a floor trader on the CBOT and as a CBOE member.

 

 

 

 

 

=================

 

Personal view: normally articles talking about buy and hold lose my interest quickly but this one really stuck out. I put it in the 'investing' forum b/c this is more about your long-term investments and not daytrading. I have no idea if the writer and/or his firm is any good, but the article main point of using options to protect your downside is good. It wouldn't be terribly hard to mimic what they are doing in their PIP program on your own if you study options a bit.

 

As w/ anything, do your homework before considering either doing it on your own or sending these guys your money.

Figure1.png.2de458006a4c62e3455cccb85fbee517.png

Figure2.png.5ed2e48afba6ae49977db5a18ae5efd5.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

a good indepth study by the member. its really a great post and lots of things which we can take as lesson and it would be fruitful for all of us if we can remember some points from this detailed explanation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • AMZN Amazon stock, nice buying at the 187.26 triple+ support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?AMZN
    • DELL Dell Technologies stock, good day moving higher off the 90.99 double support area, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?DELL
    • MCK Mckesson stock, nice trend and continuation breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?MCK
    • lmfx just officially launched their own LMGX token, Im planning to grab a couple of hundred and maybe have the option to stake them. 
    • Date: 2nd April 2025.   Market on Edge: Tariff Announcement and Volatility Ahead!   The US economic and employment data continues to deteriorate with the job vacancies figures dropping to a 5-month low. In addition to this, the IMS Manufacturing PMI also fell below expectations. However, both the US Dollar and Gold declined simultaneously following the release of the two figures, an uncommon occurrence in the market. Traders expect a key factor to be today’s ‘liberation day’ where the US will impose tariffs on imports. USDJPY - Traders Await Tariff Confirmation! Traders looking to determine how the USDJPY will look today will find it difficult to determine until the US confirms its tariff plan. Today is the day when Trump previously stated he would finalize and announce his tariff plan. The administration has not yet released the policy, but investors expect it to be the most expansionary in a century. President Trump is due to speak at 20:00 GMT. On HFM's Calendar the speech is stated as "US Liberation Day Tariff Announcement". Currently, analysts are expecting Trump’s Tariff Plan to impose tariffs on the EU, chips and pharmaceuticals later today as well as reciprocal tariffs. Economists have a good idea of how these tariffs may take effect, but reciprocal tariffs are still unspecified. In addition to this, 25% tariffs on the car industry will start tomorrow. The tariffs on the foreign cars industry are a factor which will particularly impact Japan. Although, traders should note that this is what is expected and is not yet finalised. Last week, President Trump stated that he would implement retaliatory tariffs but allow exemptions for certain US trade partners. Treasury Secretary Mr Bessent and National Economic Council Director Mr Hassett suggested that the restrictions would primarily target 15 countries responsible for the bulk of the US trade deficit. However, yesterday, Trump contradicted these statements, asserting that additional duties would be imposed on any country that has implemented similar measures against US products. The day’s volatility will depend on which route the US administration takes. The harshness of the policy will influence both the Japanese Yen as well as the US Dollar.   USDJPY 5-Minute Chart   US Economic and Employment Data The JOLT Job Vacancies figure fell below expectations and is lower than the previous month’s figure. The JOLT Job Vacancies read 7.57 million whereas the average of the past 6 months is 7.78 million. The ISM Manufacturing Index also fell below the key level of 50.00 and was 5 points lower than what analysts were expecting. The data is negative for the US Dollar, particularly as the latest release applies more pressure on the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates. However, this is unlikely to happen if the trade policy ignites higher and stickier inflation. In the Bank of Japan’s Governor's latest speech, Mr Ueda said that the tariffs are likely to trigger higher inflation. USDJPY Technical Analysis Currently, the Japanese Yen Index is the worst performing of the day while the US Dollar Index is more or less unchanged. However, this is something traders will continue to monitor as the EU session starts. In the 2-hour timeframe, the USDJPY is trading at the neutral level below the 75-bar EMA and 100-bar SMA. The RSI and MACD is also at the neutral level meaning traders should be open to price movements in either direction. On the smaller timeframes, such as the 5-minute timeframe, there is a slight bias towards a bullish outcome. However, this is only likely if the latest bearish swing does not drop below the 200-Bar SMA.     The key resistant level can be seen at 150.262 and the support level at 149.115. Breakout levels are at 149.988 and 149.674. Key Takeaway Points: Job vacancies hit a five-month low, and the ISM Manufacturing PMI missed expectations, adding pressure on the Federal Reserve regarding interest rate decisions. Traders await confirmation on Trump’s tariff policy, which is expected to impact the EU, chips, pharmaceuticals, and foreign car industries. The severity of the tariffs will influence both the JPY and the USD, with traders waiting for final policy details. The Japanese Yen Index is the worst index of the day while the US Dollar Index is unchanged. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Michalis Efthymiou HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.