Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

forrestang

Was This a Valid Short

Recommended Posts

I think the picture should be explanatory of what I was seeing at the time.

This was on Monday, 1 June 2009, @ 9:05CST.

 

 

 

"Was this a good short here?"

 

matching the volume that causes the price to go up,

and volume that causes the price to go down,

will help you visualize the participants of the market.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"Was this a good short here?"

 

matching the volume that causes the price to go up,

and volume that causes the price to go down,

will help you visualize the participants of the market.

 

:confused:

 

I'm not sure what you mean?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think the picture should be explanatory of what I was seeing at the time.

This was on Monday, 1 June 2009, @ 9:05CST.

 

11071d1243957975-valid-short-vsa_2jun2008.jpg

 

 

 

What do you mean by "technically a down bar"?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
:confused:

 

I'm not sure what you mean?

 

Sorry Tams, if I've got this wrong, but I think you were meaning that yes there was high volume on the up bar... but then low volume on the down bar. Therefore, although the move up faltered, there aren't many keen sellers.... hence the drift up. Thats how I'd interpret that situation (albeit with hindsight) so be interesting to see what others think...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What do you mean by "technically a down bar"?

 

Forgive me as I'm still a bit new to this, but when i say down bar, I just simply mean a bar that closes lower than the previous close.

 

And I was thinking we'd want to see a 'no demand' bar after a buying climax, where you'd have a slight probe above the climax to see if there are still anymore buyers present before the distribution phase is over.

 

And 'No Demand' bars occur on upbars correct?

 

I might be thinking waaay too much into that buying climax and what a good entry is? it's possible the reason that didn't work for me yesterday was because the move up was for real, and there was no resistance over head.

 

Actually, the highest resistance level I have is 939.00, and typically i'd want to see a climax occur around a resistance level, and I didn't have any annotated as we've reached new levels......as far as the data I have is concerned.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The most important question to ask for this trade which will answer your question about whether or not it was a "good short" is this question: What was the background? Forrestang, can you show us what the background conditions were prior to this trade?

 

Eiger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Forgive me as I'm still a bit new to this, but when i say down bar, I just simply mean a bar that closes lower than the previous close.

 

And I was thinking we'd want to see a 'no demand' bar after a buying climax, where you'd have a slight probe above the climax to see if there are still anymore buyers present before the distribution phase is over.

 

And 'No Demand' bars occur on upbars correct?

 

I might be thinking waaay too much into that buying climax and what a good entry is? it's possible the reason that didn't work for me yesterday was because the move up was for real, and there was no resistance over head.

 

Actually, the highest resistance level I have is 939.00, and typically i'd want to see a climax occur around a resistance level, and I didn't have any annotated as we've reached new levels......as far as the data I have is concerned.

 

 

 

you then have to ask yourself which is the way you want to go...

 

1. I want to Short because the buying has dried up.

 

2. I want to Short because people are selling.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
you then have to ask yourself which is the way you want to go...

 

1. I want to Short because the buying has dried up.

 

2. I want to Short because people are selling.

 

Ok, I get you.

 

This short was because I was thinking buying had dried up.

 

Is my logic correct for thinking buying had dried up? How would you confirm that selling was occurring?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

a close below previous bar's close does not necessarily mean a "Down" trend has been established.

 

it is a "down" close in relation to 5 minutes ago.

 

it is still an "up" price in relation to previous bar's LOW,

or median price.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The most important question to ask for this trade which will answer your question about whether or not it was a "good short" is this question: What was the background? Forrestang, can you show us what the background conditions were prior to this trade?

 

Eiger

 

The background is something I'm not akin to understanding yet, as this was relatively early and there was nothing that stood out to me.

 

Similiarly with the second pic I posted of what happened today, I'm not sure of what the background is telling me if anything?

 

Forrest

vsa_question1.thumb.jpg.08a2027af1e31dab9570849decc84951.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ok, I get you.

This short was because I was thinking buying had dried up.

Is my logic correct for thinking buying had dried up? How would you confirm that selling was occurring?

 

 

 

I always tell people:

 

Don't be a hero,

 

you don't have to be the first to sell a top,

or the first to buy a bottom.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I always tell people:

 

Don't be a hero,

 

you don't have to be the first to sell a top,

or the first to buy a bottom.

 

Is trying to pick tops/bottoms something that comes with looking at VSA? I don't want to think along those lines as I always hear it's not possible to do consistently.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is trying to pick tops/bottoms something that comes with looking at VSA? I don't want to think along those lines as I always hear it's not possible to do consistently.

 

 

There are ways to pick Top/Bottom.

It is possible; I know people who do it consistently.

But you must employ the finer "Tools" to read the market at the finer level.

You also need a deeper understanding of the auction process that is happening behind the scene.

 

Picking Top/Bottom can be intense; not everybody wants to trade at that intensity.

 

 

.

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The background is something I'm not akin to understanding yet, as this was relatively early and there was nothing that stood out to me.

 

Similiarly with the second pic I posted of what happened today, I'm not sure of what the background is telling me if anything?

 

Forrest

 

Well, you are missing the key piece if you don't understand the background. Focusing only on the last few bars will only cause you to contribute your trading account to the market paticipants who do understand the background. At the point you took a short, they would have been happy to buy it from you. VSA is all about understanding the background first, then applying the VSA signals.

 

The attached chart is a 60-minute chart of the ES. It shows data going back into late April. You can see there was an uptrend that stalled on May 7 & 8. the uptrend had been in place since March 9 and, by anyone's standards, has been a strong trend, moving about 35% off the bottom.

 

Throughout May, the market has been in a trading range. There had been no indication of significant supply coming into the market. Instead, the market held the gains it made off the March lows quite well. We discussed this on the VSA III thread last week. Overall, the market has been bullish and remains so.

 

Friday afternoon, the market began to rally on good volume and wide spread, but stalled at the top of the range and at the May 7 highs. On Monday morning, the market rallied further pushing some 21 points above Friday's close by 10:30 AM. The Friday - Monday rally is seen at A. This is known in VSA as Pushing Through Supply. It is a vigorous move up and out of a trading range, the top of which is a supply or resistance area. It signals that higher prices can be expected. What you thought was a buying climax is the one exception to the high volume rule in VSA. You would only know that this exception was occuring by looking at the background first.

 

So, looking at the background first would answer your question about whether or not this was a good short. The answer is no, because the background was exceptionally bullish.

 

Hope this is helpful,

 

Eiger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hope this is helpful,

 

Eiger

 

It is! I have a 60 min on my screen now and see what you're talking about where it pushed through. Concerning VSA, would it be unwise to initiate any shorts when such a thing occurs? To include the short I posted from this morning?

 

Would you personally look only to the long side when you get a Push Through Supply?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, looking at the background first would answer your question about whether or not this was a good short. The answer is no, because the background was exceptionally bullish.

 

Good post Eiger, but doesn't forestang's goals for the trade (i.e. what sort of entry was he looking for - a quick retracement or something more substantial) come into it?

 

If he was looking for a day position then yes the background would be critical in going with/against trend. Maybe you could enlighten us as to what sort of position you were aiming to get into forest? Although I have a guess at an answer already considering your on a H1 bar...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

If he was looking for a day position then yes the background would be critical in going with/against trend. Maybe you could enlighten us as to what sort of position you were aiming to get into forest? Although I have a guess at an answer already considering your on a H1 bar...

 

I was looking for a retracement of some sort.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I was looking for a retracement of some sort.

 

 

Why ask for a hamburger when you can have steak?

 

 

Rule # Uno: The Trend is Your Friend. Don't argue with a friend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
... doesn't forestang's goals for the trade (i.e. what sort of entry was he looking for - a quick retracement or something more substantial) come into it? ...

 

You (by your statement, I don't mean you personally) are basically telling me that you want to put your preferences ahead of the market. Not a prudent idea. The background will help you assess what type of trade is likely to work. Let the market tell you what to do, not the other way around.

 

Eiger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really Eiger... what I meant was more that within any trend (this one being bullish and with established background as you pointed out) there will obviously be short term moves to the downside periodically. What I was wondering was if forest was trying to catch one of these by studying buying action / volume. If so, wouldn't this be legitimate - as long as expectation as to the potential risk / reward are kept in check?

 

Hamburger vs. Steak as Tams put it, right enough... but I just wondered if forest really was trying to order the hamburger (and he was) :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just one observation as a non-vsa guy - the thread was rather simple 'is this a short'. It quickly turned into a 3 page discussion w/ all sorts of opinions.

 

What appears to an outsider as a simple question has needed 3 pages so far and there are still questions.

 

Don't take this the wrong way, but does this stuff work in real-time? If so, can any of the VSA'ers join us in the p/l thread and show that it does? I've seen this kind of stuff discussed here for a while, yet have never seen any definitive proof of this working in real-time.

 

I ask b/c if no one is making this work in real-time, then these questions are just the blind leading the blind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't appreciate your repeated "harassment/invitation" to join your p/l thread.

 

There are reasons for participation,

and there are reasons for opt-out.

 

Proving one's method works is NOT a reason to post at the p/l thread.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.