Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

forrestang

Was This a Valid Short

Recommended Posts

I think the picture should be explanatory of what I was seeing at the time.

This was on Monday, 1 June 2009, @ 9:05CST.

 

 

 

"Was this a good short here?"

 

matching the volume that causes the price to go up,

and volume that causes the price to go down,

will help you visualize the participants of the market.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"Was this a good short here?"

 

matching the volume that causes the price to go up,

and volume that causes the price to go down,

will help you visualize the participants of the market.

 

:confused:

 

I'm not sure what you mean?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think the picture should be explanatory of what I was seeing at the time.

This was on Monday, 1 June 2009, @ 9:05CST.

 

11071d1243957975-valid-short-vsa_2jun2008.jpg

 

 

 

What do you mean by "technically a down bar"?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
:confused:

 

I'm not sure what you mean?

 

Sorry Tams, if I've got this wrong, but I think you were meaning that yes there was high volume on the up bar... but then low volume on the down bar. Therefore, although the move up faltered, there aren't many keen sellers.... hence the drift up. Thats how I'd interpret that situation (albeit with hindsight) so be interesting to see what others think...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What do you mean by "technically a down bar"?

 

Forgive me as I'm still a bit new to this, but when i say down bar, I just simply mean a bar that closes lower than the previous close.

 

And I was thinking we'd want to see a 'no demand' bar after a buying climax, where you'd have a slight probe above the climax to see if there are still anymore buyers present before the distribution phase is over.

 

And 'No Demand' bars occur on upbars correct?

 

I might be thinking waaay too much into that buying climax and what a good entry is? it's possible the reason that didn't work for me yesterday was because the move up was for real, and there was no resistance over head.

 

Actually, the highest resistance level I have is 939.00, and typically i'd want to see a climax occur around a resistance level, and I didn't have any annotated as we've reached new levels......as far as the data I have is concerned.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The most important question to ask for this trade which will answer your question about whether or not it was a "good short" is this question: What was the background? Forrestang, can you show us what the background conditions were prior to this trade?

 

Eiger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Forgive me as I'm still a bit new to this, but when i say down bar, I just simply mean a bar that closes lower than the previous close.

 

And I was thinking we'd want to see a 'no demand' bar after a buying climax, where you'd have a slight probe above the climax to see if there are still anymore buyers present before the distribution phase is over.

 

And 'No Demand' bars occur on upbars correct?

 

I might be thinking waaay too much into that buying climax and what a good entry is? it's possible the reason that didn't work for me yesterday was because the move up was for real, and there was no resistance over head.

 

Actually, the highest resistance level I have is 939.00, and typically i'd want to see a climax occur around a resistance level, and I didn't have any annotated as we've reached new levels......as far as the data I have is concerned.

 

 

 

you then have to ask yourself which is the way you want to go...

 

1. I want to Short because the buying has dried up.

 

2. I want to Short because people are selling.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
you then have to ask yourself which is the way you want to go...

 

1. I want to Short because the buying has dried up.

 

2. I want to Short because people are selling.

 

Ok, I get you.

 

This short was because I was thinking buying had dried up.

 

Is my logic correct for thinking buying had dried up? How would you confirm that selling was occurring?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

a close below previous bar's close does not necessarily mean a "Down" trend has been established.

 

it is a "down" close in relation to 5 minutes ago.

 

it is still an "up" price in relation to previous bar's LOW,

or median price.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The most important question to ask for this trade which will answer your question about whether or not it was a "good short" is this question: What was the background? Forrestang, can you show us what the background conditions were prior to this trade?

 

Eiger

 

The background is something I'm not akin to understanding yet, as this was relatively early and there was nothing that stood out to me.

 

Similiarly with the second pic I posted of what happened today, I'm not sure of what the background is telling me if anything?

 

Forrest

vsa_question1.thumb.jpg.08a2027af1e31dab9570849decc84951.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ok, I get you.

This short was because I was thinking buying had dried up.

Is my logic correct for thinking buying had dried up? How would you confirm that selling was occurring?

 

 

 

I always tell people:

 

Don't be a hero,

 

you don't have to be the first to sell a top,

or the first to buy a bottom.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I always tell people:

 

Don't be a hero,

 

you don't have to be the first to sell a top,

or the first to buy a bottom.

 

Is trying to pick tops/bottoms something that comes with looking at VSA? I don't want to think along those lines as I always hear it's not possible to do consistently.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is trying to pick tops/bottoms something that comes with looking at VSA? I don't want to think along those lines as I always hear it's not possible to do consistently.

 

 

There are ways to pick Top/Bottom.

It is possible; I know people who do it consistently.

But you must employ the finer "Tools" to read the market at the finer level.

You also need a deeper understanding of the auction process that is happening behind the scene.

 

Picking Top/Bottom can be intense; not everybody wants to trade at that intensity.

 

 

.

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The background is something I'm not akin to understanding yet, as this was relatively early and there was nothing that stood out to me.

 

Similiarly with the second pic I posted of what happened today, I'm not sure of what the background is telling me if anything?

 

Forrest

 

Well, you are missing the key piece if you don't understand the background. Focusing only on the last few bars will only cause you to contribute your trading account to the market paticipants who do understand the background. At the point you took a short, they would have been happy to buy it from you. VSA is all about understanding the background first, then applying the VSA signals.

 

The attached chart is a 60-minute chart of the ES. It shows data going back into late April. You can see there was an uptrend that stalled on May 7 & 8. the uptrend had been in place since March 9 and, by anyone's standards, has been a strong trend, moving about 35% off the bottom.

 

Throughout May, the market has been in a trading range. There had been no indication of significant supply coming into the market. Instead, the market held the gains it made off the March lows quite well. We discussed this on the VSA III thread last week. Overall, the market has been bullish and remains so.

 

Friday afternoon, the market began to rally on good volume and wide spread, but stalled at the top of the range and at the May 7 highs. On Monday morning, the market rallied further pushing some 21 points above Friday's close by 10:30 AM. The Friday - Monday rally is seen at A. This is known in VSA as Pushing Through Supply. It is a vigorous move up and out of a trading range, the top of which is a supply or resistance area. It signals that higher prices can be expected. What you thought was a buying climax is the one exception to the high volume rule in VSA. You would only know that this exception was occuring by looking at the background first.

 

So, looking at the background first would answer your question about whether or not this was a good short. The answer is no, because the background was exceptionally bullish.

 

Hope this is helpful,

 

Eiger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hope this is helpful,

 

Eiger

 

It is! I have a 60 min on my screen now and see what you're talking about where it pushed through. Concerning VSA, would it be unwise to initiate any shorts when such a thing occurs? To include the short I posted from this morning?

 

Would you personally look only to the long side when you get a Push Through Supply?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, looking at the background first would answer your question about whether or not this was a good short. The answer is no, because the background was exceptionally bullish.

 

Good post Eiger, but doesn't forestang's goals for the trade (i.e. what sort of entry was he looking for - a quick retracement or something more substantial) come into it?

 

If he was looking for a day position then yes the background would be critical in going with/against trend. Maybe you could enlighten us as to what sort of position you were aiming to get into forest? Although I have a guess at an answer already considering your on a H1 bar...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

If he was looking for a day position then yes the background would be critical in going with/against trend. Maybe you could enlighten us as to what sort of position you were aiming to get into forest? Although I have a guess at an answer already considering your on a H1 bar...

 

I was looking for a retracement of some sort.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I was looking for a retracement of some sort.

 

 

Why ask for a hamburger when you can have steak?

 

 

Rule # Uno: The Trend is Your Friend. Don't argue with a friend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
... doesn't forestang's goals for the trade (i.e. what sort of entry was he looking for - a quick retracement or something more substantial) come into it? ...

 

You (by your statement, I don't mean you personally) are basically telling me that you want to put your preferences ahead of the market. Not a prudent idea. The background will help you assess what type of trade is likely to work. Let the market tell you what to do, not the other way around.

 

Eiger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really Eiger... what I meant was more that within any trend (this one being bullish and with established background as you pointed out) there will obviously be short term moves to the downside periodically. What I was wondering was if forest was trying to catch one of these by studying buying action / volume. If so, wouldn't this be legitimate - as long as expectation as to the potential risk / reward are kept in check?

 

Hamburger vs. Steak as Tams put it, right enough... but I just wondered if forest really was trying to order the hamburger (and he was) :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just one observation as a non-vsa guy - the thread was rather simple 'is this a short'. It quickly turned into a 3 page discussion w/ all sorts of opinions.

 

What appears to an outsider as a simple question has needed 3 pages so far and there are still questions.

 

Don't take this the wrong way, but does this stuff work in real-time? If so, can any of the VSA'ers join us in the p/l thread and show that it does? I've seen this kind of stuff discussed here for a while, yet have never seen any definitive proof of this working in real-time.

 

I ask b/c if no one is making this work in real-time, then these questions are just the blind leading the blind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't appreciate your repeated "harassment/invitation" to join your p/l thread.

 

There are reasons for participation,

and there are reasons for opt-out.

 

Proving one's method works is NOT a reason to post at the p/l thread.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 7th April 2025.   Asian Markets Plunge as US-China Trade War Escalates; Wall Street Futures Signal Further Turmoil.   Global financial markets extended last week’s massive sell-off as tensions between the US and its major trading partners deepened, rattling investors and prompting sharp declines across equities, commodities, and currencies. The fallout from President Trump’s sweeping new tariff measures continued to spread, raising fears of a full-blown trade war and economic recession.   Asian stock markets plunged on Monday, extending a global market rout fueled by rising tensions between the US and China. The latest wave of aggressive tariffs and retaliatory measures has unnerved investors worldwide, triggering sharp sell-offs across the Asia-Pacific region.   Asian equities led the global rout on Monday, with dramatic losses seen across the region. Japan’s Nikkei 225 index tumbled more than 8% shortly after the open, while the broader Topix fell over 6.5%, recovering only slightly from steeper losses. In mainland China, the Shanghai Composite sank 6.7%, and the blue-chip CSI300 dropped 7.5% as markets reopened following a public holiday. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index opened more than 9% lower, reflecting deep concerns about escalating trade tensions.           South Korea’s Kospi dropped 4.8%, triggering a circuit breaker designed to curb panic selling. Taiwan’s Taiex index collapsed by nearly 10%, with major tech exporters like TSMC and Foxconn hitting circuit breaker limits after each fell close to 10%. Meanwhile, Australia’s ASX 200 shed as much as 6.3%, and New Zealand’s NZX 50 lost over 3.5%.   Despite the escalation, Beijing has adopted a measured tone. Chinese officials urged investors not to panic and assured markets that the country has the tools to mitigate economic shocks. At the same time, they left the door open for renewed trade talks, though no specific timeline has been set.   US Stock Futures Plunge Ahead of Monday Open   US stock futures pointed to another brutal day on Wall Street. Futures tied to the S&P 500 dropped over 3%, Nasdaq futures sank 4%, and Dow Jones futures lost 2.5%—equivalent to nearly 1,000 points. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, down more than 20% from its recent highs, while the S&P 500 is nearing bear territory. The Dow closed last week in correction. Oil prices followed suit, with WTI crude dropping over 4% to $59.49 per barrel—its lowest since April 2021.   Wall Street closed last week in disarray, erasing more than $5 trillion in value amid fears of an all-out trade war. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, sinking more than 20% from its recent peak. The S&P 500 is approaching bear territory, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average has slipped firmly into correction territory.   German Banks Hit Hard Amid Escalating Trade Tensions   German banking stocks were among the worst hit in Europe. Shares of Commerzbank and Deutsche Bank plunged between 9.5% and 10.3% during early Frankfurt trading, compounding Friday’s steep losses. Fears over a global trade war and looming recession are severely impacting the financial sector, particularly export-driven economies like Germany.   Eurozone Growth at Risk   Eurozone officials are bracing for economic fallout, with Greek central bank governor Yannis Stournaras warning that Trump’s tariff policy could reduce eurozone GDP by up to 1%. The EU is preparing retaliatory tariffs on $28 billion worth of American goods—ranging from steel and aluminium to consumer products like dental floss and luxury jewellery.   Starting Wednesday, the US is expected to impose 25% tariffs on key EU exports, with Brussels ready to respond with its own 20% levies on nearly all remaining American imports.   UK Faces £22 Billion Economic Blow   In the UK, fresh research from KPMG revealed that the British economy could shrink by £21.6 billion by 2027 due to US-imposed tariffs. The analysis points to a 0.8% dip in economic output over the next two years, undermining Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ growth agenda. The report also warned of additional fiscal pressure that may lead to future tax increases and public spending cuts.   Wall Street Braces for Recession   Goldman Sachs revised its US recession probability to 45% within the next year, citing tighter financial conditions and rising policy uncertainty. This marks a sharp jump from the 35% risk estimated just last month—and more than double January’s 20% projection. J.P. Morgan issued a bleaker outlook, now forecasting a 60% chance of recession both in the US and globally.   Global Leaders Respond as Trade Tensions Deepen   The dramatic market sell-off was triggered by China’s sweeping retaliation to a new round of US tariffs, which included a 34% levy on all American imports. Beijing’s state-run People’s Daily released a defiant statement, asserting that China has the tools and resilience to withstand economic pressure from Washington. ‘We’ve built up experience after years of trade conflict and are prepared with a full arsenal of countermeasures,’ it stated.   Around the world, policymakers are responding to the growing threat of a trade-led economic slowdown. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba announced plans to appeal directly to Washington and push for tariff relief, following the US administration’s decision to impose a blanket 24% tariff on Japanese imports. He aims to visit the US soon to present Japan’s case as a fair trade partner.   In Taiwan, President Lai Ching-te said his administration would work closely with Washington to remove trade barriers and increase purchases of American goods in an effort to reduce the bilateral trade deficit. The island's defence ministry has also submitted a new list of US military procurements to highlight its strategic partnership.   Economists and strategists are warning of deeper economic consequences. Ronald Temple, chief market strategist at Lazard, said the scale and speed of these tariffs could result in far more severe damage than previously anticipated. ‘This isn’t just a bilateral conflict anymore — more countries are likely to respond in the coming weeks,’ he noted.   Analysts at Barclays cautioned that smaller Asian economies, such as Singapore and South Korea, may face challenges in negotiating with Washington and are already adjusting their economic growth forecasts downward in response to the unfolding trade crisis.           Oil Prices Sink on Demand Concerns   Crude oil continued its sharp slide on Monday, driven by recession fears and weakened global demand. Brent fell 3.9% to $63.04 a barrel, while WTI plunged over 4% to $59.49—both benchmarks marking weekly losses exceeding 10%. Analysts say inflationary pressures and slowing economic activity may drag demand down, even though energy imports were excluded from the latest round of tariffs.   Vandana Hari of Vanda Insights noted, ‘The market is struggling to find a bottom. Until there’s a clear signal from Trump that calms recession fears, crude prices will remain under pressure.’   OPEC+ Adds Further Pressure with Output Hike   Bearish sentiment intensified after OPEC+ announced it would boost production by 411,000 barrels per day in May, far surpassing the expected 135,000 bpd. The alliance called on overproducing nations to submit compensation plans by April 15. Analysts fear this surprise move could undo years of supply discipline and weigh further on already fragile oil markets.   Global political risks also flared over the weekend. Iran rejected US proposals for direct nuclear negotiations and warned of potential military action. Meanwhile, Russia claimed fresh territorial gains in Ukraine’s Sumy region and ramped up attacks on surrounding areas—further darkening the outlook for markets.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • AMZN Amazon stock watch, good buying (+313%) toi hold onto the 173.32 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?AMZN
    • META stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 507.48, 557.84 at https://stockconsultant.com/?META
    • TMUS T-Mobile stock, watch for a top of range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?TMUS
    • KULR KULR Technology stock watch, pullback to 1.25 triple support area with bullish indicators at https://stockconsultant.com/?KULR
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.