Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

lhookway

VSA: Couple of Questions

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

 

I'm trying to wrap my addled brain around VSA and I have a couple of questions that hopefully some VSA guru can answer.

 

Taken from Master the Markets p39, Effort vs Results

 

If the additional effort implied in the higher volume and wide spreads upwards had not resulted in higher prices, we can draw only one conclusion: The high volume seen must have contained more selling than buying. Supply on the opposite side of the market has been swamped by demand from new buyers and slowed or stopped the move.

 

This has me scratching my head. If the high volume contained more selling than buying then doesn't this imply that there is more supply than demand? The quote above from MTM suggests that the opposite is true and that supply has been swamped by demand. If supply is being swamped by demand then wouldn't we expect to see higher prices and a continuation of an upward move?

 

Mark-Ups and Mark-Downs

 

In MTM mention is often made of the Smart Money (i.e. the Pro's) marking prices either up or down to facilitate their nefarious purposes.

 

Just so I can get a handle on marking up and down but without getting into very detailed specifics how does the Smart Money do this?

 

Using Forex as an example if the Smart Money wanted to mark-up say EURUSD would they buy a whole bunch of EUR, gobbling up some of the EUR that other traders have previously bought but now want to sell, thereby forcing the price up?

 

Likewise if the Smart Money wanted to mark-down EURUSD would they sell a whole bunch of EUR presumably to other traders that have previously sold EUR themselves but now want to buy, thereby forcing the price down?

 

Regards,

 

Laurence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Disclaimer: I'm knew to VSA as well, so don't expect much.

 

About your first part, the quote, I'm having a hard time visualizing it?

the higher volume and wide spreads upwards had not resulted in higher prices

 

I guess this is assuming a bar like in this picture? The quote said there is a wide spread, huge volume, but price did not move higher.

 

I'm still confused as to the question, but generally, I think the market does not like WRBs. I guess, if the market heads up on high volume, then immediately falls, there can be no other explanation other than the fact that large amounts of selling was occuring, or distribution during the up move(Buying Climax).

 

You can't see it though. Because if you plot Up/Down Volume over-layed on each other during an upmove, you will naturally see more buying than selling occuring. But immediately the market fell, so what other explanation can there be, other than we were in the distribution phase? See the other attached picture.

 

 

Do you have an example we can disect?

VSA_Explanation2Jun2009.thumb.jpg.5ca4c8e4d2701abdc61973b64ef08418.jpg

VSA_Explanation2xJun2009.thumb.jpg.d3875cd05f49ca0e8bd3c6bbcbf5aee4.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Forrestang, thanks for the reply.

 

If there is a WRB that closes towards the low then the implication is that there was more supply (i.e. selling) than demand (i.e. buying) and that caused the price to fall. Your example picture of a buying climax fits the bill.

 

The quote from MTM says...

 

If the additional effort implied in the higher volume and wide spreads upwards had not resulted in higher prices, we can draw only one conclusion: The high volume seen must have contained more selling than buying. Supply on the opposite side of the market has been swamped by demand from new buyers and slowed or stopped the move.

 

The last sentence ... "Supply on the opposite side of the market has been swamped by demand from new buyers and slowed or stopped the move." ... is what has me scratching my head.

 

Shouldn't that last sentence actually say ... "Supply on the opposite side of the market has swamped demand from new buyers and slowed or stopped the move"

 

Regards,

 

Laurence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Mark-Ups and Mark-Downs

 

In MTM mention is often made of the Smart Money (i.e. the Pro's) marking prices either up or down to facilitate their nefarious purposes.

 

Just so I can get a handle on marking up and down but without getting into very detailed specifics how does the Smart Money do this?

 

Using Forex as an example if the Smart Money wanted to mark-up say EURUSD would they buy a whole bunch of EUR, gobbling up some of the EUR that other traders have previously bought but now want to sell, thereby forcing the price up?

 

Likewise if the Smart Money wanted to mark-down EURUSD would they sell a whole bunch of EUR presumably to other traders that have previously sold EUR themselves but now want to buy, thereby forcing the price down?

.

 

About Mark Up/Down. I'm a bit conflicted about this. But as i understand it(at least the way Todd Kruegar explains it), there are four phases in the market. You have Accumulation -> markup -> Distribution -> mark down.

 

But it doesn't sound like that's what you're referring to?

 

It seems like you might be talking about when someone is checking for supply or demand.

 

So say you had a Selling Climax, naturally this occurs on HEAVY volume, and an increase in the velocity of price. So price is headed down fast in furious. Now we're in the accumulation phase supposedly, where someone is accumulating supply.

 

Now, they want as much supply as possible, and they want it from the masses. They also want people to believe the market is heading lower. So they would artificially mark prices down, in an attempt to acquire more inventory at a lower price or to trap unsuspecting shorts and shakeout any longs.

 

You want price to be lower, supposedly this is seen after a selling climax, with a narrow range bar, with reduced volume, showing the lack of interest in selling at these lower prices. This "Test" bar would dip below the selling climax checking for supply, and trapping new shorts and breakout shorts.

 

Disclaimer: Again i don't know what the hell I'm talking about, just trying to learn here. :confused:

Edited by forrestang

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Forrestang,

 

Now, they want as much supply as possible, and they want it from the masses. They also want people to believe the market is heading lower. So they would artificially mark prices down, in an attempt to acquire more inventory at a lower price or to trap unsuspecting shorts and shakeout any longs.

 

It is how they artificially mark prices down and conversely how they artificially mark prices up that I was enquiring about.

 

Regards,

 

Laurence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hello Forrestang,

 

 

 

It is how they artificially mark prices down and conversely how they artificially mark prices up that I was enquiring about.

 

Regards,

 

Laurence.

 

I don't think I meant "artificially" the way I put it, as if something was happening that really wasn't happening.

 

I'm unsure how they do it, could be temporary unloading some supply to check for the presence of sellers or to see if anyone is interested in continued selling beyond this point?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Laurence

I am not a guru.

I have studied and use both Wyckoff and VSA concepts.

 

Understand this: VSA is derived from Wyckoff.

 

In wyckoff there is nothing like

"markets do not like upbars on high vol" and "professionals lurking in the background to pounce on you". This is all hype in VSA. Context is the what matters.

 

There are some very useful setups in VSA , again based entirely on Wyckoff but presented in somewhat simpler way and that is all you require. Drop the rest, especially the urge to figure out who is moving the market, each bar in the right context reveals if there is Buying or Selling pressure. Vol is activity, on each bar selling and buying contracts are equal, what the price does tells you who is in control and that is all you need to know. Anything else is just distraction.

 

In your quote ref P39 chart 7, the explanation is confusing: The context is "Pushing through Supply", There are lots of traders who were long and are itching to get out at breakeven if price reaches the level at which they bought after a fall. To absorb this vol, the demand has to be greater than supply ie. buying pressure is in control, there are more contracts on the bid, totally forget about professionals:)))

 

If you wish to progress without getting mired into lot of VSA jargon, get hold of the latest Al Brooks Book "Reading Price Charts Bar by Bar", Preface alone will set you on the right path. and is worth the price of the book

 

Attached is a pdf : The first section of the book on "Price Action".

 

Next go to the Wyckoff forum, there is enough there to guide you further on how to read vol which is Effort and price move which is Result. You really do not need any more, no fancy software, seminars, etc period.

 

End of day, Your choice.

 

Good Luck

AL BROOKS BOOK.pdf

Edited by monad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OP, It looks as if the last sentence has the words supply and demand reversed, a typo. The original Williams book had quite a number of these.

 

Prices are marked down just as a store would. Essentially you lower the price you will do business at. Nothing really nefarious. If you are being pedantic marking up or down is not actively selling it is rearranging your order book i.e changing the price at or above best ask you are prepared to sell, or the price at or below the best bid you are prepared to buy. It is my hunch that when some people talk about marking up or down they include active buying or selling (market orders).

 

Some participants might mark down (or actively sell) even if they are bullish on the market. Again nothing nefarious, if you are a broker/dealer working an order for a million shares for a customer you probably don't want to hit the market all in one shot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks Monad, I will heed your advice.

 

Regards,

 

Laurence.

 

If you do decide to investigate the Wyckoff Forum, feel free to ask whatever questions occur to you. The subjects of buying and selling, supply and demand, volume and trend are regularly made far more difficult than they need to be, largely because the person seeking to understand is assumed to know more than he does. But if you've ever made a purchase that did not involve a take-it-or-leave-it price, the subject should not drive you batty.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Blow Fish is right, that looks like a typo.

 

There was a nice example of pushing through supply over Friday and Monday in the ES. We have been discussing this on the other VSA threads. In Wyckoff terms, it's called "Jumping Across the Creek." Both talk about the same principles, just in different words.

 

Supply exists along the tops of a trading range where price has been turned down. A level of effort is often seen via spreads and volume when pushing up and through this supply. When that occurs, it is viewed as a Sign of Strength and we can anticipate higher prices. In this case, price moved into an apex (red lines) before it generated the SOS - this is referred to as a Springboad, signifying that the market is poised to make a move. To help traders understand these principles, Robert Evans, a great master of the Wyckoff Method, created the "Creek Story" about a boy scout looking to cross a creek. After trying to cross the creek at spots too wide (supply points early in the trading range), the scout pulls back, gets a running start, and jumps across. He is basically jumping across the supply points, or in VSA, "pushing through the supply."

 

Now, we are seeing a Backing Up to the Edge of the Creek -- a testing for supply. If no significant supply is found, higher prices can be anticipated. We can read this in the spreads (should be narrower) and the volume (receding) as price backs up.

 

Hope this is helpful,

 

Eiger

5aa70edecc237_JumpAcrosstheCreek6-1-09.thumb.png.3dba08300647269d89c1816feeaadcf0.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You are welcome. Here is another one of Bob Evans's great Wyckoff set-ups -- a Spring. This is one of my favorites to trade. In a Spring, the market dips under support then springs back up above it. This one occurred towards the end of the day and gave a nice rallly into the close. VSA doesn't really talk about Springs, except as a sort of reverse Up Thrust. Springs are good odds trades in an uptrending environment and occur with regularity, so it's a useful trade to know.

 

Eiger

5aa70edeeae3a_SpringES5-min6-3-09.png.ddc200909aa6cd884420dc278b6c12ad.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Laurence

I am not a guru.

I have studied and use both Wyckoff and VSA concepts.

 

Understand this: VSA is derived from Wyckoff.

 

In wyckoff there is nothing like

"markets do not like upbars on high vol" and "professionals lurking in the background to pounce on you". This is all hype in VSA. Context is the what matters.

 

There are some very useful setups in VSA , again based entirely on Wyckoff but presented in somewhat simpler way and that is all you require. Drop the rest, especially the urge to figure out who is moving the market, each bar in the right context reveals if there is Buying or Selling pressure. Vol is activity, on each bar selling and buying contracts are equal, what the price does tells you who is in control and that is all you need to know. Anything else is just distraction.

 

In your quote ref P39 chart 7, the explanation is confusing: The context is "Pushing through Supply", There are lots of traders who were long and are itching to get out at breakeven if price reaches the level at which they bought after a fall. To absorb this vol, the demand has to be greater than supply ie. buying pressure is in control, there are more contracts on the bid, totally forget about professionals:)))

 

If you wish to progress without getting mired into lot of VSA jargon, get hold of the latest Al Brooks Book "Reading Price Charts Bar by Bar", Preface alone will set you on the right path. and is worth the price of the book

 

Attached is a pdf : The first section of the book on "Price Action".

 

Next go to the Wyckoff forum, there is enough there to guide you further on how to read vol which is Effort and price move which is Result. You really do not need any more, no fancy software, seminars, etc period.

 

End of day, Your choice.

 

Good Luck

 

 

You has a full Al Brooks book? Will Be able its here show? Long ago want to look her. But while on the first part me she did not like on interpretation of the material. Wanted hear whole she such.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:

 

 

Taken from Master the Markets p39, Effort vs Results

 

If the additional effort implied in the higher volume and wide spreads upwards had not resulted in higher prices, we can draw only one conclusion: The high volume seen must have contained more selling than buying. Supply on the opposite side of the market has been swamped by demand from new buyers and slowed or stopped the move.

 

 

This has me scratching my head. If the high volume contained more selling than buying then doesn't this imply that there is more supply than demand? The quote above from MTM suggests that the opposite is true and that supply has been swamped by demand. If supply is being swamped by demand then wouldn't we expect to see higher prices and a continuation of an upward move?

 

Im new but here's my humble opinion : I think there's no typo:

 

you have higher volume,wide spreads UPWARDS (green) and NO HIGHER PRICES (doesnt mean lower prices). why ? cause there was selling there , supply, which then got swamp by demand caused by new buyers who stop or slow the (down) move. it means weakness, the market may go up but not very far, we should wait to see some no demand bars, then an up thrust and.............go short !!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It is how they artificially mark prices down and conversely how they artificially mark prices up that I was enquiring about.

 

Im not sure about how they exactly do that but think that market makers are supossed to fill orders at every price level, HOWEVER... the amount of orders they trade at every level its up to them...what would you do if you were them and wanted the price to go up??? or down ???

 

please any VSA experts out there correct me if Im wrong, I wouldnt like to missinform anybody.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Im not sure about how they exactly do that but think that market makers are supossed to fill orders at every price level, HOWEVER... the amount of orders they trade at every level its up to them...what would you do if you were them and wanted the price to go up??? or down ???

 

please any VSA experts out there correct me if Im wrong, I wouldnt like to missinform anybody.

 

Dunno about that, the only market that I can think of where the market maker (specialist) is expected to 'facilitate an orderly market' is the NYSE. Even so I don't believe that there is any requirement on them to fill orders at any particular level. In short I think you have probably been misinformed:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Im not sure about how they exactly do that but think that market makers are supossed to fill orders at every price level, HOWEVER... the amount of orders they trade at every level its up to them...what would you do if you were them and wanted the price to go up??? or down ???....

 

First, we must admit that times have changed. In Wyckoff's and Tom's day, every market had market makers. Today is a different story with electronic trading. Where there were once floor traders, there are now streams of data in cyber-space.

 

With that said, the principles remain the same.

 

According to VSA bearish market makers would do this:

 

1. first we understand that they are bearish becuase they can see both sides of the market. And the market players. If they are bearish, therefore, it is because they see a large number of sell orders from the players in the know.

 

2. Price is allowed to rise slightly as the buyers (the people ultimately on the wrong side) enter the market.

 

3. The range is kept artificially narrow. The herd (buyers) thus think they are getting a good fill. In reality, however, they are buying into a "flood" of smart money selling. In other words, the presence of a lot of supply, allows the market maker to match the orders easily and keep the range small. Econ 101 would tell us that a lot of buyers (high volume) would bid the price up. What is really happening is that the buyers are buying into a lot of selling (supply). The smart money will have more supply than the herd. So ultimately price will fall on the abundance of supply in the market. But you would at some point see that narrow range up bar on high volume.........

 

This is the type of bar Bill Williams called a squat. Tom calls such a bar "end of a rising market", when it is into new territory and closes in the middle or high of the bar.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Hello citizens of the U.S. The hundred year trade war has leaked over into a trading war. Your equity holdings are under attack by huge sovereign funds shorting relentlessly... running basically the opposite of  PPT operations.  As an American you are blessed to be totally responsible for your own assets - the govt won’t and can’t take care of you, your lame ass whuss ‘retail’ fund managers go catatonic  and can't / won’t help you, etc etc.... If you’re going to hold your positions, it’s on you to hedge your holdings.   Don’t blame Trump, don’t blame the system, don’t even blame the ‘enemies’ - ie don’t blame period.  Just occupy the freedom and responsibility you have and act.  The only mistake ‘Trump’ made so far was not to warn you more explicitly and remind you of your options to hedge weeks ago.   FWIW when Trump got elected... I also failed to explicitly remind you... just sayin’
    • Date: 7th April 2025.   Asian Markets Plunge as US-China Trade War Escalates; Wall Street Futures Signal Further Turmoil.   Global financial markets extended last week’s massive sell-off as tensions between the US and its major trading partners deepened, rattling investors and prompting sharp declines across equities, commodities, and currencies. The fallout from President Trump’s sweeping new tariff measures continued to spread, raising fears of a full-blown trade war and economic recession.   Asian stock markets plunged on Monday, extending a global market rout fueled by rising tensions between the US and China. The latest wave of aggressive tariffs and retaliatory measures has unnerved investors worldwide, triggering sharp sell-offs across the Asia-Pacific region.   Asian equities led the global rout on Monday, with dramatic losses seen across the region. Japan’s Nikkei 225 index tumbled more than 8% shortly after the open, while the broader Topix fell over 6.5%, recovering only slightly from steeper losses. In mainland China, the Shanghai Composite sank 6.7%, and the blue-chip CSI300 dropped 7.5% as markets reopened following a public holiday. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index opened more than 9% lower, reflecting deep concerns about escalating trade tensions.           South Korea’s Kospi dropped 4.8%, triggering a circuit breaker designed to curb panic selling. Taiwan’s Taiex index collapsed by nearly 10%, with major tech exporters like TSMC and Foxconn hitting circuit breaker limits after each fell close to 10%. Meanwhile, Australia’s ASX 200 shed as much as 6.3%, and New Zealand’s NZX 50 lost over 3.5%.   Despite the escalation, Beijing has adopted a measured tone. Chinese officials urged investors not to panic and assured markets that the country has the tools to mitigate economic shocks. At the same time, they left the door open for renewed trade talks, though no specific timeline has been set.   US Stock Futures Plunge Ahead of Monday Open   US stock futures pointed to another brutal day on Wall Street. Futures tied to the S&P 500 dropped over 3%, Nasdaq futures sank 4%, and Dow Jones futures lost 2.5%—equivalent to nearly 1,000 points. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, down more than 20% from its recent highs, while the S&P 500 is nearing bear territory. The Dow closed last week in correction. Oil prices followed suit, with WTI crude dropping over 4% to $59.49 per barrel—its lowest since April 2021.   Wall Street closed last week in disarray, erasing more than $5 trillion in value amid fears of an all-out trade war. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, sinking more than 20% from its recent peak. The S&P 500 is approaching bear territory, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average has slipped firmly into correction territory.   German Banks Hit Hard Amid Escalating Trade Tensions   German banking stocks were among the worst hit in Europe. Shares of Commerzbank and Deutsche Bank plunged between 9.5% and 10.3% during early Frankfurt trading, compounding Friday’s steep losses. Fears over a global trade war and looming recession are severely impacting the financial sector, particularly export-driven economies like Germany.   Eurozone Growth at Risk   Eurozone officials are bracing for economic fallout, with Greek central bank governor Yannis Stournaras warning that Trump’s tariff policy could reduce eurozone GDP by up to 1%. The EU is preparing retaliatory tariffs on $28 billion worth of American goods—ranging from steel and aluminium to consumer products like dental floss and luxury jewellery.   Starting Wednesday, the US is expected to impose 25% tariffs on key EU exports, with Brussels ready to respond with its own 20% levies on nearly all remaining American imports.   UK Faces £22 Billion Economic Blow   In the UK, fresh research from KPMG revealed that the British economy could shrink by £21.6 billion by 2027 due to US-imposed tariffs. The analysis points to a 0.8% dip in economic output over the next two years, undermining Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ growth agenda. The report also warned of additional fiscal pressure that may lead to future tax increases and public spending cuts.   Wall Street Braces for Recession   Goldman Sachs revised its US recession probability to 45% within the next year, citing tighter financial conditions and rising policy uncertainty. This marks a sharp jump from the 35% risk estimated just last month—and more than double January’s 20% projection. J.P. Morgan issued a bleaker outlook, now forecasting a 60% chance of recession both in the US and globally.   Global Leaders Respond as Trade Tensions Deepen   The dramatic market sell-off was triggered by China’s sweeping retaliation to a new round of US tariffs, which included a 34% levy on all American imports. Beijing’s state-run People’s Daily released a defiant statement, asserting that China has the tools and resilience to withstand economic pressure from Washington. ‘We’ve built up experience after years of trade conflict and are prepared with a full arsenal of countermeasures,’ it stated.   Around the world, policymakers are responding to the growing threat of a trade-led economic slowdown. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba announced plans to appeal directly to Washington and push for tariff relief, following the US administration’s decision to impose a blanket 24% tariff on Japanese imports. He aims to visit the US soon to present Japan’s case as a fair trade partner.   In Taiwan, President Lai Ching-te said his administration would work closely with Washington to remove trade barriers and increase purchases of American goods in an effort to reduce the bilateral trade deficit. The island's defence ministry has also submitted a new list of US military procurements to highlight its strategic partnership.   Economists and strategists are warning of deeper economic consequences. Ronald Temple, chief market strategist at Lazard, said the scale and speed of these tariffs could result in far more severe damage than previously anticipated. ‘This isn’t just a bilateral conflict anymore — more countries are likely to respond in the coming weeks,’ he noted.   Analysts at Barclays cautioned that smaller Asian economies, such as Singapore and South Korea, may face challenges in negotiating with Washington and are already adjusting their economic growth forecasts downward in response to the unfolding trade crisis.           Oil Prices Sink on Demand Concerns   Crude oil continued its sharp slide on Monday, driven by recession fears and weakened global demand. Brent fell 3.9% to $63.04 a barrel, while WTI plunged over 4% to $59.49—both benchmarks marking weekly losses exceeding 10%. Analysts say inflationary pressures and slowing economic activity may drag demand down, even though energy imports were excluded from the latest round of tariffs.   Vandana Hari of Vanda Insights noted, ‘The market is struggling to find a bottom. Until there’s a clear signal from Trump that calms recession fears, crude prices will remain under pressure.’   OPEC+ Adds Further Pressure with Output Hike   Bearish sentiment intensified after OPEC+ announced it would boost production by 411,000 barrels per day in May, far surpassing the expected 135,000 bpd. The alliance called on overproducing nations to submit compensation plans by April 15. Analysts fear this surprise move could undo years of supply discipline and weigh further on already fragile oil markets.   Global political risks also flared over the weekend. Iran rejected US proposals for direct nuclear negotiations and warned of potential military action. Meanwhile, Russia claimed fresh territorial gains in Ukraine’s Sumy region and ramped up attacks on surrounding areas—further darkening the outlook for markets.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • AMZN Amazon stock watch, good buying (+313%) toi hold onto the 173.32 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?AMZN
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.