Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

swansjr

How Long Does It Take to Become a Profitable Trader?

Recommended Posts

I think a reasonable expectation is to expect it to take about 4 years. So, if someone does in fact become a profitable trader in just a few months, he or she was extremely lucky to have been on the right side of the market most of the time while they were learning the hard lessons of the markets. Of course, they could be full of s___ too.

 

In addition, what do you mean by profitable? Do you simply mean your plusses coming out ahead of your minuses or do you mean that you are earning something that is significant and not a waste of time?

 

Or, does profitable mean that you earn enough money to make a living trading? If you want to make a living trading, then you need to know how much you need to take out of the market on a monthly basis and have at least 6 months of that on the sidelines in the event that you hit a dry spell. So, if you need to make 10000 a month, you need to have about 60k set aside separate from your trading capital to fill the gaps if you hit a drawdown period. Then to earn 10k a month in the first place, you need trade somewhere in the area of 30-40 contracts per trade (assuming you trade ES) to earn an average of 10k a month. It’s truly unreasonable to expect to earn more than 350-650 per month per contract traded. So, you need to address the capital requirements of trading 30-40 contracts per trade, given a reasonable tolerance for risk if you want to make a living doing this

 

So, giving yourself 3 pts of risk at 1.5% risk, you need about 300k-400k to earn 10k a month. If you plan on earning more than 350-650 per month on ES per contract, you are basing your plan on a dream. There are only a handful of traders who average more than that just like there are only a handful of people who win lotteries each year.

 

A lot of people fail at this because they put a heavy strain on their trading capital; they tried to earn too much with too little capital. I am not implying that this is the only reason people fail.

 

There is some good advice there, but a lot of those numbers seem rather arbitrary to me. Not everyone risks 3 pts/trade on the ES, and the 350-650/month, well, I can't really refute this since I don't trade the ES, but to limit yourself to $350-$650/contract/month seems like a bad idea. I mean, $350/contract/month is just over 1 ES tick/contract/day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People often say on boards that they just want to make 100k/year, as if 100k is no big deal. They are saying this in relation to the traders that make 100m and 1B, so they think if they can squeeze out 100k, no problem.

 

I always find the statements that start out "I only need to make..................." silly and they do not take into account the psychology of the trader if/when they make that much.

 

In a business where you can double your income if you had traded more contracts it is NEVER ENOUGH. If you shoot for a 100k year, when you get there you will be shooting far higher the next year. This breaks down on a monthly/weekly/daily basis also.

 

As for the original question "How long..........." I think it is entirely dependent on the individual and the situation the individual is in when they want to become a trader. I do not think their is an amount of time necessary to put in.:2c: FWIW

 

Chris

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There is some good advice there, but a lot of those numbers seem rather arbitrary to me. Not everyone risks 3 pts/trade on the ES, and the 350-650/month, well, I can't really refute this since I don't trade the ES, but to limit yourself to $350-$650/contract/month seems like a bad idea. I mean, $350/contract/month is just over 1 ES tick/contract/day.

 

Yes, I agree. The numbers are way off. To earn $10,000 a month is about $450 a day. If someone need to trade 30 - 40 contracts to earn $450 a day, he is probably wasting his time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There is some good advice there, but a lot of those numbers seem rather arbitrary to me. Not everyone risks 3 pts/trade on the ES, and the 350-650/month, well, I can't really refute this since I don't trade the ES, but to limit yourself to $350-$650/contract/month seems like a bad idea. I mean, $350/contract/month is just over 1 ES tick/contract/day.

 

I am not suggesting that you limit yourself to anything. I am looking at it from an average earnings per contract traded, taking into consideration losses and commissions. 350 a month is equal to about an 8% return per year on the amount at risk ( almost 50k for ES). 650 a month is about 15% or so. If you were consistently earning 15% you would be heralded as 1 of the top traders on the planet.

 

I know it sounds like very little but 350 is a rational amount to expect per contract commensurate with a risk level that won't destroy your account. If you expect to earn 1000 per contract, that puts you somewhere in the 20-25% return area. That means that you expect to earn more than most major Wall St trading firms. That’s not rational to me.

 

It really doesn’t matter what you trade. The numbers all work in a similar fashion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
350 a month is equal to about an 8% return per year on the amount at risk ( almost 50k for ES).

 

Hi,

 

but I have to admit, that I am confused now.

 

Its not wrong to trade conservative, but in my view, if I set 3 ES pts at risk,

its 150 bucks, not 50k bucks.

 

Please explain further.

 

:confused:

 

 

Regards,

 

Hal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
350 a month is equal to about an 8% return per year on the amount at risk ( almost 50k for ES).

 

As I made already a fool out of myself in here,

 

an observation comes into my mind,

your calculation must be for a long!

 

 

Now a question comes into my mind:

 

What is your amount of risk for a short?

 

And what results should be expected per year?

 

As I said, I am confused. :confused:

 

 

Please,

 

Hal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi,

 

but I have to admit, that I am confused now.

 

Its not wrong to trade conservative, but in my view, if I set 3 ES pts at risk,

its 150 bucks, not 50k bucks.

 

Please explain further.

 

:confused:

 

 

Regards,

 

Hal

 

Sorry about the confusion. 1 es contract has a value of about $50000 since it is almost at 1000 again and hopefully will exceed 1000 this week. Earning 350 a month is about 4k a year which is about 8% on 50k.

 

I suggested 3 pts of risk per contract traded merely as an example. I am not suggesting that 3 pts is some magic stop loss number. Your stop loss can be any amount you want it to be, but you have to work that number through the equations.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes, I agree. The numbers are way off. To earn $10,000 a month is about $450 a day. If someone need to trade 30 - 40 contracts to earn $450 a day, he is probably wasting his time.

 

 

Take all your trades for a period of time and divide the avg contracts traded by the months you traded. You may be surprised. Also, I am talking about daytrading which is essentially grinding it out day in and day out.

 

 

If you are a position trader, it's a totally different set of numbers. I simply assumed that most people here are day traders/scalpers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Its not about the 3 pts, its about the 50k!!!

 

Please, maybe you haven't read my second post yet,

but just in case, whats about the risk of a short trade?

 

Hal

 

the risk is technically unlimited with a short. Right or wrong I still look at the long contract value for determining rational expectations.

 

You can use your account size instead as the amount at risk, you're simply dealing with higher percentages, but you still shouldn't expect to earn signifcantly more than the 350 -650 range. Also, I am not suggesting that you stop trading for the month when you hit 350. 350 is an average which could mean losing 1000 this month and making 1700 next month.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
the risk is technically unlimited with a short. Right or wrong I still look at the long contract value for determining rational expectations.

 

Unlimited implies, that you can't calculate other numbers than 0.

 

Anyway, think about your calculations.

 

In my view any numbers in $ are unimportant.

 

Its about decisions, not bucks IMO.

 

 

I once have written here:

 

It takes, as long as it takes. Period.

 

And I still stand behind this statement.

 

Regards,

 

Hal.

 

P.S.: Peace. Bedtime.

Edited by HAL9000
;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Become profitable. HA,HA,HA,HA,HA. I have never seen so many genius on the INTERNET. (present company excluded) They all have magic systems. But the question every newbie has asked at one point is whats a good trading system. The answer they get is you have to develop your own. And then their are the $5000.00 learn to trade coerces but thats a different thread.

i have found that holding up gas stations works for me. But in these tough time I cant get anymore paper bags to put over my head and with the plastic ones I cant breath. So now my trading plan is ruined. I blame Obama. :angry:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Unlimited implies, that you can't calculate other numbers than 0.

 

Anyway, think about your calculations.

 

In my view any numbers in $ are unimportant.

 

Its about decisions, not bucks IMO.

 

 

I once have written here:

 

It takes, as long as it takes. Period.

 

And I still stand behind this statement.

 

Regards,

 

Hal.

 

P.S.: Peace. Bedtime.

 

Most people have limited time or funds or both.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Take all your trades for a period of time and divide the avg contracts traded by the months you traded. You may be surprised. Also, I am talking about daytrading which is essentially grinding it out day in and day out.

 

 

If you are a position trader, it's a totally different set of numbers. I simply assumed that most people here are day traders/scalpers.

 

I am doing this monthly and I am not surprised.

 

How long have you been trading now for one tick/contract per day? Don't you find it extremely tiring and stressful? I am geniunely curious and not being sarcastic. I can't imagine sitting in front of the charts day after day trading all day for 1 tick/contract.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am doing this monthly and I am not surprised.

 

How long have you been trading now for one tick/contract per day? Don't you find it extremely tiring and stressful? I am geniunely curious and not being sarcastic. I can't imagine sitting in front of the charts day after day trading all day for 1 tick/contract.

 

LOL

That's actually funny.

 

I don't trade that way. I don't think anyone does. It works out that way when you accumulate all your winners and losers.

 

Someone who is a consistant loser can do the same calculations and realize that he is losing like $10 a trade or about 1 tick. So, you can ask, why bother trading when you are losing 1 tick per trade at the end of each month.

 

Day trading is a grind which is why most people do not succeed.

 

I will go a few months without making anything or losing and then in 10 days of trading I hit a streak that brings me back in line.

 

It's how it works. I am not making it up. take your trades and you will see something similar if you are actually making money. It doesn't amount to much on a per trade basis.

 

In addition, it took me a long time to get to where the amount per trade was positive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are some strange ideas coming out here on risk. It is worth repeating risk of ruin is the key statistic that you should consider when trading. Find out more at traderscalm.com, a great little site. Your stop should be set at an appropriate level to allow your trade to work, position size is what you should be thinking about varying to control risk. Whilst using 2 3 4 5% as a rule of thumb for how much account equitey to put at risk on any single trade is not a bad idea, RoR is the key to deciding which figure to pick. For example if your trades need a 3 (ES) point stop to work, and you do not want to risk more than 3% account equity on a single trade (pre-determined by considering RoR) it is not hard to see that you need 5k account equity per contract traded.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LOL

That's actually funny.

 

I don't trade that way. I don't think anyone does. It works out that way when you accumulate all your winners and losers.

 

Someone who is a consistant loser can do the same calculations and realize that he is losing like $10 a trade or about 1 tick. So, you can ask, why bother trading when you are losing 1 tick per trade at the end of each month.

 

Day trading is a grind which is why most people do not succeed.

 

I will go a few months without making anything or losing and then in 10 days of trading I hit a streak that brings me back in line.

 

It's how it works. I am not making it up. take your trades and you will see something similar if you are actually making money. It doesn't amount to much on a per trade basis.

 

In addition, it took me a long time to get to where the amount per trade was positive.

 

What you are talking about now is average profit per trade that come out to be about a tick per contract. This is different than your earlier "calculations" based on 1 tick/contract per DAY, which is vastly different. (Unless of course you only take one trade per day.)

 

My comments were based on that and I stand by it: If you only average 1 tick a DAY per contract traded, then you are wasting your time, imho. If you insist now that you were talking about profit/trade, then your calculations above do not make any sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To become an engineer takes between 3 and 4 years (3.5 years x 8 hours/day x 5 days/week x 40 weeks/year = 5600 hours) and then probably 1 - 2 years of practical experience untill you can manage a project alone (2 years x 8 hours/day x 5 days/week x 50 weeks/year = 4000 hours) so we are back to about 10,000 hours (and that was without overtime :) )

Asuming one devotes themselves completely to trading, 8 hours/day x 5 days/week x 50 weeks/year = 2000 hours ==>> 5 years.

And don't forget that in college you have teachers that guide you, mostly, in the right direction, whereas in trading we listed to all kinds of advise (sometimes given by people who should not have opened their mouth or sat in front of a keyboard to give their "advice/knowledge".

Other professions might take much more some, less but not too many.

I remember that a plumber in Montreal told me that he had to apprentice for 8000 hours (8k), on top of studiying, to get a liecense to be a master plumber.

To be a liecensed electrician, if one has a degree in electrical engineering, one had to be an apprentice for 6000 hours (6K).

It seems to me that those who truely want to be traders as a profession should count on 5 years if they cannot find someone to mentor them and shave off a few years off the journey.

Edited by Gabe2004

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have ran across a few of these:

smart and accomplished professionals (MD, lawyers, etc.,) thinking they can "conquer" the market in a couple of months...

engineers seem to have better odds, but still takes a lot longer than a few months.

 

 

.

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since 95% of the people in the market lose money the real answer is never.

The 5%, i would really like to know who they are. I have not seen one thread or post on any of these forums that is going to lead some one to be a successful trader. They all say the same thing, have a plan (don't tell you what it is) money management and all the other stuff that has been mentioned a 1000 times. All the books recommended etc are not going to help people starting form scratch because after the finish the first or second book their head will be spinning.

Does anyone think anyone making real money is on any of these boards.

I think people trade because of the hope of making money and they enjoy it like golf.

Anyway stop picking on the newbies. How do i start is a legitimated question. But you might as well be asking how do i walk on water and have sex at the same time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What you are talking about now is average profit per trade that come out to be about a tick per contract. This is different than your earlier "calculations" based on 1 tick/contract per DAY, which is vastly different. (Unless of course you only take one trade per day.)

 

My comments were based on that and I stand by it: If you only average 1 tick a DAY per contract traded, then you are wasting your time, imho. If you insist now that you were talking about profit/trade, then your calculations above do not make any sense.

 

If you are averaging more than 15 dollars or so a day, per contract traded and are day trading, and you have been trading more than a few months, you are much better trader than most traders. I tip my hat to you.

 

In determining your averages make sure you include all winners and all losers and also make sure they are real trades and not sim.

 

Out of curiosity, what IYO is a good amount to expect to earn on average per contract traded?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you are averaging more than 15 dollars or so a day, per contract traded and are day trading, and you have been trading more than a few months, you are much better trader than most traders.

 

What is the basis of that statement?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What is the basis of that statement?

 

It's kind of simple.

 

Most traders lose money trading so their average gain per contract traded is less than zero. Yet, they contiue trading.

 

Suggesting that a tick a trade per contract traded is a waste of time could imply that you are earning more than that and I, therefore, tip my hat to you since you are earning more than a lot of traders.

 

My hat tip is a sincere statement so please don't take it any other way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's kind of simple.

 

Most traders lose money trading so their average gain per contract traded is less than zero. Yet, they contiue trading.

 

Suggesting that a tick a trade per contract traded is a waste of time could imply that you are earning more than that and I, therefore, tip my hat to you since you are earning more than a lot of traders.

 

My hat tip is a sincere statement so please don't take it any other way.

 

My mistake, I assumed you were talking about PROFITABLE traders in your post, not ALL traders. That clears it up, thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Hello citizens of the U.S. The hundred year trade war has leaked over into a trading war. Your equity holdings are under attack by huge sovereign funds shorting relentlessly... running basically the opposite of  PPT operations.  As an American you are blessed to be totally responsible for your own assets - the govt won’t and can’t take care of you, your lame ass whuss ‘retail’ fund managers go catatonic  and can't / won’t help you, etc etc.... If you’re going to hold your positions, it’s on you to hedge your holdings.   Don’t blame Trump, don’t blame the system, don’t even blame the ‘enemies’ - ie don’t blame period.  Just occupy the freedom and responsibility you have and act.  The only mistake ‘Trump’ made so far was not to warn you more explicitly and remind you of your options to hedge weeks ago.   FWIW when Trump got elected... I also failed to explicitly remind you... just sayin’
    • Date: 7th April 2025.   Asian Markets Plunge as US-China Trade War Escalates; Wall Street Futures Signal Further Turmoil.   Global financial markets extended last week’s massive sell-off as tensions between the US and its major trading partners deepened, rattling investors and prompting sharp declines across equities, commodities, and currencies. The fallout from President Trump’s sweeping new tariff measures continued to spread, raising fears of a full-blown trade war and economic recession.   Asian stock markets plunged on Monday, extending a global market rout fueled by rising tensions between the US and China. The latest wave of aggressive tariffs and retaliatory measures has unnerved investors worldwide, triggering sharp sell-offs across the Asia-Pacific region.   Asian equities led the global rout on Monday, with dramatic losses seen across the region. Japan’s Nikkei 225 index tumbled more than 8% shortly after the open, while the broader Topix fell over 6.5%, recovering only slightly from steeper losses. In mainland China, the Shanghai Composite sank 6.7%, and the blue-chip CSI300 dropped 7.5% as markets reopened following a public holiday. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index opened more than 9% lower, reflecting deep concerns about escalating trade tensions.           South Korea’s Kospi dropped 4.8%, triggering a circuit breaker designed to curb panic selling. Taiwan’s Taiex index collapsed by nearly 10%, with major tech exporters like TSMC and Foxconn hitting circuit breaker limits after each fell close to 10%. Meanwhile, Australia’s ASX 200 shed as much as 6.3%, and New Zealand’s NZX 50 lost over 3.5%.   Despite the escalation, Beijing has adopted a measured tone. Chinese officials urged investors not to panic and assured markets that the country has the tools to mitigate economic shocks. At the same time, they left the door open for renewed trade talks, though no specific timeline has been set.   US Stock Futures Plunge Ahead of Monday Open   US stock futures pointed to another brutal day on Wall Street. Futures tied to the S&P 500 dropped over 3%, Nasdaq futures sank 4%, and Dow Jones futures lost 2.5%—equivalent to nearly 1,000 points. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, down more than 20% from its recent highs, while the S&P 500 is nearing bear territory. The Dow closed last week in correction. Oil prices followed suit, with WTI crude dropping over 4% to $59.49 per barrel—its lowest since April 2021.   Wall Street closed last week in disarray, erasing more than $5 trillion in value amid fears of an all-out trade war. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, sinking more than 20% from its recent peak. The S&P 500 is approaching bear territory, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average has slipped firmly into correction territory.   German Banks Hit Hard Amid Escalating Trade Tensions   German banking stocks were among the worst hit in Europe. Shares of Commerzbank and Deutsche Bank plunged between 9.5% and 10.3% during early Frankfurt trading, compounding Friday’s steep losses. Fears over a global trade war and looming recession are severely impacting the financial sector, particularly export-driven economies like Germany.   Eurozone Growth at Risk   Eurozone officials are bracing for economic fallout, with Greek central bank governor Yannis Stournaras warning that Trump’s tariff policy could reduce eurozone GDP by up to 1%. The EU is preparing retaliatory tariffs on $28 billion worth of American goods—ranging from steel and aluminium to consumer products like dental floss and luxury jewellery.   Starting Wednesday, the US is expected to impose 25% tariffs on key EU exports, with Brussels ready to respond with its own 20% levies on nearly all remaining American imports.   UK Faces £22 Billion Economic Blow   In the UK, fresh research from KPMG revealed that the British economy could shrink by £21.6 billion by 2027 due to US-imposed tariffs. The analysis points to a 0.8% dip in economic output over the next two years, undermining Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ growth agenda. The report also warned of additional fiscal pressure that may lead to future tax increases and public spending cuts.   Wall Street Braces for Recession   Goldman Sachs revised its US recession probability to 45% within the next year, citing tighter financial conditions and rising policy uncertainty. This marks a sharp jump from the 35% risk estimated just last month—and more than double January’s 20% projection. J.P. Morgan issued a bleaker outlook, now forecasting a 60% chance of recession both in the US and globally.   Global Leaders Respond as Trade Tensions Deepen   The dramatic market sell-off was triggered by China’s sweeping retaliation to a new round of US tariffs, which included a 34% levy on all American imports. Beijing’s state-run People’s Daily released a defiant statement, asserting that China has the tools and resilience to withstand economic pressure from Washington. ‘We’ve built up experience after years of trade conflict and are prepared with a full arsenal of countermeasures,’ it stated.   Around the world, policymakers are responding to the growing threat of a trade-led economic slowdown. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba announced plans to appeal directly to Washington and push for tariff relief, following the US administration’s decision to impose a blanket 24% tariff on Japanese imports. He aims to visit the US soon to present Japan’s case as a fair trade partner.   In Taiwan, President Lai Ching-te said his administration would work closely with Washington to remove trade barriers and increase purchases of American goods in an effort to reduce the bilateral trade deficit. The island's defence ministry has also submitted a new list of US military procurements to highlight its strategic partnership.   Economists and strategists are warning of deeper economic consequences. Ronald Temple, chief market strategist at Lazard, said the scale and speed of these tariffs could result in far more severe damage than previously anticipated. ‘This isn’t just a bilateral conflict anymore — more countries are likely to respond in the coming weeks,’ he noted.   Analysts at Barclays cautioned that smaller Asian economies, such as Singapore and South Korea, may face challenges in negotiating with Washington and are already adjusting their economic growth forecasts downward in response to the unfolding trade crisis.           Oil Prices Sink on Demand Concerns   Crude oil continued its sharp slide on Monday, driven by recession fears and weakened global demand. Brent fell 3.9% to $63.04 a barrel, while WTI plunged over 4% to $59.49—both benchmarks marking weekly losses exceeding 10%. Analysts say inflationary pressures and slowing economic activity may drag demand down, even though energy imports were excluded from the latest round of tariffs.   Vandana Hari of Vanda Insights noted, ‘The market is struggling to find a bottom. Until there’s a clear signal from Trump that calms recession fears, crude prices will remain under pressure.’   OPEC+ Adds Further Pressure with Output Hike   Bearish sentiment intensified after OPEC+ announced it would boost production by 411,000 barrels per day in May, far surpassing the expected 135,000 bpd. The alliance called on overproducing nations to submit compensation plans by April 15. Analysts fear this surprise move could undo years of supply discipline and weigh further on already fragile oil markets.   Global political risks also flared over the weekend. Iran rejected US proposals for direct nuclear negotiations and warned of potential military action. Meanwhile, Russia claimed fresh territorial gains in Ukraine’s Sumy region and ramped up attacks on surrounding areas—further darkening the outlook for markets.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • AMZN Amazon stock watch, good buying (+313%) toi hold onto the 173.32 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?AMZN
    • META stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 507.48, 557.84 at https://stockconsultant.com/?META
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.