Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

brownsfan019

Futures I Trade Show & Brooks Book

Recommended Posts

Guest Maletor

That's something I've thought about.

 

Usually they become obvious after the fact and obviously there is no way to tell if the best trade of the day is still to come.

 

I just quantify it by three criteria:

 

how many unique things it has going for it

how dependable each of those things are independently

and how close the setup is to "perfect"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sorry for asking this here, but it's partly connected to what Brooks says in the book.

 

I trade currencies live, but I'm also demo trading the ES at the moment. What I'm interested in, is swing trading the SPY on 15m+ timeframes, using some of Brooks methods.

 

Could someone please outline what is needed to trade the SPY. I am almost certain to go with IB as the broker, but am unsure if I'll actually be allowed to trade the SPY.

 

Also, is it possible to get a demo feed of the SPY on any charts.

 

Thanks.

 

The pattern day trading rule may be an issue with trading the SPY on a 15m chart if you have a balance less than $25,000. Not sure since I don't trade equities.

You can get a demo from any broker, but most if not all are for 30 days only. The best way around is to open a live account with a broker. Most brokers will give you an indefinite demo account if you have a funded account with them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The pattern day trading rule may be an issue with trading the SPY on a 15m chart if you have a balance less than $25,000. Not sure since I don't trade equities.

You can get a demo from any broker, but most if not all are for 30 days only. The best way around is to open a live account with a broker. Most brokers will give you an indefinite demo account if you have a funded account with them.

 

If I recall, a friend of mine had a live demo account with TOS for like 6 months before he ever funded the account.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
........ What I'm interested in, is swing trading the SPY on 15m+ timeframes, using some of Brooks methods.

 

Could someone please outline what is needed to trade the SPY. I am almost certain to go with IB as the broker, but am unsure if I'll actually be allowed to trade the SPY.

 

Also, is it possible to get a demo feed of the SPY on any charts.

 

Thanks.

 

Yes , I think mutiple day swings are great way to start and you can even practice live trading using Brook's methods with 1 to 50 shares as Wycoff suggested. You can get into options (with 75 - 80 delta) later as you gain confidence for directional plays. Although I study ,observe and utilize the SPY chart, I don't trade it, too expensive. Here is a list of Ultra and Ultra Inverse (when market slides can buy Inverse shares) index related ETFs. You can check them out for free at FreeStockCharts.com - Web's Best Streaming Realtime Stock Charts - Free.

Leveraged_InverseETFs.pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Has anyone figured out how to quantify what the 'best trades' are each day?

 

By that I don't mean setup 1 vs. setup 2 or something, just if you were trying to explain to someone to pick the very best trades throughout the day, how would you do it?

 

I mean wether it be something having to do with how we opened, or using a S/R level somewhere, or whatever criteria you wish?

 

To me the best trades happen, first of all, when the bars are moving vertically rather than horizontally. I avoid all barb wire and tight trading ranges since I know I'm not good enough, at least yet, to trade them. A clear two legged pullback in a strong trend is number one. The second leg of an expected two leg move after a pattern such as a wedge, flag, trendline break, trend channel overshoot, etc. would be number two.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Has anyone figured out how to quantify what the 'best trades' are each day?

 

By that I don't mean setup 1 vs. setup 2 or something, just if you were trying to explain to someone to pick the very best trades throughout the day, how would you do it?

 

I mean wether it be something having to do with how we opened, or using a S/R level somewhere, or whatever criteria you wish?

 

 

 

Brooks specifically discusses this. He says it's not possible to select and be a winner as you will pick more bad cherries than good ones. Also - that is why he trades the 5M chart ... it has fewer trades on it, so less chance of overtrading. Finally, implicit in his method is to trade LARGE size and after you're up your goal STOP trading.

 

His pint is - it's better/easier to get 1 point with 100 contracts and make $5000 than it is to tray to make $5000 getting 10 points with 10 contracts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Today's trades : Bar#4 Mtl Fbo Long P/L +4, Bar# 12 Bull Trap Short P/L+4,Bar's#15,16 and 17 Bull/Bear Trap Long P/L+4....:)

 

Why didn't you take the second bull trap short at bar 15?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Maletor

Here is today's chart.

 

Afternoon trading has been abysmal as of late.

 

1 - Huge gap open with a huge bar. Going long felt like buying a top and indeed it came back to 1 tick of my MM stop. In the end worked up to +4

 

2 - Took the outside bar short thinking there were trapped longs on the H2. and it was the technical L2 from HOD. I should have taken the L2 that was after the green bar which was the real second leg down after the trend line break.

 

Was this entry 80% probable?

 

3 - Took long on breakout pullback from the mornings triangle and a 2 bar double top, moved top up, got stopped out and

 

4 - reversed like a buffoon. Quit for the day.

5aa70f051996e_Picture1(2).thumb.png.f1d0f799d9a91cc491e2ea640ac63559.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here is today's chart.

 

Going long felt like buying a top and indeed it came back to 1 tick of my MM stop.

Maletor, thanks for posting your charts and more importantly your explanations. Simple question on your 1st trade above - what does MM mean? Didn't see it in Al Brooks' book, have never seen that particular abbreviation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here is today's chart.

 

moved top up, got stopped out

 

Still working on that one myself. It seems like the ES loves to go back and hunt for stops. Many times you get 3-4 ticks and then it tests not only the entry price but the signal price and even one tick beyond before giving you the needed 5.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here is today's chart.

 

Afternoon trading has been abysmal as of late.

 

1 - Huge gap open with a huge bar. Going long felt like buying a top and indeed it came back to 1 tick of my MM stop. In the end worked up to +4

 

2 - Took the outside bar short thinking there were trapped longs on the H2. and it was the technical L2 from HOD. I should have taken the L2 that was after the green bar which was the real second leg down after the trend line break.

 

Was this entry 80% probable?

 

3 - Took long on breakout pullback from the mornings triangle and a 2 bar double top, moved top up, got stopped out and

 

4 - reversed like a buffoon. Quit for the day.

 

 

Nice trades, I still think that the highest probability trades for the day were the inside doji bar 8 setup bar and bar #9 short entry.

Also, bar #12 short, bar #4 long, and counting backwards bar #14 short.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's interesting that your traps at bar 4 and 12 were also "implied" H1 and L1 pullbacks, where the single countertrend candles may have been more clearly identified as pullbacks on a faster chart.

 

Another thing I've noticed is that EMA gap plays will sometimes show up on a daily 8:30 to 3:15 chart, but they won't show up on a 24 hour chart in the first hour and forty minutes of trading.

 

For example, the gap pullback 2nd attempt at bar 16. This isn't on a chart that plots 24 hours since the EMA actually plots differently for the first 20 5-minute periods of the regular session. It's one of my favorites.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Had this closed out at 94.20 earlier this morning, which I set last night, for +43.

 

What I'm finding from the book, is that I'm more comfortable with setups that I already could in part, see myself before reading the book. Brooks has just clarified the situation and gave me confidence to trade what I see.

 

I'm still looking at his other observations, but for now I'm concentrating on these trendline breaks and pullbacks. The target was where I thought price might stall, at the beginning of the move down yesterday. It's actually gone higher now, but I'm still happy with the result. Other pairs had the same pattern, and I should have actually went with GBP/USD instead.

 

It also highlights something he mentions in the book. The last push down appears to be a fake head and shoulders break. The line across the bottom is where I see the pattern (you can't see the left shoulder on the attached chart).

yen.gif.c525258c2ed092af0ed68610006e77a5.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Maletor, thanks for posting your charts and more importantly your explanations. Simple question on your 1st trade above - what does MM mean? Didn't see it in Al Brooks' book, have never seen that particular abbreviation.

 

I am sure he means his Money Management stop. (ie trailing his stop up after netting 4 ticks)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Difficult morning for me. Of course in hindsight it's obvious, just jump in after the break of the opening bar high. Problems were many:

  • the gap was small, only 1.50 pts, and to use Al Brooks' term the market was anything but "overdone"
  • there was over 2 hrs of congestion in that general area from the previous afternoon, and as Al said on pg.305 regarding one of his examples where the market gapped down huge (which is theoretically better), formed an opening bear-trend bar, and yet he didn't short below it: "A short based on the bear trend bar would be risky, since it is in the area of the trading range of the final hour of the day before."
  • a buy above the opening bar with a stop below it would've meant a 2.75pt stop if hit. While not excessive that's a bit steeper than I like to risk, especially with the other problems of the trade listed above
  • on the 9:50 bar the market stalled, formed a bear-trend bar (or largish-bodied doji) and I considered a buy above it. But to that point there had been no big trend bars clearly pointing the way, and serious resistance was right overhead. Entry would've been 955.50 and yesterday's high was 956.75.
  • nice pullback at 10:20/10:25 and in hindsight should've bought above the 10:25 bar. But in realtime I didn't because we had just completed 3 clear legs up and I didn't want to bet on a 4th leg.
  • another nice pullback at 10:40-10:50 which, in hindsight, I should've bought above the 10:50 bar. But this time I would've been betting on a 5th leg. Obviously it worked. Also the 6th leg worked too. Go figure.

 

I did play the 1st pullback to the EMA, but unlike the overwhelming majority of trend days that close at/near their high this one sold off and I was lucky to make 5 ticks.

 

BTW, bakrob99, thanks for the tip re: MM being Money Management. Never heard that one before. Have, of course, heard of break-even (BE) stops, and trailing stops, but never money management stops! Good to know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The gap really didn't matter. We had a failed wedge yesterday up to the high and made two legs down. The upswing at the EOD was just the beginning out of the second leg and this morning was a continuation. The first bar was a strong bar and any trade on either side of a strong trend bar is a good trade.

 

On the 9:50 bar, the market pulled back after all bull bars. This was an inside bar and a low risk long trade, we were only on our first leg up right now and I expected a minimum of two. From here the rally took off. Every pullback after this took off and not a single swing trade was stopped out. The highest risk trade was at the 10:05 pullback as this was 3.75 pts but it still worked. Either way, you could have swung from the previous entry and all would have been good.

 

Bottom line, strong swings like this are far and few and when they show up you should be buying every H1, H2 that you encounter.

 

Between scalps and swings on the morning session there were almost 25 pts to be made and if you refer to all the with trend examples in the book, I don't think that it gets much better then what we saw on the tape today.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lessons from Thursday for me. You can look at Wednesday from 10:40 (NY time) on as a big bull flag so buying the first bar bull breakout Thursday was a logical trade. You needed the full 2 point stop but the trade did work. That huge 9:55 bar was apparently a very short term climax and that is why there was such a big pullback before the trend resumed. Situations like that require a bigger stop or waiting for another setup. The rest of the day just required a suspension of disbelief in the trend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just got the Brooks book yesterday, reading it intently after having gone through this forum and the presentations he's already done.

 

Guys, I have to tell you, risking 4-6 ES ticks to scalp 4 ticks (most of the time) is not my thing because I'm a 2-contract ES player and that's why I feel that if f I'm going to risk 4-6 ticks, then I want 6+ ticks to risk 4 and 12+ ticks to risk 6 on an all-in / all-out basis.

 

Brooks spends an entire book talking about breakouts from 5 min bar ranges based on stop orders a tick outside the range. And this is fine. I think there's a lot of great value in what he's saying. To know what he knows I think can only enhance my trading and understanding of how price action works.

 

But...he's only detailing 1/2 of all good trades. That is, you've got many ranges, built up by horizontal support and resistance which, if not violated by 4-5 ES ticks, will reverse back into the current range for MORE than 4 ticks on average.

 

What you gain in ticks, you lose in winning pct. just as the inverse is true for how Brooks trades.

 

I'm posting this as something to think about as you read (like I) all of this heavy duty analysis of bar-by-bar price action stuff that appears quite complex in real-time to pull off.

 

Now, what's not hard to do in real-time is to buy double/triple bottom and sell double/triple top breakout attempts with a limit order with a 5-6 tick stop. Support and resistance is certainly a subjective matter as well, but *I think* one can come up with some reasonable rules to establish areas which should not be violated by 5-6 ticks in order to hold the S/R and shoot back into the current range (which could consist of multiple "5-min range bars"). I'm also willing to bet that you could get good enough at it, in time, on a 5-min ES chart to nail the turns with a 3-4 tick stop-loss.

 

Here's the kind of thing I'm talking about in a picture of this morning's pre-market on a 5 min 24-hour session chart.

 

I'm using Brooks book to understand how he thinks for breakouts so I can see that other side of the market which he only uses as confirmation stages and come up with 50-55% odds of the breakouts failing and getting 2x the reward for the risk. Emotionally, it's just too tough for me to have to maintain a 70% winning pct. to be successful at scalping. If I fell below 60% winning pct, I won't make it and that would hit me pretty hard emotionally.

 

I've been at this since 2003 and I'm coming to the conclusion that, for me, I'd rather start off knowing that I only have a coin flip's chance of a winning trade, but...that winning trade should pay off for 1.8x to 2x greater than what I'm willing to risk.

 

Anyway, I won't talk about this anymore in this group because it is not my intention to hijack this thread, only to tell you where I'm coming from in reading his book.

5aa70f05f01dd_Anti-Brookspatterns.thumb.PNG.fbfa18df5f1190b4f4daec7957d9aa53.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The first bar was a strong bar and any trade on either side of a strong trend bar is a good trade.

 

On the 9:50 bar, the market pulled back after all bull bars. This was an inside bar and a low risk long trade, we were only on our first leg up right now and I expected a minimum of two.

A couple of problems here. This morning our opening bar was a strong trend bar. Got long on its break at 969.75, and had a choice of a humongous 3.75pt stop (just below the bottom of the bar) or Al Brooks' more commonly recommended 2pt stop. Market went down to exactly 967.75 and immediately stopped me out for a 2pt loss. Then it reversed up. Did I get back in after just losing 2pts? No. Why should I trust it now to the upside after it just made a big bear-trend bar? Realtime and after-the-fact are so different.

 

As to yesterday after the 9:50 pullback, the problem there was you would be entering on the 9:55 bar immediately before the market-moving 10:00am gov't report (Existing Home Sales). That's always risky as there is often wild fluctuations with those reports. Yesterday it would have worked just fine. Again, realtime and after-the-fact are so different.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Got the book and finally browsed through it. He has a very idiosyncratic lexicon, but it’s obvious he has put in his 10,000 hours…

 

His micro trendline work reminded me of some scalping system development work I did a while back that is functionally similar but isn’t based on ‘other side’ micro TL’s (see attached – shorts only showing on a 1 minute EJ from early this morning) …

 

Was just wondering if anyone has coded up any of his techniques ??

LooksLikeBrooksButItsNot.thumb.jpg.b1ceb6c899290867a2df293338988beb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • "To make more capable, powerful AI models, developers need a steady flow of fresh data to train their models on. However, they’re starting to run out. Current generative AIs have scraped everything from the Internet that can be scraped. The alternative is to use “synthetic” data—training data generated by earlier forms of AI instead of original sources found on the Internet.  Using synthetic data is tempting. It’s cheaper than licensing datasets (an increasingly common requirement); there’s virtually no limit to the amount of data, text, or images AIs can create; and no one’s privacy is violated. The problem is that, over several generations, AIs trained synthetically develop what has been called “Model Autophagy Disorder,” or MAD, by the researchers at Rice University who discovered it. They like the acronym “MAD” because it’s similar to “Mad Cow Disease,” a calamitous, fatal brain disease that turned up in beef cattle in the 1980s when they were fed the ground-up remains of their butchered colleagues.  The word “autophagy” is a combination of the Greek “auto,” meaning self, and “phagy,” to eat. After training successive visual AI models on synthesized data, the scientists found a disturbing pattern: images of faces began to show grid-patterned scratch marks and eventually began more and more to look like the same face. Images of numbers gradually distorted until they became a mass of unintelligible squiggles.  “Even after a few generations of such training, the new models can become irreparably corrupted,” computer engineer Richard Baraniuk said in a university press statement.  As synthetic data, and synthetically trained AIs, proliferate online, the problem will feed on itself and become steadily worse, he warned. “One doomsday scenario is that if left uncontrolled for many generations, MAD could poison the data quality and diversity of the entire Internet,” Baraniuk said. “Short of this, it seems inevitable that as-to-now-unseen unintended consequences will arise from AI autophagy even in the near term. “Without enough fresh real data,” he added, “future generative models are doomed to MADness.” TRENDPOST: If AI developers come to believe that it is no longer possible to advance generative AI much beyond its current state, two things will happen. First, engineers will switch from developing new models to tweaking existing ones and continue customizing them to make off-the-shelf versions for specific industries. Second, developers will turn their obsession with AI power from generative systems to general AI, which can reason and make decisions without the need for human guidance.  That day might be closer than any of us, including AI engineers, are ready to deal with." Zgbs73                        
    • TS Tenaris stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 39.17 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TS
    • UAL United Airlines stock nice breakout setup at https://stockconsultant.com/?UAL
    • AAL American Airlines stock, good trend, watch for a range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?AAL
    • Date: 10th January 2025. Why is the British Pound Declining?   The Great British Pound is the worst performing currency of 2025 so far after witnessing sharp declines for 3 consecutive days. The decline is largely being triggered by the bond selloff, lack of business confidence due to the UK Autumn budget and political uncertainty. Will the trend continue?     The GBP Index Declines 2% In 2025! Why Is The Pound Dropping? The Great British Pound is the worst performing currency of the week and of the year so far. Below you can see a table showing the Pound’s performance in January 2025 so far. GBPUSD -2.25% EURGBP +1.69% GBPJPY -1.44% GBPCHF -1.42% GBPAUD -1.91% GBPCAD -2.00% A key reason for the GBP’s decline is the latest labor budget, which is driving a selloff in UK bonds. Bonds across the global market are declining, including in the US and Germany. However, the global decline is mainly due to monetary policy. The decline in UK bond yields is due to concerns regarding the UK budget, higher costs for business and investor confidence. As a result, investors are selling UK bonds, but also reducing their exposure to the Pound. Bond Selloff and Rising Yields: Higher bond yields can sometimes strengthen a currency by attracting increased investor demand. However, this effect is unlikely when rising yields result from a bond selloff driven by declining investor confidence. The UK 30-Year Bond Yields are at their highest level since 1998 and the 10-Year Bond Yields are up to the highest level since the banking crisis of 2008. Investors’ concerns are that the higher costs for business will be passed onto consumers, triggering higher stickier inflation. As a result, the Bank of England will struggle to reduce the cost of borrowing in 2025 and foreign investors will become more cautious of operations in the UK. The short-term impact is that the UK Chancellor may struggle to meet her fiscal rules. Her budget margin of £9.9bn to avoid overshooting borrowing has likely shrunk to about £1 billion due to market shifts, even before the OBR updates its forecasts. This uncertainty may force the Treasury to cut future spending plans, but the full picture won’t emerge until the OBR's March forecast. According to reports, the UK Chancellor cannot risk higher increases in taxes and will be forced to cut public spending. The GBPUSD Falls To A 60-Week Low! The GBP is struggling against all currencies, but the sharpest decline can be seen against the USD. The GBP’s decline is partially due to the incoming president, Donald Trump, who is expected to introduce Dollar-supporting measures, but also potentially impose tariffs on the UK.   The new White House administration is likely to impose new tariffs on imports from China, Canada, and Mexico. This is likely to potentially disrupt supply chains and prompt the Federal Reserve to adopt tighter monetary policy, thereby strengthening the national currency. Some experts believe the UK will face tariffs or be pressured to adopt more pro-American economic policies. This is also something the EU will likely experience. In addition to this, reports suggest that the UK Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, and Trump supporters are not on good terms, nor agree on much including on Geo-politics. Therefore, the decline is also related to concerns the UK may be put into a difficult position by the new US administration. According to analysts, Dollar strength is likely to continue throughout the year due to the new administration’s measures, but also due to a hawkish Federal Reserve. In the latest FOMC meeting minutes, the committee stated it expects interest rates to decline at a slower pace. The Federal Reserve is likely to only cut 0.50% in 2025 and may not cut until May or June. Liz Truss 2022 Or James Callaghan 1976? Is this the first Pound crisis? The GBP has experienced many "sterling crises” in the past. For example, Black Wednesday from 1992 and after Brexit in 2016. However, there have been similar crises in the past which are very similar to the current situation. For example, the Liz Truss Budget from 2022 which saw the GBP decline more than 23%. During the Sterling Crisis of 1976 the GBPUSD fell from 2.0231 to 1.5669. Both sterling crises were due to the budget, inflation and rising bond yields. Today’s issues for the GBP and UK are very similar, however, the performance of the GBP will depend on if the new SI contributions triggers lower economic activity, inflation and if the Federal Reserve indeed avoids cutting interest rates in the near future. If inflation rises it will dampen consumer demand and the Bank of England will be forced to pause any rate adjustments. As a result, the economy may contract or stall further pressuring the GBP. However, this cannot yet be certain. KPMG experts anticipate accelerated economic growth this year, supported by monetary policy and increased government spending. They project GDP to rise to 1.7%, more than doubling last year’s 0.8%. This growth, according to their estimates, will be driven by a recovery in consumer spending, expected to increase by 1.8% compared to 1.0% last year. In addition to this, if the Federal Reserve unexpectedly opts for more frequent rate cuts, the GBP and EUR are likely to benefit. When monitoring the price movement and patterns which can be seen in the exchange rate, the decline looks similar to the price movement seen in 2022, during the Truss reign. The price has now fallen below the support level from April 2024. The next support levels can be seen at 1.20391 and 1.17992. Technical analysis for the GBP can also be viewed in HFM’s latest Live Trading Session.   Key Takeaways: The Great British Pound is the worst performing currency of the year so far, having declined by more than 2.00%. A key reason for the GBP’s decline is the latest labor budget, which is driving a selloff in UK bonds. UK 30-year bond yields are at their highest since 1998, while 10-year yields have reached levels last seen during the 2008 banking crisis. Investors reduce exposure to the GBP as the US edges closer to a new president and pro-Dollar supportive measures. The UK labour government will not reconsider higher taxes but may be forced to reduce public spending. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.