Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

eurotrader

Tick Vs. Time Interval Charts

Recommended Posts

Indeed though I thought AgentKay was talking about 'order book' ticks i.e. not generated by an actual trade (similar to how FX data providers generates ticks). It is my experience that using those as a proxy for volume is not nearly as useful as 'real' ticks. That's not to say the information is not useful, its just rather a dubious proxy for volume.

 

 

ok... yeah, real trades are very different from bid/ask quotes

 

I'm talking about traded ticks and volume

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ticks and Volume have been shown through various research studies by the CME (I believe) to have a high degree of correlation... meaning you can use either.

Rahul

 

 

can you post the link?

 

I don't seem to be able to locate what you are talking about.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Great topic, My 2 cents. low Tic, Vol and range bars will make your indicators fire off faster. So if that is your goal maybe they will help. but Indicators only tell you what price action is doing. I would study price action and price action patterns. I like using the five minute chart and I look for spots were early shorts or longs got sucked in and are jumping out. most of whom are using tic vol range and 1min charts. When they are forced out of their trades they are driving the market in my direction.

 

Also I find it hard to trade with an absent of time. just watch an emini 5 minute chart for a day and pay attention. don't be checking email and IMing. watch the chart. You will see a number of times through out the day that a bar will sell off and stay at its low but just before the bar closes it will shoot to the top of the bar and makes a bull close. It happens all the time. The 89 tic and it indicators are all saying sell. and now your trapped short. Also watch major closes. your 15, 30, 1hr closes.

 

 

I hope some of you try this and give feed back.

 

 

that's a great insight... sounds like anything else, changing markets require one to adapt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
can you post the link?

 

I don't seem to be able to locate what you are talking about.

 

hmm, I just spent 30 minutes trying to find it as well, no luck.

 

I did find a couple studies referring to the difference between volume and trades (ticks) for mature markets vs emerging markets.

 

 

Emerald: Article Request - Trade size, trade frequency, and the volatility-volume relation

 

ScienceDirect - Journal of Financial Economics : Trade size, order imbalance, and the volatility–volume relation*1

 

 

This leads me to suspect that each market might need to be handled differently... or that preferred trading style will lead you to trade different markets.

 

Rahul

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I believe TradeStation displays inside bid/ask.... however, I'm unsure if it displays historical information or displays based on how long the chart is kept open.

 

Sorry but you are missing the point.

 

 

The quote to which the reference was made:

 

My favorite chart is one that shows you each individual price change based on the inside market because that is the only chart that does not require arbitrary parameters and it makes S&R easier to determine.

 

So it is not about showing bid/ask at some moment which many charting software does.

 

It is more about defining a distinct kind of charts that is different from the well-known types that take their basis from time, tick count, range or overall trade volume.

For all kinds of charts there must be a point when a new bar (or candle) starts. For time based that is after some time (e.g. 5 min), tick based some number of trade ticks (e.g. 100) and so on.

I understand the posting so that it is (theoretically) possible to start a new bar dependent on how much volume was traded at bid or ask.

 

The reaction of AgeKay to my request for further information makes me believe that he wrote his post rather theoretical - perhaps inspired by the other posting also.

 

 

Two things make me doubt that such charts exist or are of value:

 

- I cannot see depending on which condition exactly a new bar should be started

 

- Trades at bid and ask are highly manipulated. If you look even at a high-speed data stream you find that quite often there are subsequent trades that come in so fast that the quote source has not enough time to adjust bid or ask. Therefore it is easily possible that a trade that happened at bid is seen as a trade that happened at ask and vice versa.

The manipulation/disguise makes sense because if just from "hammering the ask with trades" you could know with a high chance that price is/will be going up it would be much too simple to make money from this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also I find it hard to trade with an absent of time. just watch an emini 5 minute chart for a day and pay attention. don't be checking email and IMing. watch the chart . You will see a number of times through out the day that a bar will sell off and stay at its low but just before the bar closes it will shoot to the top of the bar and makes a bull close.

 

In my view this is a very important point that makes a difference between traders - staying alert, watching what happens.

 

I think it is so important, because the information you can get through watching does not later appear in a conventional chart!

If you do not watch it while it happens there is no way to see it later on the chart.

On the other hand this is a close to impossible task: Only a few will be able to stay alert for hours, watch every little move and recognize what it means.

 

 

There is only a minor number of variables in any data stream:

- price, time, volume

- with regard to either trade happened or order level in the book

 

Putting as much of this information together into a graphical presentation in a way that you can still digest makes a difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is more about defining a distinct kind of charts that is different from the well-known types that take their basis from time, tick count, range or overall trade volume.

 

Right.

 

I understand the posting so that it is (theoretically) possible to start a new bar dependent on how much volume was traded at bid or ask.

 

Wrong.

 

The reaction of AgeKay to my request for further information makes me believe that he wrote his post rather theoretical - perhaps inspired by the other posting also.

 

It's no theoretical and not inspired by the other post. I have an actual working version of this. I just don't want to post a screenshot of it. I have already talked more about it than I originally intended to. I am willing to trade ideas if they are original, but no free lunch for you.

 

- Trades at bid and ask are highly manipulated. If you look even at a high-speed data stream you find that quite often there are subsequent trades that come in so fast that the quote source has not enough time to adjust bid or ask. Therefore it is easily possible that a trade that happened at bid is seen as a trade that happened at ask and vice versa.

The manipulation/disguise makes sense because if just from "hammering the ask with trades" you could know with a high chance that price is/will be going up it would be much too simple to make money from this.

 

This is simply untrue. Trades at bid and ask are not manipulated. If your data stream cannot keep up with the volume of data, then you have a crappy data stream. Get a good one instead of making up conspiracy theories.

Edited by Soultrader
redirect link removed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On the other hand this is a close to impossible task: Only a few will be able to stay alert for hours, watch every little move and recognize what it means.

 

 

There is only a minor number of variables in any data stream:

- price, time, volume

- with regard to either trade happened or order level in the book

 

Putting as much of this information together into a graphical presentation in a way that you can still digest makes a difference.

 

That's what I was trying to accomplish with my custom charts. There is way too much information being ignored by bar charts and you can't keep everything in your head (especially me). I could actually take a break and not miss any information.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That's why I use Dynamic Pic Bars - DPB

 

What is a Dynamic Pic Bar? A google search returns zero hits so my hunch is it's a phrase you have coined for something proprietary?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What is a Dynamic Pic Bar? A google search returns zero hits so my hunch is it's a phrase you have coined for something proprietary?

 

Proprietary and highly accurate and reliable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahh OK I wondered because the charts you have posted in the past to demonstrate trading decisions you made in your journal thread where 'regular' charts. Is this a new development or was there always a 'secret sauce'? Just curious.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ahh OK I wondered because the charts you have posted in the past to demonstrate trading decisions you made in your journal thread where 'regular' charts. Is this a new development or was there always a 'secret sauce'? Just curious.

 

Exclusive New Development in Price Action Technical Analysis.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ahh OK I wondered because the charts you have posted in the past to demonstrate trading decisions you made in your journal thread where 'regular' charts. Is this a new development or was there always a 'secret sauce'? Just curious.

 

Blowfish,

 

Without even a hint as to concept or construction and not even a cherry-picked graph and with claims like - "Proprietary and highly accurate and reliable" and "Exclusive New Development in Price Action Technical Analysis" I believe you are right about these DPB's being based on a "Secret Sauce." Further I think that our collective noses are beginning to detect the main ingredient of that sauce.

 

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.