Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

brownsfan019

A Look at a Stock Trader's Day

Recommended Posts

I'll be out until noon or so, today.

 

Also, I failed to post a follow up of TLM - I bought the July 15 calls for $1.25

I will look to sell half for 2.50 and hold half until expiration or or a breakdown in price action.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did not see this until after the fact, but MA's price action had a nice long trade opportunity with a BUY POINT BETWEEN 173.97-174.01.

 

The pattern doesn't guarantee a profitable trade, but it puts the odds of such on your side. So far MA has resisted the weakness in the general market, though that could change quickly.

 

This is a nice pattern to watch for no matter the time frame - 5 minute, daily, weekly, even monthly.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70ee45a3aa_6-10-2009MA1.jpg.e9a2819ff60927072bd8c8adbca9ad37.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I did not see this until after the fact, but MA's price action had a nice long trade opportunity with a BUY POINT BETWEEN 173.97-174.01.

 

The pattern doesn't guarantee a profitable trade, but it puts the odds of such on your side. So far MA has resisted the weakness in the general market, though that could change quickly.

 

This is a nice pattern to watch for no matter the time frame - 5 minute, daily, weekly, even monthly.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

Here is BLK, same pattern as MA but flipped upside down for a short sale. I did not see this until after the fact, and I did not take this trade.

5aa70ee461400_6-10-2009BLK1.jpg.4e8346bce3992ee8cf28341340e189fd.jpg

Edited by thalestrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Two trades today - both great trades, but both were losing efforts.

 

I am not one to post-mortem losing trades. I do flip through 600 charts each night (the 5 minute chart of each issue in the SP500 and the daily chart of each IBD 100 stock). I do review each day's trades. I print each chart, place it in a three ring binder, and flip through these charts from time to time. However, I feel that there is no need, in most cases, to autopsy my losing efforts.

 

 

Thalestrader -

I am trying to understand and learn your methods and I wondered what different things you do when reviewing trades from the day or go through all the charts you mentioned above. Do you simply go through charts that have patterns you would have traded had you seen them and determine if it would have turned out profitable? Just curious what review process you use and think is useful in increasing your win to loss ratio.

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thalestrader -

I am trying to understand and learn your methods and I wondered what different things you do when reviewing trades from the day or go through all the charts you mentioned above. Do you simply go through charts that have patterns you would have traded had you seen them and determine if it would have turned out profitable? Just curious what review process you use and think is useful in increasing your win to loss ratio.

Thanks.

 

 

Every night I

 

1) I scroll through the S & P 500 5 minute and daily charts using freestockcharts.com and Telechart (Worden Bros) software.

 

2) I scroll through the IBD 100 stock list using Telechart

 

3) I print out the 5 minute chart of each stock traded that day, and put the chart in a 3 ring binder (I have quite a few binders filled with charts).

 

4) I flip through the pages of one of the binders just to keep familiarizing myself with the patterns.

 

I am not concerned with my win/loss ratio. I focus on R/R ratio (my average profitable trade/average losing trade).

 

I scroll and flip through the charts to sharpen my pattern recognition skills.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does slippage become an issue for many of your trades. Since you are essentially scapling small profits from these stock moves, you must be trading quite a few shares to make it worth while. Where do you think someone trading like you starts to run into slippage problems - trading $20,000 per trade, $30,000, $40,000? I am still trying to get a hold of Don Bright's writing on the trading for profit and not percentage stuff but I did find your post about it.

 

Also, what setups do you look for on the ES? Your stock trading method with highs and lows doesn't seem to transfer over to the ES in my mind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Does slippage become an issue for many of your trades. Since you are essentially scapling small profits from these stock moves, you must be trading quite a few shares to make it worth while. Where do you think someone trading like you starts to run into slippage problems - trading $20,000 per trade, $30,000, $40,000? I am still trying to get a hold of Don Bright's writing on the trading for profit and not percentage stuff but I did find your post about it.

 

Also, what setups do you look for on the ES? Your stock trading method with highs and lows doesn't seem to transfer over to the ES in my mind.

 

 

Slippage has not been a problem. If negative slip occurs, it is usually not more than a penny or two, though on some of the higher price stocks with less volume, e.g. MA, CME, I may at times get clipped for as much as quarter. For example, I did trade MA today and while my stop would have allowed for a 30 penny profit, my actual profit given my fill was only 17 pennies.

 

Those small scalps do add up quickly. For the week, I am up over $2/share traded. If you are a 1500 lot trader, that's 3k. If you are a 200 lot trader that's $400.

 

The trades I have posted here are actual trades, with actual entry stops and stop losses. Most of the time I am filled at my price.

 

I trade the ES infrequently and I do trade it differently than I trade stocks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And here is the WU chart identifying entry, initial stop, trailing stops, and exit

 

At first glance the risk/reward looks way off on that initial stop. But to clarify...the runners take care of the rest correct? A few runners could make your month if your trailing stop method lets you milk the bulk of the big moves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
At first glance the risk/reward looks way off on that initial stop. But to clarify...the runners take care of the rest correct? A few runners could make your month if your trailing stop method lets you milk the bulk of the big moves.

 

Most of my trades are for small lossess and small gains. Inital stop on that trade was less than 25 cents, if I recall correctly. Few of my trades are stopped out at that inital stop loss, but I always have the stop go into the market with the entry order in case of an emergency.

 

Yes, the few runers more than take care of the small wins and losses.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Does slippage become an issue for many of your trades.

 

Two stock trades this morning - sorry for the late post, as these charts are after the fact and not at all real time, so I am posting here in the stock trader's thread instead of the real time chart reading thread.

 

imorgan had asked about slippage. Today, my buy stop for GENZ was 54.59, my fill was 54.64. That is about as bad as it typically gets, and it doesn't get that wide often.

 

My sell stop for CNX was 33.31, and I was filled at 33.31 on the penny. This has been my experience on most of my trades, especially if there is sufficient liquidity and the market on the stock is not all that "fast."

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70eea67b7a_6-17-2009CNXShort33and311.jpg.5ce04c67a7e23398882db0ec95df4669.jpg

5aa70eea6c4be_6-17-2009GENZlong54and641.jpg.7276fd6180f23f96da33a071f6c9c50f.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Do you pay attention to the futures price action closely when placing your trades?

 

I watch the ES but not constantly nor closely unless I see a real strong trade opportunity setting up, and then only if I am not already in several stock trades. I keep the cash DOW and Nasdaq COMP quote in my trading window. I monitor the market, but I do not decide to tkae a trade based upon the general market.

 

I will not let a weak general market keep me from taking a long trade.

 

I not allow a strong general market to keep me from a particular short trade.

 

I do watch the IBD 100, which by definition, are the real market leaders. As goes the IBD 100, then typically, so goes the general market.

 

Also, when IBD Big Picture says the market is in a confirmed rally, I find that the majority of my trades are long trades.

 

When the IBD Big Picture says rally under pressure, my trades tend to be more balanced between long and short.

 

And when IBD Big Picture says market is in correction (i.e. bear swing) the majority of my trades tend to be short.

 

This is not because IBD says so, i.e. I do not make a conscious decision to focus on long trades, or a mix long and short, or short trades because of what IBD says. But, it does happen that that is how my trades fall, and IBD has a very accurate way of determining the immediate character of the market.

 

If you have been tracking my trades since I've been posting here, you will see that for a while, most if not all of my trades were long, and most were profitable. I was on a real run.

 

Then, about two weeks ago, I was still taking mosty long trades, but my results were not as strong - more losers than during the positive run, and few larger profits. I started to add some more short trades.

 

Right now, I am about 50/50 long and short.

 

If the downside picks up momentum, then I will likely shift to almost all short trades (as I was doing almost October 2008 until about 2/3'rds of the way through March.

 

In other words, in my opinion, what the market is doing today or on any particular day is not nearly as important as what the intermediate (weeks to months) trend in the market is doing. If the market is in bull swing, then even on a down day I will find some strong long trades.

 

If the market is in a bear swing, then even on a strong up day, my best trades will still likely be short trades.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You conjecture that such confidence comes from much practice drawing trendlines and determining if you were right.

 

But how will you judge whether you were correct or not?

 

The implication is that upon having drawn a trendline or otherwise having identified a support or resistance level, you would then paper trade around that information. If that trade would have been profitable, you would then conclude that you drew that line correctly. Conversely, if that trade would have lost, you would conclude that you did not draw that trendline properly. You would learn nothing of value from such an excercise. After all, trading based upon support and resistance is not a holy grail that will assure only profitable trades.

 

For example, here is a trendline drawn on a 5 minute chart of BP. Buy point was 47.11-.15 depending upon slippage (I was filled at .12 with a .11 buy stop). You can see here that price has broken above the trendline, and has now returned for a retest.

 

I do not know if price will then continue higher, and if so, by how much. I am long at 47.12 with a stop loss at 46.96. If price trades above 47.18, which was the high before the throwback, then my stop loss will be raised to a penny beow the low of this throwback. If price does not continue higher and instead reverses lower, I have my stop loss.

 

The correctnes of that trendline does not depend upon the outcome of this trade.

 

Win or lose, this is an excellent trade.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70ef0bf773_6-25-2009BPTrendlinewithThrowback1.thumb.jpg.fcdf9e59f1852dcf17a6ca64b6813750.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And here is why you always trade with a stop loss in the market: I was long LM from soon after the open, and at one point I was up nearly 2 dollars (about a 1.70 or so). My stop loss was just beneath a recent pulback low, when the bottom fell out of the stock. My 1.70 profit was reduced to a mere 36 pennies when I got filled on my stop loss.

 

Now, the question is, do I short it using a sell stop at 23.85, or do I let it be?

5aa70ef0c9f3d_6-25-2009LM1.thumb.jpg.f1154a279b5fe7102b399b00b2c83fb2.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.