Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

brownsfan019

A Look at a Stock Trader's Day

Recommended Posts

  thalestrader said:
I would always suggest that it is wise to look at the big picture on any stock you see me trading during the day before buying or shorting it for a swing trade. As you saw with DTV, it had great price action for a day trade, but when you look at the daily chart, it is not necessarily something you'd want to take home, let alone have to go to bed with it.

Thales

 

Absolutely.

 

 

 

Best regards

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  imorgan said:
When you are buying new highs or shorting new lows how many criteria do you use to do decide it you like the trend enough to buy in? It appears you waited on DTV for the trend to reach the previous day's high before buying.

 

I do not make it very complicated at all. The criteria are simply a new high of day for a long trade, a new low of day for a short trade, or pullback to 20 ema on a 5 minute chart after strong move. I do not use volume, indicators, candlesticks, wicks, tails, crossovers, etc.

 

However, when deciding which particular stock to trade, I choose based upon how the trend looks, i.e. chart patterns, e.g. flags, pennants, lines (consolidations), and trendlines.

 

As for the DTV trade today, by the time DTV had rallied into the list of the top 10-15 stocks with the biggest % gain on the day, it was very near yesterday's high - too near to warrant a trade. It met resistance at that high, and it seemed wise to wait for that high to fall.

 

In other words, during much of DTV's rally, I wasn't even paying attention to it. By the time it did get my attention, I decided it best to wait to see how it handled the 22.50 price point. I really do not have any rules, per se.

 

 

 

  imorgan said:
How do you determine your exit stop or sell point?

 

I try to let the market develop natural stop points, i.e. most recent support/resistance points. See, for example, the ES short trade I posted today. You can see how the market dictated the stops all the way down.

 

Sometimes, depending upon the time of day, the order book, or simply how price is acting, I will trail a stop below the low of the previous 5 minute bar, or even trail every nickle, dime, or quarter.

 

If the stock is in the midst of a trend day move in the direction of its daily trend, I use recent pullback lows as my stop points. If it is a breakout from a sideways consolidation, especially if the breakout direction is contrary to the daily trend, I will be trailing the stop closely, using either 5 minute lows, nickles, dimes, or quarters. I will exit at the market if price action seems not to be confirming my position.

 

Again, none of these are rules.

 

 

  imorgan said:
You post your gains on the P/L thread as cents/share. Why not put as % gain based on investment? Do you always by the same number of shares, no matter the stock?

 

I'm a trader not an investor. I am seeking profit, not a rent or fee or interest on my capital. I somewhere on TL quoted Don Bright of Bright Trading on this matter - you should look up that post. I'd also suggest the writings of Gerald Loeb in The Battle for Investment Survival. He persuasively makes the case for using profit, not %return, as your organizing principle when deploying your capital in the market.

 

I almost always trade a set number of shares on each trade. This is because my initial risk, as measured by the difference between my entry and my initial stop loss, is almost always within my %risk/trade limit. Of course, if there were an opportunity that had a larger initial risk/share, I would reduce the shares traded accordingly.

 

I otherwise don't have any formulae. As I have said elsewhere, I have benefited from lots of screen time, lots of charts, and a single minded focus on, as pappo's acronymonous name teached, price action and price patterns only.

 

  imorgan said:
Thanks for posting so much good information. Keep it coming.

 

I'm happy you have found it interesting, or at least entertaining. If you find it useful, so much the better!

 

Sincerely,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  imorgan said:
Thalestrader -

What criteria do you use to decide to day trade a stock? I know you have said that you usually buy new highs and sell new lows but what other factors do you take into account in determining if the odds are in your favor? Also, what parameters do you use in setting where you will put your stop and where you will take your profit?

 

 

If you take a look at the LM trade I posted last week (6-2-2009 - page 6 or 7of this thread) you will see a decent example of what I am trying to accomplish. LM was a runner and I tried to use natural stops to stay in. At times, the stock moved very far without developing any new natural stop level, so I started to trail a stop a fixed amount below the 5 minute 20 ema.

 

Here is the way I think:

 

1) Every trade starts out as a scalp (this comes right from Mike Reed at tradestalker.com), and I will close a position at the market for a small loss or small gain if price does not act immediately as I had anticipated that it would act.

 

2) If price does act immediately as anticipated, I then assume I have a runner, and I will do my best to discern where the market is developing natural stop points and set my stops accordingly, trying to capture as much of that move as possible.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thalestrader -

Thanks for all the info. You gave me some ideas and a good direction for my current research. I am currently a CPA and professional photographer in Phoenix, Arizona. It is my dream to be able to become a profitable day trader. To me, being able to make money consistently on the market with reasonable risk would be like a dream come true. I only hope I can find the right strategy based on my trading skills and personality to become profitable. You and Brownsfan019 consistently provide great insight. Thanks again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm having something of a rough morning - 6 trades. Five are closed and I am at absolute breakeven on the day.

 

I just got stopped into FLR. Buy stop was 53.95, but my fill was 53.92. That tends to make me suspect the trade may not go my way.

5aa70ee3acdb7_6-7-2009FLR1.jpg.b69696e58ae0709a956e2ba950539b91.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  imorgan said:
Are you looking at MOS because of an ascending triangle formation or is there some other pattern you are seeing?

 

MOS gapped open higher and the gap did not fill. I did not buy the first new high after the pullback from the high struck in the first 15 minutes because of the proximity of 6/5 resistance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
Made a nickle/share on NDAQ. It was going no where and distracting me from MEE and MOS, so I closed the trade.

 

Also, I noticed all my charts today are misdated 6-7 instead of 6-9.

 

Now how is that for timing!

 

Well, it happens.

5aa70ee3e43db_6-7-2009ndaq3.jpg.6635ee93a938fd9c528be6ce3bdf50d9.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  imorgan said:
NDAQ -

Now that is one tight stop! Why didn't you buy the 2nd and 3rd new high of the day at 21.97 or 21.98?

 

Since it did not gap open higher, it did not interest me until I saw the tight action that you see in the first screen capture I posted. That tight action is what called for the tight stop.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
Since it did not gap open higher, it did not interest me until I saw the tight action that you see in the first screen capture I posted. That tight action is what called for the tight stop.

 

Here is the chart of NDAQ highlighting what I was speaking of above

5aa70ee3ea61a_6-7-2009ndaq4.jpg.adda454177b233de1d3a7286deca9009.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
Since it did not gap open higher, it did not interest me until I saw the tight action that you see in the first screen capture I posted. That tight action is what called for the tight stop.

 

Putting all your recent explanations together - you prefer watching the gainers of the day that have gaped up, fill that gap, and make a new higher high for the day above previous resistence from prior days. Correct?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  imorgan said:
Putting all your recent explanations together - you prefer watching the gainers of the day that have gaped up, fill that gap, and make a new higher high for the day above previous resistence from prior days. Correct?

 

1) I prefer stocks that have gapped open and do not fill the gap.

 

For example, today I traded FCEL, JASO, TROW, BEN, TMO, FLR, MOS, MEE, NDAQ. All of these gapped open higher (I mistakenly said earlier that NDAQ hadn't gapped open, but it did, but it filled the gap during the first 5 minute bar), and I believe that only NDAQ filled the gap back to the prior day's close.

 

2.1) I will be mindful of prior highs and lows, and I do not want to buy a new high of day if the prior day's high is just above the proposed buy point.

 

2.2) If there is some distance between the proposed buy point, i.e. a new of high of the day, and prior resistance, I will take the trade.

 

For example, today, MOS had a HOD at 53.35, so my buy point would typically be 53.36. However, Friday afternoon MOS saw resistance about a dime up from there at 53.46, so I would want that resistance cleared first. I waited until 53.51 to buy. However, if the first high today had been say, 53.15, my buy point would have been 55.16, and with 30 cents of daylight between that buy point and Friday's high, I would have bought then.

 

I think that if you would look back at the charts I've posted, most of the trades involve stocks that have gapped open, then pulled back but held above the gap, and then gone on to make a higher high (You would reverse this for short trades).

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.