Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

jfutures

Spread Trading Stock Index Futures

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

 

I was wondering if anyone could point me in the right direction of how to effectively spread trade stock indexes, specifically es, nq & ym.

 

So for example if I wanted to go long 1,2 or 3 contract ES, how many contracts of YM or NQ would be best to go short to effectively hedge my position?? What other combinations provide good spreads in your trading experiences for trading YM and NQ also??

 

Im by nature risk averse therefore I like to trade conservatively and look to make consistent modest gains over time, therefore spread trading is the best route for me. I have found spread trading treasuries quite straight forward in terms of trading 2/5 years, 5/10 years & 10/30 year combos, however spreading stocks is unclear to me.

 

Replies would be much appreciated.

 

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

jfutures

 

the idea is to be dollar neutral

 

so let's say you want to sell ES and buy YM

 

ES trading 900, so 1 ES pt is worth 900 * 12.5 * 4 = 45000

YM trading 8500, so 1 YM pt is worth 8500 * 5 = 42500

 

the ration would be 45000/42500 or 1.06

 

so you can hedge 1YM for 1ES or 17YM for 16ES

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest, I'm still experimenting.

 

I have a strategy based on assessing futures and cash markets whilst combining market profile and swings on different timeframes in order to identify potential opportunities. Knowing how to spread trade stock indexes is essentially to enable me to reduce my risk as & when the opportunities appear, because I don't like to make outright single directional plays in the underlying futures.

 

I guess I'm trying to identify how stock indexes move in terms of value per tick. With treasuries its clear that e.g. 10 year has more value per tick than the 5 year (I should really say more price movement in 10 year compared to 5 year generally) so a short spread trade would be short one 10 year and long one 5 year if you believe 10 year will decline. With stocks, it seems 'generally' speaking, whatever your bias may be for e.g. ES, it would be best to spread ES/YM or YM/NQ combos according to the rules mentioned in your post (which I will be testing when I get some time).

 

What methods do you employ if you don't mind me asking Fishing and which markets do you trade??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

is spreading treasuries very competitive or is there room for retail traders?

 

i've been trading outright futures and used to take quite big hits occassionally (still trying to be discipline and minimize them)

 

that's why i'm very interested in spreading. i've been looking at ES/YM because of high correlation between the two and convenient hedging ratio (nearly 1 by 1). From what i observed, the spread is kind of correlated to ES on intra-day and daily charts, generally.

 

quite often it goes only 1 way without looking back on intraday charts, so that's quite a challenge for me.

 

other than that, i've been trying to find some documents for this trade for quite a long time but so far no luck... :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure I entirely understand the question Fishing, would you mind clarifying please?? In treasuries, spread trading would simply be longing 1 and shorting 1 pretty much instantaneously (i.e. hitting market orders in both markets at the same time) in order to get yourself in. If you get the direction right, then the longer bond out of the 2 should start to show you profit at some point (whilst the other bond showing a loss which would be less than the profit on the longer bond). I was hoping this would be the case with the ES/YM spread, hence my original post. It looks fine, but then again I'm going through the tesing stage at the mo.

 

Actually I started to use spread trading strategies because I too used to take big hits on many occasions because of doing single futures directional trades. I have found that spread trading really does reduce my risk, but naturally it can reduce your profit per trade on a single contract basis but I'm fine with this, I'm more concerned with making modest consistent gains over time.

 

I'm afraid I have no docs on the subject otherwise I would have been happy to forward them to you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You may want to look at spreading the YM against the FESTX50 future (the Dow50 in Europe). There is one margin issue that the YM is 24 hour market while the FESTX50 trades for 14 hours so you need to watch any overnights.

 

Try creating a single chart of the spread and then doing your analysis on that as if it was a single instrument.

 

Lots of opportunity but needs a lot of homework.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually spread betting could negate the need of trading spreads. You can simply reduce your risk by betting a small amount. Pick an instrument with suitable volatility for your purposes and then bet a size that fulfils your requirements for potential loss or gain. Still kind of interested to see how you can wring juice out of two highly correlated instruments. Also won't transaction costs be pretty high? (as the spread isn't going to move as much larger positions will be requires). As an aside have you considered calendar spreads?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a valid point Blowfish. In fact, I've tried to locate a decent online execution only broker that provides spread betting on treasuries (with the option of doing stock indexes also) but haven't had much luck as yet. Would you be able to recommend any???

 

When you say calendar spreads, are you referring to intramarket contract spreading?? (i.e. newer contract to older contract). Can you please give some advice on the subject?? Would really appreciate it if so.

 

To spread effectively over time, yes you would need a large account in order to leverage your positions. Comms can be manageable, as long as you are prepared to use a low cost execution-only service.

 

The best way I've found to wring out the juice would be to try to identify which bond for treasuries, or which market in stocks (NB still investigating stocks at time of writing) is setup to move 'the most' in your direction. This trade qualification may be based on a number of things, say trend lines, channeling, OS/OB, market profile, or whatever tools you can find to identify the setup. Then once you trade the spread, assuming you're correct, the trade can show profit. The key (and this is the real key) is to not overtrade, but rather concentrate on picking the cherries, even if they occur 4 or 5 times a month, which is the number of trades I place on average in a month.

 

For anyone interested in spreading treasuries, I found a good article here which sums it up: -

 

Current Issue

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest I don't know an awful lot about spreads. A calendar spread would indeed be buying the front month and selling one further out (or vice versa). It tends to be used on commodities for fundamental reasons (which I don't profess to understand!)

 

Joe Ross has a book "trading spreads and seasonals" his books are quite expensive but he tends to tell it how it is. One of these days I'll get round to reading it and then might be able to give some more helpful answers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys,

 

actually it is my first post on this forum, but as I can see you are talking here about something what I have been doing for around a year and I would be happy to exchange some ideas about spread trading.

I usually trade DAX vs CAC as well as some forex instruments.

 

So far, to trade in such way I have always measured correlation of the securities, to make sure that there is a chance to have the spread closed up....

 

Recently I have learnt that much more reliable method would be to calculate cointegration of the instruments, because 2 charts might be almost perfectly correlated but keep constantly getting away one from another - at least when you measure correlation with Pearson's method...

 

Than, another very important issue comes - when to take a position - the easiest way to answer is: " when the spread is higher than usually". For this I created a very simple indicator which shifts me CAC chart on DAX chart with one point taken as a mutual neutral point, i.e. Jan 1. And than you can see a nice spread between instruments.

Unfortunately, we never know whether we took a really "neutral" neutral point or was it in reality an extreme point and we need to wait months before the spread would come back and let make us earn some money...

 

If this is interesting to anyone please let me know so I will post in some pictures to show clearly the problem...

 

greetings,

 

CoVal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.