Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

analyst75

Recessions Aren’t Real

Recommended Posts

Recessions are weird.

 

The more you think about them, the weirder they become.

 

Yes, the economy is cyclical. Downturns aren’t just inevitable, they’re healthy.

 

BUT

 

Economic cycles, including recessions, are not just determined by clean and predictable financial indicators but also by psychological and sociological factors.

 

Collective mood, media reporting, and public sentiment play a substantial role in shaping economic realities.

 

And they can be manipulated.

 

A.] The Fear Factory

 

Every time the media starts shouting "recession," what happens?

 

Panic. Fear.

 

It's like Halloween but for adults.

 

And this fear isn't just innocent fun – it moves markets, influences decisions, and causes real harm.

 

Give me an example of when the media saw a chance to scare the crap out of you and didn’t take it?

 

I’ll wait.

 

B.] Recessions are Relative

 

Consider this – what's called a recession in one country is a day in paradise in another.

 

Economic conditions are relative.

 

If the standards are so skewed, can we really trust this whole concept?

 

C.] The Recession Whisperers

 

Imagine a secretive group, not in some government bunker, but in a quiet office in Cambridge, Massachusetts. That's the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), the recession referee.

 

But here's the twist: By the time the NBER declares a recession, it's like announcing rain when you're already soaked.

 

Their method involves a retroactive look, meaning they wait for six months of data, plus a one-month lag.

 

So, when they finally declare a recession, it's old news, a story you've been living in, not just reading about. In the world of economic predictions, the official-unofficial referees are not the early birds; they're the historians.

 

Also…

 

D.]The GDP Puppet Show

 

GDP.

 

It’s supposed to be a “health check” for the economy.

 

BUT

 

It's like going to a doctor who only measures your height and ignores your blood pressure, cholesterol, and heart rate.

 

It counts every dollar spent, regardless of what it's spent on.

 

That means disasters, wars, and environmental destruction all pump up the GDP. If a hurricane hits and we spend billions on reconstruction, guess what? GDP goes up.

 

Celebrating a GDP increase is like throwing a party because your house burned down and you had to rebuild it.

 

It’s also the main indicator the NBER uses to measure a recession.

 

The real problem with this is…

 

GDP is a broad measure and can be influenced by short-term fluctuations that don't necessarily reflect long-term economic trends.

 

It’s a useful indicator, but far from comprehensive.

 

E.] The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy

 

Here's the kicker – by declaring a recession, we make them more likely.

 

It's a classic self-fulfilling prophecy.

 

Businesses pull back on investment, consumers close their wallets, and just like that, the economy slows down.

 

But what if we didn't buy into the narrative? I have no idea.

 

F.] Rage Against Determinism

 

Economies aren’t deterministic. They’re dynamic.

 

Economies don’t follow a predetermined path.

 

Human agency and perception play a significant role in shaping economic realities.

 

Predictions are usually wrong for this reason.

 

Also, there’s this…

 

G.] The Hidden Agenda

 

Tin foil hat time.

 

Think about who benefits from recession talk.

 

The media gets a juicy story.

 

Politicians get a scapegoat.

 

Certain investors get to buy low.

 

It’s a game, and the average person isn't the one winning. You’re always being sold a narrative that serves others, not you.

 

And Yet, a Recession is HERE

 

Of course, recessions exist. Because prolonged downturns exist.

 

But all of this calls into question what we think we know about the word “recession” and how we talk about it.

 

It’s not as clear a concept as we think.

 

Nevertheless, it’s probably here already.” – Chris Campbell (AltucherConfidential)
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure that a Russian resident would say that recessions are real today. Their prime interest rate is 21%, their corporate military contractors are threatening to file bankruptcy, and sticks of butter are kept under lock and key in their grocery stores because shoplifters are stealing it in bulk so they can resell it on the black market. A downturn is cyclical until it turns into a collapse. I really don't think anyone will be buying-into this mess.😬

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm pretty sure that a Russian resident would say that recessions are real today. Their prime interest rate is 21%, their corporate military contractors are threatening to file bankruptcy, and sticks of butter are kept under lock and key in their grocery stores because shoplifters are stealing it in bulk so they can resell it on the black market. A downturn is cyclical until it turns into a collapse. I really don't think anyone will be buying-into this mess.😬
    • Well said. This principle is highly analogous to trading. Any human can easily click buy or sell when they "feel" that price is about to go up or down. The problem with feeling, commonly referred to as "instinctive" trading, is that it cannot be quantified. And because it cannot be quantified, it cannot be empirically tested. Instinctive trading has the lowest barrier to entry and therefore returns the lowest reward. As this is true for most things in life, this comes as no surprise. Unfortunately, the lowest barrier to entry is attractive to new traders for obvious reasons. This actually applied to me decades ago.🤭   It's only human nature to seek the highest amount of reward in exchange for the lowest amount of work. In fact, I often say that there is massive gray area between efficiency and laziness. Fortunately, losing for a living inspired me to investigate the work of Wall Street quants who refer to us as "fishfood" or "cannonfodder." Although I knew that we as retail traders cannot exploit execution rebates or queues like quants do, I learned that we can engage in automated scalp, swing, and trend trading. The thermonuclear caveat here, is that I had no idea how to write code (or program) trading algorithms. So I gravitated toward interface-based algorithm builders that required no coding knowledge (see human nature, aforementioned). In retrospect, I should never have traded code written by builder software because it's buggy and inefficient. However, my paid subscription to the builder software allowed me to view the underlying source code of the generated trading algo--which was written in MQL language. Due to a lack of customization in the builder software, I inevitably found myself editing the code. This led me to coding research which, in turn, led me to abandoning the builder software and coding custom algo's from scratch. Fast forward to the present, I can now code several trading strategies per day across 2 different platforms. Considering how inefficient manual backtesting is, coding is a huge advantage. When a new trading concept hits me, I can write the algo, backtest it, and optimize it within an hour or so--across multiple exchanges and symbols, and cycle through hundreds of different settings for each input. And then I get pages upon pages of performance metrics with the best settings pre-highlighted. Having said all of this, I am by no means an advanced programmer. IMHO, advanced programmers write API gateways, construct their own custom trading platforms, use high end computers with field programmable gateway array chips, and set up shop in close proximity to the exchanges. In any event, a considerable amount of work is required just to get toward the top of the "fishfood"/"cannonfodder" pool. Another advantage of coding is that it forces me to write trade entry and exit conditions (triggers) in black & white, thereby causing me to think microscopically about my precise trade trigger conditions. For example, I have to decide whether the algo should track the slope, angle, and level of each bar price and indicator to be used. Typing a hard number like 50 degrees of angle into code is a lot different than merely looking at a chart myself and saying, that's close enough.  Code doesn't acknowledge "maybe" nor "feelings." Either the math (code) works (is profitable) or doesn't work (is a loser). It doesn't get angry, sad, nor overly optimistic. And it can trade virtually 24 hours per day, 5 days per week. If you learn to code, you'll eventually reach a point where coding an algo that trades as you intended provides its own sense of accomplishment. Soon after, making money in the market merely becomes a side effect of your new job--coding. This is how I compete, at least for now, in this wide world of trading. I highly recommend it.  
    • VRA Vera Bradley stock watch, pull back to 5.08 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?VRA
    • MU Micron stock watch, pull back to 102.83 gap support area with high trade quality at https://stockconsultant.com/?MU
    • ACLX Arcellx stock watch, trending at 84.6 support area with bullish indicators at https://stockconsultant.com/?ACLX
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.