Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

cowcool

Is Consistent 20 Percent Profit/Mo Pos

Recommended Posts

Hi Folks, it's me again :) Thank you for your previous advices, greatly appreciated. Next question:

 

Is consistent 20 or even up to 50 percent profit/Mo possible?.

 

Some people claim that they can earn 20-50 pct/Mo profit consistently through intraday trading..From my newbie perspective , I find it hard to believe because if you can achieve that, you will be a very rich person in not too long time, even most veteran money manager are not able to achieve this.

 

 

But I might be wrong, comments please.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is the BEST CASE SCENARIO:

 

Let's say you risk 2% of account size max per trade, and you have 10 trades per day. (In my opinion, any more and you are risking overtrading... unless you are using an ultra-scalping strategy). Assume 70% win-loss rate, with 20% scratch trades, 30% losers, and 70% days profitable. And here's the key and biggest number of all, the Avg Winner vs Avg Loser. Assume your average winner is 1.5 x bigger. Also, assume you will stop trading after 3 losses in any day (3 out of 10).

 

On your best days you would achieve a winning percentage of 8% of account size,

Worst days you would be -7% of account size.

Average day somewhere in the middle , say 2-3%.

 

So Monthly I think it would work out to a winning percentage of 30% per month net.

 

THIS IS THE BEST CASE SCENARIO.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now the WORST CASE SCENARIO.

 

Change the stats to a winning percentage of 60% and an Avg Winner vs Avg Loser of .75 The numbers dramatically change. Your best days would be about 2-3% of account equity and the worst days would remain at -7%.

 

So your monthly gain would be near breakeven.

 

My experience suggests that the more scratch trades I take while trying to hold on to runners for a large gain IMPROVES my Avg Win vs Avg Loss ratio and ultimately improves my monthly results. For me, the key is to do whatever you can to hold onto winning trades until there is an "obvious" place to exit or a significant gain R:R over 2x has been achieved. An added advantage to holding onto runners is it keeps you out of making trades while in the position which often can be losers (unless you are adding to it).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The easy way to look at it is whether or not your gains are rolled over.

 

Example 1
: You start with $10k and at end of month you withdraw enough to bring the account back to $10k. Very possible to make 20% on this monthly, b/c that is $2000.

 

Example 2
: You never pull your gains out and let it build every month. Eventually, you will not be able to earn 20% but the $$$ amount will increase dramatically.

 

It's very possible to make 20%/mo on accounts below $100k IMO. Once you get above $100k, then you might not be able to necessarily pull in 20%, BUT you can make more dollars than a $10k account could.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the best way to look at this situation, is not to look at it in % but in $ you need to set yourself a realistic $ amount for the day, week, and month and try to hit that.

 

Like brownsfan said once your account gets to big its going to be harder to pull in the % you want but the money will come in easier with bigger positions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Folks, it's me again :) Thank you for your previous advices, greatly appreciated. Next question:

 

Is consistent 20 or even up to 50 percent profit/Mo possible?.

 

Some people claim that they can earn 20-50 pct/Mo profit consistently through intraday trading..From my newbie perspective , I find it hard to believe because if you can achieve that, you will be a very rich person in not too long time, even most veteran money manager are not able to achieve this.

 

 

But I might be wrong, comments please.

 

 

is 20% return possible?

 

the short answer is YES.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

now let's get to the newbie part...

 

for a person starting out, the more practical question is:

 

is it possible to breakeven by year 2?

 

 

 

 

 

 

not that it is impossible to make money right off the bat.

ask any newbie, they will tell you they made lots of money in the first 3 months.

the problem is... the market has a way of "training" a winner to be a loser.

It will slowly change your winning method into a losing one, and turn you against yourself.

Your challenge is no longer the market, but yourself.

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
is 20% return possible?

 

the short answer is YES.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

now let's get to the newbie part...

 

for a person starting out, the more practical question is:

 

is it possible to breakeven by year 2?

 

 

 

 

 

 

not that it is impossible to make money right off the bat.

ask any newbie, they will tell you they made lots of money in the first 3 months.

the problem is... the market has a way of "training" a winner to be a loser.

It will slowly change your winning method into a losing one, and turn you against yourself.

Your challenge is no longer the market, but yourself.

 

 

Truth so pure, unfortunately live trading I did not have my 'make lots of money' in the beginning.

 

Made lots on the simulators, you get great fills on them, and can 'cheat' at your trading ideas! :rofl:

 

No better teacher than live trading losin real money.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

some simple thoughts on simulation:

 

 

1. simulation is not the real thing. accept the fact before you begin.

 

2. there are different levels of simulator.

 

this is a simulator:

attachment.php?attachmentid=10860&stc=1&d=1242939443

 

 

so is this one:

attachment.php?attachmentid=10862&stc=1&d=1242939896

 

 

3. If your system can make money on a sim, it doesn't mean it will make money live.

 

4. If your system can't make money on a sim, it sure won't make money live.

 

5. Practicing bad habits on a simulator will reinforce the bad habit.

 

6. Different people use simulator for different purposes; if it doesn't suite you, don't use it.

 

 

 

.

simulator.jpg.3c87a556a639c5ad23ef21b3e5a0f579.jpg

sim.jpg.0ce82c36960a6cb6f83f26391000de3d.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the best way to organize your thoughts so that this question no longer affects you is to understand the difference between trading profits and ROI, between trading capital with leverage and investments made using savings deposited into a brokerage account. Don Bright of Bright Trading explained it this way:

 

"We don't really think of trading profits as "ROI." Or even in terms of return at all.

 

For example, our people might put up $20K, and make $5k per week...but they are using our capital to trade with. We consider the money that is being used as simply another tool, just like a computer or trading method. An investor looks for ROI.

 

FWIW,

 

Don"

 

Traders trade for profits, while investors seek ROI. I have a colleague who starts each month with a balance in his futures account that most would find a ridiculously small capital with which to trade, let alone to trade for all of one's livlihood. He trades only the TF (formerly the ER2) He routinely nets two - three times his starting capital in the form of profits month after month. He never thinks in terms of having made a 200-300% return in a month. He simply knows he needs X thousand dollars in order to trade his way, and that is what he does. On the last day of the month, he draws out his profits for the month, and leaves his small starting capital to do it all over again.

 

Now, as to the question as to when a new trader can expect to be breakeven or profitable, well, that depends entirely on that trader's psyche. In the end, the only thing standing between any trader and either incredible income and wealth generation or terrible financial ruin is whether he or she is able to cut losers quickly while not cutting profits short too. If you can master your emotions, the rest if a piece of cake. Some may be successful right away. Others may forever be net losers. Near the beginning of Wyckoff's Studies in Tape Reading, he compares two traders, both of whom started out together in the same brokerage office watching the same ticker machine trading 10 share lots. Years later, one of these traders was still trading 10 lots while the other, in addition to having amassed a great fortune, was now trading an account equity of 100K. Some have it, and others never will.

 

So, in regard to the first question, think profits not ROI. You are a trader, not a money manager. If you understand yourself as seeking "a reasonable return on investment," you will never achieve what it is possible to achieve as a trader. Such thinking will limit you. It will leave you susceptible to others limiting you.

 

The answer to the second question is going to be unique to each individual, and can range on a scale of immediately profitable to perpetually unprofitable.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the problem is... the market has a way of "training" a winner to be a loser.

It will slowly change your winning method into a losing one, and turn you against yourself.

 

...cheerful stuff :( Unfortunately I think you about summed it up..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Date: 8th April 2025.   Markets Rebound Cautiously as US-China Tariff Tensions Deepen     Global markets staged a tentative recovery on Tuesday following a wave of volatility sparked by escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. The Asia-Pacific region showed signs of stability after a chaotic start to the week—though some pockets remained under pressure. Taiwan’s Taiex dropped 4.4%, dragged lower by losses in tech heavyweight TSMC. The world’s largest chipmaker fell another 4% on Tuesday and has now slumped 13.5% since April 2, when US President Donald Trump first unveiled what he called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.   However, broader sentiment across the region turned more positive, with several markets rebounding sharply after Monday’s dramatic sell-offs. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged over 6% in early trading, rebounding from an 18-month low. South Korea’s Kospi rose marginally, and Australia’s ASX 200 gained 1.9%, driven by strength in mining stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.6%, though still far from recovering from Monday’s 13.2% crash—its worst day since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. China’s Shanghai Composite added 0.9%.   In Europe, DAX and FTSE 100 are up more than 1% in opening trade. EU Commission President von der Leyen repeated yesterday that the EU had offered reciprocal zero tariffs on manufactured goods previously and continues to stand by that offer. Others are also trying again to talk to Trump to get some sort of agreement that limits the impact.   Much of the rally appeared to be driven by dip-buying, as well as hopes that the intensifying trade war could still be defused through negotiations.   China Strikes Back: ‘We Will Fight to the End’   Tensions reached a boiling point after Trump threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on all Chinese imports unless Beijing rolled back its retaliatory measures by April 8. ‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow... the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50%,’ Trump declared on social media.   If implemented, the new tariffs would bring total US duties on Chinese goods to a staggering 124%, factoring in the existing 20%, the 34% recently announced, and the proposed 50%.   In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a stern warning, stating: ‘The US threat to escalate tariffs is a mistake on top of a mistake... If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.’ The ministry also called for equal and respectful dialogue, though signs of compromise on either side remain scarce.   Beijing acted quickly to contain a market fallout. State funds intervened to support equities, and the People’s Bank of China set the yuan fixing at its weakest level since September 2023 to boost export competitiveness. Additionally, five-year interest rate swaps in China fell to their lowest levels since 2020, indicating potential for further monetary easing.   Trump Talks Tough on EU Too   Trump’s hardline approach extended beyond China. Speaking at a press conference, he rejected the European Union’s offer to eliminate tariffs on cars and industrial goods, accusing the bloc of ‘being very bad to us.’ He insisted that Europe would need to source its energy from the US, claiming the US could ‘knock off $350 billion in one week.’   The EU, meanwhile, backed away from a proposed 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey, opting instead for 25% duties on selected US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs.     Volatile Wall Street Adds to the Drama   Wall Street experienced wild swings on Monday as investors processed the rapidly evolving trade conflict. The S&P 500 briefly fell 4.7% before rebounding 3.4%, nearly erasing its losses in what could have been its biggest one-day jump in years—if it had held. The Dow Jones Industrial Average sank by as much as 1,700 points early in the day but later climbed nearly 900 points before closing 349 points lower, down 0.9%. The Nasdaq ended up 0.1%.   The brief rally was fueled by a false rumour that Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs—rumours that the White House quickly labelled ‘fake news.’ The market's sharp reaction underscored how desperate investors are for any sign that tensions might ease.   Oil Markets in Focus: Goldman Sachs Revises Forecasts   Crude prices also reflected the uncertainty, with US crude briefly dipping below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021. As of early Tuesday, Brent crude was trading at $64.72, while WTI hovered around $61.26.   Goldman Sachs, in a note dated April 7, lowered its average price forecasts for Brent and WTI through 2025 and 2026, citing mounting recession risks and the potential for higher-than-expected supply from OPEC+.       Under a base-case scenario where the US avoids a recession and tariffs are reduced significantly before the April 9 implementation date, Goldman sees Brent at $62 per barrel and WTI at $58 by December 2025. These figures fall further to $55 and $51, respectively, by the end of 2026. This outlook also assumes moderate output increases from eight OPEC+ countries, with incremental boosts of 130,000–140,000 barrels per day in June and July.   However, should the US slip into a typical recession and OPEC production aligns with the bank’s baseline assumptions, Brent could retreat to $58 by the end of this year and to $50 by December 2026.   In a more bearish scenario involving a global GDP slowdown and no change to OPEC+ output levels, Brent prices might fall to $54 by year-end and $45 by late 2026. The most extreme projection—based on a simultaneous economic downturn and a full reversal of OPEC+ production cuts—would see Brent plunge to below $40 per barrel by the end of 2026.   Goldman noted that oil prices could outperform forecasts significantly if there was a dramatic shift in tariff policy and a surprise in global demand recovery.   Cautious Optimism, But Warnings Persist   With both Washington and Beijing showing no signs of backing down, markets are likely to remain volatile in the days ahead. Investors now turn their attention to upcoming trade meetings and policy decisions, hoping for clarity in what has become one of the most unpredictable trading environments in recent years.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.