Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

cowcool

Is Consistent 20 Percent Profit/Mo Pos

Recommended Posts

Hi Folks, it's me again :) Thank you for your previous advices, greatly appreciated. Next question:

 

Is consistent 20 or even up to 50 percent profit/Mo possible?.

 

Some people claim that they can earn 20-50 pct/Mo profit consistently through intraday trading..From my newbie perspective , I find it hard to believe because if you can achieve that, you will be a very rich person in not too long time, even most veteran money manager are not able to achieve this.

 

 

But I might be wrong, comments please.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is the BEST CASE SCENARIO:

 

Let's say you risk 2% of account size max per trade, and you have 10 trades per day. (In my opinion, any more and you are risking overtrading... unless you are using an ultra-scalping strategy). Assume 70% win-loss rate, with 20% scratch trades, 30% losers, and 70% days profitable. And here's the key and biggest number of all, the Avg Winner vs Avg Loser. Assume your average winner is 1.5 x bigger. Also, assume you will stop trading after 3 losses in any day (3 out of 10).

 

On your best days you would achieve a winning percentage of 8% of account size,

Worst days you would be -7% of account size.

Average day somewhere in the middle , say 2-3%.

 

So Monthly I think it would work out to a winning percentage of 30% per month net.

 

THIS IS THE BEST CASE SCENARIO.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now the WORST CASE SCENARIO.

 

Change the stats to a winning percentage of 60% and an Avg Winner vs Avg Loser of .75 The numbers dramatically change. Your best days would be about 2-3% of account equity and the worst days would remain at -7%.

 

So your monthly gain would be near breakeven.

 

My experience suggests that the more scratch trades I take while trying to hold on to runners for a large gain IMPROVES my Avg Win vs Avg Loss ratio and ultimately improves my monthly results. For me, the key is to do whatever you can to hold onto winning trades until there is an "obvious" place to exit or a significant gain R:R over 2x has been achieved. An added advantage to holding onto runners is it keeps you out of making trades while in the position which often can be losers (unless you are adding to it).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The easy way to look at it is whether or not your gains are rolled over.

 

Example 1
: You start with $10k and at end of month you withdraw enough to bring the account back to $10k. Very possible to make 20% on this monthly, b/c that is $2000.

 

Example 2
: You never pull your gains out and let it build every month. Eventually, you will not be able to earn 20% but the $$$ amount will increase dramatically.

 

It's very possible to make 20%/mo on accounts below $100k IMO. Once you get above $100k, then you might not be able to necessarily pull in 20%, BUT you can make more dollars than a $10k account could.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the best way to look at this situation, is not to look at it in % but in $ you need to set yourself a realistic $ amount for the day, week, and month and try to hit that.

 

Like brownsfan said once your account gets to big its going to be harder to pull in the % you want but the money will come in easier with bigger positions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  cowcool said:
Hi Folks, it's me again :) Thank you for your previous advices, greatly appreciated. Next question:

 

Is consistent 20 or even up to 50 percent profit/Mo possible?.

 

Some people claim that they can earn 20-50 pct/Mo profit consistently through intraday trading..From my newbie perspective , I find it hard to believe because if you can achieve that, you will be a very rich person in not too long time, even most veteran money manager are not able to achieve this.

 

 

But I might be wrong, comments please.

 

 

is 20% return possible?

 

the short answer is YES.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

now let's get to the newbie part...

 

for a person starting out, the more practical question is:

 

is it possible to breakeven by year 2?

 

 

 

 

 

 

not that it is impossible to make money right off the bat.

ask any newbie, they will tell you they made lots of money in the first 3 months.

the problem is... the market has a way of "training" a winner to be a loser.

It will slowly change your winning method into a losing one, and turn you against yourself.

Your challenge is no longer the market, but yourself.

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Tams said:
is 20% return possible?

 

the short answer is YES.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

now let's get to the newbie part...

 

for a person starting out, the more practical question is:

 

is it possible to breakeven by year 2?

 

 

 

 

 

 

not that it is impossible to make money right off the bat.

ask any newbie, they will tell you they made lots of money in the first 3 months.

the problem is... the market has a way of "training" a winner to be a loser.

It will slowly change your winning method into a losing one, and turn you against yourself.

Your challenge is no longer the market, but yourself.

 

 

Truth so pure, unfortunately live trading I did not have my 'make lots of money' in the beginning.

 

Made lots on the simulators, you get great fills on them, and can 'cheat' at your trading ideas! :rofl:

 

No better teacher than live trading losin real money.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

some simple thoughts on simulation:

 

 

1. simulation is not the real thing. accept the fact before you begin.

 

2. there are different levels of simulator.

 

this is a simulator:

attachment.php?attachmentid=10860&stc=1&d=1242939443

 

 

so is this one:

attachment.php?attachmentid=10862&stc=1&d=1242939896

 

 

3. If your system can make money on a sim, it doesn't mean it will make money live.

 

4. If your system can't make money on a sim, it sure won't make money live.

 

5. Practicing bad habits on a simulator will reinforce the bad habit.

 

6. Different people use simulator for different purposes; if it doesn't suite you, don't use it.

 

 

 

.

simulator.jpg.3c87a556a639c5ad23ef21b3e5a0f579.jpg

sim.jpg.0ce82c36960a6cb6f83f26391000de3d.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the best way to organize your thoughts so that this question no longer affects you is to understand the difference between trading profits and ROI, between trading capital with leverage and investments made using savings deposited into a brokerage account. Don Bright of Bright Trading explained it this way:

 

"We don't really think of trading profits as "ROI." Or even in terms of return at all.

 

For example, our people might put up $20K, and make $5k per week...but they are using our capital to trade with. We consider the money that is being used as simply another tool, just like a computer or trading method. An investor looks for ROI.

 

FWIW,

 

Don"

 

Traders trade for profits, while investors seek ROI. I have a colleague who starts each month with a balance in his futures account that most would find a ridiculously small capital with which to trade, let alone to trade for all of one's livlihood. He trades only the TF (formerly the ER2) He routinely nets two - three times his starting capital in the form of profits month after month. He never thinks in terms of having made a 200-300% return in a month. He simply knows he needs X thousand dollars in order to trade his way, and that is what he does. On the last day of the month, he draws out his profits for the month, and leaves his small starting capital to do it all over again.

 

Now, as to the question as to when a new trader can expect to be breakeven or profitable, well, that depends entirely on that trader's psyche. In the end, the only thing standing between any trader and either incredible income and wealth generation or terrible financial ruin is whether he or she is able to cut losers quickly while not cutting profits short too. If you can master your emotions, the rest if a piece of cake. Some may be successful right away. Others may forever be net losers. Near the beginning of Wyckoff's Studies in Tape Reading, he compares two traders, both of whom started out together in the same brokerage office watching the same ticker machine trading 10 share lots. Years later, one of these traders was still trading 10 lots while the other, in addition to having amassed a great fortune, was now trading an account equity of 100K. Some have it, and others never will.

 

So, in regard to the first question, think profits not ROI. You are a trader, not a money manager. If you understand yourself as seeking "a reasonable return on investment," you will never achieve what it is possible to achieve as a trader. Such thinking will limit you. It will leave you susceptible to others limiting you.

 

The answer to the second question is going to be unique to each individual, and can range on a scale of immediately profitable to perpetually unprofitable.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Tams said:

the problem is... the market has a way of "training" a winner to be a loser.

It will slowly change your winning method into a losing one, and turn you against yourself.

 

...cheerful stuff :( Unfortunately I think you about summed it up..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.