Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

cowcool

Is 100% Mechanical Trading Possible?

Recommended Posts

Hi Tams,

i am useing MT4 only. pls how i can use auto trading methard. i am useing multi trading accounts so pls guide me...

 

 

forget about autotrading...

you have a reading disability... you have read my post, but did not understand it.

 

read it again might help.

 

 

 

 

p.s. alternatively, if you don't want to read, I can teach you for a fee of US$250,000.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
forget about autotrading...

you have a reading disability... you have read my post, but did not understand it.

 

read it again might help.

 

 

 

 

p.s. alternatively, if you don't want to read, I can teach you for a fee of US$250,000.

 

:)

 

You must be having a bad day?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
:)

You must be having a bad day?

 

 

nah... never a bad day.

 

I just have no patience with people who don't want to read... LOL

 

I told him to start with a book,

and he came back to ask me to guide him.

 

I already guided him -- go start with a book for crying out loud.

 

 

 

p.s. guess why I knew he uses MT4?

a few would understand, not everybody tho. LOL

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is my experience with automated trading:

 

I first started daytrading a little over a year ago. I failed miserably. I had about one good month, then the fact that I didn't really know what I was doing caught up with me...fast.

 

That was when I decided to start coding automated strategies. I am an engineer and the code came easy, so I thought it would be a cinch. Again, the fact that I still didn't know anything (other than now being more fluent in EasyLanguage) caught up with me.

 

Four months ago I stepped back and went the discretionary route. My favorite indicators are channels (price and bollinger), John Ehler's smoothed adaptive momentum, and an adaptive RSI. I have had great success.

 

Last month I started trying to build automated strategies again using my favorite indication combos and, what do you know, they are looking promising. They automated strategies are still in simulated mode, but at least they are showing promising real-time numbers.

 

I heard an excellent analog to this recently: You may be able to parallel park your car easily yourself, but telling a computer to do it for you is a significant undertaking. And in the event that you can't parallel park on your own in the first place, it will be near-impossible for you to make a computer program that does it for you.

 

Also, if you dont believe automated trading works, check this out: HFT article

42% of the market!!! Now I know HFT is different from "our" kind of automated trading, but it is still automated trading...

 

I think you get the point. It is possible. Difficult. But Possible.

 

Happy Holidays!

 

Hunter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Check out TradeVec.....MANY sophisticated automated traders are starting to use this platform.
I tried to look into it again but is still in beta... Do you know when are they going to release the product?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am yearning for a 100 % mechanical trading system that is profitable?. Is this possible?

 

Thx!

 

Yes this is possible, a lot of hard work but once you understand how the market works then you can design a very good mechanical system that gives excellent results with profits.

 

Here is a sample of a system at work using a dummy account. Is uses minimum 20 lots but can be changed to 2,1, etc...

 

Good luck

 

Regards

 

Simon

1.thumb.jpg.4f27c833b17d4da073b42a950ce7cbc9.jpg

2.thumb.jpg.e3fa3e3971a7188f8616921190fbbefa.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also think it's possible, actually I hope so :-) I've written my own simulator/executor of mechanical strategies, now I'm able to backtest (and optimize) strategies and once I will have found one I can put it into the executor to trade it fully automated.

 

I'm in the process so I can't say if this adventure will have a good end. What I can say is that it's possible to build up a machine that is able to trade even complex ideas. After finishing my software I was sometimes looking at the executor what he did and was amazed how he put in the orders, moved the stops and so on, nice to watch. Of course that should be possible, it's just an engineering task but my question before starting was: will such a system be technically stable and safe enough (so that I can put real money on it). My answer is: yes. When I trade real money then a 2nd computer runs in my parents house to observe the trading computer and in case of anything it executes going out of the The technical basis is done.

 

I think there are many advantages in technical trading, you can do other things, can trade many markets simultaneously, even at night, fast in executing (scalping possible) . It was a lot of work writing my own machine but before I checked any other system I could get (2 years ago) and I didn't find any good one for me. I've done some extended trys using Tradestation but I was always disappointed that the reality was not as good as the simulation. I believe one reason is the accuracy of the data. My own system uses 5sec bars and additionally tick, volume and order sizes and now it's accurate enough, means when I run a real trading day again in the simulator it's about 95% correct - that's enough to be able to find working systems in the sim.

 

The big point actually is to find system ideas. I say to myself: if I have found only one that works there will be many more. "Works" is definded as constantly making money, steady upslope capital curve etc. at least over some weeks/months. So far I've only dealed with relatively simple strategies without "self learning" stuff. This can work very good for some days but then "suddenly" there comes a "painful day" where it gives away a good amount of the money earned before. E.g. I have a strategy that is mostly successful in fading the 2nd breakout: on normal days I get more gain than loss, sometimes win sometimes loose but with good money management I win. But then it happens that there comes a real trend day, the market going in one direction steadily - and that's pure poison for this system, it looses the whole day. I made the same experience using other trading ideas and the result is: with "simple ideas" it's possible to program a small gain over long time, not more. The market (I actually trade only Eur/Usd) is very clever finding new ways in behaviour even if in the end it's the same again and again.

 

Things like Ross Hooks are easy to gauge and I thought "yes that must work", after programming the machine tells it's own version: yes it works often, but there are also many times where it doesn't work. I looked back at the chart and had to agree, the machine (= the pure technical idea) was right, I had overseen some non working RH.

 

So this is my contribution to the thread starter's question. I still believe it's possible but one must find a working strategy. This has to be easy, adaptive and clever at the same time :-) I'm actually working on integrating a Neural Network and other "learning stuff" into my system and I believe I will overcome the drawbacks mentioned with it. I also do some statistical research on daily behavior (like Taylor swings) to be prepared for special types of days. I don't think I will able to avoid losses but I want to avoid the "painful days" as I have them now. The market repeats itself and in the same moment it changes it's behaviour constantly, and the changes repeat themselfes. I believe a mechanical system must be able to deal with this fact.

 

Happy trading!

Andy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So Andy tell us.. You wrote the whole backtesting system from the scratch in just two years? Is that right? You must be talented young fella.. What programming language do you use?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I did. I'm a professional software developer so I know my tools. But I must admit it's my 3rd attempt, before I have written two systems in Excel which didn't really help me, but there I learned about markets, indicators, data etc. I also had tried to trade manually but have found that's not my thing.

 

Evolution: First I wrote a small trading robot dealing with the API of my broker, written in Visual Basic 6, it already had the capability to attach different strategies and could send orders, react on fills etc. Then I decided I need a simulator so I made it work with collected data from the past. But that was too slow (it needed 3mins to simulate one day using 5sec bars), I ported the engine part to C++ (now only 2secs for one day). This made it possible to add a parameter system, means parameters are read from a database and performance results are stored back, so I can do brute force optimizing. The last step was to synchronize the source codes of both simulator and trading robot so that now I can use the same strategy code in both.

 

Of course this is easier written than done :-) It was a lot of work and I wouldn't start that again. I had flexible jobs at that time so it was possible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
unbelievable! :cool:

 

Yes but one thing must be said: I first used C++ implementing the ActiveX/COM technology of Visual Basic and the result was similar slow as VB. But pure C++ is impressive, I believe you can't get more out of your processor. However it's not easy to program, there are many pitfalls, so nothing for programming beginners.

Using VB you can come much quicker to your result and it can't be called slow (I believe it's still much faster than pure interpreting languages like Easylanguage) but for brute force optimizing you need pure speed of course.

But even speed does not make a winning system, it's only a tool :-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes but one thing must be said: I first used C++ implementing the ActiveX/COM technology of Visual Basic and the result was similar slow as VB. But pure C++ is impressive, I believe you can't get more out of your processor. However it's not easy to program, there are many pitfalls, so nothing for programming beginners.

Using VB you can come much quicker to your result and it can't be called slow (I believe it's still much faster than pure interpreting languages like Easylanguage) but for brute force optimizing you need pure speed of course.

But even speed does not make a winning system, it's only a tool :-)

 

 

EasyLanguage left the interpreter in version 4. (~1997?)

 

Today's TradeStation uses p-code.

 

MultiCharts' indicators are compiled.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The hardest part about trying to go purely algorithmic is it quickly shows you how nonsensical what you think you know about markets are...Before deciding to go automated i would have said im a tape reader and trade price levels...ok...define what that means...... Its an easy cop out to pretend my brain is doing something that can't be put in code there but the reality is my strategies are simply too fraught with noise to put to code..muddled thinking and out right nonsense.

You can't find excuses with "trader psychology", "knowing yourself", ect as to why your trades have negative expectation...

There is also the aspect that I think you can make an arguement that algorithmic trading your own money is about the hardest problem to tackle there is...The skill set needed is so vast. A software engineer will tend to come at the problem wrong and try to paint the canvas with a hammer...while the "artist" will try to pound nails into the wall with a paint brush.

It strikes me though as a logical step as a trader as far as progression that you have to ask yourself eventually why you don't go algorithmic and take head on the elephant in the room of muddled thinking with discretionary setups...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is definitely some truth in that perspective.

 

But often it is because its very hard to code 'beauty' and 'looks really good' or 'well proportioned.' I know :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Smells like spam.

The advantage I find in algo trading is the lack of pressure and stress that goes along with discretionary trading.

Bottom line is - discretionary trading is a hell of a lot of work on an intraday basis. Once you are in a trade it is incredibly easy to make a mistake, especially when the market is moving.

I like the idea of discretionary trading, but it sure is relaxing doing the automated thing.

 

Depends on how discretionary and complicated you make it. I'm trading a semi-mechanical method and it's really simple. I get 0-5 setups per session (I only trade mornings). I surf, read, watch webinars, chat on skype, etc. while patiently waiting for a setup. When I get it I click the DOM to enter and that's it. either stop or target is hit. trading doesn't have to be complicated. I'd love to automate this but I trade off chart patterns including divergences which are not easy to automate, and I was a professional software developer. Maybe some day I'll try to automate it but I fear that I'll spend more time automating it than I would just trading it. Plus the markets constantly change so if I do it manually I'll gradually change with them.

 

My take on automation is that it's possible but you sacrifice your performance. I haven't been able to get higher than 1.5 profit factor on automated systems. The drawdowns are too high. I've wrote hundreds of strategies and none of them work as well as my discretionary trading. So I gave up on it.

 

The edge is in our brains. If it were possible to just program an automated strategy.. well goldman and the big companies have lots of programmers working on that sort of thing. if it were possible they'd be doing it. you have to use your brain and focus on what cannot be automated and that's reading price action, volume, order flow, etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yes it is possible and yes you can make profitable trades, no system is perfect, for instance some systems fail on sideways market moves , others are built around capturing reversals . hence why one system wont be ideal ... you need a package or 2 or 3 systems running to capture every move that can appreciate profit.

 

Or combine 3 into 1 not easy ... but YEs there rules and mechnaical systems which nail the majority of moves. it sounds a bit like you Wont something that gives you forecasts

"I have not seen a "system" where you can say for certain, "if price does this, then I will do that" every time and have it make money. I would venture to say that most traders who have a "system" or "plan", have, as a strong element in that plan, their own intuition. '

You can have something that gives a entry signal and does what it suppose to according to rules, profit is based on the markets movement and direction your system goes with , you have to trust something, where the discretiaonary trade comes in is where you see soemthing change visually or market shows you something based on exp. or rules you use for allocation etc... e..g weekly indicator changes on a wednesday and thursday confirms ,then your position is agianst the change you may lighten your position in expectation of a sudden reversal ... or market news is so different that it becomes indecisive .. BUT ive never had a an occasion where news comes out and i havnt been facing the wrong way !

 

anyway hope this helps

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a few thoughts on this.

 

First, everyday in my inbox I'm pounded by sellers of EA's to autotrader the forex. To this day I've never met, talked or seen anyone actually be successful with any length of time with these. They just turn out to be overoptimized, curve-fitted marketing gimmicks.

 

However, there's no denying that the sales pitch is awfully compelling. It really makes you want to yearn for a time where you could have the computer do your trading for you.

 

I know in my "manual" trading I do use discretion, and I also make mistakes. It would be nice to have something where those mistakes are eliminated.

 

Of late, I've been using a strategy inside of Tradestation, then using the email interface, it sends the trade into NinjaTrader and onto my Interactive Brokers accounts. Sounds slow in theory but it actually sends the order in a split second - certainly as fast as I could every manually enter it.

 

There are issues though - keeping it all in synch. As much as I'd love to feel 100% comfortable going to sleep, or playing golf (I don't but that's how EA's are always advertised) I've had things happen that make that a little uneasy. I still do it, walk away that is but at times I comeback to a surprise. The strategy itself is fine, I trade it on Crude Futures and Dax Futures now and will look to expand into forex next. But, sometimes the strategy is "exectued" but no fill was received at the broker. Yet the strategy places exit orders -- and as you can imagine if you don't fill on the original order, you can end up out there hanging totally in the wrong way when it exits you -- but turns out that becomes an entry order when the initial order wasn't triggered.

 

I've also seen times where Tradesation shows a price was hit, but for some reason it didn't trigger on IB -- and again exit orders get placed since it is trying to keep you in synch with the charts. Issues.

 

Or, just yesterday I must have lost internet connection overnight -- TS will try to reconnect for a while but it must have been down longer than a few minutes and I came to the office and saw it was asking for logins again -- totally offline.

 

So, while I feel automated trading at 100% accuracy (not trade success, I just mean following the trade strategy) is possible, I do think there are a lot of issues that makes it difficult at times to truly believe in 'set it and forget it'

 

At the same time, I'm committed to making it work because after years of manual trading it takes a toll and I'm a big believer in my strategy -- and really want this darn computer to do what it is told :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

StevenSJC you might want to take a look at Multicharts. It can run strategies written for Tradestation and place orders directly with Interactive Brokers. It would likely be more robust than your current setup with much better control and feedback. I should say that whilst I am a MC user I don't use strategies let alone automated strategies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Really?

 

I didn't know that Multicharts could do that. Learned something there.

 

How is the datafeed for Multicharts? I know a few years ago I tried it and there were some issues with a stable feed - but it has really been a while.

 

It might potentially be really cool to be able to use my same strategy that works in TS on Multicharts if it interfaces directly with IB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't want to sound like a commercial for MC (I can be a harsh critic too:)) but it supports a whole variety of data feeds including TS's own it has most of the popular ones.

 

MultiCharts / Supported Data Feeds

 

Actually one of the feeds I use is IB's. It is fine for a lot of the stuff I do. (IB aggregate ticks you can read about that elsewhere). I also use Zenfire for some research stuff that requires more precision. That is fine but it does not always re-connect properly after an internet outage. As I currently only use it for research I have not tried too hard to get to the bottom of it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great, thanks for heads up on that.

 

Would you happen to know if multicharts can chart range bars or renko bars? That's fairly new to tradestation in 2010 and I like both a lot - not sure if Multicharts is doing same?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Hello citizens of the U.S. The hundred year trade war has leaked over into a trading war. Your equity holdings are under attack by huge sovereign funds shorting relentlessly... running basically the opposite of  PPT operations.  As an American you are blessed to be totally responsible for your own assets - the govt won’t and can’t take care of you, your lame ass whuss ‘retail’ fund managers go catatonic  and can't / won’t help you, etc etc.... If you’re going to hold your positions, it’s on you to hedge your holdings.   Don’t blame Trump, don’t blame the system, don’t even blame the ‘enemies’ - ie don’t blame period.  Just occupy the freedom and responsibility you have and act.  The only mistake ‘Trump’ made so far was not to warn you more explicitly and remind you of your options to hedge weeks ago.   FWIW when Trump got elected... I also failed to explicitly remind you... just sayin’
    • Date: 7th April 2025.   Asian Markets Plunge as US-China Trade War Escalates; Wall Street Futures Signal Further Turmoil.   Global financial markets extended last week’s massive sell-off as tensions between the US and its major trading partners deepened, rattling investors and prompting sharp declines across equities, commodities, and currencies. The fallout from President Trump’s sweeping new tariff measures continued to spread, raising fears of a full-blown trade war and economic recession.   Asian stock markets plunged on Monday, extending a global market rout fueled by rising tensions between the US and China. The latest wave of aggressive tariffs and retaliatory measures has unnerved investors worldwide, triggering sharp sell-offs across the Asia-Pacific region.   Asian equities led the global rout on Monday, with dramatic losses seen across the region. Japan’s Nikkei 225 index tumbled more than 8% shortly after the open, while the broader Topix fell over 6.5%, recovering only slightly from steeper losses. In mainland China, the Shanghai Composite sank 6.7%, and the blue-chip CSI300 dropped 7.5% as markets reopened following a public holiday. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index opened more than 9% lower, reflecting deep concerns about escalating trade tensions.           South Korea’s Kospi dropped 4.8%, triggering a circuit breaker designed to curb panic selling. Taiwan’s Taiex index collapsed by nearly 10%, with major tech exporters like TSMC and Foxconn hitting circuit breaker limits after each fell close to 10%. Meanwhile, Australia’s ASX 200 shed as much as 6.3%, and New Zealand’s NZX 50 lost over 3.5%.   Despite the escalation, Beijing has adopted a measured tone. Chinese officials urged investors not to panic and assured markets that the country has the tools to mitigate economic shocks. At the same time, they left the door open for renewed trade talks, though no specific timeline has been set.   US Stock Futures Plunge Ahead of Monday Open   US stock futures pointed to another brutal day on Wall Street. Futures tied to the S&P 500 dropped over 3%, Nasdaq futures sank 4%, and Dow Jones futures lost 2.5%—equivalent to nearly 1,000 points. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, down more than 20% from its recent highs, while the S&P 500 is nearing bear territory. The Dow closed last week in correction. Oil prices followed suit, with WTI crude dropping over 4% to $59.49 per barrel—its lowest since April 2021.   Wall Street closed last week in disarray, erasing more than $5 trillion in value amid fears of an all-out trade war. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, sinking more than 20% from its recent peak. The S&P 500 is approaching bear territory, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average has slipped firmly into correction territory.   German Banks Hit Hard Amid Escalating Trade Tensions   German banking stocks were among the worst hit in Europe. Shares of Commerzbank and Deutsche Bank plunged between 9.5% and 10.3% during early Frankfurt trading, compounding Friday’s steep losses. Fears over a global trade war and looming recession are severely impacting the financial sector, particularly export-driven economies like Germany.   Eurozone Growth at Risk   Eurozone officials are bracing for economic fallout, with Greek central bank governor Yannis Stournaras warning that Trump’s tariff policy could reduce eurozone GDP by up to 1%. The EU is preparing retaliatory tariffs on $28 billion worth of American goods—ranging from steel and aluminium to consumer products like dental floss and luxury jewellery.   Starting Wednesday, the US is expected to impose 25% tariffs on key EU exports, with Brussels ready to respond with its own 20% levies on nearly all remaining American imports.   UK Faces £22 Billion Economic Blow   In the UK, fresh research from KPMG revealed that the British economy could shrink by £21.6 billion by 2027 due to US-imposed tariffs. The analysis points to a 0.8% dip in economic output over the next two years, undermining Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ growth agenda. The report also warned of additional fiscal pressure that may lead to future tax increases and public spending cuts.   Wall Street Braces for Recession   Goldman Sachs revised its US recession probability to 45% within the next year, citing tighter financial conditions and rising policy uncertainty. This marks a sharp jump from the 35% risk estimated just last month—and more than double January’s 20% projection. J.P. Morgan issued a bleaker outlook, now forecasting a 60% chance of recession both in the US and globally.   Global Leaders Respond as Trade Tensions Deepen   The dramatic market sell-off was triggered by China’s sweeping retaliation to a new round of US tariffs, which included a 34% levy on all American imports. Beijing’s state-run People’s Daily released a defiant statement, asserting that China has the tools and resilience to withstand economic pressure from Washington. ‘We’ve built up experience after years of trade conflict and are prepared with a full arsenal of countermeasures,’ it stated.   Around the world, policymakers are responding to the growing threat of a trade-led economic slowdown. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba announced plans to appeal directly to Washington and push for tariff relief, following the US administration’s decision to impose a blanket 24% tariff on Japanese imports. He aims to visit the US soon to present Japan’s case as a fair trade partner.   In Taiwan, President Lai Ching-te said his administration would work closely with Washington to remove trade barriers and increase purchases of American goods in an effort to reduce the bilateral trade deficit. The island's defence ministry has also submitted a new list of US military procurements to highlight its strategic partnership.   Economists and strategists are warning of deeper economic consequences. Ronald Temple, chief market strategist at Lazard, said the scale and speed of these tariffs could result in far more severe damage than previously anticipated. ‘This isn’t just a bilateral conflict anymore — more countries are likely to respond in the coming weeks,’ he noted.   Analysts at Barclays cautioned that smaller Asian economies, such as Singapore and South Korea, may face challenges in negotiating with Washington and are already adjusting their economic growth forecasts downward in response to the unfolding trade crisis.           Oil Prices Sink on Demand Concerns   Crude oil continued its sharp slide on Monday, driven by recession fears and weakened global demand. Brent fell 3.9% to $63.04 a barrel, while WTI plunged over 4% to $59.49—both benchmarks marking weekly losses exceeding 10%. Analysts say inflationary pressures and slowing economic activity may drag demand down, even though energy imports were excluded from the latest round of tariffs.   Vandana Hari of Vanda Insights noted, ‘The market is struggling to find a bottom. Until there’s a clear signal from Trump that calms recession fears, crude prices will remain under pressure.’   OPEC+ Adds Further Pressure with Output Hike   Bearish sentiment intensified after OPEC+ announced it would boost production by 411,000 barrels per day in May, far surpassing the expected 135,000 bpd. The alliance called on overproducing nations to submit compensation plans by April 15. Analysts fear this surprise move could undo years of supply discipline and weigh further on already fragile oil markets.   Global political risks also flared over the weekend. Iran rejected US proposals for direct nuclear negotiations and warned of potential military action. Meanwhile, Russia claimed fresh territorial gains in Ukraine’s Sumy region and ramped up attacks on surrounding areas—further darkening the outlook for markets.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • AMZN Amazon stock watch, good buying (+313%) toi hold onto the 173.32 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?AMZN
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.