Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

agon

Volume Splitter

Recommended Posts

This kind of error could cause a trader to enter or exit based on incorrect information and just one mistake could cost more than the subscription to Market Delta & IQFeed!

 

Absolutely correct, so trying to make broker supplied feeds work for BID/ASK differential duties is an exercise in futility. Use a proper data feed (with a ticker plant and available historical BID/ASK data) for a few bucks more a day and then focus your efforts on your trading set ups.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here is a ladder comparison between Ninjatrader with GOM Ladder & Zen-Fire & Market Delta with IQFeed. Look at the circled area. IQFeed & Ninja have totally different results. Interestingly enough, the price above and below they are almost the same.

 

This kind of error could cause a trader to enter or exit based on incorrect information and just one mistake could cost more than the subscription to Market Delta & IQFeed!

The exceptionally well built GomLadder (another excellent job by supper Gomi!) in NT connected to DTN.IQ feed will give you results that you can at least trust.

 

BTW, did I mention that Gomi rocks! :cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes....a $2,000 a month feed.

 

DTN.IQ feed passes the verification test on a week by week basis......none of the broker supplied feeds do from all the various testing done.

 

I dunno this still sounds rather blanket :): I am not after a detailed test plan just a couple of sentences on how you test and with what.

 

Which feed? I am not sure why the secrecy tbh :) Is it NxCore? Thompson/Reuter? Do you check that the cumulative total matches day to day? That would seem to be a fairly good 'checksum'. Do they tally exactly? Does it vary day to day? Are you using the same client software to test? Just a couple of sentences would elevate this from being a blanket statement.

 

Edit I am not disagreeing with your conclusions (thoughwith broker supplied feeds infrastructure plays a big part) just wondered how you arrived at them :)

Edited by BlowFish

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now, in the data feed, that low level of trade stuff does not need to be reflected, but... It seems quite reasonable to show book updates prior to transactions. It could go either way--so long as you are consistent and always do it one way or the other.

 

I would be interested... in the low level data of dtn.iq--are book updates always given before transactions? So a trade of 10 at bid will be always immediately preceded by a reduction in the bid size by 10?

 

I agree. I saw the same thing with the TT feed. Book updates always came before trades. I assume that this is also the case with IQFeed because if trades came before book updates then you wouldn't have the issue with trades between the inside market.

 

I have looked at event data for zen-fire and can say that there are definitely things that don't add up. Something like bid is at 19, there's a trade at same bid price of 25 and next update is bid is at 43 at same price. Obviously, there should have been some updates in the middle in order for that to have happened but they didn't show up in the feed I received.

 

I saw the same thing with TT's feed. Most likely they just drop the book updates in favour of showing you the most recent inside market. I've talked about his earlier. The feed providers have to decide whether speed or complete data is more important and in most cases it's speed. DTN claim that they don't filter anything. Even their API documentation says that you they can't guarantee that all the data you get is valid because they don't filter anything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I always thought filtering was a cop out, a throw back to a bygone era. It is using a band aid rather than curing the wound. Put another way with robust error checking filtering should be unnecessary. I have also wondered how an electronic exchange can be designed that can generate 'bad ticks'. Sure some fat fingered human might accidentally sell 100,000 rather than 100 but that's a different matter altogether.

 

I guess when people talk of filtering they might mean coalescing or aggregation? Filtering to me implies purposely removing data.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I dunno this still sounds rather blanket :): I am not after a detailed test plan just a couple of sentences on how you test and with what.

 

Which feed? I am not sure why the secrecy tbh :) Is it NxCore? Thompson/Reuter? Do you check that the cumulative total matches day to day? That would seem to be a fairly good 'checksum'. Do they tally exactly? Does it vary day to day? Are you using the same client software to test? Just a couple of sentences would elevate this from being a blanket statement.

 

Edit I am not disagreeing with your conclusions (though with broker supplied feeds infrastructure plays a big part) just wondered how you arrived at them :)

Yes on a day to day basis the Cumulative Delta plots/data match up exactly when the feeds are compared together....we are not finding any data discrepancies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You raise a good point about bid/ask in that is it really worth it to have bid/ask instead of the more reliable uptickd/downtick?

 

I'm pretty sure I remember reading at the Neoticker forum that Lawrence Chan (long time system developer, trader, and owner/creator of TickQuest, the makers of Neoticker -- What a mouth full that was!) always recommends using up/dn tick on any data feed due to its higher reliability across data sources.

 

With kind regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm pretty sure I remember reading at the Neoticker forum that Lawrence Chan (long time system developer, trader, and owner/creator of TickQuest, the makers of Neoticker -- What a mouth full that was!) always recommends using up/dn tick on any data feed due to its higher reliability across data sources.

 

With kind regards,

MK

Yes, back in the day it was not easy to get clean BID/ASK differential data (or charting software that even knew how to show that data.....INCLUDING NeoTicker). Also, after all these years you can see not even Neoticker has any decent off the shelf Cumulative Delta tracking tools. LC does not at all seem interested in CD, so I am never surprised when he makes comments like that. ;)

 

Well now we have MarketDelta, Investor RT, NT7, Sierra Charts, and soon TradeVec and the next Tradestation summer release that will have Cumulative Delta tools.....COOL! :cool:

 

Traders who want to pay attention to the order flow are asking for these bid/ask differential tools everywhere, so I wonder how good LC is at spotting a trend? ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes, back in the day it was not easy to get clean BID/ASK differential data (or charting software that even knew how to show that data.....INCLUDING NeoTicker). Also, after all these years you can see not even Neoticker has any decent off the shelf Cumulative Delta tracking tools. LC does not at all seem interested in CD, so I am never surprised when he makes comments like that. ;)

 

Well now we have MarketDelta, Investor RT, NT7, Sierra Charts, and soon TradeVec and the next Tradestation summer release that will have Cumulative Delta tools.....COOL! :cool:

 

Traders who want to pay attention to the order flow are asking for these bid/ask differential tools everywhere, so I wonder how good LC is at spotting a trend? ;)

 

That's pretty harsh coming from someone who has been calling the top since last April.(ES - 879, wasn't it?)

 

Prolly going to be right this April. You should start a thread. lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That's pretty harsh coming from someone who has been calling the top since last April.(ES - 879, wasn't it?)

 

Prolly going to be right this April. You should start a thread. lol

I never called any top last April....you seem confused. I have traded 9 longer term ES trades since this time last year and all were profitable (some LONG and some SHORT). Had some very nice longer term LONG trades this past year too. ;)

 

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQpQ6OZCyZA]YouTube - Delta Zone for the BUY![/ame]

 

 

 

Three very good longer term LONG trades in the ES this past year.....LONG off the 866/867's.....off the 977/978's....and was just recently in a longer term LONG ES trade off the 1040.75's bounce. I trade BOTH directions as I see longer term set ups form. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That's pretty harsh coming from someone who has been calling the top since last April.(ES - 879, wasn't it?)

 

Prolly going to be right this April. You should start a thread. lol

Being harsh is very different from stimulating some competition in the vendor charting industry. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes, back in the day it was not easy to get clean BID/ASK differential data (or charting software that even knew how to show that data.....INCLUDING NeoTicker). Also, after all these years you can see not even Neoticker has any decent off the shelf Cumulative Delta tracking tools. LC does not at all seem interested in CD, so I am never surprised when he makes comments like that. ;)

 

Well now we have MarketDelta, Investor RT, NT7, Sierra Charts, and soon TradeVec and the next Tradestation summer release that will have Cumulative Delta tools.....COOL! :cool:

 

Traders who want to pay attention to the order flow are asking for these bid/ask differential tools everywhere, so I wonder how good LC is at spotting a trend? ;)

 

Hiya FT,

 

I can't entirely speak for how LC trades, but I know he has done extensive work on market internals, and that is why neobreadth exists. He is a trader, and what you see in Neoticker is what tools he and the TickQuest traders need - not necessarily what others want. The model is more about giving you the tool to make anything you want in any language you want.

 

Delta tools are available from the forum or one can code it up however they like in whatever language they like.

 

Yes, I am a Neoticker fan :)

 

With kind regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hiya FT,

 

I can't entirely speak for how LC trades, but I know he has done extensive work on market internals, and that is why neobreadth exists. He is a trader, and what you see in Neoticker is what tools he and the TickQuest traders need - not necessarily what others want. The model is more about giving you the tool to make anything you want in any language you want.

 

Delta tools are available from the forum or one can code it up however they like in whatever language they like.

 

Yes, I am a Neoticker fan :)

 

With kind regards,

MK

Right, I am familiar with Neoticker (used it for a while in the past) and I do like the charting application overall. I have also followed the CD tools discussions at the NT forum in the past........... CVD (Cumulative Volume Delta) Indicator - Page 3 - NeoTicker Forums

 

I have several trader friends who use NT so I know you get some workable flexibility in the use of their charting app. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With regards to data feeds. I talked to the API guy of IQFeed yesterday and he couldn't tell me whether inside market updates come before trades or not. He said it depends on how the exchanges report it because they just forward it. I just called Eurex to find out and they told me they'll get back to me with an answer on how they report trades to the feed providers.

 

I compared IQFeed with TT's feed today and IQFeed serves more trades. There was even a point where MD Trader showed a low of the day without any volume having traded there, which means that they somehow filtered out that trade.

 

I've said before that ideally you want two different feeds. One that reports all information and is possibly a bit slower (used for charting and data processing) and one that reports only the most recent information and is really fast (used for execution/DOM). I do have the impression that IQFeed is the former and TT's feed is the later.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've said before that ideally you want two different feeds. One that reports all information and is possibly a bit slower (used for charting and data processing) and one that reports only the most recent information and is really fast (used for execution/DOM). I do have the impression that IQFeed is the former and TT's feed is the later.

 

This makes a lot of sense. I am using IQFeed for Market Delta charting and Zen-fire for Ninjatrader for the DOM.

 

I don't know if it's the Market Delta software or the IQFeed but when I compare the ninja DOM to the Market Delta Time & Sales and charts, the Ninja DOM moves faster. There is maybe 1/4 to 1/2 second lag in Market Delta. This is why I think it's important to keep an eye on the DOM.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes on a day to day basis the Cumulative Delta plots/data match up exactly when the feeds are compared together....we are not finding any data discrepancies.

 

Thanks, matching exactly is pretty conclusive and that alone would add weight to the whole procedure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm pretty sure I remember reading at the Neoticker forum that Lawrence Chan (long time system developer, trader, and owner/creator of TickQuest, the makers of Neoticker -- What a mouth full that was!) always recommends using up/dn tick on any data feed due to its higher reliability across data sources.

 

With kind regards,

MK

 

As an aside Neoticker (in theory, I have not used NT for quite a while) would be a good option for this type of work (with its 'tick precise' technology).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm pretty sure I remember reading at the Neoticker forum that Lawrence Chan always recommends using up/dn tick on any data feed due to its higher reliability across data sources.

 

With kind regards,

MK

Try and plot CVD as Fulcrum does alongside with cummulative up/down tick volume delta... and look at it - can you figure out anything from it? Tell us if you could.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Try and plot CVD as Fulcrum does alongside with cummulative up/down tick volume delta... and look at it - can you figure out anything from it? Tell us if you could.

 

Hi there,

 

I have indeed done this for quite some time on Asian futures. I'm not sure I understand your question though. Figure anything out?

 

With kind regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK. I thought you havent done... because cum delta up/dn ticks makes no sense whatsoever. while cvd on bid/ask volume makes sense most of the time...

 

i tried it for iqfeed and barchart.... perhaps your experience varies... good for you! :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Both are methods to try to detect 'trade direction'. Lots of studies have been done on how efficacious these methods are (I mentioned these earlier in the thread). Broadly speaking most conclude that V@B/A is about 10% more efficacious than uptick/downtick though results do vary. None of it is precise however they did convince me that it is a 'good enough' metric to be useful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

from my personal use of CVD - B/A has 25% efficience (which is high) and up/dn tick = 00000000... which for me doesnt mean up/dn tick 25% less efficient :) for me that mean - useless ;)

 

P.S. I use very few indicators (2-3 at a time). so may be I am not the one to argue on this :helloooo:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
from my personal use of CVD - B/A has 25% efficience (which is high) and up/dn tick = 00000000... which for me doesnt mean up/dn tick 25% less efficient :) for me that mean - useless ;)

 

P.S. I use very few indicators (2-3 at a time). so may be I am not the one to argue on this :helloooo:

 

That's odd most studies have 60%-65% (ish) for up/down and 70-80% (maybe a wee bit more) for V@B/A. Of course whether trade direction is a precursor to directional change in price is another matter. This is in markets where there is an audited database of trades (e.g. specialist markets) so it is possible that they behave a little differently. I wonder whether it is your testing methodology? Of the dozen or so papers that I have found or purchased I cant recall it ever been tested below 60%. Most of the studies have very rigorous testing methodologies. I am trying to imagine where the discrepancy could come form? What data are you using? How are you determining the actual trade direction of each trade?

 

Edit: A thought occurs to me, maybe you are talking about efficacy of using Lee & Ready to determine short term price direction? The studies are concerned with using the algorithm to determine the trade direction (order flow if you like) on each individual trade. Whether this can be used to aid trading decisions is a different matter altogther.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 8th April 2025.   Markets Rebound Cautiously as US-China Tariff Tensions Deepen     Global markets staged a tentative recovery on Tuesday following a wave of volatility sparked by escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. The Asia-Pacific region showed signs of stability after a chaotic start to the week—though some pockets remained under pressure. Taiwan’s Taiex dropped 4.4%, dragged lower by losses in tech heavyweight TSMC. The world’s largest chipmaker fell another 4% on Tuesday and has now slumped 13.5% since April 2, when US President Donald Trump first unveiled what he called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.   However, broader sentiment across the region turned more positive, with several markets rebounding sharply after Monday’s dramatic sell-offs. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged over 6% in early trading, rebounding from an 18-month low. South Korea’s Kospi rose marginally, and Australia’s ASX 200 gained 1.9%, driven by strength in mining stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.6%, though still far from recovering from Monday’s 13.2% crash—its worst day since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. China’s Shanghai Composite added 0.9%.   In Europe, DAX and FTSE 100 are up more than 1% in opening trade. EU Commission President von der Leyen repeated yesterday that the EU had offered reciprocal zero tariffs on manufactured goods previously and continues to stand by that offer. Others are also trying again to talk to Trump to get some sort of agreement that limits the impact.   Much of the rally appeared to be driven by dip-buying, as well as hopes that the intensifying trade war could still be defused through negotiations.   China Strikes Back: ‘We Will Fight to the End’   Tensions reached a boiling point after Trump threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on all Chinese imports unless Beijing rolled back its retaliatory measures by April 8. ‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow... the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50%,’ Trump declared on social media.   If implemented, the new tariffs would bring total US duties on Chinese goods to a staggering 124%, factoring in the existing 20%, the 34% recently announced, and the proposed 50%.   In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a stern warning, stating: ‘The US threat to escalate tariffs is a mistake on top of a mistake... If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.’ The ministry also called for equal and respectful dialogue, though signs of compromise on either side remain scarce.   Beijing acted quickly to contain a market fallout. State funds intervened to support equities, and the People’s Bank of China set the yuan fixing at its weakest level since September 2023 to boost export competitiveness. Additionally, five-year interest rate swaps in China fell to their lowest levels since 2020, indicating potential for further monetary easing.   Trump Talks Tough on EU Too   Trump’s hardline approach extended beyond China. Speaking at a press conference, he rejected the European Union’s offer to eliminate tariffs on cars and industrial goods, accusing the bloc of ‘being very bad to us.’ He insisted that Europe would need to source its energy from the US, claiming the US could ‘knock off $350 billion in one week.’   The EU, meanwhile, backed away from a proposed 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey, opting instead for 25% duties on selected US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs.     Volatile Wall Street Adds to the Drama   Wall Street experienced wild swings on Monday as investors processed the rapidly evolving trade conflict. The S&P 500 briefly fell 4.7% before rebounding 3.4%, nearly erasing its losses in what could have been its biggest one-day jump in years—if it had held. The Dow Jones Industrial Average sank by as much as 1,700 points early in the day but later climbed nearly 900 points before closing 349 points lower, down 0.9%. The Nasdaq ended up 0.1%.   The brief rally was fueled by a false rumour that Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs—rumours that the White House quickly labelled ‘fake news.’ The market's sharp reaction underscored how desperate investors are for any sign that tensions might ease.   Oil Markets in Focus: Goldman Sachs Revises Forecasts   Crude prices also reflected the uncertainty, with US crude briefly dipping below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021. As of early Tuesday, Brent crude was trading at $64.72, while WTI hovered around $61.26.   Goldman Sachs, in a note dated April 7, lowered its average price forecasts for Brent and WTI through 2025 and 2026, citing mounting recession risks and the potential for higher-than-expected supply from OPEC+.       Under a base-case scenario where the US avoids a recession and tariffs are reduced significantly before the April 9 implementation date, Goldman sees Brent at $62 per barrel and WTI at $58 by December 2025. These figures fall further to $55 and $51, respectively, by the end of 2026. This outlook also assumes moderate output increases from eight OPEC+ countries, with incremental boosts of 130,000–140,000 barrels per day in June and July.   However, should the US slip into a typical recession and OPEC production aligns with the bank’s baseline assumptions, Brent could retreat to $58 by the end of this year and to $50 by December 2026.   In a more bearish scenario involving a global GDP slowdown and no change to OPEC+ output levels, Brent prices might fall to $54 by year-end and $45 by late 2026. The most extreme projection—based on a simultaneous economic downturn and a full reversal of OPEC+ production cuts—would see Brent plunge to below $40 per barrel by the end of 2026.   Goldman noted that oil prices could outperform forecasts significantly if there was a dramatic shift in tariff policy and a surprise in global demand recovery.   Cautious Optimism, But Warnings Persist   With both Washington and Beijing showing no signs of backing down, markets are likely to remain volatile in the days ahead. Investors now turn their attention to upcoming trade meetings and policy decisions, hoping for clarity in what has become one of the most unpredictable trading environments in recent years.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.