Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

agon

Volume Splitter

Recommended Posts

I think the issue is with InsideAsk and InsideBid. Essentially you are 'peaking' at those values (which fluctuate) at a moment in time. They are not synchronised with last in any way shape or form.

 

 

exactly! they are unsynchronized, but synchronized "enough" when the market is calm

 

this is ome reason why it gets worse when the market moves because the Bid/Ask pushes in one direction relative to the closes and tricks the indicator. the second is that the link and code might have trouble keeping up. during quiet times, it does ok. in one of Tasuki's posts, it shows the bottoms overshooting the price, this is most likely due to this "increased activity effect." the only way to solve it properly is to received synchronized data.

 

comparing the closes to each other works relatively well; but one needs to make assumptions/avg through the up/down pressure (ie order book) based on relative closes and closes that don't move. That's where i magic will be, in my humble opinion

 

phall

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

comparing the closes to each other works relatively well; but one needs to make assumptions/avg through the up/down pressure (ie order book) based on relative closes and closes that don't move. That's where i magic will be, in my humble opinion

 

phall

 

I dont know if this is what you search, but for Ninjatrader the jtRealStats indicator shows on the right side, tick by tick, how much volume is occurring above, at and below the previous bar's closing price. I am sure thsi could be also plotted as histogramm changing some lines.

 

Level II/Tick Volume Indicator for NinjaTrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

attached is a MACD .ELD for the close based volume splitter

name: VS_MACD

 

this is not intended to be "the solution"; but to investigate whether the methodology is on the right track and could eventually be fine tuned.

 

if someone could test out today would be great

VS_MACD.ELD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

phall,

On your indicator which I called "271", I can't seem to change the colors of the open and close (DO and DC). I've looked at the code, but I'm not good enough to figure out what to do. Is there an easy fix for this? Of course there are two places where color is addressed in the indicator, one in the Inputs section (and the values here seem to override) and one in the colors tab, which seems to have been de-activated somehow. I'm sure it's in the code, but I don't know what to do. My reason for asking is that it's often very useful to put DC as Red, so that you can easily see where the bar closes, or where it is currently if the bar is still active.

I just saw your VS_MACD a few minutes ago, so I'll only get about 40 minutes of data for today, Friday June 12. I put it on two charts, a 1 minute and a 233 tick, hoping to see some kind of action before today's close. So far, after 10 minutes, I can't tell a thing. I'll post after the close.

Tasuki

Edited by Tasuki

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As requested, here's a very short snapshot of the VS_MACD by phall, from permalink #278. Just found it 40 minutes before the close, so the charts don't have much on them, but I'll do another one on Monday.

Both charts ES, first is 1 min, second is 233 tick.

Geez, looks like you got something here, phall! I'm groovin' on those divergences.

Your hippie turned trader,

Tasuki

5aa70ee61a3a8_ES1minVCMACD01.thumb.png.c393edeb18115a5c791069bb38d7939f.png

5aa70ee622eae_ES233tickVCMACD01.thumb.png.b3647962dc2b1a932098b7810b80fb47.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As requested, here's a very short snapshot of the VS_MACD by phall, from permalink #278. Just found it 40 minutes before the close, so the charts don't have much on them, but I'll do another one on Monday.

Both charts ES, first is 1 min, second is 233 tick.

Geez, looks like you got something here, phall! I'm groovin' on those divergences.

Your hippie turned trader,

Tasuki

 

You also get divergences at the same place with 8 period RSI, 8 period Momentom (ROC) and regular MACD with default settings and my guess is that you will see that with any type of oscillator.

 

I am not saying the indicator is not useful, but in this case it is not giving you anything different you cannot get with a regular indicator. Also if you look at the chart, you will see the 2nd bottom is made on much less volume than the previous one, indicating that there might not be much interest taking it lower.

 

Be careful not to fall into a trap that just because an indicator sounds complicated and fancy, that it will give you anything different than you already can get with less fancy indicators, or just by looking at what the chart is telling you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You also get divergences at the same place with 8 period RSI, 8 period Momentom (ROC) and regular MACD with default settings and my guess is that you will see that with any type of oscillator.

 

sevensa et al,

Compare the chart I've attached here to the chart of the ES 233 tick from my previous post (permalink #280). Indeed, both the RSI and the MACD did pick up the second divergence, but they were MUCH less clear than the beauty created by the VS MACD. However, neither the RSI nor the MACD picked up that first little gem of a divergence.

 

I will be the first to admit that phall's new VS MACD needs alot more testing that what I was able to give it today, but it's initial test beat the pants off the two oscillators.

 

Once upon a time I had a trading friend who told me that no trader should use an indicator unless he understood the math behind it. Looking at the code for the MACD or RSI, and comparing it to the code for the VS MACD, you'll find very little similarity. Most glaringly absent from the regular MACD is anything to do with volume. The regular MACD is just a standard lagging oscillator. The size of the trades being placed does not influence the math of the regular MACD at all.

 

Philosophers like to joke that there are only two types of people, lumpers and splitters. Lumpers are always grouping things together, saying, "This is similar to that", whereas splitters are always saying, "No, these two things are different." Well, sevensa, I'm a splitter. I say that, just because indicator A and indicator B both are able to create divergences does NOT mean they have a damn thing in common.

 

One thing we should do is to alter the block size on the VS MACD and see how the indicator changes. That's something else the regular MACD can't do.

 

So, I appreciate your note of caution, sevensa, but I think (current working hypothesis) that you're way wrong here. Further testing will tell!

5aa70ee6404e4_ES233tickregularMACDandRSI.thumb.png.44c4f5cf92c5edcae764c3bf0a494af0.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The regular MACD is just a standard lagging oscillator.

 

Well, to be fair, so is the splitter. That's not really the point, though.

 

I've been watching all this discussion about oscillators. I think someone went so far as to declare that my indicator was actually an ROC?!? Funny. It's no surprise that the overall shape of the big trader activity is similar to the overall shape of a detrended price graph, is it? I mean, if they weren't strongly correlated, we couldn't use them like we do. As such, pure price oscillators will often tell a similar story if all you watch is the amplitude.

 

However, I find that usually a couple times a day the big traders will turn a bit before price does, so for simple divergence I find them to be quite good compared to pure price oscillators. Worth a look for divergence traders, anyway.

 

Divergences aside, my focus with the EOTPro splitter has always been to read the ebb and flow of commitment from the big traders. That's also our main focus in the room. As such, we have always had at least one additional dimension of data in our splitter, beyond the simple amplitude (displayed as the thickness/color of the plot). That is one thing that clearly sets it apart from your everyday, run of the mill oscillator. I guess changing the trade sizes is another thing that sets it apart, but since I pretty much only follow the big traders I don't think it counts for much other than the "let's laugh at the small traders" gimmick.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One more thing to remember is that the time horizon for small vs big traders is very different. Traders trading small lots almost invariably have small stops because, as a general rule, their account size is relatively small. By contrast, traders trading large lots generally have, or can tolerate, much wider stops because their account sizes can tolerate larger losses. They will frequently engage in campaigns of accumulation and distribution, holding their positions over drawdowns which would wipe out the bank accounts of smaller traders. As a consquence, their trading style is very different from those of us with moderate sized bank accounts, and this needs to be taken into consideration when assessing the actions of these big traders.

1) They may drag the price around simply for the purpose of catching stops--this is something that small traders cannot do, and this behavior by large traders should be reflected in any functional volume splitter.

2) They may hold fast when price dips because they believe that higher prices lie ahead and they are using a drop in price to accumulate further shares/contracts. In this instance, one might see price dive, but large traders holding firm.

3) I presume the opposite would be true for distribution at the tops of a market---the vol splitter should show the big traders selling eagerly while price stalls at a high.

 

Basically, the vol splitter (set for big traders) should reflect the principles outliined by Wyckoff. The two techniques for reading the market should dovetail because they are both looking at the same thing--the actions of the large traders. They're just using different methods of displaying the same information...that is, if the vol splitter is working properly.

 

Those of you who have followed the VSA thread will know that it is based on Wyckoff's principles, and also that VSA seems to work best on longer time-based charts, such as 15 minute charts. The incredible drag of the vol splitters is that they don't seem to be able to handle historical data, but maybe even an intraday 15 minute chart of the vol splitter, coupled with a volume indicator and Wyckoff/VSA analysis, would be instructive. Worth looking at, anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1) They may drag the price around simply for the purpose of catching stops--this is something that small traders cannot do, and this behavior by large traders should be reflected in any functional volume splitter.

2) They may hold fast when price dips because they believe that higher prices lie ahead and they are using a drop in price to accumulate further shares/contracts. In this instance, one might see price dive, but large traders holding firm.

3) I presume the opposite would be true for distribution at the tops of a market---the vol splitter should show the big traders selling eagerly while price stalls at a high.

 

Well, I'll just say... Never forget that you are only tracking the large market orders with the splitter. Of course big traders will also trade in small market orders and small/big limit orders. So, do not expect a whole story. I've tried to remind people several times that the main purpose of the splitter is to show when the big traders act like there is no time to spare, because otherwise there is value in hiding their actions.

 

As a consequence, it will show you when they run stops, and it will show you when they push hard directionally, and it will show you when they eagerly attack highly liquid areas (presumably because they are racing to be the ones who get to avoid slippage). Since our eotpro splitter shows ebbs and flows in their commitment, we can also see when they kinda just stand aside. But, in my opinion, when people claim they can see accumulation and distribution via our volume splitter or market delta type approach, I suggest that they are misleading themselves, at least a little. I can't think of a reason why big traders would consistently broadcast accumulation and distribution in such an obvious fashion. Maybe they do, but I'm skeptical, and I certainly don't use our splitter that way.

 

(not to mention, most splitters I've seen in forums have such fast averages on them that the horizon effect should cause their indicators to completely miss any lengthy accumulation/distribution on a fast chart, even if the big traders are being obvious about it).

 

So, I'd never discourage anyone from looking into any trading angles they can imagine, but I want to remind people to consider the limitations of their algorithm. The human brain can always find a pattern if it wants to, even if there's not one there!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
phall,

On your indicator which I called "271", I can't seem to change the colors of the open and close (DO and DC). I've looked at the code, but I'm not good enough to figure out what to do. Is there an easy fix for this? Of course there are two places where color is addressed in the indicator, one in the Inputs section (and the values here seem to override) and one in the colors tab, which seems to have been de-activated somehow. I'm sure it's in the code, but I don't know what to do. My reason for asking is that it's often very useful to put DC as Red, so that you can easily see where the bar closes, or where it is currently if the bar is still active.

Tasuki

 

Tasuki

 

at the top of the code there is a line that says:

[LegacyColorValue=true] (or something similar.)

 

just delete this line and reverify.

 

Phall

Edited by phall

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With respect to the splitter divergences: i agree wholeheartedly that the user must understand the context of what the large trader group is trying to do; this can't be accomplished without using other indicators and techniques to sort out the behaviours. Just relying on this one is not a strategy; you will get killed.

 

i think it's Jon Carter who always emphasizes that if you don't understand what the other players are doing in detail; you will be a-hole in the room. This is one adds one piece of the puzzle i guess, but the puzzle has many pieces.

 

Reiterating what Blowfish said many posts ago, i would encourage everyone to take the basic "engine" and build it into their favorite indicator types. The MACD version is one VERY simple implementation, comparing the relative strength of two trend lines of differing periods; but there are many others of course and can be modified by averaging, momentum techniques, ROC etc...

 

in short, anything that operates on the OHLC of the price, could be implemented on the OHLC of the splitter

 

phall

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tasuki, that looks like it to me.

 

it looks like the basic "close compare" engine is doing its job.

 

The difference in behaviour is probably due to refinements in post processing, including potentially a more sensitive "close compare" methodology, sensitivity to changes in volume traded, and the computation of the end line.

 

i don't want to start speculating too much, but i think comparing trendlines like MACD is on the right track and building a composite of trendlines, with corrections scaled to volume, will speed it up/slow it down at the correct times

 

phall

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

here are some charts from today. The white is the blowfish macd and the purple the EOT. The chart is a 1 min. chart.

volsplit.thumb.jpg.096949742d995c9c6a667b8cc03b661a.jpg

volsplit2.thumb.jpg.2a18b911496be9eda84ea750e8f27ee9.jpg

 

 

I also wanted to add that although I'm not sure how to do it the setplotwidth could potentially be used to set the thickness of the macd line.

 

For example if # of trades > then x then setplotwidth. I'm not sure what coding to use to determine the actual amount.

Edited by pimind

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey nice simple settings without all the stuff I saw in the room. I understand its important to look at non-correlated indicators. That said the more I trade the more I believe if you have good tools to track order flow that's about all you need.

 

The folks at EOT are a good group of folks with some very good tools.

 

Is that Curious George Pimind?

Edited by dandxg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hi all

 

found a minor bug today in VS_MACD. attached is the fixed ELD.

 

Name: VS_MACD2

 

not major, but it should improve the performance; the resetting of the block sizes was slightly off

 

posting some test results would be greatly appreciated

 

phall

VS_MACD2.ELD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

phall,

 

I will run it on monday, Done trading today. Have you also taught about adding the width feature to the lines. setplotwidth. I was thinking that blocks per trade could be used.Blocks per trade uses trade volume. The more blocks the thicker the lines.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From what Richard Todd has already written, I am guessing that maybe line thickness should be determined based on the ratio of large trader activity to all other activity for that particular market. For example, there might be some kind of average ratio between "total delta" and "large trader delta" for a given period (such as prior 3 cycles). From time to time, the "large trader delta" might be proportionally greater or smaller compared to all other activity. Just a thought.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 22nd January 2025.   Netflix Earnings Surge Driving the NASDAQ to Monthly Highs!   The NASDAQ increases in value for a fourth consecutive day, gaining momentum after Netflix stocks rise more than 15%. Earnings reports are gaining speed for the technology sector, but why has Netflix stocks seen such a high and sudden rise in demand? Netflix Stocks Increase 15% Supporting the NASDAQ! Netflix stocks have been one of the best-performing stocks within the NASDAQ, rising more than 79% in 12 months. However, even for Netflix, a 15% rise in less than 24 hours is considered substantial. The quarterly earnings report was made public by Netflix after the market closed on Tuesday. The earnings report confirmed the following: Netflix beat their earnings per share expectations - $4.27 reported vs $4.21 expectations. Netflix’s revenue surpasses the previous quarter - $10.25 billion this quarter vs $9.82 billion in the previous quarter. The online streaming company confirms projects to expand into live sport and event streaming will proceed. In addition to this, the company’s forward guidance for 2025 remains positive. Netflix is the 10th most influential company for the NASDAQ meaning the positive earnings data and bullish price movement supports the overall price of the NASDAQ. In addition to this, the positive earnings improve the sentiment towards the entire US technology sector. Investors will now turn their attention to the quarterly earnings report for Intuitive Surgical. Intuitive Surgical stocks on Tuesday rose 1.94%. How is the Economy And Politics Affecting the NASDAQ?     The US stock market is witnessing an upward correction after struggling in the last weeks of 2024. The bullish price movement is a result of a sharp decline in bond yields, the new US administration and earnings season. Investors remain relieved that bond yields have fallen back down from the 5.00% level. If bond yields continue to decline further, particularly below 4.50%, the move would be deemed as positive for the US stock market. President Trump took office on Monday and so far the pro-US rhetoric from the President, Vice President and Secretary of State continues to support the stock market. So far, the main concern is how upcoming tariffs can negatively affect inflation and growth. However, some economists advise tariffs will become the “norm” and may have a lesser effect compared to 2018. However, this is something traders will continue to evaluate and monitor. The VIX this morning fell 0.83% lower and trades more than 5.70% lower over a 7-days. The lower VIX indicates a higher risk appetite towards the stock market. If the VIX continues to decline a strong buy indication may materialize. On the most influential stocks for the NASDAQ, 82% rose in value on Tuesday. However, Apple stocks, the most impactful stock, fell 3.19% due to poor sell data. If Apple stocks continue to decline, the NASDAQ’s upward trend may come under strain. In the meantime, investors over the next week will continue to monitor upcoming earnings reports. NASDAQ - Technical Analysis The price of the index is trading significantly higher than all Moving Averages on a 2-hour timeframe and relatively high on oscillators. These factors indicate that buyers are controlling the order book. However, price action also confirms the latest impulse wave measures 3.43% which is normally the point at which the index retraces. This is something that investors may also consider. The retracement potentially also may be triggered by Netflix buyers quickly selling to cash in profit after the sudden 15% bullish surge. If a retracement does indeed form, price action and the 75-period EMA indicates that the pullback may drop as low as $21,391.30.     Key Takeaways: The NASDAQ increases in value for a fourth consecutive day, but price action signals a possible retracement before continuing its bullish trend. Netflix stocks increase more than 15% due to strong earnings data. Netflix beat earnings and revenue expectations by 1.39% and confirmed projects to add live sports streaming to its platforms. The VIX trades more than 5.70% lower over a 7-days and US Bond Yields remain at recent lows. On the most influential stocks for the NASDAQ, 82% rose in value on Tuesday. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news. Michalis Efthymiou HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • DASH DoorDash stock, watch for a top of range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?DASH
    • SYF Synchrony Financial stock with a top of range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?SYF
    • RKLB Rocket Labstock, big rally off support and breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?RKLB
    • RDW Redwire stock, what a launch off the 14.16 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?RDW
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.