Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

agon

Volume Splitter

Recommended Posts

The more the merrier.

 

I wish you had posted them during the week;

when people's memory on the day's action was still fresh on their mind, people could relate to the signals better.

 

Sorry, Tams, their legal noticed didn't forbid such posting, but it seemed uncool to post their stuff on our forum while my trial was ongoing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hey guys,

 

Great thread. There is a similar one on the Ninja forum as well that got re-started after the "dumb money" videos were posted. It wasn't long ago I found out about EOT and started researching them as well. So far they seem like good guys.

 

But I have to ask... you are spending a lot of time on this, a surprising amount of time in fact... if this indicator is so good, why don't you just buy it? I mean it is pretty cheap I think, one good trade a month and you'll more than pay for it...

 

Still with that being said, I would like the source simply because 1) I want to tinker with it in hopes of improving it, and 2) I also dislike having to lease them vs. being able to buy them out right.

 

However, at the end of the day, there is a lot of work going on here and I would think your time is more valuable -- just buy (lease) them... ?

 

Mike

 

Mike (control-bark, nice handle),

Maybe you're rich, but $233 per month, every month, is too much money for me. I mean, for less than half that, Tradestation gives you an entire charting platform, a data feed, an order entry platform, a Radarscreen, access to Forex, futures and options markets, etc. etc. etc. Yes, you're right, the EOT crew seems to be a nice bunch of people, but so do Hubert and John, who are playing the same game, and getting filthy rich from it. You may recall the old saying that the people who got rich during the gold rush were the folks selling the picks and the shovels. Same deal here. These folks, just like the more disreputable pair, Hubert and John, are selling the tools that traders use. More power to 'em, but I want to bring my own tools.

There's another reason for spending so much time on this indicator---understanding where the big money is going is very much like VSA--this is just a different approach to the same question. If we can create a reliable way to do this, it will act as a confirming indicator to VSA signals, giving us more confidence in our trade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tasuki,

 

I'm not familiar with who Hubert and John are but don't want to get off-topic. I understand that $233 is more than Tradestation, but it's also less than 1 stop on the ES with a few contracts and say 8 tick stop. I was just expressing that I think you can't be afraid to spend money to make money. If there is an advantage to having a faster computer, or faster internet connection -- if they made you more money -- then wouldn't you subscribe to them/buy them?

 

Anyway, I've expressed my opinions and I respect yours. Thx!

 

BTW, the nick stands for control-break, as in pressing the control key and break key on the keyboard -- back from the early days of DOS when that combination meant something.

 

Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's another chart of the big money vs. the dumb money, this time from Thursday, June 4.

 

In this chart, they are showing how the smart money (the big traders---indicator over price) is tracking price very nicely, whereas the dumb money (yellow indicator in subgraph 2, indicator set to 1-5 contracts) seems to be doing the exact opposite of price---they seem to be buying when price continues to fall, and selling as price rises.

 

My question has to be--if this really is true, if this indicator (the yellow one in subgraph 2) is really showing the small traders acting like total idiots over and over and over and over and over and over again, how the hell do they fund their accounts? Looks to me like the small traders would be getting wiped out in short order. Think about it--doesn't this seem suspicious? The EOT main trader mentioned that the small traders do sometimes make money, but by his calculation, only 15% of the time, whereas the other 85% of the time they get their heads handed to them on a silver platter. Can this possibly be right? Woulldn't they be blowing out their accounts with statistics like this? So, I'm a tad suspicious, that's all. Seems too "pat", too obvious. There's got to be more to the story than this.

5aa70ee081f8a_0750AMEOT5minbigmoneypaint.png.cc5f87ac7f2d6d0f2001a3550245fcf7.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

These charts come from the EOT live trading room from Wednesday, June 3. These are all 5 minute charts of the ES. The horizontal lines are their version of Murrey Math. They have two moving avarages in magenta and cyan (not sure what settings they used), and the important indicator is the red and white one in subgraph 2, their EOT volume splitter that we're watching. As mentioned in my previous posts, this indicator is tracking only trades above 100 contracts, so in other words, it shows, or purports to show, what the big traders are doing.

 

I've included this as a series, which I'll continue in the next post, so you can see how their indicator works as the day progresses. The times of these snapshots are as follows (all times California):

8:54 AM

9:38 AM

9:43 AM

10:18 AM

10:33 AM

10:35 AM

11:00 AM

11:47 AM

 

To be continued in next post

Tasuki

5aa70ee0a0b3f_0854AMEOT5min.png.32771dcd809f05324ee16b7807ed4293.png

5aa70ee0a6977_0938AMEOTES5min.png.762483ac393403ccba9d6e6e13c2c9ae.png

5aa70ee0ac840_0943AMEOTES5min.png.9ac4a222b10fea1015e96850191d9215.png

5aa70ee0b2628_1018AMEOTES5min.png.3fec53999e30fe8ffdf62e1eaa1cf2d6.png

5aa70ee0b8600_1033AMEOTES5min.png.a93df8110fe0652af17f98406a1468f2.png

5aa70ee0c0d49_1035AMEOTES5min.png.628389fae7ad57ecb3372b811662c032.png

5aa70ee0c68f8_1100AMEOTES5minnotesweetdivergence.png.20d153c01937ec409ad4de40db938251.png

5aa70ee0cbfe1_1147AMEOTES5min.png.0dd022cbb77e20d42ebc6cc523bab585.png

Edited by Tasuki

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a continuation of the previous post.

 

Times for these snapshots are:

12:15 PM

12:32 PM

13:15 PM

 

Notice especially how there was a double bottom in the indicator before price made a double bottom. At least the double bottom in the Vol Splitter signaled a potential change in direction for price. However it took a few more bounces of the indicator before price started to go north again.

 

Hope this helps someone/anyone (or am I just wasting my time?).

5aa70ee0d1618_1215PMEOTES5mindoublediv.png.da35f3995daeca38112cf2fc7565c559.png

5aa70ee0d733e_1232PMEOTES5mindoublediv.png.58fb32d3892a3719ee1540181388c80d.png

5aa70ee0dcaab_1315PMEOTES5min.png.9607f798d8dbb328092ae4c7b048c664.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Tasuki,

 

 

BTW, the nick stands for control-break, as in pressing the control key and break key on the keyboard -- back from the early days of DOS when that combination meant something.

 

Mike

 

Mike,

Hideously off topic, but too cute to pass up---since your avatar shows a picture of a cute puppy (presumably yours?), I thought you might be making a subtle pun, control-break --> control-bark.

Tasuki

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here's another chart of the big money vs. the dumb money, this time from Thursday, June 4.

 

In this chart, they are showing how the smart money (the big traders---indicator over price) is tracking price very nicely, whereas the dumb money (yellow indicator in subgraph 2, indicator set to 1-5 contracts) seems to be doing the exact opposite of price---they seem to be buying when price continues to fall, and selling as price rises.

 

My question has to be--if this really is true, if this indicator (the yellow one in subgraph 2) is really showing the small traders acting like total idiots over and over and over and over and over and over again, how the hell do they fund their accounts? Looks to me like the small traders would be getting wiped out in short order. Think about it--doesn't this seem suspicious? The EOT main trader mentioned that the small traders do sometimes make money, but by his calculation, only 15% of the time, whereas the other 85% of the time they get their heads handed to them on a silver platter. Can this possibly be right? Woulldn't they be blowing out their accounts with statistics like this? So, I'm a tad suspicious, that's all. Seems too "pat", too obvious. There's got to be more to the story than this.

 

Remember, that there is a huge amount of automated trades in the U.S. equity markets which probably explains the small trades being on the wrong side - because they have the opposite position in the equities. See the attached order size analysis by CME Group which shows that 2/3 of all contracts traded are of order size 1-5 ("small"). The "big" trades (>50) are only 5%. So there is surely more to it than "big" vs. "small" traders where big traders always win and small traders always lose.

 

Most indicators are sold with a story (which is usually extremely simplified, based on anecdotal evidence or not even true) to explain the indicator and make you feel good about the indicator bought.

 

P.S.: I did not find the attached file myself, I got it from another related thread where someone posted it, but the source is CME Group.

E-Mini S&P Order Analysis by CME Group.pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a caveat to the notion that the actions of the big traders must follow the patterns of price.

 

As I point out in the legend to this chart, there are times when the big traders are buying as the price is going down and selling as the price is going up. This HAS to be true, so one needs to be careful about following the "smart money" too closely--unless you have mastered the concepts of accumulation and distribution. For those of you unclear on the concept, I recommend reading books by or about Jesse Livermore, and also reading Traders Laboratory's own very excellent sections on Wyckoff and VSA.

 

Anyway, forewarned is forearmed.

 

Tasuki

5aa70ee0e8853_0933AMTS1mindistributionmaybepaint.thumb.png.c539f3d6274e3bf59c2aea082888246a.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

P.S.: I did not find the attached file myself, I got it from another related thread where someone posted it, but the source is CME Group.

 

I tried to open your pdf file, but I got an error message:

"There was an error opening this document. The file is damaged and could not be repaired."

 

Tasuki

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much Tasuki, I wanted to check it today but forgot that the "great" IB data feed is not working on Saturday so I can't get historic data for the past week :doh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Tasuki,

 

I'm not familiar with who Hubert and John are but don't want to get off-topic. I understand that $233 is more than Tradestation, but it's also less than 1 stop on the ES with a few contracts and say 8 tick stop. I was just expressing that I think you can't be afraid to spend money to make money. If there is an advantage to having a faster computer, or faster internet connection -- if they made you more money -- then wouldn't you subscribe to them/buy them?

 

Anyway, I've expressed my opinions and I respect yours. Thx!

 

BTW, the nick stands for control-break, as in pressing the control key and break key on the keyboard -- back from the early days of DOS when that combination meant something.

 

Mike

 

 

 

money was never the issue.

 

if it were, then you have nothing to worry about, because these type are not going to get anywhere from here.

 

 

if you read the threads in more detail, you will find that people just like to understand how things work... people tinker with indicators, not as a way to save money, or as a way to cheat, but to find out what makes a move that moves, and what makes a chop that chops.

 

I am sure deep inside you, you are just as curious, unless you have a propensity to trust black boxes blindly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, I was able to take data from my other computer...

 

I wanted to compare the EOT to the regular oscillator I'm using to see if there is a difference, and as I expected, there isn't a major one...

 

I uploaded 2 comparisons where you can see both the EOT (lower chart) and the regular oscillator (upper chart), the 2 charts are not perfectly aligned but close.

Note that the major turning points are the same in both indicators, the amplitude is slightly different.

I compared only few cases and I might be wrong, but I got the feeling that the EOT is just another indicator based on ROC (like RSI, Stoch etc.), regardless of "big" / "small" traders.

 

The oscillator I'm using is a moving average of the StochasticRSI, as seen here:

stoch, rsi modified - wonder indicator - NinjaTrader Support Forum

 

Settings:

RSI - 13 days.

Stoch period - 8

StochRSI MA period - 5

There is also a signal line I removed from the pics I uploaded but you can see it in the link above, the signal line period I use is 3.

 

Can someone run this oscillator on Blowfish volume splitter indicator (instead of price as I did)? this will measure a ROC of the "smart money"?

 

Yuval.

Comp1.thumb.jpg.26e8d5f1e8f0d5e61f8349e502cdcca2.jpg

comp2.thumb.jpg.12923fea40a9fc33303d90f3bd37117c.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I wanted to compare the EOT to the regular oscillator I'm using to see if there is a difference, and as I expected, there isn't a major one...

 

Yuval.

 

Yuval, your oscillator is colored light yellow, and at least on my computer is virtually invisible. I had to manually adjust my brightness to nearly zero to see it at all. Could you repost it please, changing the color to black, or any color with good contrast, pretty please?

 

As hard as it was to see, I did manage to see what looked like some differences to me. Maybe I'm wrong. One question I'd have is whether your oscillator can mimic the "dumb money" simply by changing its settings. I doubt very much that it could do so, but again, perhaps I'm underestimating your StochRSI MA.

 

In order to make a clear comparison, I'd love to get my paws on a copy of this "wonder indicator" for Tradestation. Do you know if anyone has translated it into Easy Language?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I attach only my charts of June 2nd and 3rd, this are the days you showed.

I have no "wonder" indicator, it is only a WMA (or SMA) on StochRSI, which helps in gauging the market momentum, as any momentum indicator you want to use it in 2 timeframes though.

 

I don't have TradeStation, but this code looks right:

Trader.Online.pl® - TradeStation™ Zone - StochRSI

 

Again, this is not the EOT indicator, but the direction of both indicators is the same, hence I don't see the benefit of the EOT...

5aa70ee1aa5d9_ES06-096_2_2009(5Min).thumb.jpg.b98d1e4ba2ef366f151598e63614edf4.jpg

5aa70ee1b00ff_ES06-096_3_2009(5Min).thumb.jpg.f4e11d0c741f29ddc2ecd6fd73b676b8.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yuval, you da man! Thanks for the indicator. Looks good.

Attached is the closest I can come, after the fact, to a direct three-way comparison.

Charts represent price action last Tuesday, June 2, at about 11:43 AM PDT on the ES, 5 minute chart.

indicators:

left chart: the StochRSI ala Tradestation

middle chart: EOT's Vol Splitter

right chart: Blowfish Vol Splitter #4

 

Tasuki

5aa70ee1bf0bd_3waycomparisonexTuesJune22009.thumb.png.c2ae86a12d4786d89732ab3345aeeb95.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
... they seem to be buying when price continues to fall, and selling as price rises.

 

My question has to be--if this really is true, if this indicator (the yellow one in subgraph 2) is really showing the small traders acting like total idiots over and over and over and over and over and over again, how the hell do they fund their accounts? L

 

I believe that what you are seeing are the small lot traders closing out their losing positions from the long positions they took earlier. It doesn't mean they are idiots. It means they are being stopped out and controlling their losses.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Anyone getting this code to work in TS? It verify's just fine but upon adding it to a chart I get a error saying "Floating point invalid calculation".

 

Ideas?

 

 

it works ok in my MultiCharts.

 

What symbol/resolution is your chart?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yuval, you da man! Thanks for the indicator. Looks good.

Attached is the closest I can come, after the fact, to a direct three-way comparison.

Charts represent price action last Tuesday, June 2, at about 11:43 AM PDT on the ES, 5 minute chart.

indicators:

left chart: the StochRSI ala Tradestation

middle chart: EOT's Vol Splitter

right chart: Blowfish Vol Splitter #4

 

Tasuki

 

Is there an ELD for the Blowfish Vol Splitter #4? I have tried to search for it but I seem to find the earlier ones only. I know it's a pain in the rear for those of you who are programers and I am just starting to learn the Easy Lang. but this indicator would be nice to download if at all possible. Thank you in advance. TL is the best!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.