Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

agon

Volume Splitter

Recommended Posts

I wish I knew. I saw those videos as well and it's an interesting indicator.

 

I'm interested in how one breaks the orders into various sizes using EasyLanguage. Does anyone know how this is done? :confused:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I wish I knew. I saw those videos as well and it's an interesting indicator.

I'm interested in how one breaks the orders into various sizes using EasyLanguage. Does anyone know how this is done? :confused:

 

If you can articulate the process in English,

you can program it in EasyLanguage.

 

... just write out:

-- one thought at a time,

-- one action per sentence,

-- one sentence per line...

 

and in no time you will have your strategy coded.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I wish I knew. I saw those videos as well and it's an interesting indicator.

 

I'm interested in how one breaks the orders into various sizes using EasyLanguage. Does anyone know how this is done? :confused:

 

I know you guys wanted it for TradeStation, but I think TS and NT are compatible, if not you can get a demo for NT through Mirus which will never run out and apply it there.

 

I believe this is it for NT. This is not my own creation. I downloaded it off of NT Script page. I will let you know tomorrow how it works. I have it set to filter at 100 so it does not work in after hours really.

BAVolCounterGtr.zip

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for posting the code. Looks like that's a c# program which I don't believe will work with TS.

 

I did some research and found the EasyLanguage command TradeVolume which displays the trade volume on the last trade. I'm trying it out on a 1-tick chart in the after hours market on EC. It looks like a crude start. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks for posting the code. Looks like that's a c# program which I don't believe will work with TS.

 

I did some research and found the EasyLanguage command TradeVolume which displays the trade volume on the last trade. I'm trying it out on a 1-tick chart in the after hours market on EC. It looks like a crude start. :)

 

Let me know how it works for you and if it is like the one in the video. I could use MultiCharts with my feed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What this person is doing is programing is time and sales (on Tradestation). Using Tradestations Time and sales, you can input it to show orders in any quantity you want. In this case, he is representing the indicator to move higher as Time and sales flashes buy orders of 100 or more. The larger the order along with the frequency, has the indicator moving up. Using the same thought process on the orders of 5 contracts and less (which make up a great deal of the time and sales format). In the middle of the day when things are quiet, you will notice the large order line will move very little and will generally chop just above and under the zero line. On the other hand, this is when you will see the 5 contracts and less line moving around more. It's generally a choppy time of the day and the smaller traders are usually doing much of the trading (which is obviously not a good time to be in the market). Unfortunately I am not a programmer but have used the information he is referring to for many years. He is simply (well maybe it not simple) plotting the times and sales on a chart. I hopes that helps a little :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What this person is doing is programing is time and sales (on Tradestation). Using Tradestations Time and sales, you can input it to show orders in any quantity you want. In this case, he is representing the indicator to move higher as Time and sales flashes buy orders of 100 or more. The larger the order along with the frequency, has the indicator moving up. Using the same thought process on the orders of 5 contracts and less (which make up a great deal of the time and sales format). In the middle of the day when things are quiet, you will notice the large order line will move very little and will generally chop just above and under the zero line. On the other hand, this is when you will see the 5 contracts and less line moving around more. It's generally a choppy time of the day and the smaller traders are usually doing much of the trading (which is obviously not a good time to be in the market). Unfortunately I am not a programmer but have used the information he is referring to for many years. He is simply (well maybe it not simple) plotting the times and sales on a chart. I hopes that helps a little :)

 

Thank you for the breakdown of how it works, I am trying to code in NT, using the wizard........this will help very much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What this person is doing is programing is time and sales (on Tradestation). Using Tradestations Time and sales, you can input it to show orders in any quantity you want....Unfortunately I am not a programmer but have used the information he is referring to for many years. He is simply (well maybe it not simple) plotting the times and sales on a chart. I hopes that helps a little :)

 

Thanks. I understand that the Volume Splitter is plotting time vs. sales (or more specifically the volume in terms of "large" orders when you have it set to follow large contract players). Cooper59, I'm interested in what indicator you are using to see the order size in TradeStation. If you are using "Sales" to help in your trading, how are you accessing this information in TradeStation?

 

Thanks again for the help.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks. I understand that the Volume Splitter is plotting time vs. sales (or more specifically the volume in terms of "large" orders when you have it set to follow large contract players). Cooper59, I'm interested in what indicator you are using to see the order size in TradeStation. If you are using "Sales" to help in your trading, how are you accessing this information in TradeStation?

 

Thanks again for the help.

 

if this can help :

volume.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've tried to duplicate the EOT Volume splitter before but to no avail. I'm just not that good with easylanguage.

 

Good luck to anyone who does get it because I truly think its a great idea and a valid concept (and the EOT guys are making a killing using it to confirm trades!).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Deadalus, I tried to create it as well. I’m not familiar with how to extract the required information. For example, there are two pieces of information I need.

 

 

1) How to extract the order size. In TS there is a command called “TradeVolume” (find an example here) which is suppose to give the size of the last trade. But how does that work in relation to an indicator that might be running on a 233-tick chart.

 

2) Next, how do you determine if a given trade size was a Long or a Short?

 

 

I’m not familiar enough with the underlining functionality of TS. I’ve been doing some research but no avail. :crap:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've tried to duplicate the EOT Volume splitter before but to no avail. I'm just not that good with easylanguage.

 

Good luck to anyone who does get it because I truly think its a great idea and a valid concept (and the EOT guys are making a killing using it to confirm trades!).

 

I was not as impressed with the Ninja Trader version as I hoped (eotpro seems to make calls before the move quite often, the indicator I posted acted more like an RSI or a fast MA (after the fact).

 

I have been in contact with some C++ programmers to build one the same as eotpro.com's. The programming is somewhat expensive, however if it ends up being the same as eot it would be well worth the price over and over.

 

Anyhow, what I am getting at was you should look into this option, I am sure there are many more TradeStation programmers than those for NT.

 

I hope it works out for you guys.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well i started trying to code something like this up again today. But don't hold out hope folks... i'm about as useful with easylanguage as a blind person is at officiating a boxing match.

 

TradeVolume does seem to mimic the T&S window - but does so sporadically... also I can't seem to be able to pull any of its data off and store it in a variable as yet...

 

But i'll keep messing with it.

 

Cheers!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well i started trying to code something like this up again today. But don't hold out hope folks... i'm about as useful with easylanguage as a blind person is at officiating a boxing match.

 

TradeVolume does seem to mimic the T&S window - but does so sporadically... also I can't seem to be able to pull any of its data off and store it in a variable as yet...

 

But i'll keep messing with it.

 

Cheers!

 

Thanks. When possible, I'll lend a hand with coding.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Couple things to note thus far...

 

I can't find TradeVolume anywhere on google searches... it just references me back to this thread actually. It would be nice to know exactly what and how i'm calling things up.

 

BUT

 

Some things to consider... in the EOT videos they are able to show volume history on the indicator historically (ie it doesn't have to run in real time) which is somewhat odd because the TradeVolume function doesn't allow you to call up historical data.

 

It throws an error if you try and use TradeVolume[1] to get the previous entry... so maybe they are doing it some other way?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TradeVolume is an elusive beast. I found it on the Trade Station Forum about a week ago.

 

I started a thread on TradeStation's EasyLanguage Forum and John from TS just replied about TradeVolume:

 

Individual trade volume is not provided by the exchange for the ES contract. The volume of several trades can be consolidated into a single tick. This practice is known as "tick netting."

 

"The quote field TradeVolume is not updated with each trade tick. Like other quote fields it is updated periodically... It is what we refer to as "snapshot" data.

 

So, what we seem to have is an imperfect way of obtaining trade volume on an intrabar basis. This is a start.

 

However, now it seems the EOT indicator can be used with historical data?! This is strange.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

if I see it right, in the second video MultiCharts is used.

I think you have seen this already, but just in case.

 

 

Well, I don't use EL myself, but one thought about these "snapshots":

My broker made clear right from the start, that he uses this method.

Currently I think, that many brokers use it. In this way or another.

But in my view the raw data, would simply overload the internet at some times (for example FOMC days).

Using this method, they control the data traffic, they know the maximum load for their servers

and they know they maximum throughput. If they just would send every single tick out,

they and you would pay this in time (i.e. you lag or crash).

 

On the other hand, it seems to me, that nowadays (electronic age)

you don't just order 200 ES contracts, instead you order 200 times 1 ES contract.

You "pulse" your order. From the commissions side it should be the same, so it makes sense to me.

 

I use a tape reader that is based on 5s bars which are received 1s late,

these bars provide also the wap, volume and number of trades, but

my broker says they should be accurate, and it seems to be true.

Looking at these information, you still see the patterns

(i.e. move on very high volume or move on very low volume to prepare ... whatsoever).

I think you see it even better.

 

OK, just my thoughts.

Maybe I look for some screenshots of my tapereader tomorrow to show,

what I meant to say. If you like?

Edited by HAL9000
hmm...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OK, just my thoughts.

Maybe I look for some screenshots of my tapereader tomorrow to show,

what I meant to say. If you like?

 

Thanks Hal9000. Yes, please do post your screenshots.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I modified the Bid/Ask Pressure indicator to use TradeVolume instead of Volume or Ticks. This should give an approximate value representing the trade volume of the last order. Further modification may be necessary to the indicator will most likely be needed.

 

Below is a chart from the overnight ES market. I know it’s not the best time to run the indicator but I just wanted to see if I was on the right track.

 

The first indicator was using an order size filter of 50 or greater. The second indicator (the one on the bottom) had an order size filter of 1.

 

The first thing you notice is they do track differently. I will let this run during “normal” market hours today and post the results. I may play around with the indicator a bit more (as I have some ideas to test) then if all looks well, I’ll post it.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=10388&stc=1&d=1241183070

ES_Overnight_Vol_Splitter_Test.jpg.3b0086b6fda562eb8a9515df056a4f75.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good work man! You got a lot further than I did. I spent the evening in the EOT free indicator class trying to look at splitter examples for clues...

 

Didn't come up with much. Even with modifying the BA Pressure indicator to look for size it still leaves the fundamental question of how they are pulling this data historically and not just real time... and its one I don't have an answer to just yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.