Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

reres

Trading the Opening Gap

Recommended Posts

All last year I ran a custom automated system I wrote in EasyLanguage that faded the opening gap on YM. It made some money but I ultimately stopped trading it because I decided it needed some more work. That was last fall. I should probably revisit it.

 

In a nutshell, I found trading the opening gap tricky. Over the years the psychology of the gap changes and thus, you must be wary of this. Back testing shows that specific setups seem to come into favor then fade. In short, what will work over the next 18 months may not work so well after that. So, you must be on guard to shifting sentiment.

 

Going from memory…Monday was the worst day to fade a gap. I skipped fading gaps on Mondays. The larger the gap, the less likely it was to fill.

 

I considered a small gap on YM between 10-45 points. Target was full gap fill. Large gaps were defined as between 46 to 60 points and my target was 50% gap fill. Gaps larger than 60 were not traded.

 

Stops for were placed at 1.5*gap_size from the entry. Thus a 20 point gap would have a 30 points stop.

 

Once a trade was on, I never moved the stop or target. Price would either hit my stop, the target or be closed out at end-of-day, 1500 Central time.

 

I should probably dig up my notes and studies I did and post it. That's item #256 on the to-do list!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hey thanks for ur input.

 

i have been monitoring DAX and FTSE gaps. they seem to close many times, so i guess you just need to know when to trade them using some helpful indicators like TICK readings and volume. speaking of that....does anyone know where to get tick reading for dax. i found for dow jones but cant find for EU futures

Edited by Soultrader
link removed and post edited according to TL! Forum Guidelines

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not my thing but I know someone who has done a lot of back testing and research on ES opening gaps. (I won't plug him here as his blog is now a paid service).

 

He pays a lot of attention to categorizing gaps on size and how that relates to the previous days price action. (up/down day gap in upper/lower of yesterday range or gap from range etc.)

 

It should be possible to come up with a profitable strategy for FTSE and DAX but it will require a lot of work with back testing.

 

Good luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Harlequin. If you want to gap fade DAX and/or FTSE you must spend a lot of time back testing the probabilities of those gaps filling and not filling. It will be important to note…

 

How big is the gap

Where is it in relation to yesterdays, open, high, low, close

The day of the week (this can make a difference!)

Does it open near a pivot?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have software that i bought from tradethegap.com (I think it was from there) I don't see it offered anymore. Anyway it produces reports and tells you the % of gap fills and % of gaps fills etc.

 

I find it pretty usefull.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Reres,

 

I tried trading gaps on ES for awhile and didn't like it at all. It felt like a "Pay and Pray" trade. Yeah, it's supposed to be a high probability trade. I always felt like it was a desperation move: enter the trade and wait, wait, ignoring any other signals or order flow for as long as it takes to hit one of your exits. For me, it is much more comfortable to have a strategy that is based on more than just, "it closed here yesterday and now opened lower here, so buy."

 

If you burn enough time, you can probably come up with a winning strategy, something you'll have to trade EVERY DAY to get it to pay. It'll have so many conditions, it'll basically be a discretionary system.

 

You might look at the EuroStoxx 50 (FESX) for gap trading if you're awake in your part of the world when it opens. I've watched a number of gaps close on it during the first hour of trading.

 

Good trading,

 

Bam-Bam

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Bam-Bam said:
Hey Reres,

 

I always felt like it was a desperation move: enter the trade and wait, wait, ignoring any other signals or order flow for as long as it takes to hit one of your exits. For me, it is much more comfortable to have a strategy that is based on more than just, "it closed here yesterday and now opened lower here, so buy."

 

 

Bam-Bam

 

well, this is what im after. i dont wanna trade just based on historical data. i want to include as many indicators as possible into this to make the trade not 60% but rather 85% sure. so far i saw tick readings and volume help as indicators but i was thinking to include some more fundamental things, especially seeing where market makers are positioned in the morning, pivots, previous day action, market sentiment, and fundamental news coming out the current day.

 

i have been trading news only so far and i make my living out of it, but i got often problems with brokers, and its making me lazy so i wanna focus now more on probablity trading patterns...maybe sth will work out

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesn't hurt to have the odds in your favor. Here is a sample report for the last two years. It uses exchange time. The time frame is 8:28 open and a 3:00 close. the fill is 80%.

 

It took me a while to figure out why most traders lose and why i was losing. I believe that we all think that there must be a better way, yet if we happen to find it we never think it is good enough and try to change it, ignore it, or not believe it. It took me a while to not only realize this, but to truly adopt it. Trading is hard not because of the markets, but because of our own hangups," Its all in your head". Master yourself and you will master trading. For me I'm still working on it.

 

 

 

 

1-Minute TTG GAP ANALYSIS REPORT for @ES from 2007/4/23 to 2009/4/23

 

Minimum Gap of 1.00 and Maximum Gap of 5.00 pts

A gap is considered closed if 80% of the Gap is filled

 

Number of days tested: 517

 

Number of gaps found: 181 (GapUp: 107, GapDn: 74)

Number of gaps filled: 151 (GapUp: 92, GapDn: 59)

Percent gaps filled: 83.4% (GapUp: 86.0%, GapDn: 79.7%)

 

Gaps filled on:

 

Mondays 30/44 68.18%

Tuesdays 23/27 85.19%

Wednesdays 35/39 89.74%

Thursdays 34/38 89.47%

Fridays 29/33 87.88%

 

Time Period GapUp GapDn %GapsFilled

 

929 - 930 3 1 2.6%

930 - 931 15 13 18.5%

931 - 932 3 1 2.6%

932 - 933 7 2 6.0%

933 - 934 12 0 7.9%

934 - 935 2 2 2.6%

935 - 936 4 3 4.6%

936 - 937 2 2 2.6%

937 - 938 1 4 3.3%

938 - 939 6 1 4.6%

939 - 940 1 0 0.7%

940 - 941 2 1 2.0%

942 - 943 3 1 2.6%

943 - 944 0 1 0.7%

944 - 945 1 0 0.7%

945 - 946 1 2 2.0%

946 - 947 1 1 1.3%

947 - 948 2 1 2.0%

948 - 949 1 0 0.7%

950 - 951 0 1 0.7%

951 - 952 0 1 0.7%

952 - 953 2 0 1.3%

953 - 954 0 1 0.7%

954 - 955 1 1 1.3%

956 - 957 2 1 2.0%

957 - 958 1 0 0.7%

958 - 959 1 0 0.7%

1000 - 1001 1 0 0.7%

1002 - 1003 0 1 0.7%

1003 - 1004 1 0 0.7%

1005 - 1006 0 1 0.7%

1006 - 1007 1 2 2.0%

1008 - 1009 0 2 1.3%

1009 - 1010 0 1 0.7%

1010 - 1011 1 0 0.7%

1014 - 1015 0 1 0.7%

1024 - 1025 1 1 1.3%

1026 - 1027 1 0 0.7%

1030 - 1031 1 1 1.3%

1032 - 1033 0 1 0.7%

1035 - 1036 2 0 1.3%

1036 - 1037 0 1 0.7%

1039 - 1040 1 0 0.7%

1046 - 1047 1 0 0.7%

1050 - 1051 0 1 0.7%

1106 - 1107 1 0 0.7%

1133 - 1134 1 0 0.7%

1139 - 1140 0 1 0.7%

1214 - 1215 1 0 0.7%

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Food for thought - Lets say the market has opened for an hour. One time frame buying for the next 3 five minute bars follows. What will you do after seeing this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.