Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

taotree

Seeking Rec on Zen-fire Compatible Broker

Recommended Posts

I'm going to be doing custom software development against an API and I've pretty much decided that I want to use zen-fire, so...

 

My next questions is which brokerage to use that will allow me to use the zen-fire API? At this point, I'm only trading the ES e-mini.

 

Which brokerage to use that offers:

 

1) <= $2500 minimum to open account

 

2) <= $1000 ES intraday margin

 

3) highly competitive commissions (even for low volume)

 

4) No monthly fees

 

5) No minimum activity

 

Any recommendations?

 

I've seen at least a couple I think satisfy this, but I would like to get some more confirmation from others' experience (and if there are others I should consider) before making a commitment.

 

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like you're asking for an impossible combination.

 

No. 4 and 5 are usually mutually exclusive.

 

No. 3 would be discount brokers (Not Zenfire)

 

No. 1 & 2 normally exclude 3.

 

I'm not trying to be negative here, I'm just saying you may need to lower you're expectations a bit. For example expect a minimum activity or small platform fee. I think Mirus is the probably the nearest to what you are looking for.

 

Good Luck,

Harlequin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Harlequin said:
Bathrobe,

 

What would ES commission be like on a 2.5K account, (if you know)? Could be a good option for a second back up account for me.

 

Thanks.

 

 

ES margin at Mirus would be $500 intraday and at AMP it would be $400, also neither of these fluctuated at all during the crash or the volatility.

:cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  bathrobe said:
ES margin at Mirus would be $500 intraday and at AMP it would be $400, also neither of these fluctuated at all during the crash or the volatility.

:cool:

 

Yes I got the margin it's the commission levels I was unclear on.

 

I use IB for my main account and can live with the high margin requirements as I would never trade more than 1 car for every 10k in my account (gets me through the bad days). If Mirus and Amp meet all the OP requirements it would be a good option for a back up account in case IB has technical problems, only 2.5k sat in the account and $500 margin would hedge 5 cars for me, no platform fees and no minimum activity so it would be OK to only use occasionally. Only unanswered question is the commission rates, I can imagine it difficult to negotiate $4.70 RT on an account like that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  bathrobe said:
Mirus intraday es commission is 500, AMP is 400

 

Interesting... On what volume? According to what I've seen:

Mirus = $4.40 and AMP = $4.70 for bottom volume tier for ES.

 

 

  Harlequin said:
No. 4 and 5 are usually mutually exclusive.

 

No. 3 would be discount brokers (Not Zenfire)

 

No. 1 & 2 normally exclude 3.

 

When you say "discount broker" what do you mean (example?)? And what is a highly competitive commission in your book? Does $4.40 (<500 RTs) down to $3.15 (>10k RTs) qualify?

 

Also, I'm not going to use a platform--I'm using the zen-fire API, so I don't think I need to expect a platform fee.

 

You're not being negative, and I value your experience.

 

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

taotree,

 

I'll leave bathrobe to clarify but I think he's quoting margin not commissions.

 

Unfortunately in this business margins are negotiated and brokers like to keep their lowest offer out of the public domain so they can get all the newbies to just accept their first offer. Interactive Brokers are what I refer to a a discount broker, no single individual to hold your hand, their standard published rate for ES is $4.70 RT, min account to open is $10k and margin requirements much higher.

 

In my experience brokers that will open an account for $2.5K or £5K and $500 margin will charge anywhere from $5.5 - $7 RT.

But if you do have a much larger account you can get much lower like the $4.40 you quote. Maybe I just don't have the negotiating skills to get that so hopefully bathrobe can shed some more light.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  bathrobe said:
I am sorry about the mixup, I can not speak for AMP commission, but Mirus is $4.40 per RT, and it gets lower with increased vol. The 4.40$ commission applies to all account sizes.

 

Cool thanks bathrobe!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, the 4.40 at Mirus is without negotiating at all, that was the rate they offered and it seemed fair to me.

 

Taotree,

 

The margin of 500 at mirus and 400 at amp is trading only 1 contract.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info, seems like Mirus and AMP is what I hear most. Considering that Mirus apparently has the "in" with zen-fire (someone said they're same company (or owned by same or something)?) and that the guy who answers the emails at zen-fire Pat Shaughnessy pjs@zen-fire.com has an email address pjs@mirusfutures.com listed on mirus futures site... (and it helps that the commission rate is a little better)

 

Sounds like that's the way I'll go.

 

Thanks all!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My experience with Mirus and Zen is similar to XDTrader's, and another one you should probably check out is Open E Cry. I have no first hand experience with them, but I see them get recommended all the time, so they're at least worth a look.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  bathrobe said:
I am pretty sure Dorman makes you use an introducing broker.

 

I emailed Dorman. I received the response: "You should contact Eliot Wickersheimer". After a quick google, he's Co-owner of Mirus. So, apparently, at least for how I asked the question, I was referred to Mirus by Dorman.

 

I would like to have someone explain to me what the considerations are between Dorman and Rosenthal Collins Group. Considering I'm just doing CME right now, what's the difference? When I asked Mirus, they responded "you can use RCG" without an explanation of why that over Dorman.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since Mirus is an IB and they clear through RCG and Dorman, they really don't care which one you prefer.

 

It might be that Dorman doesn't want retail traders. I don't know this, but I am guessing that they want retail customers to go through Mirus. That's not a big deal or a problem, as your money is with the clearing firm and not the IB. I was just wondering and it seems we don't have a clear cut answer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can open an account directly with Dorman, but they won't compete against their IBs in terms of offering lower commissions. Dorman has their own in-house brokers too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.