Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

cowcool

Favorite Emini Brokers

Recommended Posts

Cow, as I mentioned here, Open ECry is a very nice broker to consider.

 

My suggestion is to demo as many platforms as you can get your hands on and just start clicking around to see what you like/dislike. The other factor will be costs. If you go with OEC, you will pay zero in data fees and/or platform fees, which is nice. I was paying around $700/mo prior to moving my trading to OEC for data and platform fees. Getting rid of that expense was nice.

 

There is a broker review section on TL as well that you might want to take a look at.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The question of brokers crops up often. There are half a dozen or so that are consistently recommended by people here. IB, Mirus, Amp, OEC, Transact (I think) and maybe a couple of others are generally recommended.

 

Maybe worth having a sticky thread to direct people too?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interactive Brokers: http://www.interactivebrokers.com

 

I trade primarily ES.

 

IB has several platforms for traders (their Trader Workstation is most popular). Their competitively priced for futures and better than most for stocks and mm interest rates; their financial position is very strong and you can hold high-balances with confidence. The best is that I can stream their data into 3rd party software solutions for advanced analysis (i.e. Ensign).

 

I hope that this helps.

 

Take care.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The choice of broker is going to depend on your individual requirements.

 

I chose Interactive Brokers beacuse of the following:

 

I'm based in Europe and I can call them on a free phone number.

Low commission rates.

I can wire money to my non-US bank account free of charge.

Global coverage of markets.

Universal Account means I can trade futures, stocks, FX and options from one account.

 

If you are only trading US futures other brokers will offer lower intraday margin requirements so you don't need to keep all your capital in your account.

If you have a large account size consider cutting out the introducing broker and go direct to a FCM for lower commissions.

Edited by Harlequin
added information

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good advice Harlequin. It should be noted that IB does not have a great reputation for being that prompt answering the phone. I have not had that issue calling the European Desk. Mind you can't remember the last time I needed to call, years ago. On the plus side they have a European, USA, & Asian dealing desk and offices in may cities.

 

How often do you call your broker? If you think that is something you might do a good test is to call them at a few 'awkward' times (just after the open, after news etc.) and see how long it takes to get through. Of course you can bet your bottom dollar that the one time you do need to close a trade by phone it will be just after a surprise 2% interest rate reduction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It should be noted that IB does not have a great reputation for being that prompt answering the phone. I have not had that issue calling the European Desk. Mind you can't remember the last time I needed to call, years ago. On the plus side they have a European, USA, & Asian dealing desk and offices in may cities.

 

How often do you call your broker? If you think that is something you might do a good test is to call them at a few 'awkward' times (just after the open, after news etc.) and see how long it takes to get through. Of course you can bet your bottom dollar that the one time you do need to close a trade by phone it will be just after a surprise 2% interest rate reduction.

 

Probably called about 5 times in the last 3 years, never had a problem getting through and found them very helpful. Last time was last week, TWS locked up on me after I sent a buy market on FTSE futures, the order just sat there as sent and acknowledged but not filled, called IB and they confirmed the price of the fill in less than a minute of me picking up the 'phone. Restarted TWS and all was well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Probably called about 5 times in the last 3 years, never had a problem getting through and found them very helpful. Last time was last week, TWS locked up on me after I sent a buy market on FTSE futures, the order just sat there as sent and acknowledged but not filled, called IB and they confirmed the price of the fill in less than a minute of me picking up the 'phone. Restarted TWS and all was well.

 

Ahh but that was the European desk I'd wager :D I wonder if the US desk is better nowadays? Last time I called I couldn't remember my security word <doh>. For things financial i try to pick extra secure account information. So secure I don't remember!!

 

I should re-iterate I think they are great broker, which is why they are my primary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use Insignia futures, mainly becuase of the free platform that they give you to trade with and get quotes with. Initially the platform cost can ruin most traders budget. I have been with them for over 2 years with no problems.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you have a large account size consider cutting out the introducing broker and go direct to a FCM for lower commissions.

 

This is a new idea to me, and I have a couple questions:

 

1. How large of an account are we talking, roughly?

2. Why are the commissions lower? Because they're doing more volume due to the larger accounts? How much lower are the commissions, roughly?

 

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is a new idea to me, and I have a couple questions:

 

1. How large of an account are we talking, roughly?

2. Why are the commissions lower? Because they're doing more volume due to the larger accounts? How much lower are the commissions, roughly?

 

Thanks.

 

I use Infinity an IB, because of their service. I have a personal broker Tom Duffy. He's just great. The best I've ever had. The way I see it you hope to never need a broker, but when you do need help you want someone who will get you out of trouble. Saving a few pennies by going direct wouldn't really be saving all that much in the long run. And my rate is already low enough that the commissions aren't a factor.

 

 

yours in trading,

 

TraderJean

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So if I had an account with an FCM, I wouldn't have a representative at the firm? Who would I contact if I were to have a problem? How would I open the account in the first place?

 

Of course they'll open your account and give you an 800 number to call. If you're big enough 100K+ they'll treat you like a king (or queen.)

 

But I think most FCMs aren't set up for the smaller retail client. Most self directed accounts will receive long hold times and something less than quality service. If you've been with IB or TradeStation you probably know what i'm talking about.

 

Having said that, I am just speaking from my personal experience. I would guess there are good IBs and not so good IBs. Just like there are good and bad FCMs. It's a search and discovery process. I'm just glad i'm with Infinity.

 

TraderJean

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I use Insignia futures, mainly becuase of the free platform that they give you to trade with and get quotes with. Initially the platform cost can ruin most traders budget. I have been with them for over 2 years with no problems.

 

Is that $4.99 per trade on their site correct? If so, that sounds like a rip unless the person really, really likes the software or something else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
take a look at infinity futures, they have a great platform and low fees.

 

How low are the "low fees"? I hear "low fees" all the time for different places, but few people actually say the fee. (Yes, yes, the fee can be different depending on how many RTs you do.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really dont get why people recommend IB over and over again... i used them for few months. their software is dinosaurus dunk and their support is the direct pavement to psyhiatric ward. The data feed is the worse I ever seen.

 

the only people who trade different kind of markets and change moods quite often - have to be happy with IB. say today etfs tomorrow stocks next week options next week mongolian currency.

 

Amongst 5 brokers I had account with IB was the worst for futures. And far from cheap.

 

Call smaller brokers and get rate below $4.

 

My today's choice (cost/quality/support) - Infinity. No data fees, no platform fees, rates below $4, STATIC DOM (feature not found anywhere for that kind of money), the quickest cheap data feed and execution.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.