Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

LS_Chad

Measuring/Quantifying Divergence

Recommended Posts

I'm often asked if we have an "indicator" for divergence/convergence, and right now, the answer is no. So I'd like to open a thread to discuss how one would measure the divergence between price and any indicator (such as RSI), or between two indicators. In essences, how would you quantify divergence, on a bar to bar basis, between any two series of data points (whether that series be price data, volume data, or any technical indicator values).

 

It is my understanding, that when looking for divergence, you would identify two consecutive significant highs (or significant lows), and look for price increasing between those two bars, while an indicators value decreased (or visa versa).

 

The first question....do we really need a "divergence" value on every bar...or do we only need it on specific bars where these significant highs or lows occurred?

 

And should that divergence just be "true" (we have divergence) or "false" (we don't) or should it have a magnitude?

 

And can we calculate this value over a specific period, or is that period variable? This is what makes measuring/calculating divergence so difficult. It's easy to identify visually on a chart, but trying to put it into code is a different story.

 

I'll begin the discussion by overly simplifying things:

 

Here's an example that uses this custom indicator:

 

(CL > CL.10) * (RSI < RSI.10) - (CL < CL.10) * (RSI > RSI.10)

 

to measure divergence over a 10 bar period between price and RSI on a 3-min chart. The bottom pane shows the custom indicator giving us a value of 1 when we have divergence of price increasing over the 10 bars while RSI decreased, and a value of -1 when price decreased yet RSI increased:

 

Divergence.png

http://www.charthub.com/images/2009/03/24/Divergence.png

 

Here's another, that puts some amplitude (change in RSI over 10 bar period) into the value of the histogram (bottom pane):

 

Divergence_2.png

http://www.charthub.com/images/2009/03/24/Divergence_2.png

 

And here is the syntax for that custom indicastor:

 

((RSI.10 - RSI) * (CL > CL.10) * (RSI < RSI.10)) - ((RSI - RSI.10) * (CL < CL.10) * (RSI > RSI.10))

 

Again, I know this overly simplifies the concept, but something we can build on. I'm sure there are a few who have tackled this issue already that could weigh with some good insight.

 

Chad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.charthub.com/images/2009/03/25/Diverg_MACD_Ergod

1. Three lines on price pane show price trending down. Some people may dispute the exact placement of those lines, but the fact remains: price declines.

2. The corresponding MACD lows are trending up. May suggest price reversal but not quite. The first declining price trend line is accompanied by a decisive rise in corresponding MACD trend but initially, at least , prices continue to fall. Only the second signal (Dec 8) is followed by price increase.

3. The forth pane shows CI kindly supplied by Chad some time ago -- ergodic signal. The false signal created by MACD -- Price divergence is absent here.

 

The 4 bottom panes are CIs (code provided above by Chad, called "amplified divergence") .

First out of 4 cranks MACD over an arbitrary period of 10 bars.

Second cranks Ergodic over a period of 10 bars.

Third cranks Ergodic over a period of 20 bars.

Forth cranks MACD over a period of 20 bars.

 

 

 

First thing that comes to mind is that the user should be able to adjust the period (number of bars) for analysis. Second: leave the choice of an indicator to the user.

You can slide the dates backward looking at "MACD amplified divergence 20 bars" and spoting former occurrences. The false signal created by "raw" MACD is eliminated.

Third: it allows to quantify the divergence !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This subject was covered in the RTL tutorial (and ongoing project) that can be found at:

 

Investor/RT - Tutorial - RTL 101

 

Specifically, the section on Divergence can be found here:

 

Investor/RT - Tutorial - RTL 101

 

Several new functions have been added to RTL which will provide more tools to attack divergence:

 

SLOPE(exp, n) - change-based slope of exp over past n bars: (exp - exp.n)/n

ACCEL(exp, n) - change-based acceleration of exp over past n bars, or slope of current bar minues slope of last bar

SLOPER(exp, n) - regression-based slope of exp over past n bars.

ACCEL(exp, n) - regression based acceleration over past n bars. Difference between the reg-based slope of current bar and reg-based slope of prev bar.

YINT(exp, n) - current value of a regression line through the past n bars of exp

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Chad,

 

I was interested in your method of determining divergence, but for Trade Navigator, and came up with the following.

 

Original code by Chad:

 

((RSI (Close , BarsToUse , False).(BarsToUse) - RSI (Close , BarsToUse , False)) * (Close > Close.(BarsToUse)) * (RSI (Close , BarsToUse , False) < RSI (Close , BarsToUse , False).(BarsToUse))) - ((RSI (Close , BarsToUse , False) - RSI (Close , BarsToUse , False).(BarsToUse)) * (Close < Close.(BarsToUse)) * (RSI (Close , BarsToUse , False) > RSI (Close , BarsToUse , False).(BarsToUse)))

 

Indicator independent version:

 

(((UserExprOne).(BarsToUse) - (UserExprOne).0) * ((UserExprTwo).0 > (UserExprTwo).(BarsToUse)) * ((UserExprOne).0 < (UserExprOne).(BarsToUse))) - (((UserExprOne).0 - (UserExprOne).(BarsToUse)) * ((UserExprTwo).0 < (UserExprTwo).(BarsToUse)) * ((UserExprOne).0 > (UserExprOne).(BarsToUse)))

 

Example of implementation with chart:

 

TLabQuantDiverg (Regression Value (Close , 7 , 0) , Regression Value (Momentum (Close , 7) , 7 , 0) , 7)

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=12683&stc=1&d=1249381472

 

Note: the use of Regression is merely to smooth-out some of the wrinkle in the input values.

 

Regards,

QuantDiverge.thumb.PNG.c3aeffa920f13a35fdb545d55cc9705f.PNG

Edited by phase21
Clarification of usage

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The democratic party is now purposefully controlled by an extremely radical 10% of the membership... So ... “follow the money” -  above the surface you’ll find all the distorted screamers  and ‘woke’ corporate fascists ,  near the surface disturbed technocratic ‘billionaires’,  and in the depths you’ll find  the CCP ... which is voraciously buying as many politicians as possible...  Gave In Newsom is prime example... he will now temporarily move to the center or wherever the CCP tells him to move, but make no mistake he’s itching to resume his failed extreme policies.. more and more governmental capture of capital, etc etc - all of which serve nothing but damage to an aging republic...  just sayin'
    • AMD Advanced Micro Devices stock watch, attempting to move higher off the 97.42 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?AMD
    • Date: 17th March 2025.   A Key Week For Central Bank: Bank Of Japan and JPY In Focus!   The market finds itself in a week full of central bank decisions which is likely to create plenty of volatility. This includes the Federal Reserve, Bank of Japan, Bank of England and the Swiss National Bank. Analysts expect all central banks to keep their interest rates unchanged except for the Swiss National Bank. Of the related currencies the best performing in 2025 so far remains the Japanese Yen. CHFJPY - Can This Week’s Events Shift Momentum Back in Favor of the JPY? The Japanese Yen has been the best performing currency of 2025 due to higher inflation, national salary increases and historic interest rate hikes. However, the currency has come under pressure from economic data weaker than previous expectations. On Monday 17th, the JPY continued to struggle. Nonetheless, most economists believe the trend remains intact and the price of the JPY remains higher than the average price of 2025 so far.     A Reuters poll of top economists suggests core inflation may ease as government energy subsidies resume. However, the overall upward trend is expected to persist, allowing the Bank of Japan to maintain its tightening stance. Preliminary estimates indicate the core consumer price index will rise by 2.9%, down from 3.2%. Even with an inflation rate of 2.9%, the central bank will have the space to manoeuvre. The Japanese Yen's bullish trend has paused for now. However, buyers are awaiting comments from the Bank of Japan Governor that could reignite momentum. Japanese government bond yields show mixed signals as the Bank of Japan gears up for its next key monetary policy decision amid global uncertainties. If the BoJ continues to signal further rate hikes for the upcoming months, the JPY is likely to rise further. Swiss National Bank This morning the Swiss Franc is witnessing neither positive nor negative price movement. Most economists believe the Swiss National Bank will take another decision to cut interest rates even though there is little room left for maneuver. Most economists believe the SNB will cut 0.25% with few individuals opting for a 50 basis point cut to 0.00%. Switzerland aims to cut rates further due to low inflation, which is nearly 0.00%. According to economists, if prices do not pick up, the country may be at risk of deflation. In addition to this, Switzerland’s Gross Domestic Product growth rate has fallen to 0.2%, the lowest since 2023. If the SNB cuts more than 0.25% or indicates that the policy rate will fall to 0.00%, the CHFJPY potentially can continue to fall. For the CHFJPY, the two central bank decisions will be the key price drivers as neither economy is due to release any major economic data. Trump and President Putin's scheduled phone call tomorrow could drive market volatility, particularly impacting the safe-haven Swiss Franc and Japanese Yen. Key Takeaway Points: Key rate decisions from the Fed, BoJ, BoE, and SNB are expected, with analysts predicting no changes except for a likely rate cut from the Swiss National Bank. The Japanese Yen has led currency performance in 2025 but is facing pressure from weaker economic data. However, analysts expect the trend to remain intact. The SNB is expected to cut rates by 0.25% due to low inflation and slow GDP growth, which could weaken the CHF further. The BoJ’s rate outlook and a scheduled Trump-Putin phone call could increase volatility, especially for safe-haven currencies. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Michalis Efthymiou HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • MP Materials stock, big top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?MP
    • PLTR Palantir Technologies stock watch, consolidation at the 81.29 triple support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?PLTR
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.