Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Firefly

T Tests

Recommended Posts

My question is regarding the importance of T testing. Below is a link i found with a T table in and i was wondering if i could ask you guys some questions regarding an exampe i found in the encyclopedia of trading?

 

http://www.sjsu.edu/faculty/gerstman/StatPrimer/t-table.pdf

 

info from example:

 

evaluating an optimised system on out of sample data.

 

No of trades = 47

 

Mean Avg Trade = 974.47

 

Standard Dev = each trade - sample mean

 

Sample Standard Deviation = SQRT( sum((Standard Dev)^2)/46)

= 6091.1

 

Expected Deviation from Mean = 6091.1/SQRT(47)

= 888.48

 

T-Stastic = 1.0968

 

this is the point where my understanding becomes a little hazy. Using the above link and running down the Yaxis to between 40 and 60 trades (47), and then running accross to between 1.05 and 1.303 (1.0968). im lost as to what both the upper and lower Xaxis are used for. the book talks about the following:

 

"The smaller the number, the more

likely the system performed the way it did for reasons other than chance. In this

instance, the probability was 0.1392; i.e., if a system with a true (population) profit of $0 was repeatedly tested on independent samples, only about 14% of the time

would it show a profit as high as that actually observed."

 

am i correct in assuming that as long as the value for the T-Statistic is less than the value stated on the T-test then its safe to assume the system hasnt been over optimised to the point of excessive curve fitting prior to running the out of sample data?

 

before the chapter ends, the books states the following as well:

 

"Finally, a considence interval on the probability of winning is estimated. In

the example, there were 16 wins in a sample of 47 trades, which yielded a percentage

of wins equal to 0.3404. Using a particular inverse of the cumulative binomial

distribution, upper 99% and lower 99% boundaries are calculated. There is a

99% probability that the percentage of wins in the population as a whole is

between 0.1702 and 0.5319. In Excel, the CRITBINOM function may be used in

the calculation of confidence intervals on percentages."

 

i dont understand this

 

id like to thank those of you who take the time to reply to this for your time and if you dont have sufficient time to answer id appreciate it if you could at least point me in the direction of some further reading on this subject, entry level. (never covered alot of stats at school)

 

Rgds

 

Firefly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would be more concerned with the few number of trades in the sample rather than getting all worked up about the T-test. Is it not possible to get more data and more trades - say at least 100. Forty seven is not enough to draw the conclusions you woiuld like to draw in my opinion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well the reason to use a T-test is when your sample size is very small... so it's an appropriate example.

 

yeah the T-test = (actual value - estimated value) / standard error

 

the estimated value is usually taken from a normal distribution. I don't remember how many trades occured in your example... I think it was 100... so say if you picked many people at random and then randomly picked 100 trades from the same opportunity space your example used...

 

once you normalize the results of these trades, the returns will look like a bell curve.

 

so what it's really saying is what is the likelyhood a random person could pick close to the same trades that your system did... say if there were 500 trading opportunities, and the average price of these opportunities was a certain price, and you were picking close to the average with your 100 choices then your results will be close to the average and your system might as well be random.

 

not sure if this is making sense or if I'm going too simple on the explanation side.

 

for curve fitting... at first glance it seems curve fitting is the other side of the t-test... obviously if your results are not obtained by random selection, they could be curve fit. but this is not necessarily true.... my understanding is that the t test cannot really tell you if you are curve fitting. it can only suggest whether your results are close enough to be called random, or maybe be something other than random. but it would be incorrect to say that just because a system is not random means it is curve fit.

 

curve fitting in the context of system development refers to more of something you *dont* want to do.... but yet you still need to acheive results that are not consistent with picking trades at random.

 

this means that curve fitting in trading is more of an art form than a science.... there is no way to detect curve fitting per say... you can use out of sample testing to indicate that curve fitting was occuring, but just because you get different results occurring out of sample does not mean your results were curve fit. They could have been random (a t test could tell you this), or it could have been that the distribution you are studying is not normal (you get a lot of fat tail distributions in finance).

 

hope that helps. for further reading, checkout the wikipedia article on statistical hypothesis testing.... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_hypothesis_testing

 

here is their example which is good :

"As an example, consider determining whether a suitcase contains some radioactive material. Placed under a Geiger counter, it produces 10 counts per minute. The null hypothesis is that no radioactive material is in the suitcase and that all measured counts are due to ambient radioactivity typical of the surrounding air and harmless objects. We can then calculate how likely it is that the null hypothesis produces 10 counts per minute. If the null hypothesis predicts (say) on average 9 counts per minute and a standard deviation of 1 count per minute, then we say that the suitcase is compatible with the null hypothesis. (This does not guarantee that there is no radioactive material, just that we have no reason to believe it); on the other hand, if the null hypothesis predicts 3 counts per minute and a standard deviation of 1 count per minute, then the suitcase is not compatible with the null hypothesis, and there are likely other factors responsible to produce the measurements."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 7th April 2025.   Asian Markets Plunge as US-China Trade War Escalates; Wall Street Futures Signal Further Turmoil.   Global financial markets extended last week’s massive sell-off as tensions between the US and its major trading partners deepened, rattling investors and prompting sharp declines across equities, commodities, and currencies. The fallout from President Trump’s sweeping new tariff measures continued to spread, raising fears of a full-blown trade war and economic recession.   Asian stock markets plunged on Monday, extending a global market rout fueled by rising tensions between the US and China. The latest wave of aggressive tariffs and retaliatory measures has unnerved investors worldwide, triggering sharp sell-offs across the Asia-Pacific region.   Asian equities led the global rout on Monday, with dramatic losses seen across the region. Japan’s Nikkei 225 index tumbled more than 8% shortly after the open, while the broader Topix fell over 6.5%, recovering only slightly from steeper losses. In mainland China, the Shanghai Composite sank 6.7%, and the blue-chip CSI300 dropped 7.5% as markets reopened following a public holiday. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index opened more than 9% lower, reflecting deep concerns about escalating trade tensions.           South Korea’s Kospi dropped 4.8%, triggering a circuit breaker designed to curb panic selling. Taiwan’s Taiex index collapsed by nearly 10%, with major tech exporters like TSMC and Foxconn hitting circuit breaker limits after each fell close to 10%. Meanwhile, Australia’s ASX 200 shed as much as 6.3%, and New Zealand’s NZX 50 lost over 3.5%.   Despite the escalation, Beijing has adopted a measured tone. Chinese officials urged investors not to panic and assured markets that the country has the tools to mitigate economic shocks. At the same time, they left the door open for renewed trade talks, though no specific timeline has been set.   US Stock Futures Plunge Ahead of Monday Open   US stock futures pointed to another brutal day on Wall Street. Futures tied to the S&P 500 dropped over 3%, Nasdaq futures sank 4%, and Dow Jones futures lost 2.5%—equivalent to nearly 1,000 points. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, down more than 20% from its recent highs, while the S&P 500 is nearing bear territory. The Dow closed last week in correction. Oil prices followed suit, with WTI crude dropping over 4% to $59.49 per barrel—its lowest since April 2021.   Wall Street closed last week in disarray, erasing more than $5 trillion in value amid fears of an all-out trade war. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, sinking more than 20% from its recent peak. The S&P 500 is approaching bear territory, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average has slipped firmly into correction territory.   German Banks Hit Hard Amid Escalating Trade Tensions   German banking stocks were among the worst hit in Europe. Shares of Commerzbank and Deutsche Bank plunged between 9.5% and 10.3% during early Frankfurt trading, compounding Friday’s steep losses. Fears over a global trade war and looming recession are severely impacting the financial sector, particularly export-driven economies like Germany.   Eurozone Growth at Risk   Eurozone officials are bracing for economic fallout, with Greek central bank governor Yannis Stournaras warning that Trump’s tariff policy could reduce eurozone GDP by up to 1%. The EU is preparing retaliatory tariffs on $28 billion worth of American goods—ranging from steel and aluminium to consumer products like dental floss and luxury jewellery.   Starting Wednesday, the US is expected to impose 25% tariffs on key EU exports, with Brussels ready to respond with its own 20% levies on nearly all remaining American imports.   UK Faces £22 Billion Economic Blow   In the UK, fresh research from KPMG revealed that the British economy could shrink by £21.6 billion by 2027 due to US-imposed tariffs. The analysis points to a 0.8% dip in economic output over the next two years, undermining Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ growth agenda. The report also warned of additional fiscal pressure that may lead to future tax increases and public spending cuts.   Wall Street Braces for Recession   Goldman Sachs revised its US recession probability to 45% within the next year, citing tighter financial conditions and rising policy uncertainty. This marks a sharp jump from the 35% risk estimated just last month—and more than double January’s 20% projection. J.P. Morgan issued a bleaker outlook, now forecasting a 60% chance of recession both in the US and globally.   Global Leaders Respond as Trade Tensions Deepen   The dramatic market sell-off was triggered by China’s sweeping retaliation to a new round of US tariffs, which included a 34% levy on all American imports. Beijing’s state-run People’s Daily released a defiant statement, asserting that China has the tools and resilience to withstand economic pressure from Washington. ‘We’ve built up experience after years of trade conflict and are prepared with a full arsenal of countermeasures,’ it stated.   Around the world, policymakers are responding to the growing threat of a trade-led economic slowdown. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba announced plans to appeal directly to Washington and push for tariff relief, following the US administration’s decision to impose a blanket 24% tariff on Japanese imports. He aims to visit the US soon to present Japan’s case as a fair trade partner.   In Taiwan, President Lai Ching-te said his administration would work closely with Washington to remove trade barriers and increase purchases of American goods in an effort to reduce the bilateral trade deficit. The island's defence ministry has also submitted a new list of US military procurements to highlight its strategic partnership.   Economists and strategists are warning of deeper economic consequences. Ronald Temple, chief market strategist at Lazard, said the scale and speed of these tariffs could result in far more severe damage than previously anticipated. ‘This isn’t just a bilateral conflict anymore — more countries are likely to respond in the coming weeks,’ he noted.   Analysts at Barclays cautioned that smaller Asian economies, such as Singapore and South Korea, may face challenges in negotiating with Washington and are already adjusting their economic growth forecasts downward in response to the unfolding trade crisis.           Oil Prices Sink on Demand Concerns   Crude oil continued its sharp slide on Monday, driven by recession fears and weakened global demand. Brent fell 3.9% to $63.04 a barrel, while WTI plunged over 4% to $59.49—both benchmarks marking weekly losses exceeding 10%. Analysts say inflationary pressures and slowing economic activity may drag demand down, even though energy imports were excluded from the latest round of tariffs.   Vandana Hari of Vanda Insights noted, ‘The market is struggling to find a bottom. Until there’s a clear signal from Trump that calms recession fears, crude prices will remain under pressure.’   OPEC+ Adds Further Pressure with Output Hike   Bearish sentiment intensified after OPEC+ announced it would boost production by 411,000 barrels per day in May, far surpassing the expected 135,000 bpd. The alliance called on overproducing nations to submit compensation plans by April 15. Analysts fear this surprise move could undo years of supply discipline and weigh further on already fragile oil markets.   Global political risks also flared over the weekend. Iran rejected US proposals for direct nuclear negotiations and warned of potential military action. Meanwhile, Russia claimed fresh territorial gains in Ukraine’s Sumy region and ramped up attacks on surrounding areas—further darkening the outlook for markets.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • AMZN Amazon stock watch, good buying (+313%) toi hold onto the 173.32 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?AMZN
    • META stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 507.48, 557.84 at https://stockconsultant.com/?META
    • TMUS T-Mobile stock, watch for a top of range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?TMUS
    • KULR KULR Technology stock watch, pullback to 1.25 triple support area with bullish indicators at https://stockconsultant.com/?KULR
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.