Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

theman

Getting Filled in Trading

Recommended Posts

Hi there

 

I want to trade the @ES, when I write a strategy on Ninja (using Zen-fire feed) will my market order be filled there and then? In other words, will I get slippage, if so, how many ticks or points are we talking about?

 

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BF' s answer is generally correct in a broad statistical way.

Getting a tiny bit more specific -

If, at a very granular level, your system using MktOrders is buying into strength (and vice versa - selling into weakness) then you will get negative slippage.

Otoh, if your system is buying into weakness (and vv) then you can expect neutral to slightly positive slippage.

Also Mkt Order slippage expands with acceleration and price 'speed'

In the ES, liquidity is slippage beneficial and the tick size is slippage detrimental...

In testing a system using mkt orders should hold up well using 2 tick slip in and out ...

These are still general answers btw only slightly more specific than BF's

hth

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 ticks on ES is pretty rare (unless you are on a satellite internet connection :D). Of course better to err on the side of caution. Mind you with recent volatility it is more common than when it traded in an 8 point daily range. As zdo says a lot depends on how your system works.

 

If your system allows it using stops (to enter break out style) or limits (to buy against price movement) will likely improve things especially if your connection is not particularly low latency.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's the issue w/ sending market orders on the ES. You just don't know where you'll get filled. In normal, every day type situations, 1 tick slippage is going to be standard.

 

If you throw that same order out there before a news announcement or something, then you'll more than likely see ticks of slippage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You have to understand what the purpose of a market order is before you get disheartened by slippage on market orders...

 

The purpose of a market order is to tell the markets - get me in, at whatever cost NOW. I am willing to take some immediate loss/pressure for the ability to enter my trade NOW.

 

The purpose of a market order is NOT to get you the most ideal price possible.

 

So w/ that said, the markets will take advantage of that but that's the deal you make when you send a market order.

 

Your other option is to send a limit order but the deal there is you say you are not willing to pay more, even if that means you miss some trades.

 

Recap:

MARKET ORDER
- gets you in now / you pay for this privilege / won't miss any trades

 

LIMIT ORDER
- you wait to get in / you don't pay extra for this / might miss trades

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You also have to consider where an order is held and how it is elected. For example stop orders are often supported by the exchange natively so most brokers will send them to the exchange immediately.

 

e.g. if the ES is trading at 853.25 and your system wants to get long at 860.00 it is far better to send a stop order at 860 that will be elected and matched at the exchange as soon as that price is traded at. If you wait for the signal at PC you might have a stale price by the time the price reaches you. Not only that you have to send the order back to your broker then on to the exchange. Price can move several ticks in those couple of hundred milliseconds.

 

Also consider MiT's (Market if Touched) (if you want to buy below price or sell above price but want to be sure of a fill so ruling out a limit order). Whilst the exchange wont handle that natively it will usually be handled by your brokers system which is a big step closer to the exchange.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou guys, you really helped me in understanding how it works.

 

OK, whats the slippage like for @YM? I guess it's not max 2 ticks for that?

 

Hope you can help me again with this.

 

Many thanks and king regards

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

YM is relatively thin these days but slippage is 1 tick in normal auctions – very generally speaking. Any speed at all though and you should not be surprised at a 2-3 slip on a mkt orders

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thankyou guys, you really helped me in understanding how it works.

 

OK, whats the slippage like for @YM? I guess it's not max 2 ticks for that?

 

Hope you can help me again with this.

 

Many thanks and king regards

 

MY experience suggests that the cost for slippage on both markets (YM and ES) is similar... even though you might think that the YM would be better with a smaller value ticksize, you can get many more ticks slippage than the ES. Mind you, this is for relatively small size trading (less than 10 lots). Larger sizes would be benficial to trade the ES.

 

On the other hand, for Limit orders I find the fills are more assured on the YM because it is more likely that price will trade through your limit price. In the ES, where I trade 2 - 5 contracts, the Limit orders I place get filled 75% of the time even if the price does not trade through them as normally my limit order is out there for a while in advance of the price retracement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What do you mean by thin? do you mean theres no volumn

 

The YM book is thin

So yes, in essense, low volume.

 

bakrob is correct. The YM is a bit shakey to trade these days. I still like the charts of the YM on short timeframes though - less 'blocky' and often id setups on YM and take the trade on ES as they rarely diverge directionally for very long.

 

fitzkie, re "what is the volume?" I wish I could help you there :roll eyes:

Good luck. Read DBP and VSA and good luck with that too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On a related subject, is anyone aware of a contract with the same or similar tick size to the YM, but with more volume? I know of the mini Nikkei on the OSE, and it looks like it's more liquid than the YM, but I'm wondering if there's something closer to the liquidity of the ES. There is nothing like this to my knowledge, but I'm just checking. Also just to be sure that I have this right, the OSE website lists the mini Nikkei 225 average daily volume in 2/2009 as ~368k, is that more or less accurate? I have no way of watching this market, otherwise I'd look for myself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On a related subject, is anyone aware of a contract with the same or similar tick size to the YM, but with more volume? I know of the mini Nikkei on the OSE, and it looks like it's more liquid than the YM, but I'm wondering if there's something closer to the liquidity of the ES. There is nothing like this to my knowledge, but I'm just checking. Also just to be sure that I have this right, the OSE website lists the mini Nikkei 225 average daily volume in 2/2009 as ~368k, is that more or less accurate? I have no way of watching this market, otherwise I'd look for myself.

 

The KOSPI futures has similar tick size as the ES and is fairly liquid. Not to mention the KOPSI options is the worlds heavily traded contract. The mini Nikkei and mini Topix though is more suitable if you are looking for similar YM tick size. (mini topix is still illiquid)

 

Attached is both the KOS and mini Nikkei 3 minute chart with DOM.

kospi.png.877f02fa73d68d3a7cb67e3695f379fc.png

mininikkei.png.2b19431bae1bfae3f554a5a21ee7e5b2.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you James, re those screenshots: I've never used CQG, so I have a couple questions. First, is that 19:00 New York time (Nikkei open)? And on the DOM, are the numbers to the right of price market depth? If so that is much more size than the YM during New York open, especially the mini Nikkei.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nikkei opens at 9am Tokyo time... which would be 7am EST for now. Just make sure to adjust according to day light savings time. The numbers to the right are market depth.. tick size is approx $5 a tick. But the ATR is alot lower than the US markets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no "slippage" in trading. You make it sound it's like this magical loss you take when you trade. Learn how the order matching process works.

 

When you use a buy market order, you buy at the ask when it arrives at the exchange.

When you use a sell market order, you sell at the bid when it arrives at the exchange

 

Of course, the bid or ask may change in between the time you click the button and the order hits the exchange, but this isn't slippage, this is the market changing. You will generally not experience this when you send your order automatically just when the inside market has changed. It generally trades there for a few seconds unless it's a thin market.

 

So in reality, you just pay the bid-ask spread when using market orders. To get a realistic fill, you would check the bid/ask X ms after you have placed your order where X is the number of ms you think it takes your order to arrive at the exchange.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • BMY Bristol-Myers Squibb stock, nice top of range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?BMY
    • ENTA Enanta Pharmaceuticals stock watch, pullback to 7.26 double support area with high trade quality at https://stockconsultant.com/?ENTA
    • MWA Mueller Water Products stock watch, pullback to 24.85 support area with bullish indicators at https://stockconsultant.com/?MWA
    • META stock watch, with some good buying at the 626.2 triple support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?META
    • Date: 10th March 2025.   SNP500 Hits a 6-Month Low: Trade Policy & Recession Fears Weigh on Market`s.   The SNP500 completes a 3-week decline and falls to its lowest price since September 2024. The price continues to remain under pressure from President Trump’s trade policy. In addition to this, investors are becoming increasingly cautious about a potential US recession. SNP500 - Trade Policy and The Federal Reserve’s View On The Economy The US Non-Farm Employment data on Friday read lower than what analysts were expecting. However, the data does not yet indicate a recession. Investors are increasingly showing a lower risk appetite and cautiousness due to Trump’s trade policy on China, Mexico and Canada. The NFP Change read 151,000, 8,000 lower than predictions and the Unemployment Rate rose to 4.1%. The poor price movement is more driven by comments from the US President. Yesterday evening on Fox News, the US President addressed concerns about a potential US recession, advising the economy will undergo ‘a period of transition.’ However, some see this as a subtle warning of a short economic downturn. Though the Chairman of the Federal Reserve is taking a different tone and looking to reassure the market.     Mr Jerome Powell advises the FOMC is not expecting or worried about a US recession. ‘The US economy remains in a strong position despite heightened uncertainty,’ Powell stated at a University of Chicago event. He also said that sentiment readings have been a reliable tool for predicting consumption growth in recent years. ‘There is no need to rush, we are in a good position to wait for more clarity,’ was his answer to questions about interest rates. On the one hand, the SNP500 may witness support from the positive comments from the Fed regarding the economy. He also clarified that certain economic indicators are not predicting a recession regardless of the lower figures. However, the comments on interest rates and keeping them unchanged for a longer period can pressure the price of the index. Will The SNP500 Continue Declining? The FedWatch tool indicated a 92% chance of a pause in this month’s Fed Rate Decision, but the figure has risen to 97%. If the possibility of a rate cut continues to be unlikely in the near future, the SNP500 may continue to remain under pressure. Currently, the VIX, an index used as an indication of risk, is trading more than 4.00% higher. For this reason, the VIX continues to indicate a poor performance in the short-term. Asian and European indices are trading lower this morning as are US indices. As a result, the performance of the global stock market shows a ‘risk off’ sentiment. SNP500 - Technical Analysis The price of the SNP500 is currently trading 0.73% lower and gains bearish momentum as the European market opens. In the 2-hour timeframe, the price is trading below the main Moving Averages and VWAP. The index also remains within the ‘sell’ zone of the RSI and MACD. On the 3-minute chart, the price remains below the 200-bar SMA and sell signals may continue to materialize for as long as the price remains below this level.     Key Takeaways: The SNP500 has declined for three consecutive weeks, hitting its lowest level since September 2024. The main cause of pressure is from Trump’s trade policies and recession concerns. Weaker-than-expected US employment data raised caution. However, the Fed reassured markets, stating there is no imminent recession and no rush to adjust interest rates. The FedWatch tool now shows a 97% chance of a rate pause, reducing hopes for near-term cuts. Technical indicators suggest continued bearish momentum, with the index trading below key moving averages and remaining in the sell zone on RSI. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Michalis Efthymiou HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.