Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

theman

Getting Filled in Trading

Recommended Posts

Hi there

 

I want to trade the @ES, when I write a strategy on Ninja (using Zen-fire feed) will my market order be filled there and then? In other words, will I get slippage, if so, how many ticks or points are we talking about?

 

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BF' s answer is generally correct in a broad statistical way.

Getting a tiny bit more specific -

If, at a very granular level, your system using MktOrders is buying into strength (and vice versa - selling into weakness) then you will get negative slippage.

Otoh, if your system is buying into weakness (and vv) then you can expect neutral to slightly positive slippage.

Also Mkt Order slippage expands with acceleration and price 'speed'

In the ES, liquidity is slippage beneficial and the tick size is slippage detrimental...

In testing a system using mkt orders should hold up well using 2 tick slip in and out ...

These are still general answers btw only slightly more specific than BF's

hth

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 ticks on ES is pretty rare (unless you are on a satellite internet connection :D). Of course better to err on the side of caution. Mind you with recent volatility it is more common than when it traded in an 8 point daily range. As zdo says a lot depends on how your system works.

 

If your system allows it using stops (to enter break out style) or limits (to buy against price movement) will likely improve things especially if your connection is not particularly low latency.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's the issue w/ sending market orders on the ES. You just don't know where you'll get filled. In normal, every day type situations, 1 tick slippage is going to be standard.

 

If you throw that same order out there before a news announcement or something, then you'll more than likely see ticks of slippage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You have to understand what the purpose of a market order is before you get disheartened by slippage on market orders...

 

The purpose of a market order is to tell the markets - get me in, at whatever cost NOW. I am willing to take some immediate loss/pressure for the ability to enter my trade NOW.

 

The purpose of a market order is NOT to get you the most ideal price possible.

 

So w/ that said, the markets will take advantage of that but that's the deal you make when you send a market order.

 

Your other option is to send a limit order but the deal there is you say you are not willing to pay more, even if that means you miss some trades.

 

Recap:

MARKET ORDER
- gets you in now / you pay for this privilege / won't miss any trades

 

LIMIT ORDER
- you wait to get in / you don't pay extra for this / might miss trades

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You also have to consider where an order is held and how it is elected. For example stop orders are often supported by the exchange natively so most brokers will send them to the exchange immediately.

 

e.g. if the ES is trading at 853.25 and your system wants to get long at 860.00 it is far better to send a stop order at 860 that will be elected and matched at the exchange as soon as that price is traded at. If you wait for the signal at PC you might have a stale price by the time the price reaches you. Not only that you have to send the order back to your broker then on to the exchange. Price can move several ticks in those couple of hundred milliseconds.

 

Also consider MiT's (Market if Touched) (if you want to buy below price or sell above price but want to be sure of a fill so ruling out a limit order). Whilst the exchange wont handle that natively it will usually be handled by your brokers system which is a big step closer to the exchange.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou guys, you really helped me in understanding how it works.

 

OK, whats the slippage like for @YM? I guess it's not max 2 ticks for that?

 

Hope you can help me again with this.

 

Many thanks and king regards

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

YM is relatively thin these days but slippage is 1 tick in normal auctions – very generally speaking. Any speed at all though and you should not be surprised at a 2-3 slip on a mkt orders

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thankyou guys, you really helped me in understanding how it works.

 

OK, whats the slippage like for @YM? I guess it's not max 2 ticks for that?

 

Hope you can help me again with this.

 

Many thanks and king regards

 

MY experience suggests that the cost for slippage on both markets (YM and ES) is similar... even though you might think that the YM would be better with a smaller value ticksize, you can get many more ticks slippage than the ES. Mind you, this is for relatively small size trading (less than 10 lots). Larger sizes would be benficial to trade the ES.

 

On the other hand, for Limit orders I find the fills are more assured on the YM because it is more likely that price will trade through your limit price. In the ES, where I trade 2 - 5 contracts, the Limit orders I place get filled 75% of the time even if the price does not trade through them as normally my limit order is out there for a while in advance of the price retracement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What do you mean by thin? do you mean theres no volumn

 

The YM book is thin

So yes, in essense, low volume.

 

bakrob is correct. The YM is a bit shakey to trade these days. I still like the charts of the YM on short timeframes though - less 'blocky' and often id setups on YM and take the trade on ES as they rarely diverge directionally for very long.

 

fitzkie, re "what is the volume?" I wish I could help you there :roll eyes:

Good luck. Read DBP and VSA and good luck with that too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On a related subject, is anyone aware of a contract with the same or similar tick size to the YM, but with more volume? I know of the mini Nikkei on the OSE, and it looks like it's more liquid than the YM, but I'm wondering if there's something closer to the liquidity of the ES. There is nothing like this to my knowledge, but I'm just checking. Also just to be sure that I have this right, the OSE website lists the mini Nikkei 225 average daily volume in 2/2009 as ~368k, is that more or less accurate? I have no way of watching this market, otherwise I'd look for myself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On a related subject, is anyone aware of a contract with the same or similar tick size to the YM, but with more volume? I know of the mini Nikkei on the OSE, and it looks like it's more liquid than the YM, but I'm wondering if there's something closer to the liquidity of the ES. There is nothing like this to my knowledge, but I'm just checking. Also just to be sure that I have this right, the OSE website lists the mini Nikkei 225 average daily volume in 2/2009 as ~368k, is that more or less accurate? I have no way of watching this market, otherwise I'd look for myself.

 

The KOSPI futures has similar tick size as the ES and is fairly liquid. Not to mention the KOPSI options is the worlds heavily traded contract. The mini Nikkei and mini Topix though is more suitable if you are looking for similar YM tick size. (mini topix is still illiquid)

 

Attached is both the KOS and mini Nikkei 3 minute chart with DOM.

kospi.png.877f02fa73d68d3a7cb67e3695f379fc.png

mininikkei.png.2b19431bae1bfae3f554a5a21ee7e5b2.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you James, re those screenshots: I've never used CQG, so I have a couple questions. First, is that 19:00 New York time (Nikkei open)? And on the DOM, are the numbers to the right of price market depth? If so that is much more size than the YM during New York open, especially the mini Nikkei.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nikkei opens at 9am Tokyo time... which would be 7am EST for now. Just make sure to adjust according to day light savings time. The numbers to the right are market depth.. tick size is approx $5 a tick. But the ATR is alot lower than the US markets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no "slippage" in trading. You make it sound it's like this magical loss you take when you trade. Learn how the order matching process works.

 

When you use a buy market order, you buy at the ask when it arrives at the exchange.

When you use a sell market order, you sell at the bid when it arrives at the exchange

 

Of course, the bid or ask may change in between the time you click the button and the order hits the exchange, but this isn't slippage, this is the market changing. You will generally not experience this when you send your order automatically just when the inside market has changed. It generally trades there for a few seconds unless it's a thin market.

 

So in reality, you just pay the bid-ask spread when using market orders. To get a realistic fill, you would check the bid/ask X ms after you have placed your order where X is the number of ms you think it takes your order to arrive at the exchange.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CART Maplebear stock, watch for a top of range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?CART
    • MAR Marriott stock, watch for a top of range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?MAR
    • CLOV Clover Health stock, nice rally watch for a continuation breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?CLOV
    • PAYO Payoneer stock, watch for a top of range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?PAYO
    • Date: 5th February 2025.   Stock Market Drops as US-China Trade War Escalates; Gold Hits Record High.   Futures for US and European stocks retreated, shrugging off gains in Asian markets as investors assessed the latest earnings from Wall Street tech giants and growing concerns over the US-China trade war. Gold prices soared to an all-time high, continuing a nearly 1% rally from the previous session, as escalating trade tensions drove demand for safe-haven assets. Global Stock Market Performance Euro Stoxx 50 futures declined 0.4%, while S&P 500 futures slipped 0.5%, weighed down by post-market declines in Alphabet Inc. and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. Asian stock markets advanced for a second straight session, though Chinese equities fell as the market reopened after the Lunar New Year holiday. The yen strengthened against the US dollar, while gold surged on increased risk aversion. Tech Stocks and Trade War Concerns Asian technology stocks mirrored their US counterparts’ gains, but investor sentiment toward China remained cautious. Markets reacted to Beijing’s swift but measured retaliation after the US imposed a 10% tariff on all imports from China. Compared to the aggressive tit-for-tat measures during Trump’s first term, President Xi Jinping appears to be taking a more calculated approach. US Jobs Report and Federal Reserve Rate Policy The US 10-year Treasury yield declined alongside the US dollar index, after data revealed a larger-than-expected drop in job openings for December, hitting a three-month low. The weaker US labour market data reduced fears of aggressive Federal Reserve rate hikes, pushing the US dollar lower and creating a favourable setup for Asian markets. Investors now turn to the US ISM services report for further clues on the Fed’s rate policy, with analysts expecting a slowdown in activity due to winter storms and wildfires. Trump Signals No Urgency for US-China Trade Talks President Donald Trump told reporters he’s in no rush to negotiate with Chinese President Xi Jinping, stating that he’ll engage in discussions “at the appropriate time.” Market analysts are concerned that prolonged uncertainty over trade negotiations could lead to increased stock market volatility, especially in China. Despite the delays in trade talks, Trump has shown that he is willing to negotiate, so markets will continue to watch closely. In a surprising move, the US Postal Service temporarily suspended international shipments from China and Hong Kong. While the reason remains unclear, the suspension follows Trump’s repeal of the de minimis rule, which previously allowed small Chinese shipments under $800 to enter the US duty-free. US-China trade tensions remain a major market risk and if both sides delay their tariff measures, markets will respond positively, but further escalation could trigger renewed volatility. Gold Prices Surge as Investors Seek Safe Havens Gold prices skyrocketed to a record high of $2,861 an ounce, fueled by concerns over trade disputes, geopolitical instability, and potential inflation risks. Beijing’s measured response to US tariffs was notably softer than its previous retaliatory actions, yet investors remain cautious about its long-term effects on global trade and monetary policy. Adding to market uncertainty, Trump proposed a US-led reconstruction plan for Gaza, further fueling demand for safe-haven assets like gold. The gold market is benefiting from rising geopolitical risks, including US-China trade uncertainty and tensions in the Middle East. Regardless of US dollar movements, gold demand remains strong.     US Dollar Weakens Amid Market Uncertainty The US dollar continued to weaken, extending Tuesday’s 0.7% drop following disappointing US jobs data. A weaker dollar generally boosts gold and commodity prices, making them more affordable for international buyers. Spot gold gained 0.7%, trading at $2,861.22 per ounce as of 6:29 a.m. in London. Meanwhile, silver and platinum also advanced, while palladium declined. Even before the latest US-China tariffs, the precious metals market was experiencing heightened volatility. Gold and silver prices in the US surged above international benchmarks, leading to a rush of large-scale shipments into the country ahead of potential tariffs. The uncertainty also caused a spike in lease rates for gold and silver, as traders scrambled to secure short-term loans for metals stored in London vaults. Crude oil prices slipped, as global growth concerns stemming from the trade war overshadowed the impact of new US sanctions on Iran. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.