Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

theman

Getting Filled in Trading

Recommended Posts

Hi there

 

I want to trade the @ES, when I write a strategy on Ninja (using Zen-fire feed) will my market order be filled there and then? In other words, will I get slippage, if so, how many ticks or points are we talking about?

 

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BF' s answer is generally correct in a broad statistical way.

Getting a tiny bit more specific -

If, at a very granular level, your system using MktOrders is buying into strength (and vice versa - selling into weakness) then you will get negative slippage.

Otoh, if your system is buying into weakness (and vv) then you can expect neutral to slightly positive slippage.

Also Mkt Order slippage expands with acceleration and price 'speed'

In the ES, liquidity is slippage beneficial and the tick size is slippage detrimental...

In testing a system using mkt orders should hold up well using 2 tick slip in and out ...

These are still general answers btw only slightly more specific than BF's

hth

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 ticks on ES is pretty rare (unless you are on a satellite internet connection :D). Of course better to err on the side of caution. Mind you with recent volatility it is more common than when it traded in an 8 point daily range. As zdo says a lot depends on how your system works.

 

If your system allows it using stops (to enter break out style) or limits (to buy against price movement) will likely improve things especially if your connection is not particularly low latency.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's the issue w/ sending market orders on the ES. You just don't know where you'll get filled. In normal, every day type situations, 1 tick slippage is going to be standard.

 

If you throw that same order out there before a news announcement or something, then you'll more than likely see ticks of slippage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You have to understand what the purpose of a market order is before you get disheartened by slippage on market orders...

 

The purpose of a market order is to tell the markets - get me in, at whatever cost NOW. I am willing to take some immediate loss/pressure for the ability to enter my trade NOW.

 

The purpose of a market order is NOT to get you the most ideal price possible.

 

So w/ that said, the markets will take advantage of that but that's the deal you make when you send a market order.

 

Your other option is to send a limit order but the deal there is you say you are not willing to pay more, even if that means you miss some trades.

 

Recap:

MARKET ORDER
- gets you in now / you pay for this privilege / won't miss any trades

 

LIMIT ORDER
- you wait to get in / you don't pay extra for this / might miss trades

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You also have to consider where an order is held and how it is elected. For example stop orders are often supported by the exchange natively so most brokers will send them to the exchange immediately.

 

e.g. if the ES is trading at 853.25 and your system wants to get long at 860.00 it is far better to send a stop order at 860 that will be elected and matched at the exchange as soon as that price is traded at. If you wait for the signal at PC you might have a stale price by the time the price reaches you. Not only that you have to send the order back to your broker then on to the exchange. Price can move several ticks in those couple of hundred milliseconds.

 

Also consider MiT's (Market if Touched) (if you want to buy below price or sell above price but want to be sure of a fill so ruling out a limit order). Whilst the exchange wont handle that natively it will usually be handled by your brokers system which is a big step closer to the exchange.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou guys, you really helped me in understanding how it works.

 

OK, whats the slippage like for @YM? I guess it's not max 2 ticks for that?

 

Hope you can help me again with this.

 

Many thanks and king regards

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

YM is relatively thin these days but slippage is 1 tick in normal auctions – very generally speaking. Any speed at all though and you should not be surprised at a 2-3 slip on a mkt orders

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thankyou guys, you really helped me in understanding how it works.

 

OK, whats the slippage like for @YM? I guess it's not max 2 ticks for that?

 

Hope you can help me again with this.

 

Many thanks and king regards

 

MY experience suggests that the cost for slippage on both markets (YM and ES) is similar... even though you might think that the YM would be better with a smaller value ticksize, you can get many more ticks slippage than the ES. Mind you, this is for relatively small size trading (less than 10 lots). Larger sizes would be benficial to trade the ES.

 

On the other hand, for Limit orders I find the fills are more assured on the YM because it is more likely that price will trade through your limit price. In the ES, where I trade 2 - 5 contracts, the Limit orders I place get filled 75% of the time even if the price does not trade through them as normally my limit order is out there for a while in advance of the price retracement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What do you mean by thin? do you mean theres no volumn

 

The YM book is thin

So yes, in essense, low volume.

 

bakrob is correct. The YM is a bit shakey to trade these days. I still like the charts of the YM on short timeframes though - less 'blocky' and often id setups on YM and take the trade on ES as they rarely diverge directionally for very long.

 

fitzkie, re "what is the volume?" I wish I could help you there :roll eyes:

Good luck. Read DBP and VSA and good luck with that too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On a related subject, is anyone aware of a contract with the same or similar tick size to the YM, but with more volume? I know of the mini Nikkei on the OSE, and it looks like it's more liquid than the YM, but I'm wondering if there's something closer to the liquidity of the ES. There is nothing like this to my knowledge, but I'm just checking. Also just to be sure that I have this right, the OSE website lists the mini Nikkei 225 average daily volume in 2/2009 as ~368k, is that more or less accurate? I have no way of watching this market, otherwise I'd look for myself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On a related subject, is anyone aware of a contract with the same or similar tick size to the YM, but with more volume? I know of the mini Nikkei on the OSE, and it looks like it's more liquid than the YM, but I'm wondering if there's something closer to the liquidity of the ES. There is nothing like this to my knowledge, but I'm just checking. Also just to be sure that I have this right, the OSE website lists the mini Nikkei 225 average daily volume in 2/2009 as ~368k, is that more or less accurate? I have no way of watching this market, otherwise I'd look for myself.

 

The KOSPI futures has similar tick size as the ES and is fairly liquid. Not to mention the KOPSI options is the worlds heavily traded contract. The mini Nikkei and mini Topix though is more suitable if you are looking for similar YM tick size. (mini topix is still illiquid)

 

Attached is both the KOS and mini Nikkei 3 minute chart with DOM.

kospi.png.877f02fa73d68d3a7cb67e3695f379fc.png

mininikkei.png.2b19431bae1bfae3f554a5a21ee7e5b2.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you James, re those screenshots: I've never used CQG, so I have a couple questions. First, is that 19:00 New York time (Nikkei open)? And on the DOM, are the numbers to the right of price market depth? If so that is much more size than the YM during New York open, especially the mini Nikkei.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nikkei opens at 9am Tokyo time... which would be 7am EST for now. Just make sure to adjust according to day light savings time. The numbers to the right are market depth.. tick size is approx $5 a tick. But the ATR is alot lower than the US markets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no "slippage" in trading. You make it sound it's like this magical loss you take when you trade. Learn how the order matching process works.

 

When you use a buy market order, you buy at the ask when it arrives at the exchange.

When you use a sell market order, you sell at the bid when it arrives at the exchange

 

Of course, the bid or ask may change in between the time you click the button and the order hits the exchange, but this isn't slippage, this is the market changing. You will generally not experience this when you send your order automatically just when the inside market has changed. It generally trades there for a few seconds unless it's a thin market.

 

So in reality, you just pay the bid-ask spread when using market orders. To get a realistic fill, you would check the bid/ask X ms after you have placed your order where X is the number of ms you think it takes your order to arrive at the exchange.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TSLA Tesla stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 195.2, 222.64 and 242.14 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TSLA
    • NI NiSource stock watch, up trend with a pullback to 38.46 support area with bullish indicators at https://stockconsultant.com/?NI
    • BE Bloom Energy stock watch, just hanging out at the 22.83 triple+ support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?BE
    • INMD Inmode stock, strong day, watch for a top of range breakout above 19.72 at https://stockconsultant.com/?INMD
    • Date: 11th March 2025.   Recession Fears Grow as Market Sell-Off Deepens.   Recession fears escalated following weekend comments from President Donald Trump, who described the US as being in a "period of transition" when questioned about economic risks. Concerns over tariffs and their global economic impact have heightened uncertainty and weakened investor confidence. A JPMorgan model recently indicated a 31% market-implied probability of a US recession, while a similar Goldman Sachs model suggests rising recession risks. Meanwhile, disappointing earnings guidance from major firms, including big tech companies, has fueled a bearish market outlook. Broader market fears are compounding the downturn. Investors remain wary of economic recession signals, exacerbated by trade uncertainties and shifting fiscal policies. The S&P 500 has erased its post-election gains, and speculative assets—including crypto-linked stocks and ETFs—are facing aggressive sell-offs. Stock Market Plunge: Major Indexes in the Red The NASDAQ tumbled -4.0%, while the S&P 500 dropped -2.70%, and the Dow Jones declined -2.08%, pushing major indexes into negative territory for the year. Global equities also suffered sharp declines.   Amid this turmoil, Treasury yields fell as investors sought safe-haven assets, reinforcing expectations of Federal Reserve rate cuts in June. The 2-year yield dropped -11.6 bps to 3.883%, while the 10-year yield slipped -8.5 bps to 4.218%. The US Dollar Index (DXY) firmed slightly to 103.926, recovering from its session low of 103.559, the weakest level since November.     Commodities Struggle Amid Market Volatility Despite Wall Street’s sell-off, gold remained flat at $2,888 per ounce, failing to gain traction as a safe-haven asset. Oil prices also dipped by -0.26% to $65.86 per barrel, reflecting broader economic concerns. Oil tracked equity markets and risk assets amid concerns that tariffs and other measures could stunt growth in the world’s largest economy. Oil has fallen nearly 20% from its mid-January high as Trump’s tariff hikes and push to cut federal spending darken the economic outlook for the largest oil producer and consumer. Other bearish factors include OPEC+ plans to increase supply and weakening demand in China, where refiners are being urged to shift away from producing key fuels like diesel and gasoline. US Energy Secretary Chris Wright provided some bullish sentiment, stating that the Trump administration is prepared to enforce US sanctions on Iranian oil production. He made the remarks at the CERAWeek by S&P Global conference in Houston on Monday. Executives from major oil producers—including Chevron Corp., Shell Plc, and Saudi Aramco—expressed strong support for Trump’s energy dominance agenda at the gathering. Vitol Group CEO Russell Hardy projected oil prices to range between $60 and $80 per barrel over the next few years.   Key US Economic Data Releases This Week Investors are bracing for significant economic data, including the Consumer Price Index (CPI), Producer Price Index (PPI), and the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) report. While the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) remains focused on inflation, Tuesday’s JOLTS report could drive market reactions amid heightened recession concerns. In December, job openings declined -556K to 7.6 million, near the lowest level since January 2021. The opening rate has also fallen to 4.5%, down from 5.3% a year ago. Meanwhile, the quit rate—a key measure of labour market confidence—held at 2.0%, compared to 3.0% at its peak. Federal Reserve Rate Cut Expectations Shift Fed funds futures indicate expectations for three quarter-point rate cuts in 2025, as economic slowdown concerns overshadow inflation fears. The futures market now anticipates the first rate cut in June, with the implied rate reflecting -30 bps in cuts. September pricing suggests -59 bps, while December signals -78 bps in total easing. However, the Fed remains in its blackout period ahead of its March 18-19 meeting. Tech Stocks Hit Hard as Nasdaq 100 Falls 3.8% The Nasdaq 100 suffered its worst single-day decline since October 2022, falling -3.8%. At intraday lows, the index was down -4.7%, erasing more than $1 trillion in market value. Key factors driving the sell-off include tariff-related uncertainty, declining confidence in AI spending, and disappointing inflation and labour data. The so-called "Magnificent 7" tech stocks, which led the recent bull market, experienced steep losses. Among the biggest losers were: Tesla (-15.4%) – its worst day since September 2020 amid falling sales and concerns over CEO Elon Musk’s focus on the company. MicroStrategy (-16.7%) AppLovin (-12%) Palantir (-10.1%) Atlassian (-9.6%) Broader Market Impact: Treasury Yields Drop as Safe-Haven Demand Rises As recession fears mount, Treasury yields fell, with the 10-year yield hitting its lowest level this year. This decline reflects investors' growing preference for safer assets. On the risk-asset front, Bitcoin plummeted to nearly $77,000, marking its lowest level since November, as investors moved away from speculative assets amid economic uncertainty. Cryptocurrency-related exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have been hit hard. Among the biggest losers were two leveraged ETFs tied to Bitcoin-holding firm MicroStrategy, both of which dropped over 30% in a single day. Additionally, an ETF doubling the daily returns of Robinhood Markets Inc.—a favoured brokerage among crypto traders—plummeted 40%. Leveraged Bitcoin funds fell approximately 20%, while those focused on Ethereum declined 26% amid the broader digital asset selloff. The downturn highlights growing uncertainty in the crypto market, particularly as speculation surrounding regulatory policies and economic conditions intensifies. Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies initially surged post-election, driven by optimism over potential policy shifts.   With key economic reports and the Fed meeting approaching, markets remain on edge. Recession fears, tech sell-offs, and shifting rate-cut expectations continue to drive volatility. Investors will closely watch upcoming data releases to gauge economic resilience and potential Federal Reserve actions in the coming months. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Michalis Efthymiou HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.