Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

gassah

Statistics

Recommended Posts

Ray and James were recently discussing time and price windows, http://tradingsuccess.com/blog/cycle-high-for-sp-ii-873.html

 

Ray calculates the price and time changes of impulsive and corrective swings and uses these stats to:

  1. estimate where a correction might end
  2. determine how overbought or oversold a move is

 

I have a couple of questions on how to distinguish between impulsive and corrective swings. In the first attachment are Barros swings of the SP500. The blue lines are the 5d and and green ones are the next higher time frame, the 18d. If we are calculating the stats for the 5d then the impulsive waves are in the direction of the 18d line and the corrective waves are counter to it. There are a couple of exceptions. If the 5d line is totally covered by the 18d line (7-8) then that line is excluded because it is a higher time frame swing. The second chart has the second exception. If a swing in the direction of the higher time frame line is followed by acceptance back beyond the top or bottom 1/8th of the prior swing extreme, then the swing is counted as corrective, even though it's in the direction of the trend. Swing CD is corrective.

 

I'm not sure about about GH because it's a small swing that fits the above corrective criteria. Are the last swings always impulsive?

 

And in the 3rd attachment is AA-BB impulsive? There's a large retracement and it is part of a 5d range. Thanks.

Swings1.thumb.png.a084e26b5b96c27003d316d76833cf37.png

Swings2.thumb.png.cc797fb4bcdbd1acc894cbf1256efe2d.png

Swings3.thumb.png.5a2c177910dd1902802ce744bb4d1adc.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  miriccar said:
it seems to me that AA-BB is impulsive of Subnormal Type (R0 move).

 

Michele

 

Thanks, Michele. I've had many questions answered by the second webinar and see it the way you do.

 

Rob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

NTES demonstrates the use of the time-price window (TPW). For those not familiar with the TPW it involves calculating the percentage change of prior swings and the number of bars for each of the swings. The goal is to estimate where a reaction will end and it utilizes the security's own history instead of some generic means such as the 50% retracement. It then narrows the window down to encompass approximately 70% of the values. In NTES's case the window ranges from 7-17% and 3-9 days.

 

It hits a MIDAS and then moves up with conviction allowing for an entry.

 

Rob

NTES.thumb.PNG.a588b6bfa1b26205b6eec141cc511a20.PNG

5aa70ee09c6b2_NTESMIDAS.thumb.png.c8848bbc8a3b1d41c030c67426430f15.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Attached are 5d TPWs for some of the stocks I'm following. It seems quite robust but it's a lot of work and very few will have the time or desire to do it.

 

Rob

RIMM.thumb.PNG.f71ecb98be56f9f7b4f5ae981a211932.PNG

AAPL.thumb.PNG.49af936744b99c99f4dec273044e015b.PNG

BIDU.thumb.PNG.ac1a018f82c5234f8aaec6a222f898a8.PNG

PBR.thumb.PNG.1e5d98e674764b0947354c4eb47872cc.PNG

SNDA.thumb.PNG.80250095a1fdb892578703088e6c4d8a.PNG

ASIA.thumb.PNG.5dc2f0d8535314203bef8872a48384eb.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesn't look like a 3 Drives and it's premature to call it an R0 because there needs to be another reaction. If you zoom out there is a trading range that triggered a buy on 6/5.

 

Rob

5aa70ee87d2e9_3Drives.png.42a6f6b87e26e7168110c2e3de0c0045.png

R0.PNG.9e0faafda691e632362b4d78cbf186a8.PNG

5aa70ee88ce01_US.thumb.PNG.e39175f2655fd41ef9257905d608d488.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Tannism said:
I can't seem to find "normalized volume" in the book. Can you tell me what it is or how it is calculated?

 

I purchased the normalised volume program from Kym Haines and he states it does the following:

 

"The program normalises volume based on:

- how a day's volume relates to the volume of the days before it

- what is the history of this volume relationship for similar days in the past (calendar day, day of the week, and many more)

- which type of similar day is the best predictor for the current day

- correcting the actual volume based on predicted behaviour (e.g. boosting volume on expected slow days)"

 

An example that Ray mentioned is July 2nd where volume was much higher after normalization.

Normalised.thumb.png.a76cd95320021434bbbefb0252792d47.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahh! Here a couple more that would have been nice to know.

 

Do you happen to know what formats the software uses?

 

Thank you. I am finding the book more and more helpful with your help with my questions and the link to the blog.

5aa70efd2662d_normalized2.jpg.ae83f23ff5f8974540270cb0de34193b.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's an interesting program. I'm not sure if manipulating volume in whatever manner he does is appropriate or more or less accurate. It costs $200.

 

In Vista I have to use a command prompt so it isn't windows friendly but it isn't difficult to use. You also need at least 10 years worth of volume for it to analyze.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes please.

i would like to test it as i am doing on other Barros' tool.

As zone i like midas as well fibos anh harmonic but i am not convinced about TPW since i expect that a correction is function only of the strenght of the prior impulse swing in the same timeframe and the current movement in the higher timeframe so not on the very long term statistic.

 

Thanks for your help

 

Michele

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 1st spreadsheet displays all the 18d corrections since 1979.

 

The 2nd one adds the bins. The bins are evenly spaced numbers that range from near the low of the data and stop with a value above the highest data. In this example a "3" is entered in B7 and 2 is added down the column till 29 is reached, just above the 28.57. In B8 type "=", left click the "3" in B7, type "+ 2", enter, and 5 should appear in B8. Then click the B8 cell and go to the bottom right corner of the cell and drag it down till the 29 is entered in B20.

 

The bin column will take some experimentation. You could start off with "2" in B7 and stop at "30". Starting with 2 or 3 and adding 1 is another option. When you become familiar with a number of examples it'll become easier to decide.

 

Left click to the right of the first bins value in the empty C7 cell and drag down to the final value, C20. Type "=frequency". As frequency is typed you can hit tab to complete the word without typing the whole thing. Click the A7 cell and drag down to the last input A57. Type "," and drag from B7-B20. Hit and hold Ctrl/Shift together and press Enter. This will enter the number of data values that fall within each array. C7 equals 3 because there are 3 data values that are less than or equal to 3 (2.05, 2.75, 2.97). C8 equals 10 because there are 10 data values greater than 3 but less than or equal to 5, etc. See chart 3.

 

If C7-C20 is highlighted there will be the summed value (51) at the bottom right corner of Excel. If it isn't highlighted then you can do it at any time. This number will be used to calculate the percent each binned value represents of the total. In D7 type "=" and click on C7, "/51", enter. Click D7 and drag down from the right lower corner to the end of the values, D20. Highlight D7-D20 and right click in any shaded cell, choose Format Cells, Percentage, Decimal Places 0 and OK. Chart 4.

 

Now beginning with the highest percentage (22) move up and down choosing the highest value. Start at 22 and move to 20, all the time keeping track of the total. You want to stop when approximately 68% is reached as this represents the 1st standard deviation. After 20, 16 is larger than the 6 in D7 so include the 16. 10 is larger than the 6 in D7 so include the 10. The D8-D11 cells total 67% so stop there because more values will exceed 68. These correspond to the B8-B11 cells or an 18d correction of 5-11%. If there are more bins you can count two cells at a time and drop to one cell when 68 is approached. If there are equal initial high values start with the one nearest the center. If there are equal values as you move north and south from the center then include both.

 

Do the same for time which I've included in chart 6. Once you get the hang of it it's a breeze.

 

nic

$COMPX 1.xlsFetching info...

$COMPX 2.xlsFetching info...

$COMPX 3.xlsFetching info...

$COMPX 4.xlsFetching info...

$COMPX 5.xlsFetching info...

$COMPX 6.xlsFetching info...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks,

it is very clear. I am sorry for let you working so much for the explanation.

So you (and he) use the market profile VA method for determinating the limits of the statistic.

I see 2 problem for TPW application:

first as admitted by himself in a private mail divide the correction form impulse in programming is a problem

second: usually a correction is more a function of previous impulse (Action-reaction principle) and what type of elliott wave we are that on the long term padt stat

 

Thanks again

 

 

Michele

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.