Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

gassah

Ray Barros Method Introduction

Recommended Posts

Today provides an example with EURGBP. The daily shows the zone comprised of the time-price window (TPW), MIDAS and the retracements. The setup is the contraction setup as the range of the bars and volume shrinks (volume not shown). There is also a potential "repo" (continuation spring) on the 5d.

 

The 60m (Forex uses 60m or 290m for intraday) shows the trigger bar overnight. I'll have to wait till EOD and decide whether or not to stay in this add-on position.

 

Rob

5aa70f4b8ed67_EURGBPDaily.thumb.png.d8b9007f60ad349a115847dc980f28c2.png

5aa70f4b9b6f1_EURGBP60m.thumb.png.433cf29b163d36016739d2419e42b71d.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rob,

 

If I use the following sequence of tf for mini-dow,

 

SHTF: daily with 5p

FHTF: 80m: 5p

TTF: 15m: 5p for lagging patterns

FLTF: 3m: 5p for forecasting patterns

SLTF: 3m bars (or we can use 5p of 30s, but not necessary)

 

Is it alright to use charts based on 24 hour data? Or I should restrict just to the data in regular US trading hours:question:

 

I'm also trying to trade the EURUSD futures (6E), I suppose I can use the same tf as above, since the pit-session is also similar to mini-dow:question:

 

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For active 24 hour markets then it's the daily (1440m), 290m, 60m,15m. If you're only going to trade the Dow during US market hours then it's still daily, 80m, 15m. I'm assuming the overnight Dow futures aren't that liquid but I don't know.

 

Rob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Rob,

 

For active 24 hour markets then it's the daily (1440m), 290m, 60m,15m. If you're only going to trade the Dow during US market hours then it's still daily, 80m, 15m. I'm assuming the overnight Dow futures aren't that liquid but I don't know.

 

Regarding the mini-dow (or similarly the mini-S&P 500) being not so liquid outside of US trading hours, that's true. A quick confirmation, from your reply, for mini-dow, so I should configure my charting software to filter away data outside of regular trading hours since the 80m, 15m, etc, tf is derived from the regular trading hours:question: Currently, my daily chart is showing daily bars which are formed using the O, H, L, C of the entire 24 hours period (instead of the O, H, L, C of just the regular trading period). And currently, my 80min chart also displays bars throughout the 24 hours. If I just display bars only for the regular trading hours, the swings will look obviously different.

 

Thanks!

 

As you can see, I'm still at the setting up phase and have not come to the interesting stuff yet!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rob,

 

While I was reading Ray's blog @ What is a RePo and 313Outside? Blog for Trading Success: Ray Barros, I got confused over the reply Ray gave to Wee Meng.

 

Wee Meng asked the question: "What context is used to view a congestion pattern at C, rather than an “active” upthrust pattern?"

 

Ray replied: "So in an uptrend, the continuation patterns occur at the bottom and the CIT pattern occurs at the top."

 

Do you have any insight? Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ray makes a distinction between springs in uptrends (continuation) and springs that occur as reversal patterns. A repo is borrowed from Joseph Hart's Trend Dynamics and stands for reverse potential, and they are the continuation springs. The reversal springs happen after a prolonged downtrend.

 

""So in an uptrend, the continuation patterns occur at the bottom and the CIT pattern occurs at the top."

 

I believe he means the continuation springs are by definition at the bottom of the range and the CIT pattern in an uptrend or upthrust, occur at the top of the range.

 

Another interpretation is that continuation springs are more likely to happen early in an uptrend, early in the mark-up phase, and CIT patterns (upthrusts) occur after a prolonged mark-up and distribution (the top).

 

This point about only looking for CIT patterns after a prolonged trend is important. Apparent CIT patterns are much more likely to fail, with the trend continuing, if the trend is immature. This is why shorting upthrusts too early in a trend is not a good idea.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Rob,

 

As you know, one of the uses of X, AB labeling that Ray taught is to allow us to compute the Maximum Extension (ME), which in turn allows us to decide whether a spring pattern has formed. Unfortunately, I met some problems labeling, I will use the figures attached to describe the problem. Though I have gone back to revise the X, AB labeling, I'm not able to ascertain the answer to my question.

 

Referring to figure 1.jpg, I would have labeled X, A, B at 3, 4, 5. But Ray would sometimes label X, A, B at 4, 5, 6. This would give a different ME, which may give a different conclusion related to whether a continuation spring formed at 7.

 

I'm not sure which one to use, 345, or 456:question:

 

For 2.jpg and 3.jpg, how would you have labeled X, A, B:question: :confused:

1.JPG.af5920133b85f65e0a14cdd58f59902b.JPG

2.JPG.ef2a98bcc009b99e684e94928fdd9391.JPG

3.JPG.05cfdf977be99574ee17bd51a5b1c0c9.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

The upper boundary is either 10% of 3-4 or 20% of 4-5, whichever is greater, assuming 3-4 is at least impulse mean.

 

The bottom boundary doesn't use 3-4, i.e., you don't take 20% of 3-4 and apply it at the bottom boundary. In this case 4-5 marks the boundary of congestion because 7 hasn't retraced far enough back into the range to count as a point to consider.

 

I'll address the rest later.

ME.thumb.PNG.b5065037b59d5b49be9c3d77e17ce2cc.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd use 4 and 5 as A and B in the second example.

 

I'm assuming you are looking at the 5d swings only. In example 3, 7-8 are AB. 4 to 9 is a downtrend, not congestion, because 8 did not retrace above the PBZ of 5-6. Therefore 7-8-9 is its own entity and the ME is 20% of 7-8. You can also use 10% of 6-7 if its impulse mean but it might not be. If it isn't then move back to 10% of 4-7.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Rob,

 

The bottom boundary doesn't use 3-4, i.e., you don't take 20% of 3-4 and apply it at the bottom boundary.

 

Do you mean 10% of 3-4 and not 20%:question: Anyway, this is something new to me. I thought we should apply 10% 3-4 on the bottom boundary as well.

 

In what situations would you label 456 as XAB:question: I attached one of Ray's charts. The blue line is the 5D while the red 18D. He labeled 456 as XAB in this situation, but I'm unable to figure out why this is so.

 

Thanks!

ray.JPG.34ce8518afd2070c4516f6e4bef900a2.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The opposing boundary always uses 20% AB. 10% XA is only in the direction of the trend. I'm pretty certain of this, unless you can point out where it says otherwise. Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In addition, Ray's labeling the counter-trend reaction with XABC and using AB to generate the ME. C cannot accept beyond the ME if a spring is going to occur.

 

For the upside 5d breakout you'll have to re-label and in this case use the XA or XC as the boundaries which move the ME back above X.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Rob,

 

In addition, Ray's labeling the counter-trend reaction with XABC and using AB to generate the ME. C cannot accept beyond the ME if a spring is going to occur. For the upside 5d breakout you'll have to re-label and in this case use the XA or XC as the boundaries which move the ME back above X.

 

Thanks. Actually, I did not mention clearly enough that my question is really about how to label X, A, B to determine a "continuation-spring".

 

Okay, referring back to the post here, for 1.jpg, I would label 456 as XAB to determine whether a continuation-spring has happened, rather than labeling 345 as XAB. Similarly, for 2.jpg, 456 as XAB would be used for continuation-spring determination.

 

On the other hand, for upthrust determination, we should label 345 in 1.jpg and 2.jpg as XAB. Is that correct:question:

 

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I find it easier keeping the labels as consistent as possible and using 345 as XAB. The other labeling Ray used is more of an anomaly. As long as you know 7 is springing 5 you're fine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rob:

 

Thank you for having this forum.

I have some questions regarding the relabelling of XAB.

 

I have attached 2 jpegs for my question.

Referring to pic1.jpg, first I label XAB. Then a higher high form at C with acceptance above ME. If the market retraces such that the price is


    1. below A but at or above D, how should I re-label XAB?
    2. below D but above B, how should I re-label XAB?

 

Referring to pic2.jpg, first I label XAB. Then market consolidates and is followed by a breakout with WPC above ME at C. If the market retraces such that the price is

  1. below A but at or above D, how should I re-label XAB?
  2. below D but above B, how should I re-label XAB?

 

Looking forward to your reply. Thanx. :)

pic1.thumb.JPG.e3ce62e3ba2f0ede642495bfb166c179.JPG

pic2.thumb.JPG.f44fad8a49d6547fd7049f5e393db0eb.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have some questions regarding the relabelling of XAB.

 

I have attached 2 jpegs for my question.

Referring to pic1.jpg, first I label XAB. Then a higher high form at C with acceptance above ME. If the market retraces such that the price is


    1. below A but at or above D, how should I re-label XAB?
    2. below D but above B, how should I re-label XAB?

 

Referring to pic2.jpg, first I label XAB. Then market consolidates and is followed by a breakout with WPC above ME at C. If the market retraces such that the price is

  1. below A but at or above D, how should I re-label XAB?
  2. below D but above B, how should I re-label XAB?

 

 

Hi dandelion,

 

I don't make a distinction between the two charts. Once a swing accepts below the PSZ of AB it continues to be considered a corrective structure. I wouldn't label either one D until it hits the 78.6%R, though I'm not absolutely certain Ray would agree.

 

Rob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rob:

 

Thanx for your reply.

I am not too sure what you mean by "I wouldn't label either one D until"?

I might have been too brief in my questions. I have problems re-labelling XAB in order

to calculate ME, especially when market make higher high but retrace great than 78.6%.

I would like to rephrase my questions.

 

From pic3.jpg, I label cde as XAB to calculate the ME.

When higher high form at f with acceptance above ME, but market retrace to less than 76.8% of ef and turn up at g, do you mean that I can re-label efg as XAB to calculate the new ME?

 

What happen if the market retrace to more than 76.8% of ef and turn up at h, can I still re-label efh as XAB to calculate ME?

 

Similarly from pic4.jpg, in a consolidating market between def, I label cde as XAB to calculate ME.

When market breakout with WPC and acceptance above ME, but retrace to less than 76.8% of fg and turn up at h, can I also re-label fgh as XAB to calculate the ME?

 

How about if it retrace to more than 76.8% of fg and turn up at i, can I also re-label fgi as XAB to calculate ME?

 

Or should I just shift the blue line at d up to g and calculate ME using c=X, g=A and e=B?

 

 

Sorry for the repetition and thanx for your reply. :)

pic3.thumb.JPG.9bb6ccfe8254f35ed7a9646529fae182.JPG

pic4.thumb.JPG.36c5d2403bf47569bd1d10219b7fa8e2.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll address the first chart with different labeling. If it comes down to D at 78.6% AB and turns up and you want to see how price behaves around the PSZ and upper ME then I would change the boundaries to BC. If, instead, it continues down toward B then I wouldn't change it yet because you want to use the old PBZ and lower ME. If it then comes back up above the PBZ then I would change it to BC at that point.

ME.thumb.png.8574c66543795c280f25ec0938082d17.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rob:

 

Is there a difference if it comes down to D at 78.6% of BC instead of 78.6% of AB?

How should the price behave around the PSZ and upper ME for me to change the boundaries to BC?

 

Thank you for your replies. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there a difference if it comes down to D at 78.6% of BC instead of 78.6% of AB?

 

I need to make a correction. CD does not need to come down to 78.6% of AB in order to label it a sideways market and to make changes to the ME. All it has to do is have a one bar acceptance below the PSZ of AB (like an upthrust). If it turns up to challenge C then I'd change the boundaries from AB to BC. It doesn't matter how it goes up. What I said about changing the boundaries if it continues lower still applies.

 

If it comes down to 78.6% of BC but stays above the PSZ of AB then you just have a continuation of the uptrend. The BC measurement does come into play with running corrections and R0 patterns. I don't think running corrections are in the book. I can try to explain them from Ray's webinar if you are interested.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rob:

 

Yes, I am interested to know about running corrections. I saw this term in Ray's Blog, but could not find in the book. Thought I slept through a chapter.... :stick out tongue:

How do we go about doing the explanation from Ray's webinar?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rob,

 

The BC measurement does come into play with running corrections and R0 patterns. I don't think running corrections are in the book. I can try to explain them from Ray's webinar if you are interested.

 

Do you have a link to his webinar? Do you need to pay for it?

 

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 7th April 2025.   Asian Markets Plunge as US-China Trade War Escalates; Wall Street Futures Signal Further Turmoil.   Global financial markets extended last week’s massive sell-off as tensions between the US and its major trading partners deepened, rattling investors and prompting sharp declines across equities, commodities, and currencies. The fallout from President Trump’s sweeping new tariff measures continued to spread, raising fears of a full-blown trade war and economic recession.   Asian stock markets plunged on Monday, extending a global market rout fueled by rising tensions between the US and China. The latest wave of aggressive tariffs and retaliatory measures has unnerved investors worldwide, triggering sharp sell-offs across the Asia-Pacific region.   Asian equities led the global rout on Monday, with dramatic losses seen across the region. Japan’s Nikkei 225 index tumbled more than 8% shortly after the open, while the broader Topix fell over 6.5%, recovering only slightly from steeper losses. In mainland China, the Shanghai Composite sank 6.7%, and the blue-chip CSI300 dropped 7.5% as markets reopened following a public holiday. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index opened more than 9% lower, reflecting deep concerns about escalating trade tensions.           South Korea’s Kospi dropped 4.8%, triggering a circuit breaker designed to curb panic selling. Taiwan’s Taiex index collapsed by nearly 10%, with major tech exporters like TSMC and Foxconn hitting circuit breaker limits after each fell close to 10%. Meanwhile, Australia’s ASX 200 shed as much as 6.3%, and New Zealand’s NZX 50 lost over 3.5%.   Despite the escalation, Beijing has adopted a measured tone. Chinese officials urged investors not to panic and assured markets that the country has the tools to mitigate economic shocks. At the same time, they left the door open for renewed trade talks, though no specific timeline has been set.   US Stock Futures Plunge Ahead of Monday Open   US stock futures pointed to another brutal day on Wall Street. Futures tied to the S&P 500 dropped over 3%, Nasdaq futures sank 4%, and Dow Jones futures lost 2.5%—equivalent to nearly 1,000 points. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, down more than 20% from its recent highs, while the S&P 500 is nearing bear territory. The Dow closed last week in correction. Oil prices followed suit, with WTI crude dropping over 4% to $59.49 per barrel—its lowest since April 2021.   Wall Street closed last week in disarray, erasing more than $5 trillion in value amid fears of an all-out trade war. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, sinking more than 20% from its recent peak. The S&P 500 is approaching bear territory, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average has slipped firmly into correction territory.   German Banks Hit Hard Amid Escalating Trade Tensions   German banking stocks were among the worst hit in Europe. Shares of Commerzbank and Deutsche Bank plunged between 9.5% and 10.3% during early Frankfurt trading, compounding Friday’s steep losses. Fears over a global trade war and looming recession are severely impacting the financial sector, particularly export-driven economies like Germany.   Eurozone Growth at Risk   Eurozone officials are bracing for economic fallout, with Greek central bank governor Yannis Stournaras warning that Trump’s tariff policy could reduce eurozone GDP by up to 1%. The EU is preparing retaliatory tariffs on $28 billion worth of American goods—ranging from steel and aluminium to consumer products like dental floss and luxury jewellery.   Starting Wednesday, the US is expected to impose 25% tariffs on key EU exports, with Brussels ready to respond with its own 20% levies on nearly all remaining American imports.   UK Faces £22 Billion Economic Blow   In the UK, fresh research from KPMG revealed that the British economy could shrink by £21.6 billion by 2027 due to US-imposed tariffs. The analysis points to a 0.8% dip in economic output over the next two years, undermining Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ growth agenda. The report also warned of additional fiscal pressure that may lead to future tax increases and public spending cuts.   Wall Street Braces for Recession   Goldman Sachs revised its US recession probability to 45% within the next year, citing tighter financial conditions and rising policy uncertainty. This marks a sharp jump from the 35% risk estimated just last month—and more than double January’s 20% projection. J.P. Morgan issued a bleaker outlook, now forecasting a 60% chance of recession both in the US and globally.   Global Leaders Respond as Trade Tensions Deepen   The dramatic market sell-off was triggered by China’s sweeping retaliation to a new round of US tariffs, which included a 34% levy on all American imports. Beijing’s state-run People’s Daily released a defiant statement, asserting that China has the tools and resilience to withstand economic pressure from Washington. ‘We’ve built up experience after years of trade conflict and are prepared with a full arsenal of countermeasures,’ it stated.   Around the world, policymakers are responding to the growing threat of a trade-led economic slowdown. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba announced plans to appeal directly to Washington and push for tariff relief, following the US administration’s decision to impose a blanket 24% tariff on Japanese imports. He aims to visit the US soon to present Japan’s case as a fair trade partner.   In Taiwan, President Lai Ching-te said his administration would work closely with Washington to remove trade barriers and increase purchases of American goods in an effort to reduce the bilateral trade deficit. The island's defence ministry has also submitted a new list of US military procurements to highlight its strategic partnership.   Economists and strategists are warning of deeper economic consequences. Ronald Temple, chief market strategist at Lazard, said the scale and speed of these tariffs could result in far more severe damage than previously anticipated. ‘This isn’t just a bilateral conflict anymore — more countries are likely to respond in the coming weeks,’ he noted.   Analysts at Barclays cautioned that smaller Asian economies, such as Singapore and South Korea, may face challenges in negotiating with Washington and are already adjusting their economic growth forecasts downward in response to the unfolding trade crisis.           Oil Prices Sink on Demand Concerns   Crude oil continued its sharp slide on Monday, driven by recession fears and weakened global demand. Brent fell 3.9% to $63.04 a barrel, while WTI plunged over 4% to $59.49—both benchmarks marking weekly losses exceeding 10%. Analysts say inflationary pressures and slowing economic activity may drag demand down, even though energy imports were excluded from the latest round of tariffs.   Vandana Hari of Vanda Insights noted, ‘The market is struggling to find a bottom. Until there’s a clear signal from Trump that calms recession fears, crude prices will remain under pressure.’   OPEC+ Adds Further Pressure with Output Hike   Bearish sentiment intensified after OPEC+ announced it would boost production by 411,000 barrels per day in May, far surpassing the expected 135,000 bpd. The alliance called on overproducing nations to submit compensation plans by April 15. Analysts fear this surprise move could undo years of supply discipline and weigh further on already fragile oil markets.   Global political risks also flared over the weekend. Iran rejected US proposals for direct nuclear negotiations and warned of potential military action. Meanwhile, Russia claimed fresh territorial gains in Ukraine’s Sumy region and ramped up attacks on surrounding areas—further darkening the outlook for markets.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • AMZN Amazon stock watch, good buying (+313%) toi hold onto the 173.32 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?AMZN
    • META stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 507.48, 557.84 at https://stockconsultant.com/?META
    • TMUS T-Mobile stock, watch for a top of range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?TMUS
    • KULR KULR Technology stock watch, pullback to 1.25 triple support area with bullish indicators at https://stockconsultant.com/?KULR
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.