Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

gassah

Ray Barros Method Introduction

Recommended Posts

Today provides an example with EURGBP. The daily shows the zone comprised of the time-price window (TPW), MIDAS and the retracements. The setup is the contraction setup as the range of the bars and volume shrinks (volume not shown). There is also a potential "repo" (continuation spring) on the 5d.

 

The 60m (Forex uses 60m or 290m for intraday) shows the trigger bar overnight. I'll have to wait till EOD and decide whether or not to stay in this add-on position.

 

Rob

5aa70f4b8ed67_EURGBPDaily.thumb.png.d8b9007f60ad349a115847dc980f28c2.png

5aa70f4b9b6f1_EURGBP60m.thumb.png.433cf29b163d36016739d2419e42b71d.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rob,

 

If I use the following sequence of tf for mini-dow,

 

SHTF: daily with 5p

FHTF: 80m: 5p

TTF: 15m: 5p for lagging patterns

FLTF: 3m: 5p for forecasting patterns

SLTF: 3m bars (or we can use 5p of 30s, but not necessary)

 

Is it alright to use charts based on 24 hour data? Or I should restrict just to the data in regular US trading hours:question:

 

I'm also trying to trade the EURUSD futures (6E), I suppose I can use the same tf as above, since the pit-session is also similar to mini-dow:question:

 

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For active 24 hour markets then it's the daily (1440m), 290m, 60m,15m. If you're only going to trade the Dow during US market hours then it's still daily, 80m, 15m. I'm assuming the overnight Dow futures aren't that liquid but I don't know.

 

Rob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Rob,

 

For active 24 hour markets then it's the daily (1440m), 290m, 60m,15m. If you're only going to trade the Dow during US market hours then it's still daily, 80m, 15m. I'm assuming the overnight Dow futures aren't that liquid but I don't know.

 

Regarding the mini-dow (or similarly the mini-S&P 500) being not so liquid outside of US trading hours, that's true. A quick confirmation, from your reply, for mini-dow, so I should configure my charting software to filter away data outside of regular trading hours since the 80m, 15m, etc, tf is derived from the regular trading hours:question: Currently, my daily chart is showing daily bars which are formed using the O, H, L, C of the entire 24 hours period (instead of the O, H, L, C of just the regular trading period). And currently, my 80min chart also displays bars throughout the 24 hours. If I just display bars only for the regular trading hours, the swings will look obviously different.

 

Thanks!

 

As you can see, I'm still at the setting up phase and have not come to the interesting stuff yet!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rob,

 

While I was reading Ray's blog @ What is a RePo and 313Outside? Blog for Trading Success: Ray Barros, I got confused over the reply Ray gave to Wee Meng.

 

Wee Meng asked the question: "What context is used to view a congestion pattern at C, rather than an “active” upthrust pattern?"

 

Ray replied: "So in an uptrend, the continuation patterns occur at the bottom and the CIT pattern occurs at the top."

 

Do you have any insight? Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ray makes a distinction between springs in uptrends (continuation) and springs that occur as reversal patterns. A repo is borrowed from Joseph Hart's Trend Dynamics and stands for reverse potential, and they are the continuation springs. The reversal springs happen after a prolonged downtrend.

 

""So in an uptrend, the continuation patterns occur at the bottom and the CIT pattern occurs at the top."

 

I believe he means the continuation springs are by definition at the bottom of the range and the CIT pattern in an uptrend or upthrust, occur at the top of the range.

 

Another interpretation is that continuation springs are more likely to happen early in an uptrend, early in the mark-up phase, and CIT patterns (upthrusts) occur after a prolonged mark-up and distribution (the top).

 

This point about only looking for CIT patterns after a prolonged trend is important. Apparent CIT patterns are much more likely to fail, with the trend continuing, if the trend is immature. This is why shorting upthrusts too early in a trend is not a good idea.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Rob,

 

As you know, one of the uses of X, AB labeling that Ray taught is to allow us to compute the Maximum Extension (ME), which in turn allows us to decide whether a spring pattern has formed. Unfortunately, I met some problems labeling, I will use the figures attached to describe the problem. Though I have gone back to revise the X, AB labeling, I'm not able to ascertain the answer to my question.

 

Referring to figure 1.jpg, I would have labeled X, A, B at 3, 4, 5. But Ray would sometimes label X, A, B at 4, 5, 6. This would give a different ME, which may give a different conclusion related to whether a continuation spring formed at 7.

 

I'm not sure which one to use, 345, or 456:question:

 

For 2.jpg and 3.jpg, how would you have labeled X, A, B:question: :confused:

1.JPG.af5920133b85f65e0a14cdd58f59902b.JPG

2.JPG.ef2a98bcc009b99e684e94928fdd9391.JPG

3.JPG.05cfdf977be99574ee17bd51a5b1c0c9.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

The upper boundary is either 10% of 3-4 or 20% of 4-5, whichever is greater, assuming 3-4 is at least impulse mean.

 

The bottom boundary doesn't use 3-4, i.e., you don't take 20% of 3-4 and apply it at the bottom boundary. In this case 4-5 marks the boundary of congestion because 7 hasn't retraced far enough back into the range to count as a point to consider.

 

I'll address the rest later.

ME.thumb.PNG.b5065037b59d5b49be9c3d77e17ce2cc.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd use 4 and 5 as A and B in the second example.

 

I'm assuming you are looking at the 5d swings only. In example 3, 7-8 are AB. 4 to 9 is a downtrend, not congestion, because 8 did not retrace above the PBZ of 5-6. Therefore 7-8-9 is its own entity and the ME is 20% of 7-8. You can also use 10% of 6-7 if its impulse mean but it might not be. If it isn't then move back to 10% of 4-7.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Rob,

 

The bottom boundary doesn't use 3-4, i.e., you don't take 20% of 3-4 and apply it at the bottom boundary.

 

Do you mean 10% of 3-4 and not 20%:question: Anyway, this is something new to me. I thought we should apply 10% 3-4 on the bottom boundary as well.

 

In what situations would you label 456 as XAB:question: I attached one of Ray's charts. The blue line is the 5D while the red 18D. He labeled 456 as XAB in this situation, but I'm unable to figure out why this is so.

 

Thanks!

ray.JPG.34ce8518afd2070c4516f6e4bef900a2.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The opposing boundary always uses 20% AB. 10% XA is only in the direction of the trend. I'm pretty certain of this, unless you can point out where it says otherwise. Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In addition, Ray's labeling the counter-trend reaction with XABC and using AB to generate the ME. C cannot accept beyond the ME if a spring is going to occur.

 

For the upside 5d breakout you'll have to re-label and in this case use the XA or XC as the boundaries which move the ME back above X.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Rob,

 

In addition, Ray's labeling the counter-trend reaction with XABC and using AB to generate the ME. C cannot accept beyond the ME if a spring is going to occur. For the upside 5d breakout you'll have to re-label and in this case use the XA or XC as the boundaries which move the ME back above X.

 

Thanks. Actually, I did not mention clearly enough that my question is really about how to label X, A, B to determine a "continuation-spring".

 

Okay, referring back to the post here, for 1.jpg, I would label 456 as XAB to determine whether a continuation-spring has happened, rather than labeling 345 as XAB. Similarly, for 2.jpg, 456 as XAB would be used for continuation-spring determination.

 

On the other hand, for upthrust determination, we should label 345 in 1.jpg and 2.jpg as XAB. Is that correct:question:

 

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I find it easier keeping the labels as consistent as possible and using 345 as XAB. The other labeling Ray used is more of an anomaly. As long as you know 7 is springing 5 you're fine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rob:

 

Thank you for having this forum.

I have some questions regarding the relabelling of XAB.

 

I have attached 2 jpegs for my question.

Referring to pic1.jpg, first I label XAB. Then a higher high form at C with acceptance above ME. If the market retraces such that the price is


    1. below A but at or above D, how should I re-label XAB?
    2. below D but above B, how should I re-label XAB?

 

Referring to pic2.jpg, first I label XAB. Then market consolidates and is followed by a breakout with WPC above ME at C. If the market retraces such that the price is

  1. below A but at or above D, how should I re-label XAB?
  2. below D but above B, how should I re-label XAB?

 

Looking forward to your reply. Thanx. :)

pic1.thumb.JPG.e3ce62e3ba2f0ede642495bfb166c179.JPG

pic2.thumb.JPG.f44fad8a49d6547fd7049f5e393db0eb.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have some questions regarding the relabelling of XAB.

 

I have attached 2 jpegs for my question.

Referring to pic1.jpg, first I label XAB. Then a higher high form at C with acceptance above ME. If the market retraces such that the price is


    1. below A but at or above D, how should I re-label XAB?
    2. below D but above B, how should I re-label XAB?

 

Referring to pic2.jpg, first I label XAB. Then market consolidates and is followed by a breakout with WPC above ME at C. If the market retraces such that the price is

  1. below A but at or above D, how should I re-label XAB?
  2. below D but above B, how should I re-label XAB?

 

 

Hi dandelion,

 

I don't make a distinction between the two charts. Once a swing accepts below the PSZ of AB it continues to be considered a corrective structure. I wouldn't label either one D until it hits the 78.6%R, though I'm not absolutely certain Ray would agree.

 

Rob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rob:

 

Thanx for your reply.

I am not too sure what you mean by "I wouldn't label either one D until"?

I might have been too brief in my questions. I have problems re-labelling XAB in order

to calculate ME, especially when market make higher high but retrace great than 78.6%.

I would like to rephrase my questions.

 

From pic3.jpg, I label cde as XAB to calculate the ME.

When higher high form at f with acceptance above ME, but market retrace to less than 76.8% of ef and turn up at g, do you mean that I can re-label efg as XAB to calculate the new ME?

 

What happen if the market retrace to more than 76.8% of ef and turn up at h, can I still re-label efh as XAB to calculate ME?

 

Similarly from pic4.jpg, in a consolidating market between def, I label cde as XAB to calculate ME.

When market breakout with WPC and acceptance above ME, but retrace to less than 76.8% of fg and turn up at h, can I also re-label fgh as XAB to calculate the ME?

 

How about if it retrace to more than 76.8% of fg and turn up at i, can I also re-label fgi as XAB to calculate ME?

 

Or should I just shift the blue line at d up to g and calculate ME using c=X, g=A and e=B?

 

 

Sorry for the repetition and thanx for your reply. :)

pic3.thumb.JPG.9bb6ccfe8254f35ed7a9646529fae182.JPG

pic4.thumb.JPG.36c5d2403bf47569bd1d10219b7fa8e2.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll address the first chart with different labeling. If it comes down to D at 78.6% AB and turns up and you want to see how price behaves around the PSZ and upper ME then I would change the boundaries to BC. If, instead, it continues down toward B then I wouldn't change it yet because you want to use the old PBZ and lower ME. If it then comes back up above the PBZ then I would change it to BC at that point.

ME.thumb.png.8574c66543795c280f25ec0938082d17.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rob:

 

Is there a difference if it comes down to D at 78.6% of BC instead of 78.6% of AB?

How should the price behave around the PSZ and upper ME for me to change the boundaries to BC?

 

Thank you for your replies. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there a difference if it comes down to D at 78.6% of BC instead of 78.6% of AB?

 

I need to make a correction. CD does not need to come down to 78.6% of AB in order to label it a sideways market and to make changes to the ME. All it has to do is have a one bar acceptance below the PSZ of AB (like an upthrust). If it turns up to challenge C then I'd change the boundaries from AB to BC. It doesn't matter how it goes up. What I said about changing the boundaries if it continues lower still applies.

 

If it comes down to 78.6% of BC but stays above the PSZ of AB then you just have a continuation of the uptrend. The BC measurement does come into play with running corrections and R0 patterns. I don't think running corrections are in the book. I can try to explain them from Ray's webinar if you are interested.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rob:

 

Yes, I am interested to know about running corrections. I saw this term in Ray's Blog, but could not find in the book. Thought I slept through a chapter.... :stick out tongue:

How do we go about doing the explanation from Ray's webinar?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rob,

 

The BC measurement does come into play with running corrections and R0 patterns. I don't think running corrections are in the book. I can try to explain them from Ray's webinar if you are interested.

 

Do you have a link to his webinar? Do you need to pay for it?

 

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 11th July 2025.   Demand For Gold Rises As Trump Announces Tariffs!   Gold prices rose significantly throughout the week as investors took advantage of the 2.50% lower entry level. Investors also return to the safe-haven asset as the US trade policy continues to escalate. As a result, investors are taking a more dovish tone. The ‘risk-off’ appetite is also something which can be seen within the stock market. The NASDAQ on Thursday took a 0.90% dive within only 30 minutes.   Trade Tensions Escalate President Trump has been teasing with new tariffs throughout the week. However, the tariffs were confirmed on Thursday. A 35% tariff on Canadian imports starting August 1st, along with 50% tariffs on copper and goods from Brazil. Some experts are advising that Brazil has been specifically targeted due to its association with the BRICS.   However, the President has not directly associated the tariffs with BRICS yet. According to President Trump, Brazil is targeting US technology companies and carrying out a ‘witch hunt’against former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, a close ally who is currently facing prosecution for allegedly attempting to overturn the 2022 Brazilian election.   Although Brazil is one of the largest and fastest-growing economies in the Americas, it is not the main concern for investors. Investors are more concerned about Tariffs on Canada. The White House said it will impose a 35% tariff on Canadian imports, effective August 1st, raised from the earlier 25% rate. This covers most goods, with exceptions under USMCA and exemptions for Canadian companies producing within the US.   It is also vital for investors to note that Canada is among the US;’s top 3 trading partners. The increase was justified by Trump citing issues like the trade deficit, Canada’s handling of fentanyl trafficking, and perceived unfair trade practices.   The President is also threatening new measures against the EU. These moves caused US and European stock futures to fall nearly 1%, while the Dollar rose and commodity prices saw small gains. However, the main benefactor was Silver and Gold, which are the two best-performing metals of the day.   How Will The Fed Impact Gold? The FOMC indicated that the number of members warming up to the idea of interest rate cuts is increasing. If the Fed takes a dovish tone, the price of Gold may further rise. In the meantime, the President pushing for a 3% rate cut sparked talk of a more dovish Fed nominee next year and raised worries about future inflation.   Meanwhile, jobless claims dropped for the fourth straight week, coming in better than expected and supporting the view that the labour market remains strong after last week’s solid payroll report. Markets still expect two rate cuts this year, but rate futures show most investors see no change at the next Fed meeting. Gold is expected to finish the week mostly flat.       Gold 15-Minute Chart     If the price of Gold increases above $3,337.50, buy signals are likely to materialise again. However, the price is currently retracing, meaning traders are likely to wait for regained momentum before entering further buy trades. According to HSBC, they expect an average price of $3,215 in 2025 (up from $3,015) and $3,125 in 2026, with projections showing a volatile range between $3,100 and $3,600   Key Takeaway Points: Gold Rises on Safe-Haven Demand. Gold gained as investors reacted to rising trade tensions and market volatility. Canada Tariffs Spark Concern. A 35% tariff on Canadian imports drew attention due to Canada’s key trade role. Fed Dovish Shift Supports Gold. Growing expectations of rate cuts and Trump’s push for a 3% cut boosted the gold outlook. Gold Eyes Breakout Above $3,337.5. Price is consolidating; a move above $3,337.50 could trigger new buy signals. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Michalis Efthymiou HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Back in the early 2000s, Netflix mailed DVDs to subscribers.   It wasn’t sexy—but it was smart. No late fees. No driving to Blockbuster.   People subscribed because they were lazy. Investors bought the stock because they realized everyone else is lazy too.   Those who saw the future in that red envelope? They could’ve caught a 10,000%+ move.   Another story…   Back in the mid-2000s, Amazon launched Prime.   It wasn’t flashy—but it was fast.   Free two-day shipping. No minimums. No hassle.   People subscribed because they were impatient. Investors bought the stock because they realized everyone hates waiting.   Those who saw the future in that speedy little yellow button? They could’ve caught another 10,000%+ move.   Finally…   Back in 2011, Bitcoin was trading under $10.   It wasn’t regulated—but it worked.   No bank. No middleman. Just wallet to wallet.   People used it to send money. Investors bought it because they saw the potential.   Those who saw something glimmering in that strange orange coin? They could’ve caught a 100,000%+ move.   The people who made those calls weren’t fortune tellers. They just noticed something simple before others did.   A better way. A quiet shift. A small edge. An asymmetric bet.   The red envelope fixed late fees. The yellow button fixed waiting. The orange coin gave billions a choice.   Of course, these types of gains are rare. And they happen only once in a blue moon. That’s exactly why it’s important to notice when the conditions start to look familiar.   Not after the move. Not once it's on CNBC. But in the quiet build-up— before the surface breaks.   Enter the Blue Button Please read more here: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/netflix-amazon-bitcoin-blue  Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • What These Attacks Look Like There are several ways you could get hacked. And the threats compound by the day.   Here’s a quick rundown:   Phishing: Fake emails from your “bank.” Click the link, give your password—game over.   Ransomware: Malware that locks your files and demands crypto. Pay up, or it’s gone.   DDoS: Overwhelm a website with traffic until it crashes. Like 10,000 bots blocking the door. Often used by nations.   Man-in-the-Middle: Hackers intercept your messages on public WiFi and read or change them.   Social Engineering: Hackers pose as IT or drop infected USB drives labeled “Payroll.”   You don’t need to be “important” to be a target.   You just need to be online.   What You Can Do (Without Buying a Bunker) You don’t have to be tech-savvy.   You just need to stop being low-hanging fruit.   Here’s how:   Use a YubiKey (physical passkey device) or Authenticator app – Ditch text message 2FA. SIM swaps are real. Hackers often have people on the inside at telecom companies.   Use a password manager (with Yubikey) – One unique password per account. Stop using your dog’s name.   Update your devices – Those annoying updates patch real security holes. Use them.   Back up your files – If ransomware hits, you don’t want your important documents held hostage.   Avoid public WiFi for sensitive stuff – Or use a VPN.   Think before you click – Emails that feel “urgent” are often fake. Go to the websites manually for confirmation.   Consider Starlink in case the internet goes down – I think it’s time for me to make the leap. Don’t Panic. Prepare. (Then Invest.)   I spent an hour in that basement bar reading about cyberattacks—and watching real-world systems fall apart like dominos.   The internet going down used to be an inconvenience. Now, it’s a warning.   Cyberwar isn’t coming. It’s here.   And the next time your internet goes out, it might not just be your router.   Don’t panic. Prepare.   And maybe keep a backup plan in your back pocket. Like a local basement bar with good bourbon—and working WiFi.   As usual, we’re on the lookout for more opportunities in cybersecurity. Stay tuned.   Author: Chris Campbell (AltucherConfidential) Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/   
    • DUMBSHELL:  re the automation of corruption ---  200,000 "Science Papers" in academic journal database PubMed may have been AI-generated with errors, hallucinations and false sourcing 
    • Does any crypto exchanges get banned in your country? How's about other as Bybit, Kraken, MEXC, OKX?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.