Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

alchemist

Market Bottom?

Is the market bottom in place?  

56 members have voted

  1. 1. Is the market bottom in place?

    • Yes! Unlikely to reach new lows
    • No! Still more room to the downside


Recommended Posts

Monthly chart on the ES posted below. Notice the increasing interest by market participants; both buyers and sellers. Insitutional funds have liquidated but at the same time smart money has stepped into buy? Tall wicks to the downside with rising volume. Are we seeing a market bottom in place? Would like to cast a vote. Thanks!

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=9779&stc=1&d=1237259083

es.thumb.jpg.db568c8a447dbfe648ed180bec84585a.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems to be having trouble even making it to the top of the channel at the moment. Yesterdays action showed that there were few buyers about.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=9780&stc=1&d=1237274879

 

IMHO the dead cat bounce will probably be over this week.

es20090317.thumb.png.cda5a70779ea0f61413f56df48b63026.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Harlequin said:
Seems to be having trouble even making it to the top of the channel at the moment. Yesterdays action showed that there were few buyers about.

 

We've moved 10% from the lows and we are back above the November lows. Did you expect to see 900 again in one week? :)

 

Besides there's also plenty of overhead resistance to work through.

 

  Harlequin said:

IMHO the dead cat bounce will probably be over this week.

 

How do you define 'dead cat bounce'?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  firewalker said:
We've moved 10% from the lows and we are back above the November lows. Did you expect to see 900 again in one week? :)

 

Besides there's also plenty of overhead resistance to work through.

 

 

 

How do you define 'dead cat bounce'?

 

No the first thing I'm looking for a a close above that upper trendline (currently 793 ish). What I was trying to get at was the way yesterdays action run up a bit ran out of steam then closed slightly below Fridays close. Also take a look at yesterday NQ action. NQ has been holding up much better than the other indices (still above November lows) but yesterday it was the leader on the downside. This makes me think this is may be spreading from the financials/housing/motor industry etc. through to the techs.

"Dead cat bounce" is just a throw away comment, but I use it to indicate I'm still seeing this as a bear market. I will be until we work through all that overhead resistance you mentioned.

 

It's been interesting reading many of the on-line market commentators, opinion seems to be split on this one. I'm just offering my interpretation of the charts as an alternative view to the OP. I'm certainly not claiming 100% that I'll be proved right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Harlequin said:
No the first thing I'm looking for a a close above that upper trendline (currently 793 ish). What I was trying to get at was the way yesterdays action run up a bit ran out of steam then closed slightly below Fridays close. Also take a look at yesterday NQ action. NQ has been holding up much better than the other indices (still above November lows) but yesterday it was the leader on the downside. This makes me think this is may be spreading from the financials/housing/motor industry etc. through to the techs.

 

Yes, that was definitely what caught my attention as well. Especially since the broader market has been weaker than the NQ recently, and yesterday was a case of the other way around.

 

I know rallies in bear markets can be sharp and recover quickly. I'm paying close attention right now to see whether we can hold above the November lows. If that area gets confirmed as support, a continuation to the upside seems likely.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  firewalker said:

I know rallies in bear markets can be sharp and recover quickly. I'm paying close attention right now to see whether we can hold above the November lows. If that area gets confirmed as support, a continuation to the upside seems likely.

 

My interpretation on that is 3 days closing above the November low. Yesterday it did that but not in a convincing way. So as you said it's down to whether it now holds as support. As a day trader my bias today is down but if it takes out yesterdays highs I expect to see 793 soon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I vote - I don't care? ;)

 

Good question and something the EOD traders can discuss, but as a pure intraday trader, I honestly could care less whether it's at a bottom or just bouncing a little. As long as the market is moving intraday, I'm happy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  brownsfan019 said:
Can I vote - I don't care? ;)

 

Good question and something the EOD traders can discuss, but as a pure intraday trader, I honestly could care less whether it's at a bottom or just bouncing a little. As long as the market is moving intraday, I'm happy.

 

Good point Brownsfan. I think it also depends what type of intraday trader you are though. The biggest breakthrough I had in my trading was when I started looking at the bigger time frames and coming up with a plan everyday to identify areas for entries and also to determine key levels where I would switch from long/short bias. I also know other successful traders who only look at the here and now and stay away from any idea of bias. Whatever works for you as they say.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Northern boy said:
I don't think this is a call that should be made with TA. You need to figure out how much more damage is left to be unveiled in Europe imo.

 

 

.... and China.

But fundamentals always show up in the charts first.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Harlequin said:
I also know other successful traders who only look at the here and now and stay away from any idea of bias. Whatever works for you as they say.

 

That's me - I'm that guy.

 

It's funny b/c when I go out to dinner, meet up w/ friends, poker games, etc. people ask how the market did that day or that week and I honestly have no clue unless the local news was carrying a story. As far as I am concerned, I'm done no later than 12pm EST and whatever happens the rest of the day happens. As for my knowledge, I'm clueless.

 

:rofl:

 

That's also an easy way to get people from constantly asking you questions about the markets. When you tell them 2 or 3 times that you don't know and don't care, they get the point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think thatA blown out trading account or suffered a significant loss?

- A lack of understanding how the trade calls are made in a trading room?

- Frustration from not being able to get in a trade?

- Difficulty understanding the proprietary software you've purchased or leased?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You know things have changed on Wall Street when the housing industry saves the day. A surprise government report that home construction picked up in February caught traders off guard and injected a week-old stock market rally with new energy Tuesday

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Harlequin said:
Seems to be having trouble even making it to the top of the channel at the moment. Yesterdays action showed that there were few buyers about.

 

You may be interested in some charts I posted Sunday. All the major averages are in pretty much the same fix (the boxes are drawn around consolidations). And so far, everything is going as expected.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=9791&stc=1&d=1237332170

 

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=9792&stc=1&d=1237332170

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=9793&stc=1&d=1237332170

Image1.gif.4f375b2c4e74e61deded707246722db0.gif

Image1a.gif.244a965b6f959503f617d60ce018392e.gif

Image1b.gif.adfa9dfaa3b1e875563f13046193efa2.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  DbPhoenix said:
You may be interested in some charts I posted Sunday. All the major averages are in pretty much the same fix (the boxes are drawn around consolidations). And so far, everything is going as expected.

 

Would you care to expand on "the same fix", or point us to your post on Sunday where I assume we can find your interpretation of your charts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Harlequin said:
Would you care to expand on "the same fix", or point us to your post on Sunday where I assume we can find your interpretation of your charts?

 

The post was made to a private group, but it didn't amount to more than "here are some charts". They're pretty much self-explanatory.

 

As to "the same fix", they're all in downward channels -- as you pointed out for the ES -- and they all have those congestion zones to contend with. And though it's not in the chart, the volume of advancers has been relatively weak.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  DbPhoenix said:
The post was made to a private group, but it didn't amount to more than "here are some charts". They're pretty much self-explanatory.

 

As to "the same fix", they're all in downward channels -- as you pointed out for the ES -- and they all have those congestion zones to contend with. And though it's not in the chart, the volume of advancers has been relatively weak.

 

Thanks Db, That's pretty much what I thought you meant, but I'm not familiar with the significance of congestion zones other than consolidation followed by breakout. Something for me to look into.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Harlequin said:
Thanks Db, That's pretty much what I thought you meant, but I'm not familiar with the significance of congestion zones other than consolidation followed by breakout. Something for me to look into.

 

Congestions become important due to the S and R they provide (because of all the trading volume that takes place there). Sometimes they're no more than a speed bump. At other times, they present an impenetrable block.

 

Midpoints can also be important as they represent the "equilibrium level" within that particular range (or consolidation or congestion). Here's the Q, for example:

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=9803&stc=1&d=1237381103

Image1.gif.a3e18564c79d36345d27005f38961a52.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  DbPhoenix said:

As to "the same fix", they're all in downward channels -- as you pointed out for the ES -- and they all have those congestion zones to contend with.

 

It seems to depend on where you get your charts... Bigcharts cash indexes show we've already reached the top of those congestions on the S&P and Nasdaq Composite.

 

9805d1237382868-market-bottom-congestions.gif

congestions.thumb.GIF.907c45c8f9e96f3916c5a2d2c4454980.GIF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  firewalker said:
It seems to depend on where you get your charts... Bigcharts cash indexes show we've already reached the top of those congestions on the S&P and Nasdaq Composite.

 

Also when one creates them. These were done last weekend.

 

Did you mean to post a chart of the Dow utilities?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 3rd April 2025.   Gold Prices Pull Back After Record High as Traders Eye Trump’s Tariffs.   Key Takeaways:   Gold prices retreated after hitting a record high of $3,167.57 per ounce due to profit-taking. President Trump announced a 10% baseline tariff on all US imports, escalating trade tensions. Gold remains exempt from reciprocal tariffs, reinforcing its safe-haven appeal. Investors await US non-farm payroll data for further market direction. Fed rate cut bets and weaker US Treasury yields underpin gold’s bullish outlook. Gold Prices Retreat from Record Highs Amid Profit-Taking Gold prices saw a pullback on Thursday as traders opted to take profits following a historic surge. Spot gold declined 0.4% to $3,122.10 per ounce as of 0710 GMT, retreating from its fresh all-time high of $3,167.57. Meanwhile, US gold futures slipped 0.7% to $3,145.00 per ounce, reflecting broader market uncertainty over economic and geopolitical developments.   The recent rally was largely fueled by concerns over escalating trade tensions after President Donald Trump unveiled sweeping new import tariffs. The 10% baseline tariff on all goods entering the US further deepened the global trade conflict, intensifying investor demand for safe-haven assets like gold. However, as traders locked in gains from the surge, prices saw a modest retracement.   Trump’s Tariffs and Their Market Implications On Wednesday, Trump introduced a sweeping tariff policy imposing a 10% baseline duty on all imports, with significantly higher tariffs on select nations. While this move was aimed at bolstering domestic manufacturing, it sent shockwaves across global markets, fueling inflation concerns and heightening trade war fears.   Gold’s Role Amid Trade War Escalations Despite the widespread tariff measures, the White House clarified that reciprocal tariffs do not apply to gold, energy, and ‘certain minerals that are not available in the US’. This exemption suggests that central banks and institutional investors may continue favouring gold as a hedge against economic instability. One of the key factors supporting gold is the slowdown that these tariffs could cause in the US economy, which raises the likelihood of future Federal Reserve rate cuts. Gold is currently in a pure momentum trade. Market participants are on the sidelines and until we see a significant shakeout, this momentum could persist.   Impact on the US Dollar and Bond Yields Gold prices typically move inversely to the US dollar, and the latest developments have pushed the dollar to its weakest level since October 2024. Market participants are increasingly pricing in the possibility of a Fed rate cut, as the tariffs could weigh on economic growth.   Additionally, US Treasury yields have plummeted, reflecting growing recession fears. Lower bond yields reduce the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets like gold, making it a more attractive investment.         Technical Analysis: Key Levels to Watch Gold’s recent rally has pushed it into overbought territory, with the Relative Strength Index (RSI) above 70. This indicates a potential short-term pullback before the uptrend resumes. The immediate support level lies at $3,115, aligning with the Asian session low. A further decline could bring gold towards the $3,100 psychological level, which has previously acted as a strong support zone. Below this, the $3,076–$3,057 region represents a critical weekly support range where buyers may re-enter the market. In the event of a more significant correction, $3,000 stands as a major psychological floor.   On the upside, gold faces immediate resistance at $3,149. A break above this level could signal renewed bullish momentum, potentially leading to a retest of the record high at $3,167. If bullish momentum persists, the next target is the $3,200 psychological barrier, which could pave the way for further gains. Despite the recent pullback, the broader trend remains bullish, with dips likely to be viewed as buying opportunities.   Looking Ahead: Non-Farm Payrolls and Fed Policy Traders are closely monitoring Friday’s US non-farm payrolls (NFP) report, which could provide critical insights into the Federal Reserve’s next policy moves. A weaker-than-expected jobs report may strengthen expectations for an interest rate cut, further boosting gold prices.   Other key economic data releases, such as jobless claims and the ISM Services PMI, may also impact market sentiment in the short term. However, with rising geopolitical uncertainties, trade tensions, and a weakening US dollar, gold’s safe-haven appeal remains strong.   Conclusion: While short-term profit-taking may trigger minor corrections, gold’s long-term outlook remains bullish. As global trade tensions mount and the Federal Reserve leans toward a more accommodative stance, gold could see further gains in the months ahead.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • AMZN Amazon stock, nice buying at the 187.26 triple+ support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?AMZN
    • DELL Dell Technologies stock, good day moving higher off the 90.99 double support area, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?DELL
    • MCK Mckesson stock, nice trend and continuation breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?MCK
    • lmfx just officially launched their own LMGX token, Im planning to grab a couple of hundred and maybe have the option to stake them. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.