Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

rsinghal2000

Consistently Profitable Trader?

Recommended Posts

Hey Everyone,

 

I was curious to know if any highly successful consistently profitable experienced traders are up for speaking to and masterminding with me. I've been trading various products for 5 years: US equities, US index futures and spot currencies in long term, swing and day trading timeframes.

 

Overall, I'm satisfied with my strategies and the customizations I've researched and developed. However, there are some changes I'd like to make with my mindset as it relates to proper execution after an extended drawdown and extended run up.

 

I'm looking to learn how a consistently successful trader thinks and views the markets. I'm not interested in anyone's system, instead I'm looking to experience a consistently successful traders' perception and behaviour. I'm 33, old to know I don't know everything and young enough to still be able to change.

 

I'd be incredibly grateful if anyone would share some of their views of how they have gained the consistency they have achieved. They can trade any market because I'm only interested learning how they view the markets and what kind of mindset they have.

 

I would love to have the opportunity to speak to someone for only 30-60 minutes a week. Enough time to touch base and heed any expert advice. I have a huge passion and commitment for the financial markets and define trading success as properly executing my trading trategies. I understand it's a continual process.

 

I'm not sure how, yet, to return the favour, but I will come up with something. I know this may be strange to ask, but if I don't put it out there I'll never know!

 

Please reply here if you're up for it, and then we can move forward from that.

 

Thanks for your time everyone.

 

Rahul

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
if you can find a consistently losing system,

just do the reverse.

 

Hi Tams,

 

I had one,

but doing the reverse, is not so easy too,

because this thing called stop.

 

Anyway, the way to ruin (within simulation) for me was,

counter trend. You see some bars with lower lows,

And say to yourself, now it will go up.

 

While you maintain a small stop, lets say 10 ticks (because this trade is risky),

you further would like to see a high target, maybe 40 ticks or more.

 

Well, what will happen is, that it might go in your favor for some time,

but then it finally enters the trend again.

 

Then, you might say to yourself, well this might become a double bottom (or top),

well I allow myself a bigger stop, lets say 40 ticks.

 

And then, you are already managing your loser,

as you should have managed a winner.

 

Regards,

 

Hal

 

 

P.S.: FWIW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
if you can find a consistently losing system,

just do the reverse.

 

This not as easy as it sounds though. If the non profitable system enter on a stop and have some trailing stop at X bar low (when going long), this is not as easy to just reverse and do the opposite.

 

Also you might have a system that is very marginally profitable, but trading costs causes it to be unprofitable. Just reversing the orders will make it even more unprofitable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
if you can find a consistently losing system,

just do the reverse.

 

I did this once, and it worked for a while, I think I started correcting for it and messing it up.

 

It was a system I purchased, and i would pick ALL the losers, day in and day out. Super frustrating.

 

Most of my stops were typically 2 - 2.50 ES points. I could literally rack up negative 10-16 points each day, as fast as I wanted.

 

So what I did was switch my stops and targets around, called it "Costanza System." I simply switched them, and subtracted a tic from the typical stop and made that the profit target....... and voila!

 

I would up making back all the points I ever lost, but then started changing somehow, I wasn't even aware I was doing it.:crap:

 

Maybe when I get to where I want trading wise, that would be a good project for an apprentice to practice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To the OP - whatever you decide to do, make sure the person giving you advice actually is a consistent and profitable trader. Anyone can come on here or PM and say - I'll help you for $10k, just send to my paypal.

 

For example, there's a handful (small) that post in the P/L thread with blotters screenshotted. For an anonymous forum, that's about as best as you are going to get.

 

Point is that anyone can hop on here and claim they actually do this for a living but very, very few EVER show ANY evidence of ACTUALLY doing it. For example, there's a few parts on this forum where discussions take place about trading ideas and a guru or two will lead the way for the followers, yet there's never been any evidence that this self-imposed 'guru' does any real money trading. Food for thought.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So true brownsfan. Few here know whether I trade or not ... and the only reason even they might have to believe me are the screams heard across the seas when I make a costly mistake.

 

.

dog.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...I'm only interested learning how they view the markets and what kind of mindset they have...

 

Hi Rahul,

 

FWIW, I view the markets as fractal in nature. This fractal nature displays patterns which are identifiable. These patterns allow a trader to track the movement of price from its beginnings until its endings. This pattern is visible on all timeframes and all liquid markets.

 

With regards to mindset, IMO, there are a few key phrases (mental and emotional) which describe a consistently successful trader's mindset:

 

Mental:

 

Knowing that you know - Having a method (which applies to any timeframe and any liquid market) which allows a trader to know where he/she is within a price cycle, and to know what it's beginnings and ending look like and when they arrive.

 

Emotional:

 

Feelings of Support, Comfort, and Confidence - Emotions signalling to the trader that he/she has a firm grasp of the trading method(s) and reinforcement which develops through continuing positive experience.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you're using the search function, you can quite frequently to dig up old threads that include the term you searched for. And it's easy to post in an old thread at that point, because for me anyway, it's easy to not notice the date of the last post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I did this once, and it worked for a while, I think I started correcting for it and messing it up.

 

It was a system I purchased, and i would pick ALL the losers, day in and day out. Super frustrating.

 

Most of my stops were typically 2 - 2.50 ES points. I could literally rack up negative 10-16 points each day, as fast as I wanted.

 

So what I did was switch my stops and targets around, called it "Costanza System." I simply switched them, and subtracted a tic from the typical stop and made that the profit target....... and voila!

 

I would up making back all the points I ever lost, but then started changing somehow, I wasn't even aware I was doing it.:crap:

 

Maybe when I get to where I want trading wise, that would be a good project for an apprentice to practice.

 

You would have been doubly screwed if the system started to work the way it was supposed to work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.